Third-party virus-specific T cells for the treatment of double-stranded DNA viral reactivation and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease after solid organ transplant.

Reactivation or primary infection with double-stranded DNA viruses is common in recipients of solid organ transplants (SOTs) and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Treatment with conventional antiviral medications is limited by toxicities, resistance, and a lack of effective options for adenovirus (ADV) and BK polyomavirus (BKPyV). Virus-specific T cells (VSTs) have been shown to be an effective treatment for infections with ADV, BKPyV, cytomegalovirus (CMV), and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). Most of these studies have been conducted in stem cell recipients, and no large studies have been published in the SOT population to date. In this study, we report on the outcome of quadrivalent third-party VST infusions in 98 recipients of SOTs in the context of an open-label phase 2 trial. The 98 patients received a total of 181 infusions, with a median of 2 infusions per patient. The overall response rate was 45% for BKPyV, 65% for cytomegalovirus, 68% for ADV, and 61% for Epstein-Barr virus. Twenty percent of patients with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder had a complete response and 40% of patients had a partial response. All the VST infusions were well tolerated. We conclude that VSTs are safe and effective in the treatment of viral infections in SOT recipients.

Virus-Specific T Cells for the Treatment of Systemic Infections Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell and Solid Organ Transplantation.

Viral infections are a major source of morbidity and mortality in the context of immune deficiency and immunosuppression following allogeneic hematopoietic cell (allo-HCT) and solid organ transplantation (SOT). The pharmacological treatment of viral infections is challenging and often complicated by limited efficacy, the development of resistance, and intolerable side effects. A promising strategy to rapidly restore antiviral immunity is the adoptive transfer of virus-specific T cells (VST). This therapy involves the isolation and ex vivo expansion or direct selection of antigen-specific T cells from healthy seropositive donors, followed by infusion into the patient. This article provides a practical guide to VST therapy by reviewing manufacturing techniques, donor selection, and treatment indications. The safety and efficacy data of VSTs gathered in clinical trials over nearly 30 years is summarized. Current challenges and limitations are discussed, as well as opportunities for further research and development.

Inotuzumab ozogamicin in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: efficacy, toxicity, and practical considerations.

Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) is an antibody drug conjugate composed of a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the cell surface receptor CD22 coupled to a cytotoxic calicheamicin payload via an acid labile linker. InO has shown significant activity in relapsed and refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) in both single agent and combination chemotherapy regimens in adult and pediatric trials. Its use in newly diagnosed elderly patients has also been established while clinical trials investigating its use in newly diagnosed pediatric patients and fit adults are ongoing. Notable toxicities include sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), particularly in patients who undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) after InO as well as myelosuppression and B-cell aplasia which confer increased infection risk, particularly in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy. In the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting, the planned subsequent curative therapy modality must be considered when using InO to mitigate SOS risk if proceeding to HSCT and account for potential B-cell aplasia if proceeding to chimeric antigen receptor CAR-T therapy. Studies exploring mechanisms of resistance or failure of InO are ongoing but modulation or loss CD22 expression, alternative CD22 splicing, and high Bcl-2 expression have been implicated. In this review, we will summarize the currently available data on InO, with an emphasis on pediatric trials, and explore future directions including combinatorial therapy.

Needle in a haystack or elephant in the room? Identifying germline predisposition syndromes in the setting of a new myeloid malignancy diagnosis.

Myeloid malignancies associated with germline predisposition syndromes account for up to 10% of myeloid neoplasms. They are classified into three categories by the proposed 5th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Hematolymphoid Tumors: (1) neoplasms with germline predisposition without a pre-existing platelet disorder or organ dysfunction, (2) neoplasms with germline predisposition and pre-existing platelet disorder, or (3) neoplasms with germline predisposition and potential organ dysfunction. Recognizing these entities is critical because patients and affected family members benefit from interfacing with hematologists who specialize in these disorders and can facilitate tailored treatment strategies. However, identification of these syndromes in routine pathology practice is often challenging, as characteristic findings associated with these diagnoses at baseline are frequently absent, nonspecific, or impossible to evaluate in the setting of a myeloid malignancy. Here we review the formally classified germline predisposition syndromes associated with myeloid malignancies and summarize practical recommendations for pathologists evaluating a new myeloid malignancy diagnosis. Our intent is to empower clinicians to better screen for germline disorders in this common clinical setting. Recognizing when to suspect a germline predisposition syndrome, pursue additional ancillary testing, and ultimately recommend referral to a cancer predisposition clinic or hematology specialist, will ensure optimal patient care and expedite research to improve outcomes for these individuals.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease in children, adolescents, and young adults.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) remains a major complication of transplantation. PTLD is a rare entity and very heterogenous making consensus on diagnosis and treatment very challenging. The majority are Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) driven, CD20+ B-cell proliferations. PTLD does occur following hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), but due to the relative short risk period and efficacy of pre-emptive therapy, PTLD following HSCT will not be discussed in this review. This review will focus on the epidemiology, role of EBV, clinical presentation, diagnosis and evaluation and the current and emerging treatment strategies for pediatric PTLD following solid organ transplantation.

