Facilitating OPAT in rural areas.

A sizable portion of the United States' population lives in a rural setting. Coupled with a limited number of infectious diseases providers, this has created a need for innovative practice models to deliver outpatient antimicrobial therapy and clinical monitoring in rural settings. This article reviews existing literature regarding outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy in rural settings and explores existing barriers and potential solutions that may be of assistance to providers looking to provide these services.

A review of evidence, antimicrobial stability, and feasibility considerations for OPAT continuous infusion.

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) has been widely used in clinical practice for many decades because of its associated cost savings, reductions in inpatient hospital days, and decreases in hospital-associated infections. Despite this long history, evolving practice patterns and new drug delivery devices continue to present challenges as well as opportunities for clinicians when designing appropriate outpatient antimicrobial regimens. One such change is the increasing use of extended and continuous infusion (CI) of antimicrobials to optimize the achievement of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic targets. Elastomeric devices are also becoming increasingly popular in OPAT, including for the delivery of CI. In this article, we review the clinical evidence for CI in OPAT, as well as practical considerations of patient preferences, cost, and antimicrobial stability.

A Bundle of the Top 10 OPAT Publications in 2022.

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) has become more common in clinical settings. Correspondingly, OPAT-related publications have also increased; the objective of this article was to summarize clinically meaningful OPAT-related publications in 2022. Seventy-five articles were initially identified, with 54 being scored. The top 20 OPAT articles published in 2022 were reviewed by a group of multidisciplinary OPAT clinicians. This article provides a summary of the "top 10" OPAT publications of 2022.

Survey of pharmacists on their roles and perceptions of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy in the United States.

Objectives: To define outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) clinical pharmacy practice across the United States, specifically pharmacist functions, design of pharmacist involvement, and to compare pharmacist training of those who practice in OPAT to infectious diseases pharmacists who do not. Methods: A survey of a possible 32 questions was emailed to the American College of Clinical Pharmacists (ACCP) Infectious Diseases Practice and Research Network (PRN) e-mail list. Results were focused on US-based respondents. Participants: In total, 87 pharmacists responded; 27 of these pharmacists (31%) practiced in OPAT. Results: Training background did not differ between groups. Programs with an OPAT pharmacist were more likely to have a formal OPAT team compared to those without an OPAT pharmacist (P < .001). OPAT pharmacists were early in their careers with 66.7% practicing <5 years in OPAT. Most OPAT pharmacists (66.7%) practiced at an academic medical center with a median full-time equivalent (FTE) of 0.6. Moreover, 63% utilized a collaborative practice agreement and 81.5% shared job functions with other pharmacist roles, most commonly antimicrobial stewardship. Few OPAT programs involved a dispensing component (28%). The median daily census was 43 patients followed by an OPAT pharmacist. Pharmacists performed a variety of tasks in OPAT. Conclusion: Pharmacist nondispensing involvement in OPAT is an emerging trend in the United States with wide variability in program structure and pharmacist tasks. A ratio of 1 OPAT pharmacist for every 45-70 OPAT patients is proposed to facilitate expansion of pharmacist clinical practice in OPAT.

A Bundle of the Top 10 OPAT Publications in 2021.

As outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) becomes more common, it may be difficult to stay current with recent related publications. A group of multidisciplinary OPAT clinicians reviewed and ranked all OPAT publications published in 2021. This article provides a high-level summary of the OPAT manuscripts that were voted the "top 10" publications of 2021.

Call to Pharmacists: End Use of "Red Man Syndrome".

Red Man Syndrome is a term used for an adverse event attributed to vancomycin infusion. Based on the presentation within white patients, the term is imprecise at best and can lead to suboptimal classification and management. Recent calls have advocated for the discontinuation of the use of this terminology. Pharmacists should take the lead in advocating for this change.

Recent Updates in Antimicrobial Stewardship in Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Antimicrobial stewardship within acute care is common and has been expanding to outpatient areas. Some inpatient antimicrobial stewardship tactics apply to outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) and complex outpatient antimicrobial therapy (COpAT) management, but differences do exist. RECENT FINDINGS: OPAT/COpAT is a growing area of practice and research with its own unique considerations for antimicrobial stewardship. Potential ideas for antimicrobial stewardship in the OPAT/COpAT setting include redesigning the regimen to COpAT instead of OPAT, ensuring the use of the shortest effective duration of antimicrobial therapy; using antimicrobials dosed less frequently, such as long-acting glycopeptides; optimizing antimicrobial susceptibility testing reporting for common OPAT/COpAT drugs; and establishing routine laboratory and safety monitoring. Future consensus is needed to determine validated OPAT program metrics and outcomes. SUMMARY: As more focus is placed on outpatient antimicrobial stewardship, clinicians practicing in OPAT should publish more data regarding OPAT program methods and outcomes as they relate to antimicrobial stewardship. These can involve patient clinical outcomes, OPAT readmission rates, OPAT therapy completion, and central line-related complications.

