Challenges in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Optimizing Biological Treatments in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Other Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a decision-making tool for optimizing the use of certain therapies. In this article, the authors review the role of proactive TDM of biological agents in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID). They also discuss the future of TDM as a component of personalized medicine from the clinical laboratory perspective. METHODS: This narrative review originated from proceedings of the fifth biannual Challenges in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring seminar and was supplemented by additional literature identified at various stages of critical review. RESULTS: Proactive TDM aims to achieve adequate concentrations of biological drugs, such that patients attain and maintain an optimal treatment response. Proactive TDM may also have a role in de-escalating anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in patients in clinical remission and in optimizing infliximab monotherapy as an alternative to combination therapy with an immunomodulator. A major proactive TDM application is in pediatric patients with IBD. Achieving mucosal healing in children with IBD requires that infliximab or adalimumab concentrations are monitored early during induction therapy, with dose modifications guided by the timing (week) of measurement. Recent innovations in biological therapy include international standards for infliximab and adalimumab for the global harmonization of bioactivity and monotest devices with an accuracy equivalent to that of conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and quicker turnaround times. CONCLUSIONS: Despite several knowledge gaps regarding proactive TDM of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in patients with IMID, growing evidence suggests that it is associated with better outcomes than empiric optimization and/or reactive TDM in IBD. Enhanced pharmacokinetic modeling to predict drug exposure and patient genotyping for the precise application of proactive TDM are considered key elements to optimize biological therapy in the future.

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring-Guided Adalimumab Therapy in Rheumatic Diseases: A Prospective, Pragmatic Trial.

INTRODUCTION: To assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) based on serum adalimumab levels compared to standard of care in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. METHODS: This was a non-inferiority, multicentric, non-randomized, pragmatic trial including adult patients diagnosed with moderate-to-severe, clinically stable rheumatic diseases treated with adalimumab. Consecutive patients were assigned 1:2 to the control (CG) or the intervention group (IG), based on the site of inclusion, and followed up for 18 months. Adalimumab serum levels were measured at each study visit and released to the IG only to modify dosing strategy. Data on disease activity, healthcare resource utilization and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measured through the EQ-5D-5L were collected. Number of persistent and overall flares, time to first flare, days experiencing high disease activity, total direct costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 169 recruited patients, 150 were included in the analysis (52 and 98 patients in the CG and IG, respectively). The primary endpoint was not met as persistent flares were not significantly lower in the IG, although mean (SD) number of flares was numerically lower in the IG (0.67 [0.70] versus 0.90 [0.82], P = 0.073), respectively. Based on EQ-5D-5L utilities, HRQoL was significantly higher in the IG at 3 (P = 0.001) and 6 months (P = 0.035), which overall translated into 0.075 QALYs gained per patient for the IG at month 18. Overall, direct costs were significantly lower for the IG patients (€15,311.59 [4,870.04] versus €17,378.46 [6,556.51], P = 0.030), resulting in the intervention being dominant, leading to increased QALY at a lower overall cost CONCLUSION: Adalimumab dose tapering based on TDM for rheumatic patients led to an increased quality of life and QALY gain and entailed lower costs, being a more cost-effective alternative than clinically guided management.

Optimal concentration range of golimumab in patients with axial spondyloarthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between serum golimumab (GLM) trough levels, clinical disease activity and treatment response during the first year of therapy in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), as well as determining an optimal concentration range of GLM in axSpA. METHODS: This was an observational prospective study including 49 patients with axSpA monitored during 52 weeks (W52). Serum GLM trough levels were measured by capture ELISA and antidrug antibodies by bridging ELISA at baseline, W24 and W52. Disease activity was assessed by the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) and clinical improvement by ΔASDAS. The association between serum GLM trough levels and disease activity was assessed using univariable and multivariable regression. In case of drop-out or missing data before W52, the last observation carried forward (LOCF) was performed. ASDAS values and GLM levels at W24 were available for 42 patients and 38 patients at W52. RESULTS: In the univariable analyses, serum GLM trough levels were inversely associated with ASDAS at W24 (n=42, r =-0.445; p<0.01), at W52 (n=38, r=-0.330; p<0.05) and W52LOCF (n=49, r=-0.309; p<0.05). In the multivariable analysis, this significant association remained. Serum trough GLM levels above the 0.7-1.4mg/L range did not contribute to additional clinical improvement. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with axSpA, serum GLM trough levels are associated with disease activity during the first year of treatment. A concentration range of 0.7-1.4mg/L appears to be useful to achieve clinical response to GLM.