Third-Party and Patient-Specific Donor-Derived Virus-Specific T Cells Demonstrate Similar Efficacy and Safety for Management of Viral Infections after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children and Young Adults.

Infections with double-stranded DNA viruses are a common complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and cause significant morbidity and mortality in the post-transplantation period. Both donor-derived (DD) and third-party (TP) virus-specific T cells (VSTs) have shown efficacy and safety in viral management following HSCT in children and young adults. Owing to a greater degree of HLA matching between the recipient and stem cell donor, DD VSTs potentially persist longer in circulation compared to TP VSTs, because they are collected from a well-matched donor. However, TP VSTs are more easily accessible, particularly for smaller transplantation centers that do not have VST manufacturing capabilities, and more economical than creating a customized product for each transplant recipient. We conducted the present study to compare clinical efficacy and safety outcomes for DD VSTs and TP VSTs in a large cohort of pediatric and young adult HSCT recipients and to determine whether DD VSTs are associated with improved outcomes owing to potentially longer persistence in the recipient's circulation. This retrospective cohort study included 145 patients who received VSTs at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC) between 2017 and 2021 for the treatment of adenovirus, BK virus, cytomegalovirus, and/or Epstein-Barr virus. Viruses were detected using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Patients received VSTs on a DD (NCT02048332) or TP (NCT02532452) protocol, and VST products for both protocols were manufactured in an identical fashion. The primary study outcome was clinical response to VSTs, evaluated 4 weeks after VST administration, defined as decrease in viral load to under the inclusion thresholds, or resolution of symptoms of invasive viral infection, without the need for additional conventional antiviral medication following VST administration. Secondary outcomes included graft-versus-host-disease, transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy, renal function, hospital length of stay, and overall survival at 30 days and 100 days after VST administration and 1 year after HSCT. Statistical analysis was performed using the Fisher exact test or chi-square test. An unpaired t test was used to compare continuous variables. The study group comprised 77 patients in the DD cohort and 68 patients in the TP cohort. Eighteen patients in the TP cohort underwent HSCT at CCHMC, and the other 50 underwent HSCT at other institutions and presented to CCHMC solely for VST administration. There was no statistically significant difference in clinical response rates between DD and TP cohorts (65.6% versus 62.7%; odds ratio [OR], 1.162; 95% confidence interval [CI], .619 to 2.164; P = .747). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes between the 2 cohorts. The percentage of patients requiring multiple infusions for a clinical response did not differ significantly between the DD and TP cohorts (38.2% versus 32.5%; OR, .780; 95% CI, .345 to 1.805; P = .666). We found no significant difference in clinical response rate between DD VSTs and TP VSTs and a similar safety profile. Our data suggest that TP VSTs may be sufficient to control viral infection until immune reconstitution occurs despite the potential for more rapid VST clearance compared to DD VSTs. The lack of significant differences between DD VSTs and TP VSTs is an important finding, indicating that it is not necessary for every transplant center to manufacture customized DD VSTs, and that TP VSTs are a satisfactory substitute.

The Choice of Either Conventional Chemotherapy or Inotuzumab Ozogamicin as Bridging Regimen Does Not Appear To Impact Clinical Response to CD19-Directed CAR-T Therapy in Pediatric B-ALL.

