Effects on Health-Related Quality of Life of Biofeedback Physiotherapy of the Pelvic Floor as an Adjunctive Treatment Following Surgical Repair of Cystocele.

OBJECTIVES: to demonstrate the benefits of physiotherapy (PT) with pelvic floor biofeedback (BFB) in improving health-related quality of life when used as a complementary therapy after surgical treatment of cystocele, in cases in which perineal pain or discomfort persists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: prospective observational study in 226 women who received complementary therapy after surgical treatment of cystocele due to persistent perineal discomfort or pain. Groups: GA (n = 78): women treated with 25 mg of oral pregabalin every 12 h plus BFB, consisting of 20 once-weekly therapy sessions, each 20 min long, with perineal pregelled surface electrodes connected to a screen which provides visual feedback; GB (n = 148): women treated with oral pregabalin 25 mg every 12 h without BFB. VARIABLES: age, body mass index (BMI), time since onset of cystocele prior to surgery (TO), SF-36 health-related quality of life survey score, diseases and concomitant health conditions, follow-up time, success, or failure of postsurgical treatment. RESULTS: average age 67.88 years (SD 12.33, 30-88), with no difference between GA and GB. Average body mass index (BMI) 27.08 (SD 0.45, 18.74-46.22), with no difference between GA and GB. Time since onset of cystocele prior to surgery (TO) was 6.61 years (SD 0.6), with no difference between GA and GB. Pretreatment SF-36 score was lower in GA success than GB success. Treatment was successful in 141 (63.20%) women and failed in 82 (36.80%). PT and age were the main predictors of success, and the least important were pretreatment SF-36 and the time elapsed after the intervention. In GA, 63 women (80.80%) showed improvement while 15 (19.20%) did not. Age was the main predictor of treatment success, while the least important was BMI. In GB, 78 women (53.80%) showed improvement while 67 (46.20%) did not improve. The main predictor was time since cystocele onset prior to surgery, while the least important was age. The odds ratio (OR) of improving quality of life for each unit increase in SF-36 was 11.5% (OR = 0.115) in all patients, with no difference between success and failure; in GA it was 23.80% (OR = 0.238), with a difference between success and failure; in GB it was 11.11% (OR = 0.111), with no difference between success and failure. GA and GB success had more history of eutocic delivery. GA success had more rUTI. GB success and GA failure both had more history of UI corrective surgery. The "failure" outcome had a higher number of patients with more than two concomitant pathological conditions. CONCLUSIONS: BFB as an adjunctive treatment improves quality of life in women suffering from persistent discomfort after surgery for cystocele. Young women who meet the criteria for recurrent urinary tract infection or who have a history of eutocic delivery show greater improvement. Body mass index does not influence response to treatment, while the presence of more than two concomitant conditions indicates a poor prognosis for improving quality of life.

The American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) Risk Group Classification Can Be Used to Anticipate Functional Recovery Outcomes after the Surgical Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence with Transobturator Suburethral Tape.

INTRODUCTION: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) has an incidence of 15-80% in women. One of the most widely used surgical techniques for treatment is the placement of a suburethral transobturator tape (TOT). Although this technique has a relatively low morbidity rate, it is not exempt from intraoperative or postoperative complications, which can have an impact on functional recovery, understood as the return to routine life prior to the intervention. AIMS: To assess the time for functional recovery in women operated on for SUI by TOT; to identify complications and related factors, according to anaesthetic risk, which condition the time to functional recovery; and proposals for improvements in the prevention of possible complications and in reducing functional recovery time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A non-concurrent prospective observational multicenter study of 891 women undergoing TOT for stress urinary incontinence since 1 April 2003, who were successful in achieving urinary continence (completely dry). Study groups: GA (n = 443): patients with ASA I risk. GB (n = 306): patients with ASA II risk. GC (n = 142): patients with anaesthetic risk ASA III. Investigated variables: age, body mass index, follow-up time, secondary diagnoses, surgical history, obstetric-gynecological history, toxic habits, and complications derived from surgery: bleeding, pain, infection. Descriptive statistics, Student's t test, Chi2, Fisher, ANOVA, multivariate analysis, significance for p < 0.05. RESULTS: Mean age was 60.10 years (SD13.38), with no difference between groups. Mean body mass index (BMI) was 26.55 kg/m2 (SD 4.51), lowest in GA. GB had more HT (38.6%) than GC (23.23%), more type 2 diabetes (19.83% versus 10.56%), and more respiratory disorders (6.97% versus 2.11%). There were more women with anxiety in GB (19.3%) than in GC (6.33%) (p = 0.0221) and GA (10.51%) (p = 0.0004). There was more hypothyroidism in GB (16.08%) compared to GC (2.11%) and GA (9.07%). There was more history of curettage in GC (11.97%) versus GB (5.63%); and more pelvic surgery in GB (71.31%) and GC (66.9%) compared to GA (32.57%). There were more concomitant treatments with benzodiazepines in GC (27.46%) and GB (28.41%) than in GA (8.86%), and more parapharmacy treatments in GB (17.96%) than in GC (6.33%). Following the operation, 113 patients had some sign or symptom that required medical attention: in GA 48 (10.83%), in GB 49 (16.06%), in GC 16 (13.22%). Mean days until functional recovery in patients with complications: in GA 5.72 (SD2.05); bleeding 3 (SD1), pain 6.40 (SD1.34), and infection 7.33 (SD0.57), with fewer days for bleeding than for pain or infection. GB: 27.96 (SD 28.42), bleeding 3 (SD0), pain 46.69 (SD31.36), infection 10.83 (SD3.90); lowest for patients with bleeding. GC: 9.44 (SD 2.50); for bleeding 7.66 (SD2. 08), pain 10.66 (SD1.15), infection 10 (SD3.46); no differences. Overall, for women with bleeding, the time was 4.16 days (SD1.94); less in GA and GB than in GC. Pain, at 31.33 days (SD 30.70), was the factor that most delayed functional recovery; in GB women, it took longer to return to work due to pain (45.96, SD31.36) compared to GA (6.4, SD 1.34) and GC (10.66, SD1.15). In women with infection, overall mean time was 10.11 days (SD 3.61) with no difference between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Mean time for the return to normal activity in patients who underwent TOT for SUI is 5 days if there are no complications, and 16.91 days if there are any. The ASA-SP risk group classification can be used to anticipate functional outcomes. An ASA-PS risk-based functional recovery forecasting protocol should be adapted, especially ASA II patients who may present with long-term disabling postoperative pain. Preventive management measures are proposed that favour functional recovery.

