Rise of public e-learning opportunities in the context of COVID-19 pandemic-induced curtailment of face-to-face courses, exemplified by epidural catheterization on YouTube.

BACKGROUND: In the context of the coronavirus pandemic, countless face-to-face events as well as medical trainings were cancelled or moved to online courses, which resulted in increased digitalization in many areas. In the context of medical education, videos provide tremendous benefit for visualizing skills before they are practised. METHODS: Based on a previous investigation of video material addressing epidural catheterization available on the YouTube platform, we aimed to investigate new content produced in the context of the pandemic. Thus, a video search was conducted in May 2022. RESULTS: We identified twelve new videos since the pandemic with a significant improvement in the new content in terms of procedural items (p = 0.03) compared to the prepandemic video content. Video content released in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic was more often created by private content creators and were significantly shorter in total runtime than those from university and medical societies (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The profound changes in the learning and teaching of health care education in relation to the pandemic are largely unclear. We reveal improved procedural quality of predominantly privately uploaded content despite a shortened runtime compared to the prepandemic period. This might indicate that technical and financial hurdles to producing instructional videos by discipline experts have decreased. In addition to the teaching difficulties caused by the pandemic, this change is likely to be due to validated manuals on how to create such content. The awareness that medical education needs to be improved has grown, so platforms offer specialized sublevels for high-quality medical videos.

Influence of using simulated or real patients on undergraduate medical students acquiring competencies in medical conversations in surgery: A prospective, controlled study.

Background: Communication with patients and their relatives as well as with colleagues and students is an essential part of every physician's daily work. An established method for teaching communication skills is using simulated patients (SPs). However, teaching with SPs is often subjectively perceived by medical students as less instructive than teaching with real patients (RPs). Studies that analyze the influence of SPs compared to RPs for acquiring competencies are lacking. The aim of the present study was therefore to investigate the impact of SPs on long-term learning success for communication skills compared to RPs. Material and Methods: Study participants were undergraduate third-year medical students who attended a communication unit and were randomized into three groups. The first group trained the role-play part with a SP (SP-group). The second group trained with a SP but thought that the patient was a RP because the students and the tutors were told that they were a RP by the principal investigator (incognito patient group [IP-group]). The third group and their tutors trained with a RP and were told that the patient was a RP (real patient group [RP-group]). Five to 12 weeks after completing the training, the study participants completed a curricular summative objective standardized clinical examination. Results: There were 146 students who participated in the study. There were no significant differences between the three study groups at the informed consent stations and for those conducting anamnesis interviews. Conclusion: Communication skills training with SPs appears to be equivalent to training with RPs in terms of competency development in communication-based assessments in surgery. Therefore, SPs should be used in these curricula, especially at an early stage, to enable the students to practice adequate communication skills.

Epidural Catheterization in Obstetrics: A Checklist-Based Video Assessment of Free Available Video Material.

Epidural catheterization has become an indispensable part of modern pain therapy, for example, in obstetrics. Learning how to master this skill is an important competency. Videos are among the information sources with the highest information content for learning such skills. The present study aims to analyze videos regarding epidural catheter placement provided on the YouTube platform based on a validated checklist. An expert workshop selected crucial items for learning epidural catheterization in obstetrics. Items were identified and optimized in a five-step testing process. Using this checklist, videos from YouTube were evaluated by eleven health care professionals. Sixteen videos were identified and analyzed. Concerning the catheterization-specific part of the checklist, only two videos showed satisfactory quality. In the didactic part, eleven out of 21 items reached a mean score >50% of the points. Regarding interrater reliability, the catheterization-specific checklist was shown to be substantial (Fleiss' kappa = 0.610), and the didactic part was shown to be fair (Fleiss' kappa = 0.401). Overall, standard monitoring and appropriate aseptic technique were followed in only 42% and 49% for the procedure. There was a significant correlation between the runtime and the content quality (p < 0.001). No correlation could be found in terms of platform rating parameters. The video quality varied highly in terms of the requirements of this practical skill. The majority appear unsuitable for self-study due to serious errors and deficiencies regarding patient safety. However, there is no quality control on free platforms. Accordingly, it is difficult to identify suitable videos for educational purposes.