Bridging therapy (BT) given during the period between T-cell collection and initiation of lymphodepleting chemotherapy is indicated for most children with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) undergoing treatment with tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), a CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. Both conventional chemotherapy agents and B-cell directed antibody-based therapies such as antibody-drug conjugates and bispecific T-cell engagers have been used as systemic forms of BT. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate if there are detectable differences in clinical outcomes based on the type of BT given (conventional chemotherapy or inotuzumab). A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients treated with tisa-cel at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center for B-ALL with bone marrow disease (with or without extramedullary disease). Patients who did not receive systemic BT were excluded. Only 1 patient received blinatumomab as BT and was therefore not included in this analysis to focus the analysis on the use of inotuzumab. Pre-infusion characteristics and post-infusion outcomes were collected. Fisher's exact test was used for categorical variables, and t-test or Mann-Whitney test was used for continuous parametric and non-parametric variables respectively. Mantel-Cox was used for survival analyses. Thirty-two patients received BT before CD19 CAR-T for medullary leukemia; 24 received conventional chemotherapy, and 8 received inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO). Cohorts were evenly matched regarding CAR-T indication, recipient age, and median CAR-T cell dose. There were no significant differences between the groups for attaining a minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative complete response after CAR-T, the percentage of patients who maintained prolonged B-cell aplasia, or the median duration of B-cell aplasia. Thirty-seven percent of patients in the conventional chemotherapy group and 43% in the antibody-based therapy group relapsed, with a median time to relapse in both groups of 5 months. No differences in event-free survival, the cumulative incidence of relapse, or overall survival were seen between the two groups. Initial response to tisa-cel, relapse rate, and survival were similar between patients who received BT with conventional chemotherapy or InO therapy. Because low disease burden at the time of infusion is a positive prognostic factor, choice of bridging regimen should focus on therapy that is anticipated to effectively lower disease burden and minimize treatment-related toxicity. Given the limitations associated with the single center retrospective analysis, a larger, multicenter study is needed to further explore these findings.

Durable remissions achieved with reinfusion of CD19-directed CAR-T despite failure to induce or maintain B-cell aplasia and single-center experience with reinfusion of tisagenlecleucel.

CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T lymphocytes (CAR-T) have led to durable remissions in children with refractory and/or multiply relapsed B-lymphoblastic leukemia. For those who relapse or lose B-cell aplasia post CAR-T, the role of CAR-T reinfusion is unclear. We report two cases of durable remission with tisagenlecleucel reinfusion despite failure to achieve or maintain B-cell aplasia, and compare these cases to six additional children who received multiple tisagenlecleucel infusions at our institution. Our experience suggests that reinfusion is safe and may be a definitive therapy for a small subset of patients. Reinfusion can also reintroduce remission and/or B-cell aplasia, allowing for subsequent therapies.

Use of gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and anti-CD20 therapy in children and adolescents with non-Hodgkin lymphoma unfit for intensive therapy.

Multiagent immunochemotherapy affords excellent outcomes in pediatric non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL); however, scarce data exist for patients unfit for intensive treatment. Rituximab, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin (R-GemOx) is well tolerated and efficacious in elderly adults with NHL; however, its use has not been described in pediatrics. In this retrospective, single-center study, six children with mature B-cell NHL and significant comorbidities received anti-CD20 therapy with GemOx (rituximab or obinutuzumab or ofatumumab with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin [R/O-GemOx]). R/O-GemOx was well tolerated and resulted in complete response in two of three patients with newly diagnosed NHL and one of three patients with primary refractory NHL. R/O-GemOx is a viable treatment option for children with NHL who cannot tolerate intensive therapy.

Burkitt lymphoma after solid-organ transplant: Treatment and outcomes in the paediatric PTLD collaborative.

Burkitt lymphoma arising in paediatric post-solid-organ transplantation-Burkitt lymphoma (PSOT-BL) is a clinically aggressive malignancy and a rare form of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). We evaluated 35 patients diagnosed with PSOT-BL at 14 paediatric medical centres in the United States. Median age at organ transplantation was 2.0 years (range: 0.1-14) and age at PSOT-BL diagnosis was 8.0 years (range: 1-17). All but one patient had late onset of PSOT-BL (≥2 years post-transplant), with a median interval from transplant to PSOT-BL diagnosis of 4.0 years (range: 0.4-12). Heart (n = 18 [51.4%]) and liver (n = 13 [37.1%]) were the most frequently transplanted organs. No patients had loss of graft or treatment-related mortality. A variety of treatment regimens were used, led by intensive Burkitt lymphoma-specific French-American-British/Lymphomes Malins B (FAB/LMB), n = 13 (37.1%), and a low-intensity regimen consisting of cyclophosphamide, prednisone and rituximab (CPR) n = 12 (34.3%). Median follow-up was 6.7 years (range: 0.5-17). Three-year event-free and overall survival were 66.2% and 88.0%, respectively. Outcomes of PSOT-BL patients receiving BL-specific intensive regimens are comparable to reported BL outcomes in immunocompetent children. Multi-institutional collaboration is feasible and provides the basis of prospective data collection to determine the optimal treatment regimen for PSOT-BL.