Spinal anesthesia compared with general anesthesia for neonates with hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Studies of spinal anesthesia in children are limited to a reduced group of high-risk patients and it remains relatively underused compared with general anesthesia in this age group in most institutions. In our experience, spinal anesthesia appears to be a good alternative to general anesthesia during pyloromyotomy in neonates and infants. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate respiratory morbidity of spinal anesthesia compared to general anesthesia in infants undergoing pyloromyotomy. METHODS: The University Hospital of Salamanca used spinal or general anesthesia on infants undergoing pyloromyotomy between 2003 and 2017. The primary outcome assessed was the prevalence of apnea. The second one was the prevalence of oxygen saturation below 95%. An analysis was performed using t test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables, and Chi-square for categorical variables. Logistic regression was done to account for differences in demographic and clinical covariates. RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 68 infants and neonates undergoing pyloromyotomy (48 with spinal anesthesia and 20 with general anesthesia). There was a significant difference in apneic episodes after surgery between general (number/percentage = 5/20, 25%) and spinal (number/percentage = 0/48, 0%) groups. Absolute risk reduction is 25% (CI 95%: 6%-44%), P < .001. CONCLUSION: Spinal anesthesia in neonates with hypertrophic pyloric stenosis undergoing pyloromyotomy was a viable alternative to general anesthesia, reducing the respiratory morbidity associated with the latter.

Comparative study of bacterial translocation control with nitric oxide donors and COX2 inhibitor / Estudio comparativo del control de la translocación bacteriana con donadores de óxido nítrico e inhibidor de la COX2

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: To evaluate the beneficial effects of exogenous NO and an inhibitor of the COX2, and their action levels in a model of SIRS/bacterial translocation (BT) induced by Zymosan A®. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety Wistar rats were submitted to different treatments, and after 12h and 24h they were anaesthetized in order to collect blood, mesenteric lymph nodes, and kidney for subsequent biochemical analyses and microbiological examinations. Treatments. A nitric oxide donor, Molsidomine®, was compared with a COX2 inhibitor, Celecoxib®. METHODS: Zymosan A® was administered to Wistar rats. The animals were divided into 6 groups: one group for survival study, Group (1) No manipulation (BASAL); Group (2) vehicle of Zymosan A® given intraperitoneally (SHAM); Group I (control), with Zymosan A® (0.6g/kg) intraperitoneally; Group II (Molsidomine), with Molsidomine® (4mg/kg) through the penis dorsal vein, 30min prior to administration of the Zy® (0.6g/kg); Group III (Celecoxib), with Celecoxib® (400mg/kg) orally through a stomach tube, 6h prior to administration of the Zy (0.6g/kg). Determinations. The parameters survival, bacterial translocation, renal function, neutrophil accumulation, oxygen free radicals (OFR), detoxifying enzymes, and cytokines were measured at different times after Zymosan administration. RESULTS: The model established induced a mortality rate of 100% and generated BT and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) in all samples. It also significantly increased all variables, with p<.001 for MPO and all pro-inflammatory cytokines, and p<.01 for all OFR. Treatment with Molsidomine reduced mortality to 0%, decreased BT, MPO, pro-inflammatory cytokines and OFR (p<.001) significantly and increased IL-10 and IL-6 production. Moreover, the Celecoxib® showed a lower capacity for SIRS regulation. CONCLUSIONS: The exogenous administration of NO prevented BT and controlled SIRS. Therefore these results suggest that Molsidomine could be used as a therapeutic strategy to protect against BT

