Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
West J Emerg Med ; 19(3): 467-473, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29760842

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Emergency departments (ED) and hospitals face increasing challenges related to capacity, throughput, and stewardship of limited resources while maintaining high quality. Appropriate utilization of extremity magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations within the emergency setting is not well known. Therefore, this study aimed to determine indications for and appropriateness of MRI of the extremities for musculoskeletal conditions in the ED observation unit (EDOU). METHODS: We conducted this institutional review board-approved, retrospective study in a large, quaternary care academic center and Level I trauma center. An institutional database was queried retrospectively to identify all adult patients undergoing an extremity MRI while in the EDOU during the two-year study period from October 2013 through September 2015. We compared clinical history with the American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria® for musculoskeletal indications. The primary outcome was appropriateness of musculoskeletal MRI exams of the extremities; examinations with an ACR Criteria score of seven or higher were deemed appropriate. Secondary measures included MRI utilization and imaging findings. RESULTS: During the study period, 22,713 patients were evaluated in the EDOU. Of those patients, 4,409 had at least one MRI performed, and 88 MRIs met inclusion criteria as musculoskeletal extremity examinations (2% of all patients undergoing an MRI exam in the EDOU during the study period). The most common exams were foot (27, 31%); knee (26, 30%); leg/femur (10, 11%); and shoulder (10, 11%). The most common indications were suspected infection (42, 48%) and acute trauma (23, 26%). Fifty-six percent of exams were performed with intravenous contrast; and 83% (73) of all MRIs were deemed appropriate based on ACR Criteria. The most common reason for inappropriate imaging was lack of performance of radiographs prior to MRI. CONCLUSION: The majority of musculoskeletal extremity MRI examinations performed in the EDOU were appropriate based on ACR Appropriateness Criteria. However, the optimal timing and most-appropriate site for performance of many clinically appropriate musculoskeletal extremity MRIs performed in the EDOU remains unclear. Potential deferral to the outpatient setting may be a preferred population health management strategy.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Extremities , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Physical Examination , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Pain/etiology , Radiography , Retrospective Studies
2.
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol ; 47(6): 393-396, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29032882

ABSTRACT

Everyday radiologists use dictation software to compose clinical reports of imaging findings. The dictation software is tailored for medical use and to the speech pattern of each radiologist. Over the past 10 years we have used dictation software to compose academic manuscripts, correspondence letters, and texts of educational exhibits. The advantages of using voice dictation is faster composition of manuscripts. However, use of such software requires preparation. The purpose of this article is to review the steps of adapting a clinical dictation software for dictating academic manuscripts and detail the advantages and limitations of this technique.


Subject(s)
Manuscripts, Medical as Topic , Radiology , Speech Recognition Software , Humans , User-Computer Interface , Work Simplification
3.
West J Emerg Med ; 18(5): 780-784, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28874928

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Emergency department observation units (EDOUs) are a valuable alternative to inpatient admissions for ED patients needing extended care. However, while the use of advanced imaging is becoming more common in the ED, there are no studies characterizing the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations in the EDOU. METHODS: This institutional review board-approved, retrospective study was performed at a 999-bed quaternary care academic Level I adult and pediatric trauma center, with approximately 114,000 ED visits annually and a 32-bed adult EDOU. We retrospectively reviewed the EDOU patient database for all MRI examinations done from October 1, 2013, to September 30, 2015. We sought to describe the most frequent uses for MRI during EDOU admissions and reviewed EDOU length of stay (LOS) to determine whether the use of MRI was associated with any change in LOS. RESULTS: A total of 22,840 EDOU admissions were recorded during the two-year study period, and 4,437 (19%) of these patients had a least one MRI examination during their stay; 2,730 (62%) of these studies were of the brain, head, or neck, and an additional 1,392 (31%) were of the spine. There was no significant difference between the median LOS of admissions in which an MRI study was performed (17.5 hours) and the median LOS (17.7 hours) of admissions in which an MRI study was not performed [p=0.33]. CONCLUSION: Neuroimaging makes up the clear majority of MRI examinations from our EDOU, and the use of MRI does not appear to prolong EDOU LOS. Future work should focus on the appropriateness of these MRI examinations to determine potential resource and cost savings.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Units/statistics & numerical data , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/statistics & numerical data , Neuroimaging/statistics & numerical data , Databases, Factual , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Massachusetts/epidemiology , Observation , Retrospective Studies , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data
6.
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol ; 46(6): 419-422, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28410848

