Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 49
Filter
2.
Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed) ; 70 Suppl 1: 95-102, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36906509

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To provide practical recommendations for the comprehensive approach of people with type 2 diabetes according to evidence-based medicine. PARTICIPANTS: Members of the Diabetes Knowledge Area of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition. METHODS: The recommendations were formulated according to the degrees of evidence of the Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022. After reviewing the available evidence and formulating recommendations by the authors of each section, several rounds of comments were developed incorporating the contributions and voting on controversial points. Finally, the final document was sent to the rest of the members of the area for review and incorporation of contributions, to finally carry out the same process with the members of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition Board of Directors. CONCLUSIONS: The document establishes practical recommendations based on the latest available evidence for the management of people with type 2 diabetes.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Societies, Medical , Spain
3.
Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed) ; 69(9): 732-743, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36404267

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To guide professionals involved in the care of people with diabetes mellitus who practice sport. PARTICIPANTS: Members of the Diabetes Mellitus Working Group of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition. METHODS: A group of experts in each area covered by the statement carried out a bibliographic review of the available evidence for each topic, based on which recommendations were subsequently agreed upon within the Diabetes Mellitus Working Group. CONCLUSIONS: The statement provides practical recommendations for the management of diabetes mellitus during sports practice.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Endocrinology , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Consensus
4.
Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed) ; 69(7): 530-539, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36028449

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To provide practical recommendations for the management of mineral and bone metabolism alterations in pregnancy and lactation. PARTICIPANTS: Members of the Working Group on Osteoporosis and Mineral Metabolism of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition. METHODS: Recommendations were formulated according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system to describe both the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence. A systematic search was carried out in Medline of the available evidence for each pathology. Papers in English with publication date until 29 February 2020 were included. A methodologist resolved the differences that arose during the process of reviewing the literature and formulating recommendations. The recommendations were discussed and approved by all members of the Working Group. CONCLUSIONS: The document establishes practical recommendations based on evidence about the management of mineral and bone metabolism disorders in pregnancy and lactation.


Subject(s)
Bone Diseases, Metabolic , Osteoporosis , Female , Humans , Lactation , Minerals , Osteoporosis/therapy , Pregnancy
5.
Endocrinol. diabetes nutr. (Ed. impr.) ; 69(7): 530-539, 2022 Aug-Sep.
Article in English | BIGG - GRADE guidelines | ID: biblio-1412611

ABSTRACT

Objective: To provide practical recommendations for the management of mineral and bone metabolism alterations in pregnancy and lactation. Participants: Members of the Working Group on Osteoporosis and Mineral Metabolism of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition. Methods: Recommendations were formulated according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system to describe both the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence. A systematic search was carried out in Medline of the available evidence for each pathology. Papers in English with publication date until 29 February 2020 were included. A methodology resolved the differences that arose during the process of reviewing the literature and formulating recommendations. The recommendations were discussed and approved by all members of the Working Group. Conclusions: The document establishes practical recommendations based on evidence about the management of mineral and bone metabolism disorders in pregnancy and lactation.


Objetivo: Proporcionar unas recomendaciones prácticas para el manejo de las alteraciones del metabolismo mineral y óseo en la gestación y la lactancia. Participantes: Miembros del Grupo de Metabolismo Mineral de la Sociedad Española de Endocrinología y Nutrición. Métodos:Las recomendaciones se formularon de acuerdo con el sistema Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) para establecer tanto la fuerza de las recomendaciones como el grado de evidencia. Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática en Medline de la evidencia disponible para cada patología. Se revisaron artículos escritos en inglés con fecha de inclusión hasta 29 de febrero del 2020. Un metodólogo resolvió las diferencias que surgieron durante el proceso de revisión de bibliografía y formulación de recomendaciones. Tras la formulación de las recomendaciones éstas se discutieron en una reunión conjunta del Grupo de Trabajo. Conclusiones: El documento establece unas recomendaciones prácticas basadas en la evidencia acerca del manejo de las alteraciones del metabolismo mineral y óseo en la gestación y la lactancia.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Osteoporosis/therapy , Bone Diseases, Metabolic , Lactation , Pregnancy , Minerals
8.
Endocrinol. diabetes nutr. (Ed. impr.) ; 67(3): 205-215, mar. 2020. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-188149