Manikins versus simulated patients in emergency medicine training: a comparative analysis.

PURPOSE: Every physician must be able to sufficiently master medical emergencies, especially in medical areas where emergencies occur frequently such as in the emergency room or emergency surgery. This contrasts with the observation that medical students and young residents often feel insufficiently prepared to handle medical emergencies. It is therefore necessary to train them in the treatment of emergency patients. The aim of this study is to analyze the influence of the assignment of manikin versus simulated patients during a training for undergraduate medical students on learning outcomes and the perceived realism. METHODS: The study had a prospective cross-over design and took place in a 3-day emergency medicine training for undergraduate medical students. Students completed three teaching units ('chest pain', 'impaired consciousness', 'dyspnea'), either with manikin or simulated patient. Using a questionnaire after each unit, overall impression, didactics, content, the quality of practical exercises, and the learning success were evaluated. The gained competences were measured in a 6-station objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) at the end of training. RESULTS: 126 students participated. Students rated simulated patients as significantly more realistic than manikins regarding the possibility to carry out examination techniques and taking medical history. 54.92% of the students would prefer to train with simulated patients in the future. Regarding the gained competences for 'chest pain' and 'impaired consciousness', students who trained with a manikin scored less in the OSCE station than the simulated patients-group. CONCLUSION: Simulated patients are rated more realistic than manikins and seem to be superior to manikins regarding gained competence.

Evidence-Based Examination Techniques for the Shoulder Joint. / Evidenzbasiertes Lehrvideo für Untersuchungstechniken am Schultergelenk.

OBJECTIVE: Digitalisation now almost covers all areas of medical student teaching. Teaching videos are a good way to help students learn practical skills. The existing evidence is a recognised aid for the classification of the respective technology. METHOD: This video presents the usual examination techniques of the shoulder joint on a patient with an unstable shoulder. The respective techniques, if available, were backed up with appropriate evidence. CONCLUSION: The examination techniques presented allow students to view them in a standardized manner on a patient. The evidence for the examination techniques can help with the classification of the respective technique.

Evidence-Based Examination Techniques for the Knee. / Evidenzbasiertes Lehrvideo für Untersuchungstechniken am Kniegelenk.

OBJECTIVE: Digitalisation now almost covers all areas of medical student teaching. Teaching videos are a good way to help students learn practical skills. The existing evidence is a recognised aid for the classification of the respective technology. METHOD: This video presents the usual examination techniques of the knee joint on a patient with an unstable knee. The respective techniques, if available, were backed up with the appropriate evidence. CONCLUSION: The examination techniques presented allow students to view the examination techniques in a standardised manner on a patient. The evidence for the examination techniques can help with the classification of the respective technique. ZIELSETZUNG: Die Digitalisierung erfasst inzwischen alle Bereiche der studentischen Lehre. Um die Studierenden im Erlernen praktischer Fertigkeiten zu unterstützen, sind Lehrvideos eine gute Methode. Für die Einordnung der jeweiligen Technik ist die vorhandene Evidenz eine anerkannte Hilfestellung. METHODE: Das hier vorliegende Video stellt die üblichen Untersuchungstechniken des Kniegelenkes an einer Patientin mit einem instabilen Knie dar. Die jeweiligen Techniken wurden, wenn vorhanden, mit der jeweiligen Evidenz unterlegt. SCHLUSSFOLGERUNG: Die dargestellten Untersuchungstechniken ermöglichen es Studierenden, sich die Untersuchungstechniken standardisiert an einem Patienten anzuschauen. Die eingeblendete Evidenz für die Untersuchungstechniken kann hierbei eine Hilfestellung bei der Einordnung der jeweiligen Technik leisten.

Checklist Focused on Patients for Making of Teaching Videos in Orthopedic Surgery. / Patientenorientierte Checkliste für die Erstellung von Lehrvideos für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie.