OBJETIVO Y DISEÑO. Evaluar los efectos beneficiosos del ON exógeno y de un inhibidor de la COX2 y sus niveles de acción en un modelo de síndrome de respuesta inflamatoria sistémica (SIRS)/traslocación bacteriana (TB) inducida por Zymosan A®. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Noventa ratas Wistar fueron sometidas a diferentes tratamientos, y después de 12 y 24 horas fueron anestesiadas para recoger sangre, nódulos linfáticos mesentéricos y tejido renal, para analizarlos bioquímica y microbiológicamente. Tratamientos. Un donador de óxido nítrico, Molsidomina®, fue comparado con Celecoxib®, inhibidor de la COX2. MÉTODOS: Se administró Zymosan A® a las ratas Wistar. Estas fueron divididas en CINCO grupos: grupo 1 (basal), sin manipulaciones; grupo 2 (sham), vehículo de Zymosan A® administrado intraperitonealmente; grupo I (control), con Zymosan A® (0,6 g/kg) intraperitoneal; grupo II (Molsidomina) con Molsidomina® (4 mg/kg) administrada a través de la vena dorsal del pene, 30 minutos antes de la administración de Zymosan® (0,6 g/kg); y grupo III (Celecoxib) con Celecoxib® (400 mg/kg) administrado oralmente por tubo esomacal, 6 horas antes de la administración de Zymosan A® (0,6 g/kg). Determinaciones. Se midieron los parámetros supervivencia, traslocación bacteriana, función renal, acumulación de neutrófilos, radicales libres de oxígeno, enzimas detoxificantes y citoquinas, a diferentes tiempos después de la administración de Zymosan®. RESULTADOS: El modelo establecido inducía una tasa de mortalidad del 100%, y se generaba traslocación bacteriana y síndrome de respuesta inflamatoria sistémica en todas las muestras. También se incrementaban significativamente todas las variables, con p < 0,001 para mieloperoxidasa y todas las citokinas proinflamatorias, y p < 0,01 para todos los radicales libres de oxígeno. El tratamiento con Molsidomina reducía la mortalidad al 0%, disminuía la traslocación bacteriana, mieloperoxidasas, citokinas proinflamatorias y radicales libres de oxígeno (p < 0,001), e incrementaba la producción de IL-10 e IL-6. Además, Celecoxib® mostró una menor capacidad para la regulación del síndrome de respuesta inflamatoria sistémica. CONCLUSIONES: La administración exógena de óxido nítrico evita la traslocación bacteriana y controla el síndrome de respuesta inflamatoria sistémica. Estos resultados sugieren que Molsidomina podría usarse como estrategia terapéutica frente a la traslocación bacteriana

Comparative study of bacterial translocation control with nitric oxide donors and COX2 inhibitor.

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: To evaluate the beneficial effects of exogenous NO and an inhibitor of the COX2, and their action levels in a model of SIRS/bacterial translocation (BT) induced by Zymosan A(®). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety Wistar rats were submitted to different treatments, and after 12h and 24h they were anaesthetized in order to collect blood, mesenteric lymph nodes, and kidney for subsequent biochemical analyses and microbiological examinations. TREATMENTS: A nitric oxide donor, Molsidomine(®), was compared with a COX2 inhibitor, Celecoxib(®). METHODS: Zymosan A(®) was administered to Wistar rats. The animals were divided into 6 groups: one group for survival study, Group (1) No manipulation (BASAL); Group (2) vehicle of Zymosan A(®) given intraperitoneally (SHAM); Group I (control), with Zymosan A(®) (0.6g/kg) intraperitoneally; Group II (Molsidomine), with Molsidomine(®) (4mg/kg) through the penis dorsal vein, 30min prior to administration of the Zy(®) (0.6g/kg); Group III (Celecoxib), with Celecoxib(®) (400mg/kg) orally through a stomach tube, 6h prior to administration of the Zy (0.6g/kg). DETERMINATIONS: The parameters survival, bacterial translocation, renal function, neutrophil accumulation, oxygen free radicals (OFR), detoxifying enzymes, and cytokines were measured at different times after Zymosan administration. RESULTS: The model established induced a mortality rate of 100% and generated BT and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) in all samples. It also significantly increased all variables, with p<.001 for MPO and all pro-inflammatory cytokines, and p<.01 for all OFR. Treatment with Molsidomine reduced mortality to 0%, decreased BT, MPO, pro-inflammatory cytokines and OFR (p<.001) significantly and increased IL-10 and IL-6 production. Moreover, the Celecoxib(®) showed a lower capacity for SIRS regulation. CONCLUSIONS: The exogenous administration of NO prevented BT and controlled SIRS. Therefore these results suggest that Molsidomine could be used as a therapeutic strategy to protect against BT.