ABSTRACT

La concentración sérica de fósforo oscila entre 2,5 y 4,5 mg/dl (0,81-1,45 mmol/l) en adultos, con niveles más altos en la infancia, la adolescencia y durante la gestación. El fosfato intracelular está implicado en el metabolismo intermediario y otras funciones celulares esenciales, mientras que el extracelular es fundamental para la mineralización de la matriz ósea. La fosforemia se mantiene en un estrecho rango mediante la regulación de la absorción intestinal, la redistribución y la reabsorción tubular renal de fósforo. La hipofosfatemia y la hiperfosfatemia son situaciones clínicas frecuentes, aunque, en la mayoría de las ocasiones, se trata de alteraciones leves y poco sintomáticas. Sin embargo, pueden presentarse cuadros agudos y severos que requieren tratamiento específico. En este documento elaborado por miembros del Grupo de Trabajo de Metabolismo Mineral y Óseo de la Sociedad Española de Endocrinología y Nutrición se revisan los trastornos del fosfato y se proporcionan algoritmos de manejo clínico de la hipofosfatemia y la hiperfosfatemia


Serum phosphorus levels range from 2.5 and 4.5 mg/dL (0.81-1.45 mmol/L) in adults, with higher levels in childhood, adolescence, and pregnancy. Intracellular phosphate is involved in intermediary metabolism and other essential cell functions, while extracellular phosphate is essential for bone matrix mineralization. Plasma phosphorus levels are maintained within a narrow range by regulation of intestinal absorption, redistribution, and renal tubular absorption of the mineral. Hypophosphatemia and hyperphosphatemia are common clinical situations, although changes are most often mild and oligosymptomatic. However, acute and severe conditions that require specific treatment may occur. In this document, members of the Mineral and Bone Metabolism Working Group of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition review phosphate disorders and provide algorithms for adequate clinical management of hypophosphatemia and hyperphosphatemia


Subject(s)
Humans , Phosphates/metabolism , Hypophosphatemia/etiology , Hypophosphatemia/physiopathology , Hyperphosphatemia/etiology , Hyperphosphatemia/therapy , Hypophosphatemia/therapy , Phosphorus, Dietary , Rickets, Hypophosphatemic/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential
9.
Prim Care Diabetes ; 14(1): 68-74, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31171461

ABSTRACT

AIM: Liraglutide and lixisenatide improved glycemic control, weight and cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Our objective was to analyze clinical efficacy and safety differences in routine clinical practice. METHODS: A 24-week prospective observational study to compare the effect of liraglutide versus lixisenatide in obese T2DM patients in routine clinical practice. The main objective was to analyze between-group glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) differences at the end of the study. Secondary objectives included differences in body weight, other CVRF, changes in medication, side effects, satisfaction and safety. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients (50 liraglutide, 50 lixisenatide) were included. Both groups experienced a decrease in HbA1c values (liraglutide, -1.4%, CI 95% -2, -0.8, P < 0.001 vs. lixisenatide, -0.8%, 95% CI -1.2, -0.5, P < 0.001). No differences were found in final HbA1c values between both groups (liraglutide 7.3 ±â€¯0.9% vs. lixisenatide 7.2 ±â€¯1.5%, P = 0.7). We did not detect between groups differences in anthropometric variables or CVRF at the study end. A lower proportion of patients received treatment with a maximum dose of liraglutide compared with lixisenatide (27% vs. 95%, P < 0.001). In contrast, a greater percentage of patients in the lixisenatide group than in liraglutide group (29% vs. 9%, P = 0.026) intensified treatment by the addition of sodium-glucose transporter type 2 inhibitors. Adverse events were less frequently reported in liraglutide treated patients compared with lixisentatide (80% vs. 96%, P = 0.014). No serious adverse events were detected. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm the efficacy and safety of liraglutide and lixisenatide in routine clinical practice. Moreover, a different therapeutic effect between liraglutide and lixisenatide was detected.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose/drug effects , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Liraglutide/therapeutic use , Obesity/drug therapy , Peptides/therapeutic use , Weight Loss/drug effects , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers/blood , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Female , Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor/agonists , Glycated Hemoglobin/metabolism , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects , Liraglutide/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/diagnosis , Obesity/physiopathology , Peptides/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Spain , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
10.
Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed) ; 67(3): 205-215, 2020 Mar.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31501071

ABSTRACT

Serum phosphorus levels range from 2.5 and 4.5mg/dL (0.81-1.45 mmol/L) in adults, with higher levels in childhood, adolescence, and pregnancy. Intracellular phosphate is involved in intermediary metabolism and other essential cell functions, while extracellular phosphate is essential for bone matrix mineralization. Plasma phosphorus levels are maintained within a narrow range by regulation of intestinal absorption, redistribution, and renal tubular absorption of the mineral. Hypophosphatemia and hyperphosphatemia are common clinical situations, although changes are most often mild and oligosymptomatic. However, acute and severe conditions that require specific treatment may occur. In this document, members of the Mineral and Bone Metabolism Working Group of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition review phosphate disorders and provide algorithms for adequate clinical management of hypophosphatemia and hyperphosphatemia.


