Facial nerve palsy after middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma: a case report.

Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) has emerged as a safe and efficacious alternative to surgery for the treatment of new or recurrent chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH). Several complications such as facial palsy may suddenly occur even in the absence of evident dangerous anastomoses in the angiogram. We herein present a case-report of left facial nerve palsy after MMAE.

Comparison Between 24-2 ZEST and 24-2 ZEST FAST Strategies in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Using a Fundus Perimeter.

PRCIS: Using a Compass (CMP) (CMP, Centervue, Padova, Italy) fundus perimeter, Zippy Estimation by Sequential Testing (ZEST) FAST strategy showed a significant reduction in examination time compared with ZEST, with good agreement in the quantification of perimetric damage. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the test duration of ZEST strategy with ZEST FAST and to evaluate the test-retest variability of ZEST FAST strategy on patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective study. We analyzed 1 eye of 60 subjects: 30 glaucoma patients and 30 patients with ocular hypertension. For each eye we analyzed, 3 visual field examinations were performed with Compass 24-2 grid: 1 test performed with ZEST strategy and 2 tests performed with ZEST FAST. Mean examination time and mean sensitivity between the 2 strategies were computed. ZEST FAST test-retest variability was examined. RESULTS: In the ocular hypertension cohort, test time was 223±29 seconds with ZEST FAST and 362±48 seconds with ZEST (38% reduction, P <0.001). In glaucoma patients, it was respectively 265±62 and 386±78 seconds (31% reduction using ZEST FAST, P <0.001). The difference in mean sensitivity between the 2 strategies was -0.24±1.30 dB for ocular hypertension and -0.14±1.08 dB for glaucoma. The mean difference in mean sensitivity between the first and the second test with ZEST FAST strategy was 0.2±0.8 dB for patients with ocular hypertension and 0.24±0.96 dB for glaucoma patients. CONCLUSIONS: ZEST FAST thresholding provides similar results to ZEST with a significantly reduced examination time.

Exoscopic Microsurgery: A Change of Paradigm in Brain Tumor Surgery? Comparison with Standard Operative Microscope.

BACKGROUND: The exoscope is a high-definition telescope recently introduced in neurosurgery. In the past few years, several reports have described the advantages and disadvantages of such technology. No studies have compared results of surgery with standard microscope and exoscope in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). METHODS: Our retrospective study encompassed 177 patients operated on for GBM (WHO 2021) between February 2017 and August 2022. A total of 144 patients were operated on with a microscope only and the others with a 3D4K exoscope only. All clinical and radiological data were collected. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) have been estimated in the two groups and compared by the Cox model adjusting for potential confounders (e.g., sex, age, Karnofsky performance status, gross total resection, MGMT methylated promoter, and operator's experience). RESULTS: IDH was mutated in 9 (5.2%) patients and MGMT was methylated in 76 (44.4%). Overall, 122 patients received a gross total resection, 14 patients received a subtotal resection, and 41 patients received a partial resection. During follow-up, 139 (73.5%) patients experienced tumor recurrence and 18.7% of them received a second surgery. After truncation to 12 months, the median PFS for patients operated on with the microscope was 8.82 months, while for patients operated on with the exoscope it was >12 months. Instead, the OS was comparable in the two groups. The multivariable Cox model showed that the use of microscope compared to the exoscope was associated with lower progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 3.55, 95%CI = 1.66-7.56, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The exoscope has proven efficacy in terms of surgical resection, which was not different to that of the microscope. Furthermore, patients operated on with the exoscope had a longer PFS. A comparable OS was observed between microscope and exoscope, but further prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed.

Fluorescence and Intraoperative Ultrasound as Surgical Adjuncts for Brain Metastases Resection: What Do We Know? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

