Potential and clinical relevant drug-drug interactions among elderly from nursing homes: a multicentre study in Murcia, Spain.

This study purposes to determine the prevalence of potential and clinical relevant Drug-Drug-Interactions (pDDIs) in institutionalized older adults and to identify the pertinent factors associated. We conduct an observational, multicenter and cross-sectional study during the last quarter of 2010. We selected a sample of 275 subjects (aged ≥ 65 years) from 10 nursing homes of Murcia (Spain) by a two-stage complex sampling. pDDIs were identified using the College of Pharmacists Database. We only considered pDDIs of clinical relevance, and thereafter the relevant factors were identified through uni-level and multi-level regression analyses. A total of 210 pDDIs were identified, 120 of which were considered clinically relevant (57.1%), affecting a total of 70 elderly (25.8%). Eight pharmacological groups made up 70.2% of the clinically relevant pDDIs. More clinically relevant DDIs were found in people suffering several pathologies (OR = 2.3; 95%CI = 1.4-4.5), and also in people who take ten or more drugs daily (OR = 9.6; 95%CI = 4.8-19.1), and people who take anti-inflammatory drugs (OR = 3.9; 95%CI = 1.4-10.4). This study reveals that clinically relevant pDDIs are very common in institutionalized elderly people, and that caregivers should aim at improving their practice in order to reduce the prevalence of this phenomenon.

Potential and clinical relevant drug-drug interactions among elderly from nursing homes: a multicentre study in Murcia, Spain / Interações medicamentosas potenciais e clinicamente relevantes em instituições de longa permanência para idosos: um estudo multicêntrico em Murcia, Espanha

Abstract This study purposes to determine the prevalence of potential and clinical relevant Drug-Drug-Interactions (pDDIs) in institutionalized older adults and to identify the pertinent factors associated. We conduct an observational, multicenter and cross-sectional study during the last quarter of 2010. We selected a sample of 275 subjects (aged ≥ 65 years) from 10 nursing homes of Murcia (Spain) by a two-stage complex sampling. pDDIs were identified using the College of Pharmacists Database. We only considered pDDIs of clinical relevance, and thereafter the relevant factors were identified through uni-level and multi-level regression analyses. A total of 210 pDDIs were identified, 120 of which were considered clinically relevant (57.1%), affecting a total of 70 elderly (25.8%). Eight pharmacological groups made up 70.2% of the clinically relevant pDDIs. More clinically relevant DDIs were found in people suffering several pathologies (OR = 2.3; 95%CI = 1.4-4.5), and also in people who take ten or more drugs daily (OR = 9.6; 95%CI = 4.8-19.1), and people who take anti-inflammatory drugs (OR = 3.9; 95%CI = 1.4-10.4). This study reveals that clinically relevant pDDIs are very common in institutionalized elderly people, and that caregivers should aim at improving their practice in order to reduce the prevalence of this phenomenon.

Resumo Este estudo pretende identificar a prevalência de interações medicamentosas potenciais (IMP) em idosos institucionalizados e seus fatores associados. Realizamos um estudo observacional, multicêntrico e transversal, durante o último trimestre de 2010. Selecionamos uma amostra de 275 sujeitos (≥ 65 anos) de 10 instituições para idosos de Murcia (Espanha) mediante amostragem aleatória complexa em duas etapas. As IMP foram identificadas usando a base de dados do College of Pharmacists. Estimamos a prevalência de IMP de relevância clínica e analisamos os fatores associados com análise de regressão uni e multinível. Identificamos 210 IMP, das quais 120 foram consideradas clinicamente relevantes (57,1%) e afetaram 70 idosos (25,8%). Oito grupos farmacológicos constituíram 70,2% das IMP clinicamente relevantes. A prevalência de IMP esteve associada à multimorbidade (OR = 2,3; IC 95% = 1,4-4,5) e tomar dez ou mais medicamentos diariamente (OR = 9,6; IC95% = 4,8-19,1) e uso de medicamentos anti-inflamatórios (OR = 3,9; IC 95% = 1,4-10,4). Este estudo revela que as IMP clinicamente relevantes são muito comuns em idosos institucionalizados e que os serviços devem melhorar seus processos para reduzir a prevalência deste fenômeno.