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Critical access hospitals face difficulty providing all services locally and may need to refer patients off-site for additional care. Providing on-site minimally invasive biopsies, may obviate visits to tertiary or quaternary care centers. This study aims to assess feasibility and outcomes of an ultrasound-guided thyroid biopsy program in a critical access hospital. METHODS: In this HIPAA compliant, IRB approved study, the Interventional Radiology (IR) database of a 19-bed, island, rural, critical access hospital without onsite pathology services affiliated with our quaternary care institution was retrospectively reviewed to identify all thyroid biopsies that were performed on site since inception of the service in April 2014 through August 2016. A specialized biopsy and specimen collection protocol was created as each specimen was transferred to and analyzed by the pathology department at our affiliated quaternary care institution. RESULTS: Two IR physicians carried out thyroid biopsies on 34 nodules in 29 patients during the study period. The mean age of patients was 56.5 ± 14.0, with a range of 35-85 and 86% female, 14% male. 94.1% of nodules had adequate material for interpretation on the first biopsy and 97.1% upon repeat biopsy. Ultimately, 5 patients (with 6 nodules) underwent surgical resection at the integrated quaternary care center. Surgical resection identified one atypical follicular adenoma, one follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma, two papillary carcinomas, and two Hürthle cell tumors. CONCLUSION: IR thyroid biopsy services may be successfully provided in the rural setting without onsite pathology analysis and adequacy checks, enhancing patient access and streamlining care while also expanding the reach of tertiary care centers.


Subject(s)
Critical Care/methods , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Rural , Thyroid Neoplasms/pathology , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Rural Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Thyroid Gland/diagnostic imaging , Thyroid Gland/pathology , Thyroid Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
8.
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol ; 46(3): 225-233, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28041657

ABSTRACT

Image-guided biopsy and ablation relies on successful identification and targeting of lesions. Currently, image-guided procedures are routinely performed under ultrasound, fluoroscopy, magnetic resonance imaging, or computed tomography (CT) guidance. However, these modalities have their limitations including inadequate visibility of the lesion, lesion or organ or patient motion, compatibility of instruments in an magnetic resonance imaging field, and, for CT and fluoroscopy cases, radiation exposure. Recent advances in technology have resulted in the development of a new generation of navigational guidance tools that can aid in targeting lesions for biopsy or ablations. These navigational guidance tools have evolved from simple hand-held trajectory guidance tools, to electronic needle visualization, to image fusion, to the development of a body global positioning system, to growth in cone-beam CT, and to ablation volume planning. These navigational systems are promising technologies that not only have the potential to improve lesion targeting (thereby increasing diagnostic yield of a biopsy or increasing success of tumor ablation) but also have the potential to decrease radiation exposure to the patient and staff, decrease procedure time, decrease the sedation requirements, and improve patient safety. The purpose of this article is to describe the challenges in current standard image-guided techniques, provide a definition and overview for these next-generation navigational devices, and describe the current limitations of these, still evolving, next-generation navigational guidance tools.


Subject(s)
Ablation Techniques , Image-Guided Biopsy , Patient Care Planning , Radiology, Interventional , Surgery, Computer-Assisted , Humans
10.
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther ; 6(6): 493-507, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28123971

ABSTRACT

Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) affecting the extremities is a common clinical problem. Prompt imaging aids in rapid diagnosis and adequate treatment. While ultrasound (US) remains the workhorse of detection of extremity venous thrombosis, CT and MRI are commonly used as the problem-solving tools either to visualize the thrombosis in central veins like superior or inferior vena cava (IVC) or to test for the presence of complications like pulmonary embolism (PE). The cross-sectional modalities also offer improved visualization of venous collaterals. The purpose of this article is to review the established modalities used for characterization and diagnosis of DVT, and further explore promising innovations and recent advances in this field.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL