Surgical management of acute subdural hematoma: a comparison between decompressive craniectomy and craniotomy on patients treated from 2010 to the present in a single center.

BACKGROUND: Acute subdural hematoma represents an important cause of disability and mortality. Its surgical treatment takes advantage of two surgical procedures: craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy, nevertheless the effectiveness of one procedure rather than the other is still debated. This study was conducted to identify which of the surgical procedures could provide better neurological outcome after traumatic acute subdural hematoma; as a secondary endpoint, the study tries to settle preoperative prognostic factors useful to identify the most appropriate surgical technique for every specific patient and kind of trauma. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who underwent craniotomy or decompressive craniectomy between January 2010 and July 2017 at the Department of Neurosurgery of Umberto I Hospital in Rome. Ninety-four patients were selected and reviewing clinical records, preoperative and postoperative's data were collected (e.g., GCS, mechanism of trauma, CT findings, mortality rate, neurological outcome at discharge, mRS at 12 months). Data were analyzed using χ2 test and the F test. The multivariate analysis was performed using a stepwise logistic regression. The analysis was carried out using SPSS software and a P value ≤0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: In 94 patients, 46.8% underwent decompressive craniectomy and 53.2% underwent craniotomy. The mortality rate was (53.2%); it was shown to be related to a GCS<8 (P=0.033) and to age >60 years old (P=0.0001). Decompressive craniectomy was performed most frequently for high energy trauma (P=0.006); the mean GCS at admission was 7.91 for decompressive craniectomy and 9.64 for craniotomy (P=0.05). Patients who underwent decompressive craniectomy and survived surgery showed a better neurological outcome compared to those who underwent craniotomy (P=0.009). The evaluation of mRS after 12 months did not show a statistically significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In case of high energy trauma and GCS≤8 different neurosurgeons decided to perform most frequently decompressive craniectomy rather than craniotomy. Furthermore, even if not related to survival rate, decompressive craniectomy showed a better neurological outcome especially in patients with GCS≤8 at admission. In conclusion, even if prospective studies are required, these results depict the current attitude about the choice between craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy.

Proposal of Standardization of Closure Techniques After Endoscopic Pituitary and Skull Base Surgery Based on Postoperative Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak Risk Classification.

Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak still represents the main limitation of endonasal endoscopic surgery. The aim of the study is to classify the risk of postoperative leak and to propose a decision-making protocol to be applied in the preoperative phase based on radiological data and on intraoperative findings to obtain the best closure.One hundred fifty-two patients were treated in our institution; these patients were divided into 2 groups because from January 2013 the closure technique was standardized adopting a preoperative decision-making protocol. The Postoperative CSF leak Risk Classification (PCRC) was estimated taking into account the size of the lesion, the extent of the osteodural defect, and the presence of intraoperative CSF leak (iCSF-L). The closure techniques were classified into 3 types according to PCRC estimation (A, B, and C).The incidence of the use of a nasoseptal flap is significantly increased in the second group 80.3% versus 19.8% of the first group and the difference was statistically significant P < 0.0001. The incidence of postoperative CSF leak (pCSF-L) in the first group was 9.3%. The incidence of postoperative pCSF-L in the second group was 1.5%. An analysis of the pCSF-L rate in the 2 groups showed a statistically significant difference P = 0.04.The type of closure programmed was effective in almost all patients, allowing to avoid the possibility of a CSF leak. Our protocol showed a significant total reduction in the incidence of CSF leak, but especially in that subgroup of patients where a leak is usually unexpected.

A Survey on Pituitary Surgery in Italy.

BACKGROUND: Pituitary tumors are a heterogeneous group of lesions that are usually benign. Therefore, a proper understanding of the anatomy, physiology, and pathology is mandatory to achieve favorable outcomes. Accordingly, diagnostic tests and treatment guidelines should be determined and implemented. Thus, we decided to perform a multicenter study among Italian neurosurgical centers performing pituitary surgery to provide an actual depiction from the neurosurgical standpoint. METHODS: On behalf of the SINch (Società Italiana di Neurochirurgia), a survey was undertaken with the participants to explore the activities in the field of pituitary surgery within 41 public institutions. RESULTS: Of the 41 centers, 37 participated in the present study. The total number of neurosurgical procedures performed in 2016 was 1479. Most of the procedures were performed using the transsphenoidal approach (1320 transsphenoidal [1204 endoscopic, 53 microscopic, 53 endoscope-assisted microscopic] vs. 159 transcranial). A multidisciplinary tumor board is convened regularly in 32 of 37 centers, and a research laboratory is present in 18 centers. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosing pituitary/hypothalamus disorders and treating them is the result of teamwork, composed of several diverse experts. Regarding neurosurgery, our findings have confirmed the central role of the transsphenoidal approach, with preference toward the endoscopic technique. Better outcomes can be expected at centers with a multidisciplinary team and a full, or part of a, residency program, with a greater surgical caseload.