[Gastrointestinal bleeding and potentially inappropriate medication by NSAIDs]. / Hemorragia digestiva y prescripción potencialmente inadecuada de AINEs en mayores de 65 años.

OBJECTIVE: Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used but they increase the risk of gastrointestinal haemorrage among other adverse effects. The objective of this study was to compare potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) by NSAIDs using the original Beers Criteria, a global reference for evaluating elderly people's prescriptions, and the Spanish adaptation of the same; and the relation between PIM of NSAIDs and gastrointestinal bleeding. METHODS: The study was a retrospective observational study carried out located in a primary care district in the province of de Murcia, south-eastern Spain. The study population (n=7.856) were citizens aged 65 and above, with at least one drug prescribed in a Spanish health district during the study period . We analized illnesses and treatments registered in the primary care's electronic medical history of patients and hospital admissions, during the 12 month study period (2012). The original Beers Criteria and their Spanish adaptation were used to evaluate PIM of NSAIDs in patients considering the medication globally and also each active substance. Gastrointestinal bleeding events recorded in the data bases studied were evaluated. RESULTS: Detection of PIM of NSAIDs was 5,6% with the original version and 7,0% (Δ=25,5%; p less than 0,001) with the adapted one. PIM of NSAIDs was related with an increased incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding without significant differences between PIM exposed and NSAID exposed patients AINE (RR=1,6; IC:0,2-14,5). CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish adaptation of the Beers criteria identified a greater degree of PIM of NSAIDs than the original version, and in both versions the detection of PIM was not related with a significant increase of gastrointestinal bleeding compared to patients exposed to NSAIDs.

OBJETIVO: Los Antiinflamatorios No Esteroideos (AINE) son un grupo de medicamentos con uso muy extendido en la población, su uso genera un mayor riesgo de hemorragia digestiva. El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar y comparar la prescripción potencialmente inadecuada (PPI) de AINE según los criterios de Beers en su versión original con su adaptación española y la relación de esta PPI con los eventos de sangrado gastrointestinal. METODOS: Estudio observacional longitudinal retrospectivo de 12 meses (año 2012) realizado en un área de salud de la Región de Murcia. La población estudiada fue los mayores de 65 años a los que se les había prescrito, al menos, 1 receta médica de AINE durante el periodo de estudio (7.856). Se utilizaron ambas versiones de los criterios de Beers para evaluar la PPI por AINE. Para evaluar el papel etiológico de la exposición a AINE potencialmente inadecuados, respecto a haber recibido AINE, en la hemorragia gastrointestinal se calculó la incidencia acumulada y el Riesgo Relativo. RESULTADOS: La detección de PPI por AINE pasó de 5,6% con la versión original, a 7,0% (Δ=25,5%; pmenor de 0,001) En los sujetos con prescripción de AINE la exposición a PPI por AINE presentó una mayor incidencia de sangrado gastrointestinal pero sin diferencias significativas respecto a la población que recibió AINE (RR=1,6; IC:0,2-14,5). CONCLUSIONES: El uso de la adaptación española de los criterios de Beers posibilita una mayor detección de PPI por AINE en comparación con el uso de la versión original, en ambas versiones, la PPI por AINE no genera un incremento significativo en el sangrado gastrointestinal respecto a recibir AINE.

Prescripción potencialmente inadecuada en mayores de 65 años según los criterios de Beers originales y su versión adaptada / Identifying potentially inappropriate prescriptions in patients over 65 years-old using original Beers criteria and their Spanish adaptation

Objetivo: Comparar la detección de prescripción potencialmente inadecuada (PPI) con el uso de los criterios de Beers, referente global en la evaluación de la farmacoterapia del paciente aciano, en su versión original y en su adaptación española. Diseño: Estudio observacional retrospectivo. Emplazamiento: Un área de salud en la Región de Murcia. Participantes: Ciudadanos mayores de 65 años que hayan recogido, al menos, una receta médica durante el periodo de estudio (n = 7.856). Método: Análisis de la información de la historia clínica informatizada de atención primaria (enfermedades y prescripciones) durante el periodo de estudio (12 meses, año 2012). Se utilizaron los criterios de Beers en su versión original de 2012 y su adaptación española para evaluar la PPI. Se estudió la proporción de pacientes con PPI a nivel global y por cada criterio concreto, y la diferencia entre ambas versiones. Resultados: La mediana de edad de la población estudiada fue de 76años, con predominio del sexo femenino (56,6%). Respecto al uso de medicamentos, la muestra presentó una mediana de 13 principios activos y 66 recetas. Respecto a la población estudiada, el porcentaje de pacientes con PPI según la versión original de los criterios de Beers es del 44,8%, ascendiendo al 49,4% cuando se utiliza la adaptación. Conclusiones: La PPI es frecuente en nuestro entorno. La aplicación directa de los criterios de Beers en su versión original, sin tener en cuenta la idiosincrasia del mercado farmacéutico local, proporciona una infraestimación del volumen de PPI en el paciente mayor de 65 años (AU)

Objective: To compare the detection of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) using the original Beers criteria, a global reference for evaluating prescriptions in the elderly, and their Spanish version. Design: Retrospective observational study Location: A Primary Care area in the province of Murcia, Spain. Participants: A total of 7,856 subjects aged 65 and over, with at least one drug prescribed in a Primary Care Area of Spain during study period. Method: Illnesses and treatments registered in the Primary Care computerised medical history of patients were analysed during a 12 month study period (2012). The original Beers criteria and their Spanish adaptation were used to evaluate PIM, considering both sets of criteria overall, and individually. Results: The median age of the patients was 76.0 years, with the majority females (56.6%). Patients received a median of 13 active substances and 66 medical prescriptions. The percentage of patients prescribed PIM ranged from 44.8% according to the original Beers criteria to 49.4% with the Spanish adaptation. Conclusions: PIMs are frequent in our context. The original Beers criteria, if not adapted to the local drug catalogue, underestimated the frequency of PIM in the elderly population studied (AU)

[Identifying potentially inappropriate prescriptions in patients over 65 years-old using original Beers criteria and their Spanish adaptation]. / Prescripción potencialmente inadecuada en mayores de 65 años según los criterios de Beers originales y su versión adaptada.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the detection of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) using the original Beers criteria, a global reference for evaluating prescriptions in the elderly, and their Spanish version. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study LOCATION: A Primary Care area in the province of Murcia, Spain. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 7,856 subjects aged 65 and over, with at least one drug prescribed in a Primary Care Area of Spain during study period. METHOD: Illnesses and treatments registered in the Primary Care computerised medical history of patients were analysed during a 12month study period (2012). The original Beers criteria and their Spanish adaptation were used to evaluate PIM, considering both sets of criteria overall, and individually. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 76.0years, with the majority females (56.6%). Patients received a median of 13 active substances and 66 medical prescriptions. The percentage of patients prescribed PIM ranged from 44.8% according to the original Beers criteria to 49.4% with the Spanish adaptation. CONCLUSIONS: PIMs are frequent in our context. The original Beers criteria, if not adapted to the local drug catalogue, underestimated the frequency of PIM in the elderly population studied.

Hemorragia digestiva y prescripción potencialmente inadecuada de aines en mayores de 65 años / Gastrointestinal bleeding and potentially inappropriate medication by NSAIDs

Fundamentos: Los Antiinflamatorios No Esteroideos (AINE) son un grupo de medicamentos con uso muy extendido en la población, su uso genera un mayor riesgo de hemorragia digestiva. El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar y comparar la prescripción potencialmente inadecuada (PPI) de AINE según los criterios de Beers en su versión original con su adaptación española y la relación de esta PPI con los eventos de sangrado gastrointestinal. Métodos: Estudio observacional longitudinal retrospectivo de 12 meses (año 2012) realizado en un área de salud de la Región de Murcia. La población estudiada fue los mayores de 65 años a los que se les había prescrito, al menos, 1 receta médica de AINE durante el periodo de estudio (7.856). Se utilizaron ambas versiones de los criterios de Beers para evaluar la PPI por AINE. Para evaluar el papel etiológico de la exposición a AINE potencialmente inadecuados, respecto a haber recibido AINE, en la hemorragia gastrointestinal se calculó la incidencia acumulada y el Riesgo Relativo. Resultados: La detección de PPI por AINE pasó de 5,6% con la versión original, a 7,0% (DELTA=25,5%; p<0,001) En los sujetos con prescripción de AINE la exposición a PPI por AINE presentó una mayor incidencia de sangrado gastrointestinal pero sin diferencias significativas respecto a la población que recibió AINE (RR=1,6; IC:0,2-14,5). Conclusiones: El uso de la adaptación española de los criterios de Beers posibilita una mayor detección de PPI por AINE en comparación con el uso de la versión original, en ambas versiones, la PPI por AINE no genera un incremento significativo en el sangrado gastrointestinal respecto a recibir AINE

Background: Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used but they increase the risk of gastrointestinal haemorrage among other adverse effects. The objective of this study was to compare potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) by NSAIDs using the original Beers Criteria, a global reference for evaluating elderly people's prescriptions, and the Spanish adaptation of the same; and the relation between PIM of NSAIDs and gastrointestinal bleeding. Methods: The study was a retrospective observational study carried out located in a primary care district in the province of de Murcia, south-eastern Spain. The study population (n=7.856) were citizens aged 65 and above, with at least one drug prescribed in a Spanish health district during the study period . We analized illnesses and treatments registered in the primary care's electronic medical history of patients and hospital admissions, during the 12 month study period (2012). The original Beers Criteria and their Spanish adaptation were used to evaluate PIM of NSAIDs in patients considering the medication globally and also each active substance. Gastrointestinal bleeding events recorded in the data bases studied were evaluated. Results: Detection of PIM of NSAIDs was 5,6% with the original version and 7,0% (DELTA=25,5%; p<0,001) with the adapted one. PIM of NSAIDs was related with an increased incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding without significant differences between PIM exposed and NSAID exposed patients AINE (RR=1,6; IC:0,2-14,5). Conclusions: The Spanish adaptation of the Beers criteria identified a greater degree of PIM of NSAIDs than the original version, and in both versions the detection of PIM was not related with a significant increase of gastrointestinal bleeding compared to patients exposed to NSAIDs

Atrial septal defect: anatomoechocardiographic correlation.

This study was undertaken to enhance understanding of the anatomic abnormalities involved in atrial septal defect (ASD) based on the anatomoechocardiographic comparison of equivalent specimens of ASD and the echocardiograms of patients with this anomaly. Of the 72 heart specimens, two had common atrioventricular canal (2.8%) and one had absence of right atrioventricular connection (1.4%). In all, 46 (63.8%) had fossa ovalis type ASD, two (2.8%) had true ostium secundum type ASD, two (2.8%) had ostium primum type ASD, two (2.8%) had superior sinus venosus type ASD, and two (2.8%) had inferior sinus venosus type ASD. One (1.4%) specimen had a coronary venous sinus type ASD and 14 (19.4%) had mixed type ASD. Of the 144 patients evaluated with echocardiography 15 (10.4%) had common atrioventricular canal, one (0.7%) had right absence of atrioventricular connection, 105 (72.9%) had ostium secundum type ASD (fossa ovalis), 10 (7%) had mixed type ASD, 9 (6.2%) had superior venous sinus type ASD, two (1.4%) had ostium primum type ASD, and two (1.4%) had true fossa ovalis type ASD. This series leads us to conclude that the key to successful management of ASD depends on understanding echocardiographic images in terms of anatomic specimens to provide appropriate evaluations for therapeutic decisions and establishment of prognoses.