Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Palliat Med ; 27(3): 358-366, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38010809

ABSTRACT

Background: Palliative care is a valuable component of health care that improves a patient's quality of life, yet its availability to patients with serious chronic illness remains relatively low. Due to their knowledge of community preferences and ability to improve patient education and access to care, community health workers (CHWs) can increase palliative care usage by patients. Notably, barriers to CHWs helping patients with serious chronic illness remain poorly understood. Objective: Explore the perception of barriers CHWs feel they face when attempting to support the health care of patients with serious chronic illness. Design: Qualitative semistructured individual interviews of CHWs and qualitative descriptive analysis. Setting/Subjects: Twelve CHWs who have worked with patients with serious chronic illness were recruited from the Johns Hopkins Healthcare LLC and the Baltimore Alliance for Careers in Healthcare organizations to virtually participate. Results: CHWs perceived both active and passive barriers that obstructed their efforts to work with seriously ill patients. CHWs shared that these barriers were dependent on themselves, their peers, and their work environments. Prevalent themes included interprofessional conflict, poor health care worker understanding of the CHW's role, and lack of access to quality resource organizations. CHWs noted job-specific training, better means to identify needed resources for patients, and inclusive health care teams as solutions to support their professional goals, while helping patients with serious illness. Conclusions: There are multiple perceived barriers to CHWs helping seriously ill patients. CHWs aiding patients with serious illness can be supported through better job training, better resource management tools, and improved communication between health care team members.


Subject(s)
Community Health Workers , Quality of Life , Humans , Qualitative Research , Delivery of Health Care , Chronic Disease
2.
Acad Pediatr ; 23(7): 1454-1458, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36907434

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine whether a formal note-writing session and note template for medical students (MS) during the Core Clerkship in Pediatrics (CCP) increase note quality, shortens note length, and decreases time of documentation. METHODS: In this single site, prospective study, MS participating in an 8-week CCP received a didactic session on note-writing in the electronic health record (EHR) and utilized EHR template developed for the study. We assessed note quality (measured by Physician Documentation Quality Instrument-9 [PDQI-9]), note length and note documentation time in this group compared to MS notes on the CCP in the prior academic year. We used descriptive statistics and Kruskal-Wallis tests for analysis. RESULTS: We analyzed 121 notes written by 40 students in the control group and 92 notes writing by 41 students in the intervention group. Notes from the intervention group were more "up to date," "accurate," "organized," and "comprehensible" compared to the control group (P = 0.02, P = 0.04, P = 0.01, and P = 0.02, respectively). Intervention group notes received higher cumulative PDQI-9 scores compared to the control group (median score 38 (IQR 34-42) versus 36 (IQR 32-40) out of 45 total, P = 0.04). Intervention group notes were approximately 35% shorter than the control group notes (median 68.5 lines vs 105 lines, P < 0.0001) and were signed earlier than control group notes (median file time 316 minute vs 352 minute, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The intervention successfully decreased note length, improved note quality based on standardized metrics, and reduced time to completion of note documentation.


Subject(s)
Students, Medical , Humans , Child , Prospective Studies , Electronic Health Records , Documentation , Writing
3.
J Surg Oncol ; 127(4): 706-715, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36468401

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is increasingly performed for peritoneal surface malignancies but remains associated with significant morbidity. Scant research is available regarding the impact of insurance status on postoperative outcomes. METHODS: Patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC between 2000 and 2017 at 12 participating sites in the US HIPEC Collaborative were identified. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare the baseline characteristics, operative variables, and postoperative outcomes of patients with government, private, or no insurance. RESULTS: Among 2268 patients, 699 (30.8%) had government insurance, 1453 (64.0%) had private, and 116 (5.1%) were uninsured. Patients with government insurance were older, more likely to be non-white, and comorbid (p < 0.05). Patients with government (OR: 2.25, CI: 1.50-3.36, p < 0.001) and private (OR: 1.69, CI: 1.15-2.49, p = 0.008) insurance had an increased risk of complications on univariate analysis. There was no independent relationship on multivariate analysis. An American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 3 or 4, peritoneal carcinomatosis index score >15, completeness of cytoreduction score >1, and nonhome discharge were factors independently associated with a postoperative complication. CONCLUSION: While there were differences in postoperative outcomes between the three insurance groups on univariate analysis, there was no independent association between insurance status and postoperative complications after CRS/HIPEC.


