ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Urgent seizures are a medical emergency for which new therapies are still needed. This study evaluated the use of intravenous brivaracetam (IV-BRV) in an emergency setting in clinical practice. METHODS: BRIV-IV was a retrospective, multicenter, observational study. It included patients ≥18 years old who were diagnosed with urgent seizures (including status epilepticus (SE), acute repetitive seizures, and high-risk seizures) and who were treated with IV-BRV according to clinical practice in 14 hospital centers. Information was extracted from clinical charts and included in an electronic database. Primary effectiveness endpoints included the rate of IV-BRV responder patients, the rate of patients with a sustained response without seizure relapse in 12 h, and the time between IV-BRV administration and clinical response. Primary safety endpoints were comprised the percentage of patients with adverse events and those with adverse events leading to discontinuation. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were included in this study. The mean age was 57.7 ± 21.5 years old with a prior diagnosis of epilepsy for 57.1% of patients. The most frequent etiologies were brain tumor-related (18.1%) and vascular (11.2%) epilepsy. SE was diagnosed in 55.3% of patients. The median time from urgent seizure onset to IV treatment administration was 60.0 min (range: 15.0-360.0), and the median time from IV treatment to IV-BRV was 90.0 min (range: 30.0-2400.0). Regarding dosage, the mean bolus infusion was 163.0 ± 73.0 mg and the mean daily dosage was 195.0 ± 87.0 mg. A total of 77.6% of patients responded to IV-BRV (66.3% with SE vs. 91% other urgent seizures) with a median response time of 30.0 min (range: 10.0-60.0). A sustained response was achieved in 62.8% of patients. However, adverse events were reported in 14.7%, which were predominantly somnolence and fatigue, with 4.5% leading to discontinuation. Eighty-six percent of patients were discharged with oral brivaracetam. CONCLUSION: IV-BRV in emergency settings was effective, and tolerability was good for most patients. However, a larger series is needed to confirm the outcomes.
Subject(s)
Epilepsy , Status Epilepticus , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Humans , Middle Aged , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Drug Therapy, Combination , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Pyrrolidinones/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Seizures/drug therapy , Seizures/chemically induced , Status Epilepticus/drug therapy , Treatment OutcomeSubject(s)
Cytomegalovirus Infections , Infections , Sinus Thrombosis, Intracranial , Venous Thrombosis , Humans , Cytomegalovirus , Portal Vein , Venous Thrombosis/complications , Cytomegalovirus Infections/complications , Sinus Thrombosis, Intracranial/diagnosis , Sinus Thrombosis, Intracranial/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
Auditory hallucinations are defined as the abnormal perception of sound in the absence of an external auditory stimulus. Musical hallucinations constitute a complex type of auditory hallucination characterized by perception of melodies, music, or songs. Musical hallucinations are infrequent and have been described in 0.16% of a general hospital population. The auditory hallucinations are popularly associated with psychiatric disorders or degenerative neurological diseases but there may be other causes in which the patient evolves favorably with treatment. With this clinical case we want to stress the importance of knowing the causes of musical hallucinations due to the unpredictable social consequences that they can have.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Lacosamide is a sodium channel blocker antiepileptic drug authorized as an adjunctive therapy for focal seizures in adolescents and adults. AIM: To analyze the efficacy and safety of lacosamide in Galicia according to its use in daily clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study in patients who started treatment with lacosamide between January 2014 and June 2013 in 10 hospitals in Galicia, Spain. Its efficacy and safety at 3, 6 and 12 months after starting lacosamide was assessed. RESULTS: We included 184 patients with a mean age of 44.2 ± 17.4 years old; 56.5% (n = 104) were male; 173 patients constituted the efficacy population. Mean duration of epilepsy was 18.8 ± 15.5 years. Seizure frequency was 2.5 ± 1.6 episodes/month. After 12 months, 68.2% of patients (n = 118) had >= 50% improvement (responders) and among them, 54 (45.8% of responder patients) were seizure free. Twenty-three percent (n = 43) suffered from adverse events after 12 months, being dizziness (10.3%) and instability (3.3%) the most frequently reported. After the 12 month visit, 87.5% of patients (n = 161) continued treatment with lacosamide. CONCLUSIONS: Lacosamide provides a very good efficacy and safety profile for patients with focal refractory epilepsy. High percentage of responders may be related to a less refractory population compared to other daily clinical practice studies. It constitutes an attractive therapeutic option for the treatment of focal epilepsies.
TITLE: Experiencia clinica con lacosamida en Galicia: estudio GALACO.Introducción. La lacosamida es un fármaco antiepiléptico bloqueante de los canales de sodio, autorizado en adolescentes y adultos como tratamiento coadyuvante en crisis de inicio focal. Objetivo. Analizar los resultados de eficacia y seguridad de la lacosamida en Galicia en su uso de acuerdo con la práctica clínica habitual. Pacientes y métodos. Estudio retrospectivo observacional en pacientes que iniciaron tratamiento con lacosamida entre enero de 2013 y junio de 2014 en 10 hospitales de Galicia. Se evaluó su eficacia y seguridad a los 3, 6 y 12 meses del inicio del tratamiento. Resultados. Se incluyeron 184 pacientes con edad media de 44,2 ± 17,4 años; el 56,5% (n = 104) eran varones. Conforman la población de eficacia 173 pacientes. El tiempo medio de evolución de la epilepsia fue de 18,8 ± 15,5 años. La frecuencia de crisis era de 2,5 ± 1,6 episodios/mes. A los 12 meses, el 68,2% de los pacientes (n = 118) presentaba una mejoría igual o superior al 50% (pacientes respondedores) y, de ellos, 54 (el 45,8% de los respondedores) estaban libres de crisis. El 23,4% (n = 43) refirió efectos adversos a los 12 meses, principalmente mareos (10,3%) e inestabilidad (3,3%). Después de la visita de los 12 meses, continuaba con lacosamida el 87,5% de los pacientes (n = 161). Conclusiones. La lacosamida ofrece un perfil de eficacia y seguridad muy favorable para pacientes con epilepsia focal refractaria. El elevado porcentaje de respondedores podría atribuirse a una población de epilépticos menos refractarios que en otros estudios de práctica clínica. Constituye una opción terapéutica atractiva para el tratamiento de epilepsias de inicio focal.
Subject(s)
Acetamides/therapeutic use , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Acetamides/adverse effects , Adult , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Lacosamide , Male , Middle Aged , Nervous System Diseases/chemically induced , Retrospective Studies , Sodium Channel Blockers/adverse effects , Sodium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use , SpainABSTRACT
Introducción. La lacosamida es un fármaco antiepiléptico bloqueante de los canales de sodio, autorizado en adolescentes y adultos como tratamiento coadyuvante en crisis de inicio focal. Objetivo. Analizar los resultados de eficacia y seguridad de la lacosamida en Galicia en su uso de acuerdo con la práctica clínica habitual. Pacientes y métodos. Estudio retrospectivo observacional en pacientes que iniciaron tratamiento con lacosamida entre enero de 2013 y junio de 2014 en 10 hospitales de Galicia. Se evaluó su eficacia y seguridad a los 3, 6 y 12 meses del inicio del tratamiento. Resultados. Se incluyeron 184 pacientes con edad media de 44,2 ± 17,4 años; el 56,5% (n = 104) eran varones. Conforman la población de eficacia 173 pacientes. El tiempo medio de evolución de la epilepsia fue de 18,8 ± 15,5 años. La frecuencia de crisis era de 2,5 ± 1,6 episodios/mes. A los 12 meses, el 68,2% de los pacientes (n = 118) presentaba una mejoría igual o superior al 50% (pacientes respondedores) y, de ellos, 54 (el 45,8% de los respondedores) estaban libres de crisis. El 23,4% (n = 43) refirió efectos adversos a los 12 meses, principalmente mareos (10,3%) e inestabilidad (3,3%). Después de la visita de los 12 meses, continuaba con lacosamida el 87,5% de los pacientes (n = 161). Conclusiones. La lacosamida ofrece un perfil de eficacia y seguridad muy favorable para pacientes con epilepsia focal refractaria. El elevado porcentaje de respondedores podría atribuirse a una población de epilépticos menos refractarios que en otros estudios de práctica clínica. Constituye una opción terapéutica atractiva para el tratamiento de epilepsias de inicio focal (AU)
Introduction. Lacosamide is a sodium channel blocker antiepileptic drug authorized as an adjunctive therapy for focal seizures in adolescents and adults. Aim. To analyze the efficacy and safety of lacosamide in Galicia according to its use in daily clinical practice. Patients and methods. Retrospective observational study in patients who started treatment with lacosamide between January 2014 and June 2013 in 10 hospitals in Galicia, Spain. Its efficacy and safety at 3, 6 and 12 months after starting lacosamide was assessed. Results. We included 184 patients with a mean age of 44.2 ± 17.4 years old; 56.5% (n = 104) were male; 173 patients constituted the efficacy population. Mean duration of epilepsy was 18.8 ± 15.5 years. Seizure frequency was 2.5 ± 1.6 episodes/month. After 12 months, 68.2% of patients (n = 118) had ≥ 50% improvement (responders) and among them, 54 (45.8% of responder patients) were seizure free. Twenty-three percent (n = 43) suffered from adverse events after 12 months, being dizziness (10.3%) and instability (3.3%) the most frequently reported. After the 12 month visit, 87.5% of patients (n = 161) continued treatment with lacosamide. Conclusions. Lacosamide provides a very good efficacy and safety profile for patients with focal refractory epilepsy. High percentage of responders may be related to a less refractory population compared to other daily clinical practice studies. It constitutes an attractive therapeutic option for the treatment of focal epilepsies (AU)
Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , Evaluation of the Efficacy-Effectiveness of Interventions , Retrospective Studies , Seizures/drug therapy , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
No disponible
Subject(s)
Humans , Aged , Carotid-Cavernous Sinus Fistula/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Carotid-Cavernous Sinus Fistula/therapy , Endovascular ProceduresABSTRACT
No disponible
Subject(s)
Humans , Guillain-Barre Syndrome/etiology , Colitis, Ulcerative/complications , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
No disponible
Subject(s)
Humans , Sulfonamides/adverse effects , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Conduct Disorder/chemically induced , JealousySubject(s)
Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Delusions/chemically induced , Epilepsies, Partial/drug therapy , Isoxazoles/adverse effects , Jealousy , Adult , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Brain Diseases/complications , Cysts/complications , Delusions/psychology , Drug Substitution , Drug Therapy, Combination , Epilepsies, Partial/etiology , Humans , Isoxazoles/therapeutic use , Male , Phenytoin/therapeutic use , Syndrome , ZonisamideSubject(s)
Cerebrovascular Disorders/etiology , Colitis, Ulcerative , Crohn Disease , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Cerebrovascular Disorders/diagnosis , Colitis, Ulcerative/complications , Colitis, Ulcerative/diagnosis , Colitis, Ulcerative/physiopathology , Crohn Disease/complications , Crohn Disease/diagnosis , Crohn Disease/physiopathology , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/complications , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/diagnosis , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/physiopathologyABSTRACT
No disponible
