Transpalpebral/Blepharoplasty Incision and Supraorbital Craniotomy for the Treatment of Ethmoidal Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Inherent complex angioarchitecture associated with ethmoidal dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs) can make endovascular treatment methods challenging. Many surgical approaches are accompanied by unfavorable cosmetic results such as facial scarring. Blepharoplasty incision of the eyelid offers a minimal, well-hidden scar compared with other incision sites while offering the surgeon optimal visualization of pathogenic structures. This case series aims to report an initial assessment of the safety and efficacy of supraorbital craniotomy by blepharoplasty transpalpebral (eyelid) incision for surgical disconnection of ethmoidal dAVFs. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was conducted for all patients who underwent blepharoplasty incision and craniotomy for disconnection of ethmoidal dAVFs at our institution between October 2011 and February 2023. Patient charts and follow-up imaging were reviewed to report clinical and angiographic outcomes as well as periprocedural and follow-up complications. RESULTS: Complete obliteration and disconnection of ethmoidal dAVF was achieved in all 6 (100%) patients as confirmed by intraoperative angiogram with no resulting morbidity or mortality. Periprocedural complications included one case of transient nasal cerebrospinal fluid leak that was self-limiting and resolved before discharge without intervention. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment for ethmoidal dAVFs, specifically by transpalpebral incision and supraorbital craniotomy, is a safe and effective treatment option and affords the surgeon greater access to the floor of the anterior fossa when necessary. In addition, blepharoplasty incision addressed patient concerns for facial scarring compared with other incision sites by creating a more well-hidden, minimal scar in the natural folds of the eyelid for patients with an eyelid crease.

Revascularization of the Anterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery Using Extracranial and Intracranial Donors: A Morphometric Cadaveric Study.

INTRODUCTION: Anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA) aneurysms are rare, accounting for 0.2%-1.3% of all intracranial aneurysms. The standard treatment is often endovascular embolization or neck clipping; however, sacrifice of the parent vessel is sometimes necessary. Addition of revascularization procedures is a subject of controversy. The occipital artery (OA) has been used as a donor for bypass, but recently there has been a trend toward intracranial-intracranial approaches. The posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA)-AICA side-to-side bypass may serve as a safe alternative. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the PICA-AICA side-to-side bypass and the OA-AICA end-to-side bypass and review the literature relevant to AICA revascularization. METHODS: We performed a far-lateral approach on 12 cadaveric specimens and analyzed the regional anatomy. On this basis, we performed either an OA-AICA or a PICA-AICA bypass and took morphometric measurements relevant to the technique. RESULTS: PICA-AICA bypass was successful in 6/12 specimens. The length of the flocculopeduncular segment was 42.6 ± 15.8 mm in the specimens in which the bypass was feasible and 26.2 ± 7.2 mm in those in which the bypass was not feasible (P = 0.04). Mean distance between AICA and PICA was 5.3 ± 4 mm in the specimens in which side-to-side bypass was feasible and 11.6 ± 4.2 mm in the specimens in which it was not (P = 0.02). OA-AICA end-to-side bypass was feasible in all the specimens (75% in the flocculopeduncular segment; 25% in the cortical segment). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first cadaveric study analyzing the PICA-AICA side-to-side bypass for AICA revascularization. Our analyses provide evidence for the feasibility of this bypass and document the anatomic variations that may indicate its use.

Cervical tracheal resection: new lessons learned.

BACKGROUND: Cervical tracheal stenosis can be a difficult condition to manage. Depending on the etiology, location, and extent of the stenosis, tracheal or cricotracheal resection may be required. Intraoperative decisions may predict outcome. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing cervical tracheal or cricotracheal resection from April 2000 through March 2008. RESULTS: One hundred and five patients underwent 108 tracheal or cricotracheal resections. Median age was 65 years (range, 15 to 78); 68% were women. Indication for operation included postintubation tracheal stenosis (38), idiopathic (31), tracheostomy stenosis (19), invasive thyroid cancer (9), and other (8). Median length of trachea resected was 2.7 cm (range, 1.5 to 6.0 cm); 48 patients (46%) underwent extended cricotracheal resections. Twenty-six patients (25%) had an intraoperative chin stitch placed. Hospital stay was a median of 4 days (range, 2 to 33). Operative mortality was (1%); 1 patient died of myocardial infarction on postoperative day 3. Four patients (4%) had hoarseness or vocal cord immobility. Median follow-up was 36 months (range, 1 to 79). Eighteen patients (17%) required dilation postoperatively. Seven patients (7%) required tracheostomy; 2 (2%) are tracheostomy dependent. Three patients (3%) underwent a re-resection for recurrent stenosis. Multivariate analysis of indication for resection, type of resection, length of resection, anastomotic technique, and use of chin stitch did not predict the need for postoperative dilation, tracheostomy, or reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical tracheal resection can be performed safely with low morbidity and mortality. Only 5% of patients required a long-term tracheostomy or re-resection for recurrent tracheal stenosis. Specific intraoperative decisions did not predict long-term success.