INTRODUCTION: The focus of medical-didactic research is the improvement of clinical-practical training. One way to support practical skills training in a time- and resource-saving way is to provide instructional videos. Often the freely available instructional videos do not meet didactic or content requirements. Creating your own videos can therefore be a useful alternative for teachers. There are a variety of instructions on the Internet for shooting instruction videos. To date, this does not include any concrete instructions/assistance for the production of medical instructional videos. However, the presentation of medical learning content in particular can contain many hurdles. The aim of this work was to design a checklist for the creation of instructional videos, which can be used as a guide. METHODS: As a first step, a systematic literature search was carried out to identify works that deal with the creation and not the use of medical instructional videos. To date, corresponding publications do not exist. In a workshop, the participants, who already gained experience in creating this type of video, exchanged ideas. These were critically discussed and analyzed. As a result, a checklist was created. In a subsequent multi-step review process, the checklist was reviewed with regard to applicability, comprehensibility, completeness and quality of the items. RESULTS: Four phases in the creation of an instructional video could be differentiated: preliminary reflections, preparation, day of filming, post-production. The checklist is structured accordingly and should be actively processed phase by phase. The checklist is created in such a way that it can be used and edited without reading this text. Particular focus is placed on the patient and his needs. CONCLUSION: The checklist created provides useful help in the creation of medical instructional videos and can for the first time serve as a guide especially for orthopedic and accident surgical instructional videos.

"Quod licet Chefarzt  ": The Impact of Perceived Hierarchy on Working Atmosphere and Quality of Work in Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. Results of a Survey Among 799 Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgeons in Germany. / "Quod licet Chefarzt  ": Der Einfluss der empfundenen Hierarchie auf Arbeitsklima und Arbeitsqualität in O und U. Ergebnisse einer Umfrage unter 799 Orthopäden und Unfallchirurgen in Deutschland.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical departments are discredited as guardians of traditional structures of hierarchy. Hierarchy and working climate have a large share in human factor, being made responsible for 70% of avoidable errors in medicine. Aim of this study was the assessment of these topics amongst physicians in the field of orthopedics and traumatology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A questionnaire of 10 questions was digitally handed to DGOU members. 799 questionnaires were answered. RESULTS: We found significant differences in the assessment of hierarchy and working atmosphere amongst the physician groups. Working atmosphere was perceived as not appreciative by registrars only. All groups were in favor of a hierarchy rather close to, but nut absolutely on equal terms. All groups attach high influence of working atmosphere on quality of daily work. DISCUSSION: Literature shows that hierarchic differentiation can increase performance of a team, while rigid hierarchy structures can lead to mistakes. Although hierarchy in orthopedics and traumatology seems to be less pronounced than assumed, hierarchy has great influence on daily work. CONCLUSION: In order to achieve a safety oriented medical environment, it will be of great importance to define hierarchy structures in clinics and to utilize them efficiently as a part of safety culture.

Surgeons' participation in the development of collaboration and management competencies in undergraduate medical education.

The teaching of professional roles in medical education is an interdisciplinary concern. However, surgeons require specific standards of professionalism for certain context-based situations. In addition to communication, studies require collaboration, leadership, error-/conflict-management, patient-safety and decision-making as essential competencies for surgeons. Standards for corresponding competencies are defined in special chapters of the German National Competency-based Learning Objectives for Undergraduate Medical Education (NKLM; chapter 8, 10). The current study asks whether these chapters are adequately taught in surgical curricula. Eight German faculties contributed to analysing mapping data considering surgical courses of undergraduate programs. All faculties used the MERlin mapping platform and agreed on procedures for data collection and processing. Sub-competency and objective coverage, as well as the achievement of the competency level were mapped. Overall counts of explicit citations were used for analysis. Collaboration within the medical team is a strongly represented topic. In contrast, interprofessional cooperation, particularly in healthcare sector issues is less represented. Patient safety and dealing with errors and complications is most emphasized for the Manager/Leader, while time management, career planning and leadership are not addressed. Overall, the involvement of surgery in teaching the competencies of the Collaborator and Manager/Leader is currently low. However, there are indications of a curricular development towards explicit teaching of these roles in surgery. Moreover, implicitly taught roles are numerous, which indicates a beginning awareness of professional roles.