Subject(s)
Hyperphosphatemia/diagnosis , Hyperphosphatemia/therapy , Hypophosphatemia/diagnosis , Hypophosphatemia/therapy , Decision Trees , Homeostasis , Humans , Phosphates/physiology
11.
Endocrinol. diabetes nutr. (Ed. impr.) ; 66(7): 443-458, ago.-sept. 2019. graf, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-182864

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: El tratamiento de la diabetes tipo 2 (DM2) es complejo y su propósito es reducir la morbimortalidad, por lo que su manejo tiene que incluir: un control glucémico individualizado precoz (mediante una adecuada educación diabetológica, modificaciones del estilo de vida y tratamiento farmacológico), el control de los factores de riesgo cardiovascular (CV), la detección y tratamiento precoz de las complicaciones y la evaluación de las comorbilidades asociadas. El objetivo fue elaborar un documento para unificar los aspectos necesarios para el abordaje integral de las personas con DM2. Participantes: Miembros del Grupo de trabajo de Diabetes Mellitus de la Sociedad Española de Endocrinología y Nutrición. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión de la evidencia disponible relativa a cada aspecto del manejo de la diabetes: objetivos de control glucémico, dieta y ejercicio, tratamiento farmacológico, tratamiento y control de factores de riesgo, detección de complicaciones y manejo del paciente frágil con DM2. Las recomendaciones se formularon según los grados de evidencia recogidos en los Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2018. Tras la formulación de las recomendaciones el documento fue consensuado por los miembros del Grupo de trabajo de Diabetes Mellitus de la Sociedad Española de Endocrinología y Nutrición. Conclusiones: El objetivo de este documento es proporcionar, desde el punto de vista del endocrinólogo clínico, unas recomendaciones prácticas basadas en la evidencia acerca de todos los aspectos necesarios para el abordaje integral de la DM2


Objective: Treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is complex and is intended to decrease morbidity and mortality. Management should therefore include adequate diabetes education, lifestyle changes, drug treatment to achieve early blood glucose control and reduction of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, early detection and treatment of complications, and assessment of associated comorbidities. The objective was to prepare a document including all aspects required for a comprehensive approach to T2DM. Participants: Members of the Diabetes Mellitus Working Group of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology. Methods: The available evidence regarding each aspect of diabetes management (blood glucose control goals, diet and exercise, drug treatment, risk factor management and control, detection of complications, and management of frail patients) was reviewed. Recommendations were formulated based on the grades of evidence stated in the 2018 Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes. Recommendations were discussed and agreed by the working group members. Conclusions: This document is intended to provide evidence-based practical recommendations for comprehensive management of T2DM by clinical endocrinologists


Subject(s)
Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Risk Factors , Societies, Medical/standards , 36448 , Glycemic Index , Life Style , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , eHealth Strategies , Exercise/physiology
12.
Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed) ; 66(7): 443-458, 2019.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30827909

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is complex and is intended to decrease morbidity and mortality. Management should therefore include adequate diabetes education, lifestyle changes, drug treatment to achieve early blood glucose control and reduction of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, early detection and treatment of complications, and assessment of associated comorbidities. The objective was to prepare a document including all aspects required for a comprehensive approach to T2DM. PARTICIPANTS: Members of the Diabetes Mellitus Working Group of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology. METHODS: The available evidence regarding each aspect of diabetes management (blood glucose control goals, diet and exercise, drug treatment, risk factor management and control, detection of complications, and management of frail patients) was reviewed. Recommendations were formulated based on the grades of evidence stated in the 2018 Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes. Recommendations were discussed and agreed by the working group members. CONCLUSIONS: This document is intended to provide evidence-based practical recommendations for comprehensive management of T2DM by clinical endocrinologists.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Algorithms , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Clinical Trials as Topic , Combined Modality Therapy , Comorbidity , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Diabetes Complications/prevention & control , Diet, Diabetic , Disease Management , Dyslipidemias/epidemiology , Dyslipidemias/therapy , Evidence-Based Medicine , Exercise , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension/therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents/economics , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Insulin/administration & dosage , Insulin/therapeutic use , Life Style , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/diagnosis , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/epidemiology , Patient Education as Topic , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/epidemiology
13.
PLoS One ; 13(6): e0199504, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29928063

