The case for open science: rare diseases.

The premise of Open Science is that research and medical management will progress faster if data and knowledge are openly shared. The value of Open Science is nowhere more important and appreciated than in the rare disease (RD) community. Research into RDs has been limited by insufficient patient data and resources, a paucity of trained disease experts, and lack of therapeutics, leading to long delays in diagnosis and treatment. These issues can be ameliorated by following the principles and practices of sharing that are intrinsic to Open Science. Here, we describe how the RD community has adopted the core pillars of Open Science, adding new initiatives to promote care and research for RD patients and, ultimately, for all of medicine. We also present recommendations that can advance Open Science more globally.

Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Rare Disease Registries.

Rare diseases (RD) patient registries are powerful instruments that help develop clinical research, facilitate the planning of appropriate clinical trials, improve patient care, and support healthcare management. They constitute a key information system that supports the activities of European Reference Networks (ERNs) on rare diseases. A rapid proliferation of RD registries has occurred during the last years and there is a need to develop guidance for the minimum requirements, recommendations and standards necessary to maintain a high-quality registry. In response to these heterogeneities, in the framework of RD-Connect, a European platform connecting databases, registries, biobanks and clinical bioinformatics for rare disease research, we report on a list of recommendations, developed by a group of experts, including members of patient organizations, to be used as a framework for improving the quality of RD registries. This list includes aspects of governance, Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data and information, infrastructure, documentation, training, and quality audit. The list is intended to be used by established as well as new RD registries. Further work includes the development of a toolkit to enable continuous assessment and improvement of their organizational and data quality.

Data Quality in Rare Diseases Registries.

In the field of rare diseases, registries are considered power tool to develop clinical research, to facilitate the planning of appropriate clinical trials, to improve patient care and healthcare planning. Therefore high quality data of rare diseases registries is considered to be one of the most important element in the establishment and maintenance of a registry. Data quality can be defined as the totality of features and characteristics of data set that bear on its ability to satisfy the needs that result from the intended use of the data. In the context of registries, the 'product' is data, and quality refers to data quality, meaning that the data coming into the registry have been validated, and ready for use for analysis and research. Determining the quality of data is possible through data assessment against a number of dimensions: completeness, validity; coherence and comparability; accessibility; usefulness; timeliness; prevention of duplicate records. Many others factors may influence the quality of a registry: development of standardized Case Report Form and security/safety controls of informatics infrastructure. With the growing number of rare diseases registries being established, there is a need to develop a quality validation process to evaluate the quality of each registry. A clear description of the registry is the first step when assessing data quality or the registry evaluation system. Here we report a template as a guide for helping registry owners to describe their registry.

Rare Disease Biospecimens and Patient Registries: Interoperability for Research Promotion, a European Example: EuroBioBank and SpainRDR-BioNER.

Well-annotated and properly preserved specimens are crucial both for diagnostic purposes and for use in basic and pre-clinical research, and are especially important for rare disease (RD) studies. Several consortia have been established in the recent years in order to facilitate research and to maximise access to rare biological samples and data stored in rare disease biobanks and registries, among them the EuroBioBank network and the Spain National Rare Disease Registry (RDR) and Biobank (BioNER).EuroBioBank, established in 2001, was the first network of RD biobanks to operate in Europe as a service distributing human DNA, cells, and tissue to the scientific community conducting research on rare diseases.The Spanish RDR and BioNER were created for facilitating rare disease research and health-related matters. The coordination of these two bodies represents an example of great scientific value as biological samples donated by patients at BioNER are linked to clinical information collected in the RDR.Rare disease biobanks and registries will need for the future to increase their effort to improve interconnection so to enable investigators to better locate samples and associated data, while protecting security of the data and privacy of the participants and adhering to international ethical and legal requirements.

NIH/NCATS/GRDR® Common Data Elements: A leading force for standardized data collection.

The main goal of the NIH/NCATS GRDR® program is to serve as a central web-based global data repository to integrate de-identified patient clinical data from rare disease registries, and other data sources, in a standardized manner, to be available to researchers for conducting various biomedical studies, including clinical trials and to support analyses within and across diseases. The aim of the program is to advance research for many rare diseases. One of the first tasks toward achieving this goal was the development of a set of Common Data Elements (CDEs), which are controlled terminologies that represent collected data. A list of 75 CDEs was developed by a national committee and was validated and implemented during a period of 2 year proof of concept. Access to GRDR CDEs is freely available at: https://grdr.ncats.nih.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3&Itemid=5. The GRDR CDEs have been the cornerstone of the GRDR repository, as well as of several other national and international patient registries. The establishment of the GRDR program has elevated the issue of data standardization and interoperability for rare disease patient registries, to international attention, resulting in a global dialog and significant change in the mindset of registry developers, patient advocacy groups, and other national and international organizations.

Creating a global rare disease patient registry linked to a rare diseases biorepository database: Rare Disease-HUB (RD-HUB).

A movement to create a global patient registry for as many as 7,000 rare diseases was launched at a workshop, "Advancing Rare Disease Research: The Intersection of Patient Registries, Biospecimen Repositories, and Clinical Data." http://rarediseases.info.nih.gov/PATIENT_REGISTRIES_WORKSHOP/. The workshop was sponsored by the Office of Rare Diseases Research (ORDR). The focus was the building of an infrastructure for an internet-based global registry linking to biorepositories. Such a registry would serve the patients, investigators, and drug companies. To aid researchers the participants suggested the creation of a centralized database of biorepositories for rare biospecimens (RD-HUB)http://biospecimens.ordr.info.nih.gov/ that could be linked to the registry. Over two days of presentations and breakout sessions, several hundred attendees discussed government rules and regulations concerning privacy and patients' rights and the nature and scope of data to be entered into a central registry as well as concerns about how to validate patient and clinician-entered data to ensure data accuracy. Mechanisms for aggregating data from existing registries were also discussed. The attendees identified registry best practices, model coding systems, international systems for recruiting patients into clinical trials and novel ways of using the internet directly to invite participation in research. They also speculated about who would bear ultimate responsibility for the informatics in the registry and who would have access to the information. Hurdles associated with biospecimen collection and how to overcome them were detailed. The development of the recommendations was, in itself, an indication of the commitment of the rare disease community as never before.

Chromosomal protein HMGN1 modulates the expression of N-cadherin.

HMGN1 is a nuclear protein that binds to nucleosomes and alters the accessibility of regulatory factors to their chromatin targets. To elucidate its biological function and identify specific HMGN1 target genes, we generated Hmgn1-/- mice. DNA microarray analysis of Hmgn1+/+ and Hmgn1-/- embryonic fibroblasts identified N-cadherin as a potential HMGN1 gene target. RT-PCR and western blot analysis confirmed a linkage between HMGN1 expression and N-cadherin levels. In both transformed and primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), HMGN1 acted as negative regulator of N-cadherin expression. Likewise, the N-cadherin levels in early embryos of Hmgn1-/- mice were higher than those of their Hmgn1+/+ littermates. Loss of HMGN1 increased the adhesiveness, motility and aggregation potential of Hmgn1-/- MEFs, a phenotype consistent with increased levels of N-cadherin protein. Re-expression of wild-type HMGN1, but not of the mutant HMGN1 protein that does not bind to chromatin, in Hmgn1-/- MEFs, decreased the levels of N-cadherin and restored the Hmgn1+/+ phenotype. These studies demonstrate a role for HMGN1 in the regulation of specific gene expression. We suggest that in MEFs, and during early mouse development, the interaction of HMGN1 with chromatin down-regulates the expression of N-cadherin.