Comparing video-based versions of Halsted's 'see one, do one' and Peyton's '4-step approach' for teaching surgical skills: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Teaching complex motor skills at a high level remains a challenge in medical education. Established methods often involve large amounts of teaching time and material. The implementation of standardized videos in those methods might help save resources. In this study, video-based versions of Peyton's '4-step Approach' and Halsted's 'See One, Do One' are compared. We hypothesized that the video-based '4-step Approach' would be more effective in learning procedural skills than the 'See One, Do One Approach'. METHODS: One-hundred-two naïve students were trained to perform a structured facial examination and a Bellocq's tamponade with either Halsted's (n = 57) or Peyton's (n = 45) method within a curricular course. Steps 1 (Halsted) and 1-3 (Peyton) were replaced by standardized teaching videos. The performance was measured directly (T1) and 8 weeks (T2) after the intervention by blinded examiners using structured checklists. An item-analysis was also carried out. RESULTS: At T1, performance scores significantly differed in favor of the video-based '4-step Approach' (p < 0.01) for both skills. No differences were found at T2 (p < 0.362). The item-analysis revealed that Peyton's method was significantly more effective in the complex subparts of both skills. CONCLUSIONS: The modified video-based version of Peyton's '4-step Approach' is the preferred method for teaching especially complex motor skills in a large curricular scale. Furthermore, an effective way to utilize Peyton's method in a group setting could be demonstrated. Further studies have to investigate the long-term learning retention of this method in a formative setting.

Influence of the Instructional Approach "Mastery Learning" versus "See One, Do One" on Acquiring Competencies in Abdomen Sonography: A Comparative Effectiveness Analysis.

Ultrasound is an important diagnostic tool in patients with abdominal pain and after injury. However, it is highly dependent on the skills and training of the examiner. Thus, ultrasound competencies should be acquired early during medical education. The instructional approach affects the retention and performance of skills. A promising approach is "mastery learning." The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of "mastery learning" compared with the "see one, do one" approach by performing a focused assessment of sonography for trauma (FAST) in undergraduate medical students based using an academic assessment tool (Objective Structured Clinical Examination [OSCE]). In a prospective controlled trial, 146 participants were randomly allocated to two groups (see one, do one and mastery learning) and trained in a 90-min module. In the see one, do one group, the trainer demonstrated the complete FAST routine, and then the students trained each other on it under supervision and received direct oral feedback from the tutors. In the mastery learning group, each student received a routing slip. The routing slip contained five levels of competence for the FAST routine, each of which had to be achieved (e.g., choosing the correct probe) and verified by the trainer before working toward the next competency level. The acquired competencies were assessed after training using the OSCE, which is a standardized practical exam using checklists. The mastery learning group attained 40.69 ± 5.6 points on average (of a maximum of 46 points), and the see one, do one group, 33.85 ± 7.7 points (p < 0.001). Mastery learning is an effective teaching method for undergraduate medical students performing FAST and is superior to the see one, do one approach, as assessed with the OSCE.

Impact of the teaching method of the rub-in technique for learning hygienic hand disinfection in medical studies: a comparative effectiveness analysis of two techniques.

Objective: Hygienic hand disinfection is of major importance regarding nosocomial infections and antibiotic resistance. The six-step technique is the most commonly taught method, but its superiority has not been empirically demonstrated. This study compares two hand disinfection techniques with regard to their total distribution of the disinfectant. Methods: In this comparative effectiveness analysis, medical students were randomized into two groups. Group 1 was instructed in the 6-step technique, group 2 was referred to a self-responsible application. Learning success was measured using fluorescent disinfectant and black light photographs at three time points (directly, few days later, 5-12 weeks later). Photographs were evaluated quantitatively. Results: 198 students were included in the study (Group 1: 6-step technique; n=103, Group 2: self-responsible disinfection; n=95). 186 were followed up at the second measurement, 182 at the third measurement. Directly after training, there were no significant differences between the two groups. At the second measurement, Group 2 outperformed Group 1 for total, dorsal, and palmar areas (p<0.001, p=0.002, p<0.001). At the third measurement, Group 2 was significantly better (p=0.019) for palmar-sided hands. In Group 1, areas of disinfected skin deteriorated significantly between measurement 1 and 2 (p=0.019) and measurement 2 and 3 (p<0.001). Group 2 did not deteriorate between measurement 1 and 2 (p=0.269) but between measurement 2 and 3 (p<0.001). Conclusions: Compared to the established six-step technique, a self-responsible application method results in measurably better distribution of the hand disinfectant.

The acceptance of CIRS among orthopedic and trauma surgeons in Germany-Significant gap between positive perception and actual implementation in daily routine.

PURPOSE: Medical errors are the third leading cause of death in the United States after malignant tumors and cardiovascular disease. Handling of errors becomes more and more eclectic due to the implementation of incident reporting systems and the use of checklists. Since 2015, any German hospital would have a critical incident reporting system (CIRS). The aim of this study is to discover the nationwide utilization and attitude toward CIRS of orthopedic and trauma surgeons. METHODS: Between April 10, 2015 and May 22, 2015, a web-based questionnaire, which was designed by an expert team consisting of orthopedic and trauma surgeons, aeronautic human factors specialists, and psychologists (Lufthansa Aviation Training), was sent to all members of the German Society for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery. The survey consisted of three questions regarding CIRS and its use in German hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 669 orthopedic and trauma surgeons working in German hospitals completed the questionnaire. All participants rated CIRS as useful, although 71.3% of participants did not report a critical incident in the last 12 months. In that time period, only 13.4% of participating residents reported at least one incident, but 44.7% of chief physicians reported one incident within the same period. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates that even though CIRS as a tool is positively appreciated by orthopedic and trauma surgeons working in German hospitals, many do not know about its existence at their own hospital. This can be a reason for the low number of critical incidents reported.

The Use of Teaching Associates for Knee and Shoulder Examination: A Comparative Effectiveness Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Musculoskeletal diseases and injuries are the most common cause of long-term pain and physical disability. Thus, every medical graduate should be able to perform a structured examination of the musculoskeletal system. Besides the see-one-do-one principle, other teaching methods have been proposed to be effective. The use of teaching associates offers an established, proven pathway for teaching examination skills in urology and gynecology. During the patient experience method, students are examined first, thus giving them an opportunity to feel the examination before performing it themselves. The objective of this study was to compare the efficiency of 3 distinct teaching methods for both knee and shoulder examination. DESIGN: The study took place during obligatory knee and shoulder examination training. Participants received basic training, including a demonstration of the structured examination by a specialist in trauma surgery. Afterward, group 1 examined each other under professional supervision; group 2 students examined the teaching associates, followed by mutual examinations; and group 3 students were each examined by the instructor, followed by mutual examinations. The acquired competence was assessed in 5-minute practical assessments directly after training and again 5 weeks later. SETTING: The study was conducted at the medical faculty of Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany. PARTICIPANTS: Study participants were third-year undergraduate medical students completing their obligatory 3-week surgical training. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-four students [group 1 (N = 53), group 2 (N = 46), and group 3 (N = 45)] participated in the first measurement, 92 students in the second measurement of the study. Directly after the training, group 2 and group 3 performed significantly better than group 1 regarding overall score (p < 0.001) and all 4 checklist parts (p < 0.001). At the second measurement, group 2 performed significantly better than group 1 regarding shoulder examination (p = 0.003) and significantly better than group 3 (p = 0.025) regarding knee examination. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a teaching associate and the patient perspective can increase students' performance in knee and shoulder examinations.

Do they teach what they need to? An analysis of the impact of curriculum mapping on the learning objectives taught in a lecture series in surgery.

Introduction: Curriculum mapping shows concordances and differences between the intended and the taught curriculum. To our knowledge, no previous studies describe the effects that this mapping has on the curriculum. The aim of the present study is to map the content of a lecture series in surgery to the National Catalogue of Learning Objectives in Surgery and analyze the effects this mapping has on the content of the following lecture series. Methods: All lecturers in the lecture series were directly observed by a minimum of two reviewers and learning objectives and the level of competence were documented. After the lecture series, the results were visualized within the catalog of learning objectives and were sent to the lecturers. In the following lecture series, learning objectives were documented correspondingly. Results: In the first lecture series, 47% of the learning objectives were taught. After the mapping, the number of learning objectives that were taught increased to 59% (p < 0.001). The increase was found in all surgical disciplines and in all levels of competences without any changes in the average duration of the lectures. Conclusions: The presented method for mapping a curriculum effectively increased the number of taught learning objectives without requiring longer lecture durations.

The Influence of the Instructional Approach on Acquiring Clinical Skills in Surgery: A Comparative Effectiveness Study.

OBJECTIVE: The instructional approach used to teach skills and competencies seems to have a critical impact on retaining and performing the learned skills/competencies. However, for most of them, the effect of different instructional approaches as well as evidence for appropriate approaches is unknown. The aim of the present study was to analyze and compare the impact of different instructional approaches in the acquisition of basic skills during undergraduate surgical training. DESIGN: Randomized controlled cohort study. For the intervention, four instructional approaches ('See one - Do one', 'Video 4-Step Approach', 'Mental Group Mapping', and 'Control') were compared in six basic skills. Students completed a six-station OSCE (one for each skill) during their skills lab training week after the intervention. SETTING: This study was conducted at the medical faculty of the Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany. PARTICIPANTS: Medical students in their fourth year completing their four week of obligatory surgical training. RESULTS: A total of 151 students were included. The group 'Mental Group Mapping' scored significantly higher in comparison to 'See one - Do one' in four of the six skills and 'Control' in five skills. The group 'Video 4-Step Approach' scored significantly higher in comparison to 'See one - Do one' (three skills) in comparison to 'Control' (two skills). There were no significant differences between the approaches 'Mental Group Mapping' and 'Video 4-Step Approach' as well as between the approaches 'See one - Do one' and 'Control'. CONCLUSION: Activating instructional approaches such as the '4-Step Approach' and 'Mental Group Mapping' have a significant impact on performing the learned skills and competencies.

Effects and Consequences of Being an OSCE Examiner in Surgery-A Qualitative Study.

OBJECTIVE: Even though objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is a well-investigated format for competency-based practical examination, only a few studies have explored the motivations of OSCE examiners and their opinions, both positive and negative, toward being an examiner. The aim of this study was to gain insights into the views of OSCE examiners using semi-structured interviews. DESIGN: Surgical OSCE examiners were queried at two medical faculties in Germany via semi-structured interviews. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using the techniques of structured qualitative content analysis. SETTING: This study was conducted at the medical faculties of the Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany and of the Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany. PARTICIPANTS: All of the study participants were surgeons working at the university hospital of one of the faculties. RESULTS: A total of 29 examiners were queried until a saturation of content was achieved. A critical reflection of one's own teaching was described as a major benefit by most participants. Furthermore, they noted that the standards and competences examined during the OSCE boosted the detail of their teaching sessions in the wards. However, the examiners criticized missed operations due the examination and were not appreciated by superiors for being an examiner. Most of the examiners (22/29) preferred to be an examiner themselves rather than appointing student peer examiners. If they had appointed someone else, that would mean they would miss valuable experiences useful for their own teaching. CONCLUSIONS: Being an OSCE examiner confers several advantages, notably the reflection of one's own teaching, which was described as highly valuable by the examiners.

[A Nationwide Survey of Undergraduate Training in Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery]. / Statuserhebung der studentischen Lehre in Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie.

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal conditions are the most frequent cause of long-term pain and disability. Scientifically funded, structured training would be highly desirable for all medical students and of great economic relevance for the health care system. The present article portrays the status quo of undergraduate training in orthopaedics and trauma surgery, with a comparison to the status quo of 2008. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A 51-item questionnaire was sent to all heads of the departments of orthopaedics or trauma surgery at the 37 medical faculties in Germany. RESULTS: A return rate of 81.1% from orthopaedics and 73% from trauma surgery was attained. The organisation of undergraduate training in orthopaedics and trauma surgery is completely separated in 34.4% of hospitals. The corresponding figure in 2008 was 64%. The amount of training in lectures and practical training rarely changed during this period. CONCLUSION: Even closer collaboration between lecturers in orthopaedics and trauma surgery would be desirable. This would reflect the importance of the disciplines, as well as politico-economic relevance of musculoskeletal injuries and diseases, and would encourage the sharing of resources.