Antibodies to infliximab in Remicade-treated rheumatic patients show identical reactivity towards biosimilars.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether antibodies to infliximab (IFX) in Remicade-treated patients cross-react with the biosimilar CT-P13. METHODS: 250 consecutive patients with rheumatic diseases under Remicade and 77 controls were retrospectively selected for the study. Anti-IFX antibodies at drug through levels were measured in parallel with three different bridging ELISA assays: Promonitor-ANTI-IFX kit, which uses Remicade to detect antibodies, and two more assays that use either Inflectra or Remsima with the same format. Correlation and association between each assay was studied. RESULTS: 50.4% of patients were tested positive with Promonitor-ANTI-IFX. All were antibodies to IFX (ATI)-positive when either Inflectra or Remsima assays were used. In all comparisons positive and negative percentage agreements were 100%, and correlation coefficients were ≥0.995. No differences between rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis, or between concomitant immunosuppressives, were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-IFX antibodies of Remicade-treated patients cross-react with either Inflectra or Remsima. Although additional epitopes may be present in the biosimilar, results suggest that epitopes influencing the immune response to IFX are also present in the biosimilar. Antibody-positive patients treated with Remicade should not be switched to the biosimilar, since antibodies will interact with the new drug and potentially lead to loss of response. This finding supports the utility for therapeutic drug monitoring before a switching strategy is considered.

Influence of immunogenicity on the efficacy of long-term treatment with infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the clinical relevance of the production of anti-infliximab antibodies (anti-infliximab Abs) in patients with RA undergoing infliximab treatment over a prolonged period of time. METHODS: Clinical characteristics, serum trough infliximab and antibody levels were evaluated in 85 RA patients treated with infliximab for a median of 4.42 (interval 0.4-10.2) years. DAS in 28 joints (DAS-28), EULAR response criteria and survival of treatment were assessed at 3 time points (6 months, 12 months and >4 years). RESULTS: Antibodies against infliximab were detected in 28 (32.9%) patients and were present in all EULAR non-responder patients. Antibody levels were higher in EULAR non-responders throughout the study period (P = 0.05 at 6 months, P = 0.02 at 1 year, P = 0.003 at >4 years) compared with EULAR (good and moderate) responders. Nine (10.5%) patients, all of them with high-serum anti-infliximab Ab levels, developed infusion-related reactions. Patients with anti-infliximab Abs more often required increased infliximab doses (51.7%) (P = 0.032) and median survival time on treatment was shorter (4.15 vs 8.89 years) (P = 0.0006). MTX co-therapy was not associated with lower proportion of anti-infliximab Ab-positive patients, but those receiving both infliximab and MTX had lower levels of anti-infliximab Abs (P = 0.073) and longer survival (P = 0.015) on treatment. CONCLUSION: The formation of anti-infliximab Abs during treatment with infliximab is associated with a loss of clinical response, the appearance of infusion reactions and discontinuation of treatment.

Detection of catechol-O-methyltransferase Val158Met polymorphism by a simple one-step tetra-primer amplification refractory mutation system-PCR.

The G-->A transition at nucleotide 21881 of the human catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene represents a functional genetic polymorphism (Val158Met), rendering an enzyme with reduced activity that has been associated with psychiatric disorders and estrogen-related cancers. A new method for the detection of this polymorphism is described, based on the tetra-primer amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-PCR), with a single PCR to discriminate both alleles. Two primers amplify a common amplicon independently of the allele considered. At the same time, two primers are used, differing in the 3' base. In the Val/Val or Met/Met conditions, amplification occurs both in the general amplicon and in the specific allele; in the Val/Met condition three different amplicons are produced. Direct DNA sequencing of a COMT region containing the G/A polymorphism demonstrates the validity of this tetra-primer ARMS-PCR method. Reevaluation by PCR-RFLP revealed 100% accordance for genotype adscription. Subjects carrying the COMT(HH) genotype in a Spanish population comprised 28%, and the COMT(LL) homozygotes amounted to 21%. The described method provides a fast and reliable approach for determining COMT polymorphism that can be useful in large clinical studies using minimal quantity of DNA, avoiding the timely and costly use of restriction enzymes.