Multicenter study of pediatric Epstein-Barr virus-negative monomorphic post solid organ transplant lymphoproliferative disorders.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric Epstein-Barr virus-negative monomorphic post solid organ transplant lymphoproliferative disorder [EBV(-)M-PTLD] comprises approximately 10% of M-PTLD. No large multi-institutional pediatric-specific reports on treatment and outcome are available. METHODS: A multi-institutional retrospective review of solid organ recipients diagnosed with EBV(-)M-PTLD aged ≤21 years between 2001 and 2020 in 12 centers in the United States and United Kingdom was performed, including demographics, staging, treatment, and outcomes data. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were identified with EBV(-)M-PTLD. Twenty-three (63.9%) were male. Median age (range) at transplantation, diagnosis of EBV(-)M-PTLD, and interval from transplant to PTLD were 2.2 years (0.1-17), 14 years (3.0-20), and 8.5 years (0.6-18.3), respectively. Kidney (n = 17 [47.2%]) and heart (n = 13 [36.1%]) were the most commonly transplanted organs. Most were Murphy stage III (n = 25 [69.4%]). Lactate dehydrogenase was elevated in 22/34 (64.7%) and ≥2 times upper limit of normal in 11/34 (32.4%). Pathological diagnoses included diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n = 31 [86.1%]) and B-non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) not otherwise specified (NOS) (n = 5 [13.9%]). Of nine different regimens used, the most common were: pediatric mature B-NHL-specific regimen (n = 13 [36.1%]) and low-dose cyclophosphamide, prednisone, and rituximab (n = 9 [25%]). Median follow-up from diagnosis was 3.0 years (0.3-11.0 years). Three-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 64.8% and 79.9%, respectively. Of the seven deaths, six were from progressive disease. CONCLUSIONS: EFS and OS were comparable to pediatric EBV(+) PTLD, but inferior to mature B-NHL in immunocompetent pediatric patients. The wide range of therapeutic regimens used directs our work toward developing an active multi-institutional registry to design prospective studies. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Pediatric Epstein-Barr virus-negative monomorphic post solid organ transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (EBV(-)M-PTLD) have comparable outcomes to EBV(+) PTLD, but are inferior to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in immunocompetent pediatric patients. The variety of treatment regimens used highlights the need to develop a pediatric PTLD registry to prospectively evaluate outcomes. The impact of treatment regimen on relapse risk could not be assessed because of small numbers. In the intensive pediatric B-non-Hodgkin lymphoma chemoimmunotherapy group, 11 of 13 patients remain alive in complete remission after 0.6 to 11 years.

Outcome of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy following treatment with inotuzumab ozogamicin in children with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Chimeric antigen receptor T cells targeting CD19 (CART-19) have shown remarkable efficacy for relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). We investigated whether prior use of inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO), an anti-CD22 antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, may impact CAR T-cell manufacturing or efficacy via pre-CART-19 depletion of the B-cell compartment. In this international, retrospective analysis, 39 children and young adults receiving InO before (n = 12) and/or after (n = 27) T-cell apheresis as bridging therapy to CART-19 treatment were analyzed. Median age at infusion was 13 years (range 1.4-23 years). Thirty-four out of 39 patients (87.2%) obtained complete remission. With a median follow-up of 18.2 months after CART-19 infusion, 12-month event-free survival (EFS) was 53.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 38.7-73.4) and overall survival (OS) was 77.8% (95% CI: 64.5-93.9). Seventeen patients (44%) relapsed with a median of 159 days (range 28-655) after CART-19 infusion. No difference in day 28 minimal residual disease negative complete response rate, 12-month OS/EFS, or incidence of CD19-positive or -negative relapses was observed among patients receiving InO before or after apheresis. Compared to published data for patients treated with CART-19 therapy without prior InO exposure, response and OS/EFS for patients treated with InO prior to CART-19 are similar.

Acute myeloid leukemia in SRP54-mutated congenital neutropenia.