Young surgeons' challenges at the start of their clinical residency: a semi-qualitative study.

INTRODUCTION: According to German regulations on licensing to practice medicine, the aim of undergraduate medical training is to produce a scientifically and practically trained physician who is able to work independently. More precisely, medical training has to impart the required knowledge and skills in diagnostics, therapy, health promotion, prevention, and rehabilitation. From the young residents' point of view, this aim is not achieved, and they do not feel prepared to be a doctor. However, the literature on this subject relies mostly on data based on surveys, and there is a lack of deep analysis of the specific details of the topic. The aim of this study was to analyze in depth how junior doctors in their first and second years felt about their preparation for clinical practice as a doctor from their undergraduate training, as well as which teaching formats and factors influence their preparedness. METHODS: This semi-qualitative study is based on recorded interviews conducted using a structured interview manual. This serves to limit the subject matter of the interview and to target the topics. The study participants were 35 residents of general and visceral surgery, trauma surgery, and urology in their first and second years of medical specialty training. The number of participants was defined by the concept of saturation of the content. Basic data regarding age and the location and length of study were collected using a questionnaire. The audio recordings were transcribed word by word and analyzed with structured qualitative content analysis techniques. RESULTS: Only 43% (n=15) of the 35 participating residents stated they were sufficiently prepared to be a doctor from undergraduate medical training, and 22.9% stated that they were not prepared for their work as a resident (8/35). However, 34.3% of the residents stated that undergraduate medical training did prepare them for some of the parts they were expected to master in daily clinical practice, but not other parts. Most of the participants described their first weeks as doctors as particularly stressful and exhausting. As major hurdles during their daily clinical work, participants described knowledge gaps regarding organizational and administrative pathways (71%), deficits in linking knowledge to clinical reasoning (71%), decision making (54%), and therapy planning (51%). Most participants stated that the practical placements during the semester, the clinical clerkships, and the last year internship were most effective as preparation for clinical residency. To be better prepared for clinical practice, participants suggested providing a clearer structure and that the course subjects bear better relations to each other. Nearly all participants proposed increasing patient encounters directly from the beginning of medical training as a longitudinal approach. DISCUSSION: Even though we were able to demonstrate an increase in residents' preparedness, 57% of the study participants still felt unprepared for their job to some extent. One might argue that starting a new profession will always result in a feeling of being unprepared to some extent. However, this unpreparedness can increase the risk for patients' well being due to medical errors, which actually represents the third leading cause of death in the US after malignant tumors and cardiovascular diseases. Structured on-the-job adjustment, structured qualification training, and guided professional training are becoming increasingly important for future doctors as selection criteria for career choice and choice of employer. Thus, the surgical disciplines that are struggling with new young residents have to improve their concepts.

Examiner effect on the objective structured clinical exam - a study at five medical schools.

BACKGROUND: The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is increasingly used at medical schools to assess practical competencies. To compare the outcomes of students at different medical schools, we introduced standardized OSCE stations with identical checklists. METHODS: We investigated examiner bias at standardized OSCE stations for knee- and shoulder-joint examinations, which were implemented into the surgical OSCE at five different medical schools. The checklists for the assessment consisted of part A for knowledge and performance of the skill and part B for communication and interaction with the patient. At each medical faculty, one reference examiner also scored independently to the local examiner. The scores from both examiners were compared and analysed for inter-rater reliability and correlation with the level of clinical experience. Possible gender bias was also evaluated. RESULTS: In part A of the checklist, local examiners graded students higher compared to the reference examiner; in part B of the checklist, there was no trend to the findings. The inter-rater reliability was weak, and the scoring correlated only weakly with the examiner's level of experience. Female examiners rated generally higher, but male examiners scored significantly higher if the examinee was female. CONCLUSIONS: These findings of examiner effects, even in standardized situations, may influence outcome even when students perform equally well. Examiners need to be made aware of these biases prior to examining.