ABSTRACT
Orbitopathy is the main extra thyroidal manifestation of Graves' disease. It is a very challenging condition, which requires a cooperation between many specialists (endocrinologists, ophthalmologists, radiologists, radiotherapeutic, orbital surgeons) for an optimal clinical management. An accurate diagnostic assessment is required, in order to plan an adequate treatment of Graves' orbitopathy. Medical therapy, radiotherapy or surgery may be necessary to control the disease. In this review, the authors analyze the various therapeutic strategies, as well the more recent therapies based on pharmacologic immunomodulation.
Subject(s)
Antithyroid Agents/pharmacology , Graves Ophthalmopathy/diagnosis , Graves Ophthalmopathy/surgery , Graves Ophthalmopathy/therapy , Iodine Radioisotopes/pharmacology , Age Factors , Combined Modality Therapy , Diabetes Mellitus , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Quality of Life , Risk Assessment , Sex Factors , Smoking , Thyroid Gland , Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed , UltrasonographyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Irradiation of the Pharyngeal Superior Constrictor Muscle (PSCM) seems to play a crucial role in radiation-related swallowing dysfunctions. Purpose of our study was to quantify operator-related variability in the contouring of PSCM on Computed Tomography (CT) scans and adherence with contours derived from MR images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three sets of treatment planning CT and their corresponding MR images were selected. Contouring of the PSCM was performed using both a literature-based method, derived from literature review, and an optimized method, derived from Magnetic Resonance (MR) images thus obtaining "literature-based" and "optimized" contours. Each operator contoured the PSCM on CT scans according to both methods for three times in three different days. Inter- and intra-operator variability and adherence to a contour obtained from MR images (named "MR-derived" contour) were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-four operators participated and 612 contours were obtained. Both intra- and inter-operator variability and adherence to the "MR-derived" contour were significantly different between the two methods (p⩽0.05). The "optimized" method showed a lower intra- and inter-operator variability and a higher adherence to the "MR-derived" contour. CONCLUSIONS: The "optimized" method ameliorates both operator-related variability and adherence with MR images.