Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 45(4): 261-266, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36870436

ABSTRACT

Human papillomavirus (HPV), a sexually transmitted disease, is identified as the source of 99.7% of cervical cancers. Screening for cervical cancer using oncogenic HPV (high-risk [HR] HPV) detection is more sensitive than traditional cytology. However, few Canadian data exist on HR HPV self-sampling. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the acceptability of HR HPV self-sampling by patients, the percentage of correctly collected samples, the return rate of mailed kits, and the HPV positivity rate in a population sample based on different cervical cancer risk factors. METHODS: We conducted an observational cross-sectional study on HPV primary cervical cancer screening with self-collected cervicovaginal samples through mail service. RESULTS: A total of 400 kits were mailed and 310 kits were returned, making a return rate of 77.5%. Of these, 84.2% of patients were very satisfied with this method and 95.8% (297/310) of patients would choose self-sampling over cytology as their primary screening method. All patients would recommend this screening method to their friends or family members. Of the samples, 93.8% could be analyzed correctly and the HPV positivity rate was 11.7%. CONCLUSION: In this large and random sample, there was a strong interest in self-testing. Offering HR HPV self-sampling could increase access to cervical cancer screening. The self-screening method could also be a part of the solution to reaching under-screened populations, in particular, those who do not have a family doctor or avoid gynaecologic exams because of pain or anxiety.


Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Canada , Mass Screening/methods , Human Papillomavirus Viruses , Papillomaviridae , Vaginal Smears
2.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 44(11): 1174-1180, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36099965

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Serous ovarian cancer is the most common subtype of epithelial ovarian carcinoma-the most prevalent type of ovarian cancer. High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is thought to arise from the distal fallopian tube, with a precursor lesion known as serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC). STICs are found in the final pathology of a salpingectomy specimen in 10%-20% of women with a BRCA gene mutation and 1%-7% of women without a mutation. However, there is currently no official guideline and a paucity of data on the management of STICs. DATA SOURCES: We performed a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines. Five databases were searched for relevant studies on STICs. STUDY SELECTION: Two independent reviewers performed the abstract and full-text screening and data extraction, with conflicts resolved through discussion with the third reviewer. The risk of bias of each study was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Fourteen articles were included. Ninety-nine patients who were diagnosed with STIC and subsequently followed for a mean period of 55.5 months were included in this analysis. Eighty-three patients (83.9%) were BRCA mutation carriers. After the diagnosis of isolated STIC, 7 patients (7.3%) received chemotherapy and 25 (26%) underwent surgical staging. Three of the 25 patients were diagnosed with HGSOC based on the staging surgery. Nine patients were later diagnosed with HGSOC during follow-up, with an average duration of follow-up of 58.5 months between the diagnosis of STIC and the diagnosis of HGSOC. CONCLUSION: Based on our review of the literature, there is a 10.7% risk of having concurrent HGSOC at the time of STIC diagnosis, and the risk of developing a subsequent HGSOC is 14.5%. BRCA mutation status should be determined in cases of isolated STIC, as 83.9% of patients included in this study were found to carry BRCA mutations. We believe it is necessary to further investigate the role of surgical staging following the diagnosis of STIC.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma in Situ , Carcinoma in Situ , Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous , Fallopian Tube Neoplasms , Ovarian Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Carcinoma in Situ/genetics , Carcinoma in Situ/pathology , Fallopian Tube Neoplasms/genetics , Fallopian Tube Neoplasms/surgery , Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/pathology , Salpingectomy , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology
3.
Eur Spine J ; 30(6): 1521-1528, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33881642

