[Advances in the targeted treatment of non-small cell lung cancer]. / Fortschritte in der zielgerichteten Behandlung des nicht-kleinzelligen Lungenkarzinoms.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) paradigmatically shows the potential of personalized and therefore precise cancer treatment. For around one third of the patients, predominantly suffering from adenocarcinoma, targetable driver mutations could be characterized in the meantime. Targeted therapies, mostly with kinase inhibitors, achieve impressive advances in the prolongation of overall survival often over many years and excellent quality of life in patients with advanced NSCLC. Targeted treatment is also increasingly evaluated as adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment in early inoperable stages of NSCLC. An absolute prerequisite for the use of personalized treatment is upfront broad molecular diagnostics before the decision on first line treatment. The limitations of personalized treatment are the so far unavoidable development of resistance mutations and increasing clonal heterogeneity during the course of the treatment. Approaches to further improve treatment results comprise the development of next-generation inhibitors, the combination of targeted substances, also with chemotherapy and the use of new immunoconjugates.

MET Fusions in NSCLC: Clinicopathologic Features and Response to MET Inhibition.

INTRODUCTION: MET fusions have been described only rarely in NSCLC. Thus, data on patient characteristics and treatment response are limited. We here report histopathologic data, patient demographics, and treatment outcome including response to MET tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in MET fusion-positive NSCLC. METHODS: Patients with NSCLC and MET fusions were identified mostly by RNA sequencing within the routine molecular screening program of the national Network Genomic Medicine, Germany. RESULTS: We describe a cohort of nine patients harboring MET fusions. Among these nine patients, two patients had been reported earlier. The overall frequency was 0.29% (95% confidence interval: 0.15-0.55). The tumors were exclusively adenocarcinoma. The cohort was heterogeneous in terms of age, sex, or smoking status. We saw five different fusion partner genes (KIF5B, TRIM4, ST7, PRKAR2B, and CAPZA2) and several different breakpoints. Four patients were treated with a MET TKI leading to two partial responses, one stable disease, and one progressive disease. One patient had a BRAF V600E mutation as acquired resistance mechanism. CONCLUSIONS: MET fusions are very rare oncogenic driver events in NSCLC and predominantly seem in adenocarcinomas. They are heterogeneous in terms of fusion partners and breakpoints. Patients with MET fusion can benefit from MET TKI therapy.

Clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics of small-scale ROS1-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

BACKGROUND: ROS1 fusions are well treatable aberrations in NSCLC. Besides solvent-front mutations (SFM) in resistance to targeted therapy, small-scale ROS1 mutations are largely unknown. We exploratively analyzed the clinical and molecular characteristics of small-scale ROS1 mutations in NSCLC patients without activating ROS1 fusions or SFMs. METHODS: Next-generation sequencing was performed on tissue samples from NSCLC patients within the Network Genomic Medicine. Patients with ROS1 fusions and SFMs were excluded. We analyzed clinical characteristics of patients harboring small-scale ROS1-mutations, ROS1- and co-occurring mutations, and their response to systemic therapy. RESULTS: Of 10,396 patients analyzed, 101 (1.0%) patients harbored small-scale ROS1 mutations. Most patients were male (73.3%) and smokers (96.6%). Nearly half of the patients presented with squamous-cell carcinoma (SqCC, 40.4%). Most mutations were transversions (50.5%), and 66% were in the kinase domain. Besides TP53 mutations (65.3%), KRAS (22.8%), EGFR (5.9%), PIK3CA (9.9%) and FGFR1-4 mutations (8.9%) co-occurred. In 10 (9.9%) patients, ROS1 mutation was the only aberration detected. Median overall survival (mOS) differed significantly in patients with or without KRAS co-mutations (9.7 vs 21.5 months, p = 0.02) and in patients treated with or without immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB) during treatment (21.5 vs 4.4 months, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The cohort's clinical characteristics contrasted ROS1-fused cohorts. Co-occurrence of KRAS mutations led to shortened survival and patients benefited from ICB. Our data does not support the idea of ROS1 small-scale mutations as strong oncogenic drivers in NSCLC, but rather as relevant bystanders altering the efficacy of treatment approaches.

Genetic Heterogeneity of MET-Aberrant NSCLC and Its Impact on the Outcome of Immunotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Robust data on the outcome of MET-aberrant NSCLC with nontargeted therapies are limited, especially in consideration of the heterogeneity of MET-amplified tumors (METamp). METHODS: A total of 337 tumor specimens of patients with MET-altered Union for International Cancer Control stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were analyzed using next-generation sequencing, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and immunohistochemistry. The evaluation focused on the type of MET aberration, co-occurring mutations, programmed death-ligand 1 expression, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: METamp tumors (n = 278) had a high frequency of co-occurring mutations (>80% for all amplification levels), whereas 57.6% of the 59 patients with MET gene and exon 14 (METex14) tumors had no additional mutations. In the METamp tumors, with increasing gene copy number (GCN), the frequency of inactivating TP53 mutations increased (GCN < 4: 58.2%; GCN ≥ 10: 76.5%), whereas the frequency of KRAS mutations decreased (GCN < 4: 43.2%; GCN ≥ 10: 11.8%). A total of 10.1% of all the METamp tumors with a GCN ≥ 10 had a significant worse OS (4.0 mo; 95% CI: 1.9-6.0) compared with the tumors with GCN < 10 (12.0 mo; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.4-14.6). In the METamp NSCLC, OS with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy was significantly better compared with chemotherapy with 19.0 months (95% CI: 15.8-22.2) versus 8.0 months (95% CI: 5.8-10.2, p < 0.0001). No significant difference in median OS was found between ICI therapy and chemotherapy in the patients with METex14 (p = 0.147). CONCLUSIONS: METex14, METamp GCN ≥ 10, and METamp GCN < 10 represent the subgroups of MET-dysregulated NSCLC with distinct molecular and clinical features. The patients with METex14 do not seem to benefit from immunotherapy in contrast to the patients with METamp, which is of particular relevance for the prognostically poor METamp GCN ≥ 10 subgroup.