Emergence of Resistance in Klebsiella aerogenes to Piperacillin-Tazobactam and Ceftriaxone.

We examined the effects of piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) concentration and bacterial inoculum on in vitro killing and the emergence of resistance in Klebsiella aerogenes The MICs for 15 clinical respiratory isolates were determined by broth microdilution for TZP and by Etest for ceftriaxone (CRO) and cefepime (FEP). The presence of resistance in TZP-susceptible isolates (n = 10) was determined by serial passes over increasing concentrations of TZP-containing and CRO-containing agar plates. Isolates with growth on TZP 16/4-µg/ml and CRO 8-µg/ml plates (n = 5) were tested in high-inoculum (HI; 7.0 log10 CFU/ml) and low-inoculum (LI; 5.0 log10 CFU/ml) time-kill studies. Antibiotic concentrations were selected to approximate TZP 3.375 g every 8 h (q8h) via a 4-h prolonged-infusion free peak concentration (40 µg/ml [TZP40]), peak epithelial lining fluid (ELF) concentrations, and average AUC0-24 values for TZP (20 µg/ml [TZP20] and 10 µg/ml [TZP10], respectively), the ELF FEP concentration (14 µg/ml), and the average AUC0-24 CRO concentration (6 µg/ml). For HI, FEP exposure significantly reduced 24-h inocula against all comparators (P ≤ 0.05) with a reduction of 4.93 ± 0.64 log10 CFU/ml. Exposure to TZP40, TZP20, and TZP10 reduced inocula by 0.81 ± 0.43, 0.21 ± 0.18, and 0.05 ± 0.16 log10 CFU/ml, respectively. CRO-exposed isolates demonstrated an increase of 0.42 ± 0.39 log10 CFU/ml compared to the starting inocula, with four of five CRO-exposed isolates demonstrating TZP-nonsusceptibility. At LI after 24 h of exposure to TZP20 and TZP10, the starting inoculum decreased by averages of 2.24 ± 1.98 and 2.91 ± 0.50 log10 CFU/ml, respectively. TZP demonstrated significant inoculum-dependent killing, warranting dose optimization studies.

Treatment of patients with HIV or hepatitis C by pharmacist clinicians in a patient-centered medical home.

PURPOSE: This report describes an innovative pharmacy practice model assisting in the care of patients living with or at risk of acquiring human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and/or hepatitis C virus (HCV). SUMMARY: In the state of New Mexico, pharmacists can obtain prescribing privileges through a Pharmacist Clinician (PhC) license. The license allows PhCs to assess patients, order laboratory/diagnostic tests, prescribe medication, and bill select insurances. PhCs have developed a practice model for patients living with or at risk of HIV and/or HCV at a Level 3 National Committee for Quality Assurance Patient-Centered Medical Home in Albuquerque, New Mexico. In 2015, 5 PhCs, employed part time, were involved with 8 different clinics: (1) HIV Adherence and Complex Care, (2) HIV Transitions of Care, (3) HCV Mono- and Co-Infection, (4) HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP), (5) HIV Primary Care and Cardiovascular Risk Reduction, (6) Young Adult Clinic, (7) Perinatal HIV, and (8) Pediatric HIV. In 2015, PhCs at the clinic billed for 774 direct patient encounters. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists with the PhC license are able to provide high-quality medical care to patients living with or at risk of HIV and/or HCV infections within an interprofessional medical home model.

Predictors of Clostridium difficile infection and predictive impact of probiotic use in a diverse hospital-wide cohort.

BACKGROUND: Hospital-based predictive models for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) may aid with surveillance efforts. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of adult hospitalized patients who were tested for CDI between May 1, 2011, and August 31, 2016, was formed. Proposed clinical and sociodemographic predictors of CDI were evaluated using multivariable predictive logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: In a cohort of 5,209 patients, including 1,092 CDI cases, emergency department location (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.51, 2.41; compared with an intensive care unit reference category, which had the lowest observed odds in the study) and prior exposure to a statin (aOR, 1.26, 95% CI, 1.06, 1.51), probiotic (aOR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.08, 1.80), or high-risk antibiotic (aOR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.29, 1.84), such as a cephalosporin, a quinolone, or clindamycin, were independent predictors of CDI. Probiotic use did not appear to attenuate the odds of CDI in patients exposed to high-risk antibiotics, but moderate-risk antibiotics appeared to significantly attenuate the odds of CDI in patients who received probiotics. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency department location, high-risk antibiotics, probiotics, and statins were independently predictive of CDI. Further exploration of the relationship between probiotics and CDI, especially in diverse patient populations, is warranted.