Giant Cell Ependymoma of Cervicomedullary Junction: A Case Report of a Long-Term Survivor and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Ependymoma accounts for 3%-9% of all neuroepithelial tumors. Giant cell ependymoma (GCE) is a rare and distinct variant, with only 22 cases described in the literature. The 2007 World Health Organization classification first acknowledged this rare subtype. The cytologic features of GCE include the presence of pleomorphic giant cells with several cellular atypias, which at intraoperative frozen diagnosis may appear to be high-grade glial lesions. Despite its apparently malignant histology, GCE seems to be a neoplasm with a relatively good prognosis. Extended tumor removal is the gold standard without adjuvant treatment. CASE DESCRIPTION: We describe the first case, to our knowledge, of GCE situated at the cervicomedullary junction in a 62-year-old patient. Surgery was performed with combined intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials. Intraoperative frozen diagnosis revealed a high-grade glial neoplasm; however, gross total resection was achieved. The definitive diagnosis was GCE. At follow-up evaluation 11 years after surgery, the patient did not present with any tumor recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: As the intraoperative diagnosis can be misleading, whenever a cleavage plane is recognized, it is essential to perform a gross total resection with the aid of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring, to improve prognosis and neurologic outcome. Data reported in the literature show that prognosis is mainly influenced by grade of resection.

True Petroclival Meningiomas: Proposal of Classification and Role of the Combined Supra-Infratentorial Presigmoid Retrolabyrinthine Approach.

BACKGROUND: The evolution of the surgical treatment of petroclival meningiomas (PMs) has led to a tendency to abandon complex petrous approaches and return to "less-aggressive" skull base approaches. OBJECTIVE: To propose a classification of PMs and establish the role of the combined supra-infratentorial presigmoid retrolabyrinthine (CSIPR) approach in the treatment of PMs rigorously matching the anatomical definition. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 51 cases of PMs strictly adhering to the anatomical definition who were operated on from January 1990 to December 2011. On the basis of the different patterns of growth from a common anatomical region of origin, a classification of PMs in 4 groups is proposed. RESULTS: Gross total resection was achieved in 32 patients (63%) and subtotal resection (at least 90% tumor volume removal) in 14 patients (27%). Each of the 4 groups of the proposed classification lends itself to be removed by a distinct surgical approach. Statistical analysis confirmed that such group-approach pairings significantly correlate with radical surgical removal (P < 0.001). Despite the high incidence of early postoperative complications, at late follow-up 82% of patients were free of significant postoperative neurological deficits (95% confidence interval: 70-90). Comparable neurological improvement was observed limited to cases treated by CSIPR (P = 0.60). CONCLUSIONS: For each PM group, the most suitable approach was identified in terms of surgical radicality and low postoperative morbidity. CSIPR can be considered the approach of choice for the most frequent group of PMs in our series. We believe that the CSIPR remains a valuable option for the treatment of PMs.

Intradural Extramedullary Primary Ependymoma of the Craniocervical Junction Combined with C1 Partial Agenesis: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Intramedullary ependymomas represent 40%-60% of spinal cord tumors in adults and can be located along the entire spinal cord. Intradural extramedullary (IDEM) ependymomas are very rare with the exception of tumors located at the filum terminale or conus medullaris, with histologic features of myxopapillary ependymomas (World Health Organization grade I). CASE DESCRIPTION: We present the case of a 42-year-old woman with an IDEM ependymoma of the craniocervical junction who experienced neck pain for 5 months. Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine and craniocervical junction showed a large IDEM solid-cystic lesion with anterolateral junction spinal cord compression. A preoperative computed tomography scan did not show any calcified lesion, although a partial agenesis of the C1 posterior arch was observed. During surgery, a well-encapsulated IDEM tumor without dural attachment or medullary infiltration was found, and a total en bloc excision was performed. Histologic examination revealed a grade II ependymoma. The patient had an excellent clinical recovery, with no recurrence after 2 years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, no other cases of craniocervical junction ependymomas with vertebral bone abnormalities are described in the literature. This association supports the hypothesis that these lesions may originate from the extrusion of ependymal cells before neural tube closure. Differential diagnosis should include other extramedullary tumors that are more frequent in this region, such as meningioma, schwannoma, or dermoid tumor.