ABSTRACT

Cardiovascular diseases are a health problem throughout the world, especially in people with diabetes. The identification of cardiovascular disease biomarkers can improve risk stratification. Sclerostin is a modulator of the Wnt/ß-catenin signalling pathway in different tissues, and it has recently been linked to vascular biology. The current study aimed to evaluate the relationship between circulating sclerostin levels and cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality in individuals with and without type 2 diabetes. We followed up a cohort of 130 participants (mean age 56.8 years; 48.5% females; 75 with type 2 diabetes; 46 with prevalent cardiovascular disease) in which serum sclerostin levels were measured at the baseline. Time to death (both of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular causes) was assessed to establish the relationship between sclerostin and mortality. We found that serum sclerostin concentrations were significantly higher in patients with prevalent cardiovascular disease (p<0.001), and independently associated with cardiovascular mortality (p = 0.008), showing sclerostin to be a stronger predictor of mortality than other classical risk factors (area under the curve = 0.849 vs 0.823). The survival analysis showed that an increase of 10 pmol/L in the serum sclerostin level resulted in a 31% increase in cardiovascular mortality. However, no significant association was observed between sclerostin levels and non-cardiovascular mortality (p = 0.346). From these results, we conclude that high sclerostin levels are related to mortality due to cardiovascular causes. The clinical implication of these findings is based on the possible use of serum sclerostin as a new biomarker of cardiovascular mortality risk in order to establish preventive strategies.


Subject(s)
Bone Morphogenetic Proteins/blood , Cardiovascular Diseases/blood , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing , Cohort Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/mortality , Female , Genetic Markers , Humans , Incidence , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , ROC Curve , Risk Factors
14.
Endocrinol. diabetes nutr. (Ed. impr.) ; 65(supl.1): 9-16, mar. 2018. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-172972

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Proporcionar unas recomendaciones prácticas para la evaluación y tratamiento de la osteoporosis del varón. Participantes. Miembros del Grupo de Metabolismo Mineral de la Sociedad Española de Endocrinología y Nutrición. Métodos: Las recomendaciones se formularon de acuerdo con el sistema Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) para establecer tanto la fuerza de las recomendaciones como el grado de evidencia. Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática en Medline de la evidencia disponible sobre la osteoporosis del varón usando las siguientes palabras claves asociadas: osteoporosis, men, fractures, bone mineral density, treatment, hypogonadism y prostate cancer. Se revisaron artículos escritos en inglés y español con fecha de inclusión hasta el 30 de agosto del 2017; cada tema fue revisado por 2 personas del grupo. Tras la formulación de las recomendaciones, estas se discutieron en una reunión conjunta del grupo de trabajo. Conclusiones: El documento establece unas recomendaciones prácticas basadas en la evidencia acerca del diagnóstico, evaluación y tratamiento de la osteoporosis del varón y situaciones especiales como el hipogonadismo y el tratamiento con terapia de déficit androgénico en el carcinoma de próstata


Objective: To provide practical recommendations to assess and treat osteoporosis in males. Participants. Members of the Bone Metabolism Working Group of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology. Methods: Recommendations were formulated using the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) to describe both the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence. A systematic search was made in Medline (PubMed) using the following associated terms: «osteoporosis», «men», «fractures», «bone mineral density», «treatment», «hypogonadism», and «prostate cancer». Papers in English and Spanish with publication date before 30 August 2017 were included. Current evidence for each disease was reviewed by 2 group members. Finally, recommendations were discussed in a meeting of the working group. Conclusions: The document provides evidence-based practical recommendations for diagnosis, assessment, and management of osteoporosis in men and special situations such as hypogonadism and prostate cancer


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Androgen Antagonists/adverse effects , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Osteoporosis/etiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/complications , Hypogonadism/complications , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control
15.
Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr ; 64 Suppl 1: 1-6, 2017 Mar.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28440761