Subject(s)
Hyperthermia, Induced , Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy , Humans , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Hyperthermia, Induced/adverse effects , Chemotherapy, Cancer, Regional Perfusion/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Insurance Coverage , Combined Modality Therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Survival Rate
4.
Urol Oncol ; 40(4): 164.e9-164.e16, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35045949

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To better define surrogate endpoints for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) trials in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. We compared survival in patients with carcinoma in-situ (CIS) only vs. complete response following NAC and radical cystectomy (RC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with cT2-4N0M0 disease treated with NAC and RC between 2001 and 2018 were stratified by response: complete response (CR, pT0N0), partial response (PR, pTaN0, pT1N0+/-CIS), CIS-only (pTisN0), stable disease (SD, pT2N0), or progressive disease (PD, >pT2N0). Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and risk of recurrence in patients with CIS-only vs. CR. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for OS and a competing risks proportional hazards model was used for risk of recurrence. RESULTS: Of 1,406 patients in our institution cohort, 340 patients met inclusion criteria. Kaplan-Meier mean estimates of OS for CR and CIS-only were 108.9 months (95% CI 89.7-127.9) and 125.8 months (95% CI 112.3-139.3), respectively (P = 0.13). Cox proportional hazards model found no difference in OS between patients with PR (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.33-2.58, P = 0.897) or CIS-only (HR 0.422, 95% CI 0.15-1.18, P = 0.101) when compared to CR. The risk of recurrence was similar between patients with CIS-only (HR 0.73, 95% 0.29-1.84, P = 0.49) and PR (HR 1.32, 95% CI 0.54-3.29, P = 0.54) when compared to CR on competing risks analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Residual CIS-only after NAC and RC demonstrated similar survival outcomes when compared to patients with pathologic CR. Further study in large multi-institutional cohorts may further validate CIS-only as an additional surrogate endpoint after NAC and may inform future trials.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma in Situ , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Carcinoma in Situ/drug therapy , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Cystectomy , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Male , Muscles/pathology , Neoadjuvant Therapy/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Urinary Bladder/pathology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery
5.
Ann Palliat Med ; 11(2): 862-870, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34412501

ABSTRACT

Surgical palliative care is an interdisciplinary treatment modality that aims to decrease suffering and improve the quality of life of seriously ill surgical patients. Although surgical palliative care is increasingly being found to positively impact patient quality of life, disparities in surgical palliative care remain poorly defined. While the field of medical palliative care has demonstrated certain racial/ethnic, socioeconomic, and geographic groups are at higher risks for receiving worse palliative care, there is no analogous consensus in the field of surgical palliative care. This is largely secondary to a paucity of research focus in this field. Given that the aforementioned disparities experienced by minoritized patient populations has led to significant morbidity, it is important to understand and call attention to disparities existing within the field of surgical palliative care as well. To advance the knowledge of current healthcare shortcomings and progress towards equitable surgical palliative care, this paper reviews the current state of surgical palliative care disparities evidence, details gaps in knowledge, and highlights priorities for future surgical palliative care research. The articles identified in this review noted disparate surgical palliative care access and outcomes across various racial/ethnic groups, age ranges, socioeconomic classes, hospital populations, and regions. However, evidence scarcity necessitates more robust research be performed to adequately identify at risk groups and understand the factors supporting disparity development.


Subject(s)
Hospice and Palliative Care Nursing , Palliative Care , Delivery of Health Care , Ethnicity , Healthcare Disparities , Humans , Quality of Life
6.
Nat Commun ; 10(1): 4877, 2019 10 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31653831

ABSTRACT

The interaction between the mammalian host and its resident gut microbiota is known to license adaptive immune responses. Nutritional constituents strongly influence composition and functional properties of the intestinal microbial communities. Here, we report that omission of a single essential amino acid - tryptophan - from the diet abrogates CNS autoimmunity in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. Dietary tryptophan restriction results in impaired encephalitogenic T cell responses and is accompanied by a mild intestinal inflammatory response and a profound phenotypic shift of gut microbiota. Protective effects of dietary tryptophan restriction are abrogated in germ-free mice, but are independent of canonical host sensors of intracellular tryptophan metabolites. We conclude that dietary tryptophan restriction alters metabolic properties of gut microbiota, which in turn have an impact on encephalitogenic T cell responses. This link between gut microbiota, dietary tryptophan and adaptive immunity may help to develop therapeutic strategies for protection from autoimmune neuroinflammation.


Subject(s)
Autoimmunity/immunology , Diet , Encephalomyelitis, Autoimmune, Experimental/immunology , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Tryptophan , Animals , Dietary Proteins , Disease Models, Animal , Encephalomyelitis, Autoimmune, Experimental/microbiology , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/genetics , Mice , Multiple Sclerosis , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL