Asociación entre rigidez arterial y masa grasa en pacientes con obesidad / Association between arterial stiffness and fat mass in patients with obesity

Objetivo Comprobar si la composición corporal en los pacientes con obesidad de riesgo alto (índice de masa corporal>35 o entre 30 y 34,9kg/m2 con un perímetro abdominal mayor de 102cm en varones o mayor de 88cm en mujeres) se relaciona con la enfermedad vascular. Métodos Estudio transversal de pacientes con obesidad de riesgo alto. Se mide su masa grasa mediante bioimpedancia y la rigidez arterial mediante la velocidad de la onda de pulso (VOP). Se analizan los terciles de pacientes según la distribución de la VOP. Resultados Se ha estudiado a 59 pacientes. Con incrementos de la VOP, aumentan el IMC (p=0,02) y el contenido de masa grasa (p<0,00). Existe, además, un incremento significativo de los indicadores de inflamación. Conclusiones En pacientes con obesidad de riesgo alto existen diferencias relativas a su composición corporal que se asocian a modificaciones de su rigidez arterial y de su carga inflamatoria (AU)

Objective The aim is to observe whether body composition in patients with high-risk obesity (body mass index>35 or between 30 and 34.9kg/m2 with a waist circumference greater than 102cm in men or greater than 88cm in women) is related with vascular disease. Methods This is a cross-sectional study of patients with high-risk obesity. Their fat mass was measured through bioimpedance and arterial stiffness through pulse wave velocity (PWV). Tertiles of patients were analyzed according to PWV distribution. Results A total of 59 patients were analyzed. As PWV increased, BMI (p=0.02) and fat mass content (p<0.00) increased. There was also a significant increase in inflammation indicators. Conclusions In patients with high-risk obesity, there were differences in their body composition which were associated with changes in arterial stiffness and inflammatory burden (AU)

Association between arterial stiffness and fat mass in patients with obesity.

OBJECTIVE: The aim is to observe whether body composition in patients with high-risk obesity (body mass index >35 or between 30 and 34.9kg/m2 with a waist circumference greater than 102cm in men or greater than 88cm in women) is related with vascular disease. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of patients with high-risk obesity. Their fat mass was measured through bioimpedance and arterial stiffness through pulse wave velocity (PWV). Tertiles of patients were analyzed according to PWV distribution. RESULTS: A total of 59 patients were analyzed. As PWV increased, BMI (p=0.02) and fat mass content (p<0.00) increased. There was also a significant increase in inflammation indicators. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with high-risk obesity, there were differences in their body composition which were associated with changes in arterial stiffness and inflammatory burden.

Risk for post-thrombotic syndrome after lower-limb deep vein thrombosis: location of the thrombus or residual thrombi? / Risk razvitiia posttromboflebiticheskogo sindroma posle tromboza glubokikh ven nizhnikh konechnostei: lokalizatsiia tromba ili rezidual'nyi tromboz?

BACKGROUND: Many works aimed to determine factors that influence the onset of postthrombotic syndrome after an acute episode of deep venous thrombosis. We aimed to compare the prognostic value of the most proximal extent of thrombus (proximal and distal DVT) versus the residual thrombosis as identified by venous ultrasonography performed during follow-up. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective study of prospectively collected 1183 consecutive cohort patients in the RIETE registry after a first episode of deep venous thrombosis and assessed for postthrombotic syndrome after 12 months. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis revealed that: residual thrombosis (OR 1.40; 95% CI 0,88-2,21), the presence of cancer (OR 1.38; 95% CI: 0,64-2,97), immobility (OR 1.31; 95% CI 0,70-2,43) and estrogen-containing drugs use (OR 2.08, 95% CI 0,63-6,83), all had a predictive value for the occurrence of PTS. CONCLUSION: Our study results revealed that ultrasound finding of residual thrombosis is more predictive than proximal location of thrombus for postthrombotic syndrome after episode of deep venous thrombosis. Real life data from a large group of patients from the RIETE registry substantiates that.

Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity with a custom device.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) is one of the most widely used arterial stiffness variables for assessing vascular risk. The abiPWV is a device that calculates various PWVs and the blood pressure ankle-brachial index (ABI). The device can also determine baPWV. The aim of this study was to calculate the baPWV with abiPWV, validate it with a reference device (VaSera) and study its clinical usefulness. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 113 patients (mean age, 53 ±â€¯12 years), 59 (52%) of whom were women, and 10 (8.8%) of whom had a previous cardiovascular event. The participants were classified according to cardiovascular risk factors (CRFs) into group I (none), group II (1 or 2 CRFs) and group III (3 or more CRFs). The patients with a previous cardiovascular event were included in group III. All participants had their baPWV measured with abiPWV and VaSera. RESULTS: The baPWV correlation between the 2 devices was r = 0.93 (p < .001), and the percentage error calculated with the Bland-Altman analysis was 4.5%. The baPWV measured with abiPWV (in m/s) was as follows: group I, 10.5 ±â€¯1.6; group II, 13.8 ±â€¯2.9 (p < .001 when compared with group I); and group III, 14.1 ±â€¯2.7 (p < .001 when compared with group I). There were no differences between groups II and III. The results with VaSera were comparable to those of abiPWV. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring baPWV with the abiPWV is safe and has a similar clinical utility to that of VaSera. Incorporating this function into the options of abiPWV makes it a complete device for assessing arterial stiffness.

Velocidad de onda de pulso brazo-tobillo con un dispositivo propio / Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity with a custom device

Antecedentes y objetivos La velocidad de onda de pulso brazo-tobillo (VOPbt) es una de las variables de rigidez arterial más empleada en la valoración del riesgo vascular. VOPITB es un dispositivo que calcula distintas VOP y el índice tobillo-brazo de presión arterial (ITB). Además, con sus registros se podría determinar la VOPbt. El objetivo de este estudio fue: calcular la VOPbt con VOPITB, validarlo con un equipo de referencia (VaSera) y estudiar su utilidad clínica. Pacientes y métodos Se estudiaron 113 pacientes, con edad media de 53±12años; 59 (52%) eran mujeres y 10 (8,8%) presentaban evento cardiovascular previo. Los participantes se estatificaron según factores de riesgo vascular (FRV) en: grupoI, ninguno; grupoII, uno o 2; y grupoIII, 3 o más FRV. Los pacientes con algún evento vascular previo se incluyeron en el grupoIII. A todos se les midió la VOPbt con VOPITB y VaSera. Resultados La correlación de VOPbt entre ambos equipos fue r=0,93 (p<0,001) y el porcentaje de error calculado con análisis de Bland-Altman: 4,5%. La VOPbt con VOPITB fue (m/s): grupoI, 10,5±1,6 comparado con grupoII, 13,8±2,9 (p<0,001) y grupoIII, 14,1±2,7 (p<0,001). No se observaron diferencias entre gruposII y III. Los resultados obtenidos con VaSera fueron equiparables a los de VOPITB. Conclusiones La medición de la VOPbt con el equipo VOPITB es segura y de utilidad clínica similar a la realizada con VaSera. La incorporación de esta función a las prestaciones de VOPITB lo convertirá en un dispositivo completo para valorar la rigidez arterial (AU)

Background and objectives The brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) is one of the most widely used arterial stiffness variables for assessing vascular risk. The abiPWV is a device that calculates various PWVs and the blood pressure ankle-brachial index (ABI). The device can also determine baPWV. The aim of this study was to calculate the baPWV with abiPWV, validate it with a reference device (VaSera) and study its clinical usefulness. Patients and methods We studied 113 patients (mean age, 53±12years), 59 (52%) of whom were women, and 10 (8.8%) of whom had a previous cardiovascular event. The participants were classified according to cardiovascular risk factors (CRFs) into groupI (none), groupII (1 or 2 CRFs) and groupIII (3 or more CRFs). The patients with a previous cardiovascular event were included in groupIII. All participants had their baPWV measured with abiPWV and VaSera. Results The baPWV correlation between the 2 devices was r=0.93 (P<.001), and the percentage error calculated with the Bland-Altman analysis was 4.5%. The baPWV measured with abiPWV (in m/s) was as follows: groupI, 10.5±1.6; groupII, 13.8±2.9 (P<.001 when compared with groupI); and groupIII, 14.1±2.7 (P<.001 when compared with groupI). There were no differences between groupsII and III. The results with VaSera were comparable to those of abiPWV. Conclusions Measuring baPWV with the abiPWV is safe and has a similar clinical utility to that of VaSera. Incorporating this function into the options of abiPWV makes it a complete device for assessing arterial stiffness (AU)

Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity with a custom device. / Velocidad de onda de pulso brazo-tobillo con un dispositivo propio.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) is one of the most widely used arterial stiffness variables for assessing vascular risk. The abiPWV is a device that calculates various PWVs and the blood pressure ankle-brachial index (ABI). The device can also determine baPWV. The aim of this study was to calculate the baPWV with abiPWV, validate it with a reference device (VaSera) and study its clinical usefulness. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 113 patients (mean age, 53±12years), 59 (52%) of whom were women, and 10 (8.8%) of whom had a previous cardiovascular event. The participants were classified according to cardiovascular risk factors (CRFs) into groupI (none), groupII (1 or 2 CRFs) and groupIII (3 or more CRFs). The patients with a previous cardiovascular event were included in groupIII. All participants had their baPWV measured with abiPWV and VaSera. RESULTS: The baPWV correlation between the 2 devices was r=0.93 (P<.001), and the percentage error calculated with the Bland-Altman analysis was 4.5%. The baPWV measured with abiPWV (in m/s) was as follows: groupI, 10.5±1.6; groupII, 13.8±2.9 (P<.001 when compared with groupI); and groupIII, 14.1±2.7 (P<.001 when compared with groupI). There were no differences between groupsII and III. The results with VaSera were comparable to those of abiPWV. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring baPWV with the abiPWV is safe and has a similar clinical utility to that of VaSera. Incorporating this function into the options of abiPWV makes it a complete device for assessing arterial stiffness.

[Pulse wave velocity of the leg minus that of the arm measured with a custom device correlates to the coronary calcium quantification]. / La velocidad de onda de pulso de la pierna menos brazo medida con un dispositivo propio se correlaciona con la cuantificación de calcio coronario.

OBJECTIVE: The pulse wave velocity (PWV) in the great arteries is an indicator of vascular risk. Our objective was to identify the PWV index between the arms and legs that best correlates with the coronary calcium quantification (CCQ) and to compare it with other methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eight-one patients without vascular disease underwent the following measurements: CCQ; carotid intima-media thickness (IMT); carotid-femoral PWV (cfPWV), using COMPLIOR; and PWV in the arms and legs, with our own device (abiPWV, ankle brachial index PWV). RESULTS: The difference in PWVs between the leg and arm (l-a PWV) measured with abiPWV was the index that best correlated with CCQ (r=0.401, P<.001). The correlation between IMT and CCQ and between CF-PWV and CCQ were r=0.366, P=.001; and r=0.385, P=.001, respectively. For a CCQ score higher than 100 as a marker of significant coronary arteriosclerosis, the areas under the curve for l-a PWV, IMT and cfPWV were 0.721 (P=.002), 0.758 (P<.001) and 0.636 (P=.058), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For patients without vascular disease, the l-a PWV measured with abiPWV appears to be the index that best correlates with the CCQ. This association is comparable to that between IMT and CCQ and between cfPWV and CCQ. The abiPWV is an easy-to-use device that can help improve vascular risk stratification.

Historia natural de la enfermedad tromboembólica venosa en el área mediterránea. Una revisión sistemática / Natural history of venous thromboembolism in patients from the Mediterranean region. A systematic review

Antecedentes: El pronóstico de las enfermedades cardiovasculares es mejor en los países mediterráneos que en otras partes del mundo. Se desconoce si estas diferencias también acontecen en la enfermedad tromboembólica venosa (ETV) Métodos: En las bases de datos Medline y EMBASE se revisaron los ensayos clínicos y estudios de cohortes de pacientes con ETV que habían recibido tratamiento anticoagulante durante 3 meses. Dos revisores extrajeron independientemente los datos de forma reglada. Se seleccionaron 24 estudios con un total de 7.225 pacientes incluidos (2.414 del área mediterránea y 4.811 de otras regiones). Resultados: Entre los pacientes del área mediterránea predominaban las mujeres, tenían mayor edad, y la ETV idiopática fue menos frecuente que en otras regiones del mundo. Comparados con otros países, los pacientes del área mediterránea presentaron más recidivas de trombosis venosa profunda (4,35% frente a 2,68%; odds ratio [OR]: 1,65; intervalo de confianza al 95% [IC95%]: 1,27-2,15), recidivas mortales de ETV (0,75% frente a 0,35%; OR: 2,11; IC95%: 1,09-4,12) y sangrado mortal (0,25% frente a 0,06%; OR: 3,99; IC95%: 1-16). En el área mediterránea el porcentaje de recidivas de ETV mortal fue del 12,8%, IC95%: 7,99-19,1 frente al 8,41%, IC95%: 5,15-12,9 en otras zonas del mundo. El porcentaje de hemorragias mortales fue del 11,3%, IC95%: 4,72-22,1 frente al 3,22%, IC95%: 0,83-8,53 en otras zonas geográficas. Conclusiones: Los pacientes con ETV del área mediterránea tienen una mayor mortalidad durante los 3 primeros meses de tratamiento imputable a una mayor incidencia de ETV recidivante y de hemorragias graves (AU)

Background: Patients with cardiovascular diseases living in the Mediterranean area have a better outcome than those in other parts of the world, but it is not known whether these differences also occur with venous thromboembolism (VTE). Methods: We searched the Medline and EMBASE databases to identify clinical trials and cohort studies of patients with VTE who had been treated with anticoagulant therapy for 3 months. Two reviewers independently extracted the data in a standardized manner. A total of 24 studies that included 7,225 patients (2,414 from the Mediterranean region and 4,811 from other regions) were analyzed. Results: The patients from the Mediterranean area were predominately women and older, and the idiopathic VTE was less frequent than in other regions. Compared with patients from other regions, patients from the Mediterranean region had an increased rate of recurrent deep vein thrombosis (4.35% vs. 2.68%; odds ratio [OR], 1.65; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.27-2.15), fatal recurrent VTE (0.75% vs. 0.35%; OR, 2.11; 95% CI 1.09-4.12) and fatal bleeding (0.25% vs. 0.06%; odds ratio: 3.99; 95% CI 1.00-16.0). The case-fatality rate (CFR) for recurrent VTE was 12.8% (95% CI 7.99-19.1) in the Mediterranean region and 8.41% (5.15-12.9) in other areas. The CFR for major bleeding was 11.3% (95% CI 4.72-22.1) and 3.22% (95% CI 0.83-8.53), respectively. Conclusions: Compared to other regions, patients with VTE from the Mediterranean region have greater mortality during the first 3 months of treatment due to a greater incidence of recurrent VTE and severe hemorrhaging (AU)

Natural history of venous thromboembolism in patients from the Mediterranean region. A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cardiovascular diseases living in the Mediterranean area have a better outcome than those in other parts of the world, but it is not known whether these differences also occur with venous thromboembolism (VTE). METHODS: We searched the Medline and EMBASE databases to identify clinical trials and cohort studies of patients with VTE who had been treated with anticoagulant therapy for 3 months. Two reviewers independently extracted the data in a standardized manner. A total of 24 studies that included 7,225 patients (2,414 from the Mediterranean region and 4,811 from other regions) were analyzed. RESULTS: The patients from the Mediterranean area were predominately women and older, and the idiopathic VTE was less frequent than in other regions. Compared with patients from other regions, patients from the Mediterranean region had an increased rate of recurrent deep vein thrombosis (4.35% vs. 2.68%; odds ratio [OR], 1.65; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.27-2.15), fatal recurrent VTE (0.75% vs. 0.35%; OR, 2.11; 95% CI 1.09-4.12) and fatal bleeding (0.25% vs. 0.06%; odds ratio: 3.99; 95% CI 1.00-16.0). The case-fatality rate (CFR) for recurrent VTE was 12.8% (95% CI 7.99-19.1) in the Mediterranean region and 8.41% (5.15-12.9) in other areas. The CFR for major bleeding was 11.3% (95% CI 4.72-22.1) and 3.22% (95% CI 0.83-8.53), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to other regions, patients with VTE from the Mediterranean region have greater mortality during the first 3 months of treatment due to a greater incidence of recurrent VTE and severe hemorrhaging.

Comparison of the clinical history of symptomatic isolated distal deep-vein thrombosis vs. proximal deep vein thrombosis in 11 086 patients.

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of symptomatic isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is uncertain. Consequently, this leads to important disparities in its management. OBJECTIVE: To examine the clinical history of isolated distal DVT and to compare it with that of proximal DVT. METHODS: Using data from the international, prospective, RIETE registry on patients with confirmed symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE), we compared the risk factors and 3-month outcome in patients with isolated distal DVT vs. proximal DVT. RESULTS: Eleven thousand and eighty-six patients with symptomatic DVT, but without pulmonary embolism, were included between 2001 and 2008; 1921 (17.3%) exhibited isolated distal DVT. Anticoagulant treatment was received by 89.1% (1680/1885) of isolated distal DVT and 91.8% (7911/8613) of proximal DVT patients for the entire follow-up period. Isolated distal DVTs were more associated with transient risk factors (i.e. recent travel, hospitalization, recent surgery), whereas proximal DVTs were more associated with chronic states (i.e. > or =75 years or with active cancer). At 3 months, major bleeding rate was lower in patients with isolated distal DVT (1.0% vs. 2.2%, P < 0.01), whereas VTE recurrence rate was equivalent (2.0% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.07). The mortality rate was lower in patients with isolated distal DVT (2.7% vs. 7.5%; P < 0.001); this was mainly due to a lower rate of non-VTE-related deaths (2.2% vs. 6.3%; P < 0.001). Active cancer was the main predictive factor of death in patients with isolated distal DVT. CONCLUSIONS: Proximal and isolated distal DVT patients differ in terms of risk factors and clinical outcomes, suggesting different populations. In the short term, the life expectancy of patients with isolated distal DVT depended chiefly on their cancer status.