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Cervical sagittal alignment is correlated with myelopathy severity and used by spinal surgeons for surgical planification. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for the evaluation of cervical myelopathy but may not be for the assessment of cervical sagittal balance compared to X-rays. The objective of this study was to assess the correlation of cervical alignment between supine MRI and standing radiographs in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). METHODS: Cobb, Jackson and Harrison methods were used to measure cervical sagittal alignment on supine MRI and standing radiographs of CSM adults. Cervical alignment was divided based on Cobb angle values on lordotic (> 4°), kyphotic (< - 4°) and rectitude (- 4° to 4°). Correlations between radiographic and MRI measurements were determined. Intra- and interobserver reliability were assessed and MRI and X-Ray-measured angles were compared. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty patients with CSM were reviewed. Correlations of cervical lordosis measures between radiographs and MRI were strong using the Cobb (0.65) and Jackson (0.63) methods, and moderate using the Harrison (0.37) method. Mean cervical lordosis angle was significantly lower on supine MRI compared to standing radiographs for all methods (Cobb 11.6 Rx vs. 9.2 MRI, Jackson 14.6 vs. 11.6, Harrison 23.5 vs. 19.9). Eighteen patients (15.4%) without lordosis on supine MRI presented lordosis on standing radiographs. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of patients has sagittal alignment discrepancies between supine MRI and standing radiographs. Therefore, standing radiographs of the cervical spine should always be included in surgical planning of CSM patients.


Subject(s)
Lordosis , Spinal Cord Diseases , Adult , Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Lordosis/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Reproducibility of Results
4.
Womens Health (Lond) ; 17: 17455065211003821, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33779417

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Human papillomavirus coverage varies widely among women depending on their race, incomes, geographical location and education level. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether reminder educative phone calls increase human papillomavirus vaccination rates in adult women aged 18-45 with high-risk factors of cervical cancer. DESIGN: We conducted a single-blind randomized controlled trial in patients who consulted at a Canadian tertiary center in October 2019 during National Cervical Cancer Awareness Week. INTERVENTIONS: We randomized women to receive three standardized educative phone calls or standard care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: We assessed the immunization rate at 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 130 patients were randomized of which 62 patients were randomized to the intervention. Eight patients (15.4%) got immunized at 6 months in the intervention group as compared to seven (11.7%) in the control group (p = 0.5645). The main barrier to vaccination reported by non-immunized patients at 6 months was the cost of vaccination (42.3%). CONCLUSION: Reminder educative phone calls did not increase human papillomavirus vaccination rates in adult women with risk factors of cervical cancer.ISRCTN registration number: ISRCTN58518971.


Subject(s)
Alphapapillomavirus , Papillomavirus Infections , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Adult , Canada , Female , Humans , Immunization , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Single-Blind Method , Telephone , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control
5.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 42(8): 948-952, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32345552

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) and the Society of Gynaecologic Oncology of Canada (GOC) recommend complete removal of the fallopian tubes as a permanent contraceptive method because of its association with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer. Currently, many women are not offered bilateral salpingectomy as an alternative to tubal ligation for permanent contraception. METHOD: As part of a quality improvement initiative, we reviewed all cases of sterilization performed at our university centre between 1 January and 31 December 2018. A literature review of the clinical and ethical considerations that prevent clinicians from offering bilateral salpingectomy as permanent contraception is also presented. RESULTS: The records of 111 women who underwent tubal sterilization were reviewed. Of these, 31.5% underwent bilateral salpingectomy; 46.8% underwent tubal fulguration; 12.6% underwent clip ligation; and 9.1% underwent tubal implant ligation (Essure). According to the information on file, only 36.3% of women were offered bilateral salpingectomy, and of these, 83.8% chose this method. CONCLUSION: Bilateral salpingectomy should be offered to all women seeking permanent contraception. The benefits and very low risks associated with this procedure should make it a first choice option.


Subject(s)
Salpingectomy , Sterilization, Reproductive , Sterilization, Tubal , Canada , Clinical Audit , Contraception , Female , Humans , Quality Improvement
6.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 42(6): 734-739, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32279989

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this study was to determine the most cost-effective communications strategy for National Cervical Cancer Awareness Week. The secondary objectives were to identify the reasons women were not screened by their primary care provider and to determine the number of abnormal cytology results obtained as a result of the awareness week screening. METHODOLOGY: As part of an evaluation of the quality of care, we reviewed the medical records of all patients who underwent cervical cancer screening at a Québec teaching hospital during National Cervical Cancer Awareness Week. RESULTS: A total of 202 women underwent screening during the national awareness week, held in October 2018. For 180 of the women, we were able to identify the communications strategies that led them to get screened and to obtain information on their follow-up care with their primary health care provider. No-cost marketing channels (including Facebook, the hospital website, and a news report and interview) led to 66 women (36.7%) participating, making these channels the most cost-effective. While 59% of the women had a family physician, 41% of them reported that their family physician did not perform pelvic exams. Abnormal cytology results were reported for 2.8% of the women. CONCLUSION: No-cost communications channels were the most effective for raising awareness. The majority of participants had a family physician. Efforts to raise awareness of cervical cancer must continue in order to increase screening rates. In addition, strategies must be put in place to improve access to Pap tests.