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To provide recommendations on the effect of antidiabetic drugs on bone fragility to help select the most adequate antidiabetic treatment, especially in diabetic patients with high risk of fracture. PARTICIPANTS: Members of the Bone Metabolism Working Group of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology. METHODS: The GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) was used to establish both the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence. A systematic search was made in MEDLINE (Pubmed) using the following terms associated to the name of each antidiabetic drug: AND "osteoporosis", "fractures", "bone mineral density", "bone markers", "calciotropic hormones". Papers in English with publication date before 30 April 2016 were reviewed. Recommendations were jointly discussed by the Working Group. CONCLUSIONS: The document summaries the data on the potential effects of antidiabetic drugs on bone metabolism and fracture risk.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Fractures, Spontaneous/prevention & control , Hypoglycemic Agents/pharmacology , Aged , Bone Remodeling/drug effects , Bone Resorption/chemically induced , Bone Resorption/prevention & control , Contraindications, Drug , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors/pharmacology , Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Female , Fractures, Spontaneous/epidemiology , Fractures, Spontaneous/etiology , Glucagon-Like Peptide 1/agonists , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Insulin/adverse effects , Insulin/pharmacology , Insulin/therapeutic use , Male , Metformin/pharmacology , Metformin/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Osteoporosis/complications , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Osteoporosis/prevention & control , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors/adverse effects , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors/pharmacology , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Sulfonylurea Compounds/adverse effects , Sulfonylurea Compounds/pharmacology , Sulfonylurea Compounds/therapeutic use , Thiazolidinediones/adverse effects , Thiazolidinediones/pharmacology , Thiazolidinediones/therapeutic use
16.
Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr ; 64 Suppl 1: 7-14, 2017 Mar.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28440763

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To provide recommendations based on evidence on the management of vitaminD deficiency in the general population. PARTICIPANTS: Members of the Bone Metabolism Working Group of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology. METHODS: Recommendations were formulated using the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) to describe both the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence. A systematic search was made in MEDLINE (Pubmed) using the term VitaminD and the name of each issue. Papers in English and Spanish with publication date before 17 March 2016 were included. Recommendations were jointly discussed by the Working Group. CONCLUSIONS: This document summarizes the data about vitaminD deficiency in terms of prevalence, etiology, screening indications, adequate levels and effects of supplementation on bone and non-skeletal health outcomes.


Subject(s)
Vitamin D , Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Aged , Bone Diseases/complications , Dietary Supplements , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Fractures, Bone/prevention & control , Humans , Kidney Diseases/complications , Liver Diseases/complications , Malabsorption Syndromes/complications , Male , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Middle Aged , Muscle Weakness/etiology , Muscle Weakness/prevention & control , Nutritional Requirements , Obesity/complications , Osteoporosis/prevention & control , Risk Factors , Vitamin D/analogs & derivatives , Vitamin D/blood , Vitamin D Deficiency/etiology , Vitamin D Deficiency/prevention & control , Vitamin D Deficiency/therapy
17.
Endocrinol. diabetes nutr. (Ed. impr.) ; 64(supl.1): 1-6, mar. 2017.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-171735

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Proporcionar recomendaciones sobre el efecto de las diferentes terapias antidiabéticas en la fragilidad ósea con el fin de ayudar a seleccionar el tratamiento antidiabético más adecuado, especialmente en pacientes diabéticos con elevado riesgo de fractura. Participantes: Miembros del Grupo de trabajo de Osteoporosis y Metabolismo Mineral de la SEEN. Métodos: Se empleó el sistema Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) para establecer tanto la fuerza de las recomendaciones como el grado de evidencia. Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática en PubMed usando las siguientes palabras clave asociadas al nombre de cada tratamiento antidiabético: AND 'osteoporosis', 'fractures', 'bone mineral density', 'bone markers', 'calciotropic hormones'. Se revisaron artículos escritos en inglés con fecha de inclusión hasta 30 de abril de 2016. Tras la formulación de las recomendaciones, estas se discutieron de forma conjunta por el Grupo de Trabajo. Conclusiones: Este documento resume los datos acerca de los potenciales efectos de los diferentes tratamientos antidiabéticos sobre el metabolismo óseo y el riesgo de fractura (AU)


Objective: To provide recommendations on the effect of antidiabetic drugs on bone fragility to help select the most adequate antidiabetic treatment, especially in diabetic patients with high risk of fracture. Participants: Members of the Bone Metabolism Working Group of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology. Methods: The GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) was used to establish both the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence. A systematic search was made in MEDLINE (Pubmed) using the following terms associated to the name of each antidiabetic drug: AND 'osteoporosis', 'fractures', 'bone mineral density', 'bone markers', 'calciotropic hormones'. Papers in English with publication date before 30 April 2016 were reviewed. Recommendations were jointly discussed by the Working Group. Conclusions: The document summaries the data on the potential effects of antidiabetic drugs on bone metabolism and fracture risk (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Consensus Development Conferences as Topic , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Bone and Bones , Osteogenesis Imperfecta/drug therapy , Bone Density , Osteoporosis/complications , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Metformin/therapeutic use , Sulfonylurea Compounds/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Insulin/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...