SRP54 mutations have recently been implicated in congenital neutropenia (CN) and the in-frame deletion, p.Thr117del, is the most common pathogenic mutation reported. The largest study of SRP54-mutated CN to-date followed 23 patients for a median of 15 years. No patients developed a hematologic malignancy in that study. Given the known risk of leukemia in other CNs it is crucial to know whether patients with SRP54-mutated CN have an increased risk of leukemia. We report the first case of leukemia in a patient with SRP54-mutated CN. A 15-year-old male with SRP54-mutated CN (p.Thr117del) was diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes on a screening bone marrow evaluation. Next generation sequencing of the leukemia cells identified CSF3R and RUNX1 mutations. These mutations commonly co-exist in CN-associated malignancies and suggest leukemogenesis in SRP54-mutated CN may occur in a similar manner to other CNs. He was successfully treated with CPX-351 followed by hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) and remains in remission at a follow-up time of 9 months. Although conclusions from this single report must be limited, this has potentially significant implications for both screening and treatment practices for these patients, including the role and timing of HCT.

Scheduled administration of virus-specific T cells for viral prophylaxis after pediatric allogeneic stem cell transplant.

Infections with double-stranded DNA viruses are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatric patients following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Virus-specific T-cell therapies (VSTs) have been shown to be an effective treatment for infections with adenovirus, BK virus, cytomegalovirus (CMV), and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). To date, prophylactic regimens to prevent or mitigate these infections using conventional antiviral medications provide suboptimal response rates. Here we report on a clinical trial (NCT03883906) performed to assess the feasibility of rapid manufacturing and early infusion of quadrivalent VSTs generated from stem cell donors ("donor-derived VSTs") into allogeneic HSCT recipients with minimal or absent viremia. Patients were eligible to receive scheduled VSTs as early as 21 days after stem cell infusion. Twenty-three patients received scheduled VSTs. Twenty of 23 patients had no viremia at the time of infusion, while 3 patients had very low-level BK viremia. Two developed clinically significant graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), although this incidence was not outside of expected incidence early after HSCT, and both were successfully treated with systemic corticosteroids (n = 2). Five patients were deemed treatment failures. Three developed subsequent significant viremia/viral disease (n = 3). Eighteen patients did not fail treatment, 7 of whom did not develop any viremia, while 11 developed low-level, self-limited viremia that resolved without further intervention. No infusion reactions occurred. In conclusion, scheduled VSTs appear to be safe and potentially effective at limiting serious complications from viral infections after allogeneic transplantation. A randomized study comparing this scheduled approach to the use of VSTs to treat active viremia is ongoing.

Off-the-Shelf Third-Party Virus-Specific T Cell Therapy to Treat JC Polyomavirus Infection in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients.

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a progressive and generally fatal demyelinating neurologic disease that occurs in profoundly immunocompromised patients due to infection with the human polyomavirus JC virus (JCPyV). Treatment options are limited and are largely focused on restoring T cell immunity, and outcomes are historically poor. Control of JCPyV in the setting of an immunocompromised patient by adoptive transfer of third-party virus specific T cells (VSTs) has been described in a small number of cases. To investigate treatment response and outcomes in recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with PML treated with third-party VSTs directed against the BK virus, a highly homologous polyoma virus that shares immunogenic epitopes with JCPyV. A retrospective chart review was performed on 4 patients who received VSTs for the treatment of PML at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center since 2019. VSTs were administered safely, with no cases of graft-versus-host disease and no infusion reactions. One patient who was treated almost immediately after diagnosis was able to clear JCPyV from blood and cerebrospinal fluid, with resultant stabilization of neurologic decline. IFN-γ enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) analysis demonstrated VSTs in the peripheral blood following infusion. Response was maintained through repeat infusions. Three other patients, all of whom had a longer delay between diagnosis and infusion, exhibited progressive neurologic decline despite varying degrees of improvement in viral load. PML is a rare but often fatal complication following HSCT for which few treatment options are available. BK-directed, JCPyV cross-reactive VSTs are a safe and viable therapeutic option, and prompt administration should be considered once PML is diagnosed. © 2021 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Virus-specific T cells for adenovirus infection after stem cell transplantation are highly effective and class II HLA restricted.