Subject(s)
Communication , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Quality of Health Care , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Adult , Canada , Female , Humans , Information Dissemination , Information Seeking Behavior , Middle Aged , Primary Prevention , Quebec/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology
7.
Can J Anaesth ; 66(6): 696-705, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30809776

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anemia is common in critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury, and often requires red blood cell transfusion. Studies suggest that prolonged storage causes lesions of the red blood cells, including a decreased ability to carry oxygen. Considering the susceptibility of the brain to hypoxemia, victims of traumatic brain injury may thus be more vulnerable to exposure to older red blood cells. METHODS: Our study aimed to ascertain whether the administration of fresh red blood cells (seven days or less) results in a better neurologic outcome compared with standard red blood cells in critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury requiring transfusion. The Age of Blood Evaluation in traumatic brain injury (ABLE-tbi) study was a nested study within the ABLE study (ISRCTN44878718). Our primary outcome was the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSe) at six months. RESULTS: In the ABLE study, 217 subjects suffered a traumatic brain injury: 110 in the fresh group, and 107 in the standard group. In the fresh group, 68 (73.1%) of the patients had an unfavourable neurologic outcome (GOSe ≤ 4) compared with 60 (64.5%) in the standard group (P = 0.21). Using a sliding dichotomy approach, we observed no overall effect of fresh red blood cells on neurologic outcome (odds ratio [OR], 1.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72 to 2.50; P = 0.35) but observed differences across prognostic bands with a decreased odds of unfavourable outcome in patients with the best prognosis at baseline (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.96; P = 0.04) but an increased odds in those with intermediate and worst baseline prognosis (OR, 5.88; 95% CI,1.66 to 20.81; P = 0.006; and OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 0.53 to 5.30; P = 0.38, respectively). CONCLUSION: Overall, transfusion of fresh red blood cells was not associated with a better neurologic outcome at six months in critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury. Nevertheless, we cannot exclude a differential effect according to the patient baseline prognosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ABLE study (ISRCTN44878718); registered 22 August, 2008.


Subject(s)
Anemia/therapy , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/therapy , Erythrocyte Transfusion/methods , Erythrocytes/cytology , Adult , Aged , Anemia/etiology , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/complications , Critical Illness , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
8.
Neurology ; 89(21): 2198-2209, 2017 Nov 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29070664

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively assess recurrent traumatic brain injury (rTBI) risk and risk factors in the general population. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the references of included studies until January 16, 2017, for general population observational studies reporting rTBI risk or risk factors. Estimates were not meta-analyzed due to significant methodologic heterogeneity between studies, which was evaluated using meta-regression. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies reported recurrence risk and 11 reported on 27 potential risk factors. rTBI risk was heterogeneous and varied from 0.43% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19%-0.67%) to 41.92% (95% CI 34.43%-49.40%), with varying follow-up periods (3 days-55 years). Median time to recurrence ranged from 0.5 to 3.8 years. In studies where cases were ascertained from multiple points of care, at least 5.50% (95% CI 4.80%-6.30%) of patients experienced a recurrence after a 1-year follow-up. Studies that used administrative data/self-report surveys to ascertain cases tended to report higher risk. Risk factors measured at time of index traumatic brain injury (TBI) that were significantly associated with rTBI in more than one study were male sex, prior TBI before index case, moderate or severe TBI, and alcohol intoxication. Risk factors reported in a single study that were significantly associated with rTBI were epilepsy, not seeking medical care, and multiple factors indicative of low socioeconomic status. CONCLUSIONS: rTBI is an important contributor to the general population TBI burden. Certain risk factors can help identify individuals at higher risk of these repeated injuries. However, higher quality research that improves on rTBI surveillance methodology is needed.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic/epidemiology , Humans , Recurrence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...