(1) Background: brain metastases (BMs) are the most common neoplasm of the central nervous system; despite the high incidence of this type of tumour, to date there is no universal consensus on the most effective treatment in patients with BMs, even if surgery still plays a primary role. Despite this, the adjunct systems that help to reach the GTR, which are well structured for other tumour forms such as ultrasound and fluorescence systems, are not yet well employed and standardised in surgical practice. The aim of this review is to provide a picture of the current state-of-art of the roles of iOUS and intraoperative fluorescence to better understand their potential roles as surgical tools. (2) Methods: to reach this goal, the PubMed database was searched using the following string as the keyword: (((Brain cerebral metastasis [MeSH Major Topic])OR (brain metastasis, [MeSH Major Topic])) AND ((5-ala, [MeSH Terms]) OR (Aminolevulinicacid [All fields]) OR (fluorescein, [MeSH Terms]) OR (contrast enhanced ultrasound [MeSH Terms])OR ((intraoperative ultrasound. [MeSH Terms]))) AND (english [Filter]) AND ((english [Filter]) AND (2010:2022 [pdat])) AND (english [Filter]). (3) Results: from our research, a total of 661 articles emerged; of these, 57 were selected. 21 of these included BMs generically as a secondary class for comparisons with gliomas, without going deeply into specific details. Therefore, for our purposes, 36 articles were considered. (4) Conclusions: with regard to BMs treatment and their surgical adjuncts, there is still much to be explored. This is mainly related to the heterogeneity of patients, the primary tumour histology and the extent of systemic disease; regardless, surgery plays a paramount role in obtaining a local disease control, and more standardised surgical protocols need to be made, with the aim of optimizing the use of the available surgical adjuncts and in order to increase the rate of GTR.

Perilesional resection technique of glioblastoma: intraoperative ultrasound and histological findings of the resection borders in a single center experience.

INTRODUCTION: The surgical goal in glioblastoma treatment is the maximal safe resection of the tumor. Currently the lack of consensus on surgical technique opens different approaches. This study describes the "perilesional technique" and its outcomes in terms of the extent of resection, progression free survival and overall survival. METHODS: Patients included (n = 40) received a diagnosis of glioblastoma and underwent surgery using the perilesional dissection technique at "San Gerardo Hospital"between 2018 and 2021. The tumor core was progressively isolated using a circumferential movement, healthy brain margins were protected with Cottonoid patties in a "shingles on the roof" fashion, then the tumorwas removed en bloc. Intraoperative ultrasound (iOUS) was used and at least 1 bioptic sample of "healthy" margin of the resection was collected and analyzed. The extent of resection was quantified. Extent of surgical resection (EOR) and progression free survival (PFS)were safety endpoints of the procedure. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (85%) received a gross total resection(GTR) while 3 (7.5%) patients received a sub-total resection (STR), and 3 (7.5%) a partial resection (PR). The mean post-operative residual volume was 1.44 cm3 (range 0-15.9 cm3).During surgery, a total of 76 margins were collected: 51 (67.1%) were tumor free, 25 (32.9%) were infiltrated. The median PFS was 13.4 months, 15.3 in the GTR group and 9.6 months in the STR-PR group. CONCLUSIONS: Perilesional resection is an efficient technique which aims to bring the surgeon to a safe environment, carefully reaching the "healthy" brain before removing the tumoren bloc. This technique can achieve excellent tumor margins, extent of resection, and preservation of apatient's functions.

The "STARS" study: advanced preoperative rehearsal and intraoperative navigation in neurosurgical oncology.

BACKGROUND: Neurosurgical 3D visualizers and simulators are innovative devices capable of defining a surgical strategy in advance and possibly making neurosurgery safer by rehearsing the phases of the operation beforehand. The aim of this study is to evaluate Surgical Theater™ (Surgical Theater LLC, Mayfield, OH, USA), a new 3D neurosurgical planning, simulation, and navigation system, and qualitatively assess its use in the operating room. METHODS: Clinical data were collected from 30 patients harboring various types of brain tumors; Surgical Theater™ was used for the preoperative planning and intraoperative 3D navigation. Preoperative and postoperative questionnaires were completed by first and second operators to get qualitative feedback on the system's functionality. Furthermore, we measured and compared the impact of this technology on surgery duration. RESULTS: Neurosurgeons were overall satisfied when using this rehearsal and navigation tool and found it efficient and easy to use; interestingly, residents considered this device more useful as compared to their more senior colleagues (with significantly higher scores, P<0.05), possibly because of their limited anatomical experience and spatial/surgical rehearsal ability. The length of the surgical procedure was not affected by this technology (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical Theater™ system was found to be clinically useful in improving anatomical understanding, surgical planning, and intraoperative navigation, especially for younger and less experienced neurosurgeons.

Improving event-based progression analysis in glaucomatous visual fields.