Infection with adenoviruses is a common and significant complication in pediatric patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Treatment options with traditional antivirals are limited by poor efficacy and significant toxicities. T-cell reconstitution is critical for the management of adenoviral infections, but it generally takes place months after transplantation. Ex vivo-generated virus-specific T cells (VSTs) are an alternative approach for viral control and can be rapidly generated from either a stem cell donor or a healthy third-party donor. In the context of a single-center phase 1/2 clinical trial, we treated 30 patients with a total of 43 infusions of VSTs for adenoviremia and/or adenoviral disease. Seven patients received donor-derived VSTs, 21 patients received third-party VSTs, and 2 received VSTs from both donor sources. Clinical responses were observed in 81% of patients, with a complete response in 58%. Epitope prediction and potential epitope identification for common HLA molecules helped elucidate HLA restriction in a subset of patients receiving third-party products. Intracellular interferon-γ expression in T cells in response to single peptides and response to cell lines stably transfected with a single HLA molecule demonstrated HLA-restricted CD4+ T-cell response, and these results correlated with clinical outcomes. Taken together, these data suggest that VSTs are a highly safe and effective therapy for the management of adenoviral infection in immunocompromised hosts. The trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02048332 and #NCT02532452.

Treatment of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder with poor prognostic features in children and young adults: Short-course EPOCH regimens are safe and effective.

No guidelines exist for which intensive chemotherapy regimen is best in pediatric or young adult patients with high-risk posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). We retrospectively reviewed patients with PTLD who received interval-compressed short-course etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin (SC-EPOCH) regimens at our institution. Eight patients were included with median age of 12 years. All patients achieved a complete response with a manageable toxicity profile. Two patients developed second, clonally unrelated, EBV-positive PTLD and one patient had recurrence at 6 months off therapy. No graft rejection occurred during therapy. All eight patients are alive with median follow-up of 29 months.

Tolerance of dinutuximab therapy for treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma in two patients with end-stage renal disease on dialysis.

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (aHCT) has a significant survival advantage in patients with high-risk (HR) neuroblastoma. Transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) is a serious complication and may result in chronic renal disease leading to delay in subsequent posttransplant therapy and limitations of treatment options. Dinutuximab represents an important therapeutic advance in the treatment of pediatric HR neuroblastoma, but historically has not been administered in patients with GFR < 60 mL/m2 /min. Here, we present the safe outcome of dinutuximab administration while on renal replacement therapy in two cases of HR neuroblastoma with end-stage renal disease secondary to TA-TMA.

Virus-specific T-cell therapy to treat BK polyomavirus infection in bone marrow and solid organ transplant recipients.

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection is a major complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and solid organ transplant (SOT). Treatment options are limited, poorly effective, and have significant toxicities. Cellular therapy using T cells directed against BKPyV is an emerging therapy, and we report efficacy in controlling BKPyV-associated disease in highly immunocompromised patients. Virus-specific T cells (VSTs) against BKPyV were manufactured using either blood from the patient's stem cell donor (donor-derived VSTs) or from unrelated donors (third-party VSTs). VSTs were used to treat BKPyV in 38 HSCT recipients and 3 SOT recipients between June 2017 and December 2019. Overall response rate was 86% in patients treated for BK viremia, 100% in patients treated for hemorrhagic cystitis, and 87% in patients treated for both BK viremia and hemorrhagic cystitis. No infusional toxicity, de novo graft-versus-host disease, or rejection of the organ occurred attributable to the VST infusion. BKPyV-specific immune responses were demonstrated by interferon-γ production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells postinfusion in response to BKPyV antigens. VSTs are a safe and potentially effective strategy to treat BKPyV and associated symptoms in recipients of HSCT and SOT. Cellular therapy should be considered for all patients with BKPyV and underlying immune suppression at risk of complications. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02532452.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy in Patients with Multiply Relapsed or Refractory Extramedullary Leukemia.

Autologous CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T lymphocyte (CAR-T) therapy is an approved and effective treatment for the management of patients with refractory and multiply relapsed B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Experience using this therapy in pediatric patients with extramedullary (EM) disease is limited, in part because these patients have frequently been excluded from clinical trials owing to concerns for an increased risk of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). We infused 7 patients with refractory or multiply relapsed B-ALL who presented with isolated EM relapse with tisagenlecleucel. Six patients had isolated central nervous system (CNS) leukemia, and 1 patient had an isolated testicular relapse. An initial complete response was seen in all patients, with 5 patients remaining in CAR-T-induced remission at a median of 18 months from first infusion. Reversible ICANS was seen in 1 patient with CNS leukemia. Durable B cell aplasia occurred in 3 patients, with a median time to B cell recovery of 6.5 months in the other patients. These data suggest that CAR-T therapy has promising safety and efficacy in treating EM leukemia, although definitive conclusions are limited by the small size of the cohort and limited follow-up period.