Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Ophthalmol ; : 11206721231206091, 2023 Oct 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37787167

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The association between Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and visual impairment has been mentioned in the literature. The aim of our study was to investigate the prevalence of autism among children with albinism compared to the prevalence of ASD in children with visual impairment secondary to other causes. METHODS: Retrospective study of children with albinism from January 2015 to December 2020. A control group was created with children with early onset visual impairment of similar visual range and age, secondary to diagnosis other than albinism. Patients with associated Autism were identified in both groups. RESULTS: Seven hundred and eight children aged 1-18 years with visual impairment were included in the study. 401 children had a diagnosis of albinism, of whom 14 were also diagnosed with ASD. In the control group, composed of 307 patients, only 3 had ASD (p: 0·03). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of ASD in patients with albinism was 1 in 28, while in children with visual impairment from other causes was 1 in 102. We aim to raise awareness of the higher prevalence of autism in children diagnosed with albinism in order to reach earlier diagnosis and support.

2.
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus ; 59(6): 380-387, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35275776

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare the ability to detect refractive anomalies in children using automated refraction versus retinoscopic cycloplegic refraction. METHODS: A pediatric population from a pediatric eye institute underwent complete ophthalmic examinations. Children were randomly assigned to one of two pediatric optometrists who performed manual cycloplegic refraction using retinoscopy and automated cycloplegic refraction using a handheld autorefractometer (Retinomax K-plus 5; Right Mfg. Co., Ltd.). Recorded patient data included refraction values for each eye (sphere, astigmatism, and axis), use of glasses, and degree of cooperation. RESULTS: Two hundred thirteen children were included. The mean age was 6.2 years. For all ages, strong associations were found in sphere and spherical equivalent (SE) measurements between the two methods (b = 0.78, P < .001; b = 0.71, P < .001; respectively). Among children older than 5 years, associations between the two methods were significant in all parameters (sphere: b = 0.99, P < .001; astigmatism: b = 0.69, P < .001; axis: b = 0.19, P < .05; SE: b = 0.97, P < .001), whereas among children 5 years and younger, a significant association was found only in the axis measurements (b = 0.31, P < .01). Retinomax K-plus 5 measurements showed significantly more hyperopic results in sphere measurements and higher astigmatism in all children examined, but this difference was markedly higher in children 5 years and younger. Good cooperation was observed in 94.1% of children older than 5 years and 77% of children 5 years and younger (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The Retinomax K-plus 5 may be used for screening in children older than 5 years. However, in all age groups, it may not be accurate enough for treatment and decision making, even with good cooperation. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2022;59(6):380-387.].


Subject(s)
Astigmatism , Refractive Errors , Child , Humans , Child, Preschool , Retinoscopy/methods , Mydriatics , Refractive Errors/diagnosis , Astigmatism/diagnosis , Vision Tests , Refraction, Ocular
3.
Int Ophthalmol ; 42(6): 1771-1780, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34981294

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare treatment regimens of tacrolimus and of topical steroids for VKC and suggest a treatment protocol according to our clinical experience. METHODS: This retrospective, nonrandomized case series enrolled 85 patients with VKC. Patients were classified clinically according to severity (mild, moderate, severe) and were treated according to a suggested protocol. Analysis was made according to treatment received: tacrolimus ointment as first line treatment (tacrolimus 1st line), tacrolimus ointment after topical steroid drops treatment (tacrolimus 2nd line) and topical steroid drops or artificial tears alone (topical steroid and tears group). RESULTS: Significant improvements in clinical signs and symptoms were achieved under tacrolimus treatment 14 months in the moderate group and 5 months in the severe group. The longest duration of treatment was for tacrolimus 2nd line group (p = 0.031) and the mean number of visits in the clinic was the highest. The mean number of topical treatments per day was higher in the topical steroid and tears group (2.6 times) than in the two tacrolimus groups (1.3 times for both). The mean time needed to achieve disease remission or relief did not differ between the tacrolimus 1st line and 2nd line groups. CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus treatment is effective and safe for VKC. Tacrolimus as 1st line treatment may be preferred for severe cases, for faster disease remission compared to tacrolimus as 2nd line treatment; and with fewer topical treatments per day compared to topical steroids.


Subject(s)
Conjunctivitis, Allergic , Tacrolimus , Administration, Topical , Clinical Protocols , Conjunctivitis, Allergic/diagnosis , Conjunctivitis, Allergic/drug therapy , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Ointments/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Steroids/therapeutic use , Tacrolimus/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
4.
Case Rep Ophthalmol ; 11(2): 322-329, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32884545

ABSTRACT

Ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG) is an autoimmune disease of the neuromuscular junction and commonly associated with other immune diseases. We describe a 16-year-old female who presented to our clinic with 1-month complaints of diplopia and strabismus, visual acuity deterioration, and ocular irritation. Her examination showed crossed diplopia and alternating exotropia of 25 prism diopters, severe blepharitis, conjunctival hyperemia, corneal pannus, epithelial irregularities, and subepithelial opacities. Workup included pediatric neurologic examination, laboratory tests, imaging, and electrophysiological tests. Diagnoses of OMG and blepharitis with ocular surface disease were made. Topical treatment included eyelid hygiene, tea tree oil scrubbing, topical steroids, and tacrolimus ointment. Systemic treatment included corticosteroids, pyridostigmine, azathioprine, intravenous immunoglobulins, amitriptyline, and doxycycline. Both diseases were refractory to intensive immunosuppressive treatment and had simultaneous relapses and an intertwined course. Our hypothesis is that a shared immune mechanism may be the cause of both OMG and ocular surface disease in our patient.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...