Glaucoma is a progressive optic neuropathy with characteristic changes to the optic nerve head and the visual field (VF). Detecting progression of VF damage with Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) is of paramount importance for clinical care. One common approach to detecting progression is to compare each new VF test to a baseline SAP test (event analysis). This comparison is made difficult by the test-retest variability of SAP, which increases with the level of VF damage, and the limited range of measurement, meaning that damage cannot be assessed below a certain level. We performed a prospective international multi-centre data collection of SAP data on 90 eyes from 90 people with glaucoma and different levels of VF damage over a short period of time (6 tests in 60 days). Data were collected using a fundus tracked perimeter (Compass, CenterVue). We used these data (minus the first test) to develop an improved event analysis that accounts for both the change in variability with damage and the lower bound on the measurement imposed by SAP. Using simulations, we show that our approach is more sensitive compared to previously developed methods, especially in the case of advanced glaucoma, while retaining similar specificity.

The "STARS-CASCADE" Study: Virtual Reality Simulation as a New Training Approach in Vascular Neurosurgery.

OBJECTIVE: Surgical clipping has become a relatively rare procedure in comparison to endovascular exclusion of cerebral aneurysms. Consequently, there is a declining number of cases where young neurosurgeons can practice clipping. For this reason, we investigated the application of a new 3-dimensional (3D) simulation and rehearsal device, Surgical Theater, in vascular neurosurgery. METHODS: We analyzed data of 20 patients who underwent surgical aneurysm clipping. In 10 cases, Surgical Theater was used to perform the preoperative 3D planning (CASCADE group), while traditional imaging was used in the other cases (control group). Preoperative 3D simulation was performed by 4 expert and 3 junior neurosurgeons (1 fellow, 2 residents). During postoperative debriefings, expert surgeons explained the different aspects of the operation to their younger colleagues in an interactive way using the simulator. Questionnaires were given to the surgeons to get qualitative feedback about the simulator, and the junior surgeons' performance at simulator was also analyzed. RESULTS: There were no differences in surgery outcomes, complications, and surgical duration (P > 0.05) between the 2 groups. Senior neurosurgeons performed similarly when operating at the simulator as compared with in the operating room, while junior neurosurgeons improved their performance at the simulator after the debriefing session (P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical Theater proved to be realistic in replicating vascular neurosurgery scenarios for rehearsal and simulation purposes. Moreover, it was shown to be useful for didactic purposes, allowing young neurosurgeons to take full advantage and learn from senior colleagues to become familiar with this demanding neurosurgical subspecialty.

The "STARS-CT-MADE" Study: Advanced Rehearsal and Intraoperative Navigation for Skull Base Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Skull base meningiomas represent a challenge for neurosurgeons, and the procedures are typically performed by experienced neurosurgeons, thus limiting resident training. A new simulation and rehearsal device can be used as an aid for senior surgeons during these operations and serve as a training tool for junior surgeons. METHODS: Forty patients harboring an anterior/middle fossa meningioma were recruited. Surgical Theater, a rehearsal/simulation platform, was used for preoperative planning and intraoperative 3D navigation on 20 patients (CT-MADE group), while the remaining (control group) underwent a traditional navigation. Qualitative comparisons between the 2 groups were made with regard to surgical procedure and patient outcome. Satisfaction questionnaires were completed by expert neurosurgeons and residents to assess the overall usefulness of the platform. Furthermore, the surface of the simulated craniotomy performed during the planning was compared with the one actually performed during surgery in order to evaluate the reliability of the planning. RESULTS: No differences between the 2 groups were found (surgery duration: P = 0.4; visual impairment: P = 0.56). Both residents and senior neurosurgeons enjoyed using the platform for intraoperative navigation and planning; simulated craniotomies were significantly smaller as compared with the real ones (P = 0.009), probably because it was not intuitive to depict the exact margins of the operculum with the platform. CONCLUSION: Surgical Theater helped residents to improve their anatomic and procedural comprehension and was deemed as a useful aid to safely perform some demanding neurosurgical procedures, by both senior and junior surgeons.

Utility and safety of early allograft biopsy in adult deceased donor kidney transplant recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Delayed graft function (DGF) is considered a risk factor for rejection after kidney transplantation (KTx). Clinical guidelines recommend weekly allograft biopsy until DGF resolves. However, who may benefit the most from such an aggressive policy and when histology should be evaluated remain debated. METHODS: We analyzed 223 biopsies in 145 deceased donor KTx treated with basiliximab or anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) and calcineurin inhibitor-based maintenance. The aim of the study was to assess the utility and safety of biopsies performed within 28 days of transplant. Relationships between transplant characteristics, indication, timing, and biopsy-related outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Main indication for biopsy was DGF (87.8%) followed by lack of improvement in graft function (9.2%), and worsening graft function (3.1%). Acute tubular necrosis was the leading diagnosis (89.8%) whereas rejection was detected in 8.2% specimens. Rejection was more frequent in patients biopsied due to worsening graft function or lack of improvement in graft function than DGF (66.7% vs. 3.5%; P = 0.0075 and 33.3% vs. 3.5%; P = 0.0104, respectively) and in biopsies performed between day 15 and 28 than from day 0 to 14 (31.2% vs. 3.7%; P = 0.0002). Complication rate was 4.1%. Management was affected by the information gained with histology in 12.2% cases (7% considering DGF). CONCLUSIONS: In low-immunological risk recipients treated with induction and calcineurin inhibitors maintenance, protocol biopsies obtained within 2 weeks of surgery to rule out rejection during DGF do not necessarily offer a favourable balance between risks and benefits. In these patients, a tailored approach may minimize complications thus optimizing results.

Compass fundus automated perimetry.

BACKGROUND: Compass (CenterVue, Padova, Italy) is a fundus automated perimeter which has been introduced in the clinical practice for glaucoma management in 2014. The aim of the article is to review Compass literature, comparing its performances against Humphrey Field Analyzer (Zeiss Humphrey Systems, Dublin, CA, USA). RESULTS: Analyses on both normal and glaucoma subjects agree on the fact that Humphrey Field Analyzer and Compass are interchangeable, as the difference of their global indices is largely inferior than test -retest variability for Humphrey Field Analyzer. Compass also enables interesting opportunities for the assessment of morphology, and the integration between morphology and function on the same device. CONCLUSION: Visual field testing by standard automated perimetry is limited by a series of intrinsic factors related to the psychophysical nature of the examination; recent papers suggest that gaze tracking is closely related to visual field reliability. Compass, thanks to a retinal tracker and to the active dislocation of stimuli to compensate for eye movements, is able to provide visual fields unaffected by fixation instability. Also, the instrument is a true colour, confocal retinoscope and obtains high-quality 60° × 60° photos of the central retina and stereo-photos details of the optic nerve. Overlapping the image of the retina to field sensitivity may be useful in ascertaining the impact of comorbidities. In addition, the recent introduction of stereoscopic photography may be very useful for better clinical examination.

Reference Clinical Database for Fixation Stability Metrics in Normal Subjects Measured with the MAIA Microperimeter.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to establish a normal reference database for fixation stability measured with the bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA) in the Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA) microperimeter. METHODS: Subjects were 358 healthy volunteers who had the MAIA examination. Fixation stability was assessed using two BCEA fixation indices (63% and 95% proportional values) and the percentage of fixation points within 1° and 2° from the fovea (P1 and P2). Statistical analysis was performed with linear regression and Pearson's product moment correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Average areas of 0.80 deg2 (min = 0.03, max = 3.90, SD = 0.68) for the index BCEA@63% and 2.40 deg2 (min = 0.20, max = 11.70, SD = 2.04) for the index BCEA@95% were found. The average values of P1 and P2 were 95% (min = 76, max = 100, SD = 5.31) and 99% (min = 91, max = 100, SD = 1.42), respectively. The Pearson's product moment test showed an almost perfect correlation index, r = 0.999, between BCEA@63% and BCEA@95%. Index P1 showed a very strong correlation with BCEA@63%, r = -0.924, as well as with BCEA@95%, r = -0.925. Index P2 demonstrated a slightly lower correlation with both BCEA@63% and BCEA@95%, r = -0.874 and -0.875, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The single parameter of the BCEA@95% may be taken as accurately reporting fixation stability and serves as a reference database of normal subjects with a cutoff area of 2.40 ± 2.04 deg2 in MAIA microperimeter. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Fixation stability can be measured with different indices. This study originates reference fixation values for the MAIA using a single fixation index.