Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Br J Anaesth ; 120(5): 1110-1116, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29661388

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The role of obesity as a risk factor for difficult intubation remains controversial. We primarily assessed the association between body mass index (BMI) and difficult tracheal intubation. METHODS: We analysed electronic records of more than 67 000 adults having elective non-cardiac surgery requiring tracheal intubation at the Cleveland Clinic between 2011 and 2015. The association between BMI and difficult intubation, defined as more than one intubation attempt, was assessed using multivariable logistic regression adjusting for pre-specified confounders. RESULTS: Amongst 40 183 patients with BMI <30 kg m-2 and 27 519 with BMI ≥30 kg m-2, 9% required more than one intubation attempt. Increasing BMI up to 30 kg m-2 was significantly associated with increased odds of more than one intubation attempt [odds ratio (OR): 1.03; 97.5% confidence interval (CI): 1.02, 1.04] per unit increase in BMI, P < 0.001. However, the odds of difficult intubation remained unchanged once BMI exceeded 30 kg m-2 (P = 0.08). The results were similar when analysis was restricted to patients without history of airway abnormalities in whom intubation was attempted using a standard direct laryngoscope (OR: 1.03; 99.4% CI: 1.01, 1.04) per kg m-2 increase in BMI <30 kg m-2). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing BMI was associated with increasing odds of difficult intubation in the lean range. At higher BMI, the odds of difficult intubation remain elevated, but there is no additional increase in odds with further increase in BMI. Obese patients were thus harder to intubate than lean ones, but difficult intubation was no more likely in morbidly obese patients than in those who were only slightly obese.


Subject(s)
Body Mass Index , Intubation, Intratracheal/statistics & numerical data , Obesity/complications , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
2.
Br J Anaesth ; 119(4): 803-811, 2017 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29121296

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The anti-inflammatory effects of statins have been suggested to relieve postoperative pain. This retrospective study tested the association between the perioperative routine use of statins in therapeutic doses, and opioid requirements and pain scores, after hip replacement surgery. METHODS: With IRB approval, data was obtained for adult patients who had elective hip replacement surgery under spinal anaesthesia at Cleveland Clinic between 2005 and 2015. Patients were compared using a joint hypothesis framework. We used the inverse probability of treatment weighting method to control for observed confounding factors (a total of 26). RESULTS: We included 611 statin users and 780 non-statin users. Pain score during the initial 72 h after surgery was 0.07 higher (95% CI: -0.02, 0.17) in statin users (noninferiority test in both directions P<0.001). The estimated ratio of geometric means in the cumulative i.v. morphine equivalent opioid consumption was 1.01 (95% CI: 0.93, 1.10) for statin vs non-statin users (noninferiority test P=0.001 in the hypothesized direction and<0.001 in the other direction) during the initial 72 h after surgery. The statin and non-statin patients were deemed equivalent on postoperative opioid consumption and pain score. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first large retrospective clinical study that investigates the effects of statin use on postoperative pain and opioid consumption. We observed no difference between statin users and non-users during the initial 72 h after hip surgery. Our findings do not support the routine use of statins as part of an analgesic regimen.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Anesthesia, Spinal/methods , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Perioperative Care/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
3.
BJOG ; 122(1): 71-9, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25163819

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17OHPC) prolongs gestation beyond 37 weeks of gestation (primary outcome) and reduces neonatal morbidity (secondary outcome) in twin pregnancy. DESIGN: Randomised controlled double-blind clinical trial. SETTING: Tertiary-care university medical centre. POPULATION: Unselected women with twin pregnancies. METHODS: Participants received weekly injections of 250 mg 17OHPC (n = 194) or placebo (n = 94), from 16-20 to 36 weeks of gestation. Randomisation was performed using the permuted-block randomisation method. Data were analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Preterm birth (PTB) rate before 37 weeks of gestation. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the average gestational age at delivery, or in the rates of PTB before 37, 32, and 28 weeks of gestation, between the two groups. The proportion of very-low-birthweight neonates (<1500 g) was significantly lower in the 17OHPC group (7.6%) compared with placebo (14.3%) (relative risk, RR 0.5; 95% confidence interval, 95% CI 0.3-0.9; P = 0.01). Progestogen-treated neonates had a significantly lower composite neonatal morbidity (19.1%) compared with placebo (30.9%) (odds ratio, OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.31-0.90; P = 0.02), with significantly lower odds for respiratory distress syndrome (14.4 versus 23.4%; OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.31-0.98; P = 0.04), retinopathy of prematurity (1.1 versus 4.6%; OR 0.21; 95% CI 0.05-0.96; P = 0.04), and culture-confirmed sepsis (3.4 versus 12.8%; OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.10-0.57; P = 0.00). CONCLUSIONS: Intramuscular 17OHPC therapy did not reduce PTB before 37 weeks of gestation in unselected twin pregnancies. Nonetheless, 17OHPC significantly reduced neonatal morbidity parameters and increased birthweight.


Subject(s)
Hydroxyprogesterones/therapeutic use , Pregnancy, Twin , Premature Birth/prevention & control , Progestins/therapeutic use , Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn/prevention & control , Retinopathy of Prematurity/prevention & control , Sepsis/prevention & control , 17 alpha-Hydroxyprogesterone Caproate , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Infant, Very Low Birth Weight , Injections, Intramuscular , Odds Ratio , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, Second , Pregnancy Trimester, Third
5.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 54(6): 764-9, 2010 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20236094

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Subarachnoid (SA) morphine, highly effective for the management of pain after a cesarean delivery, is associated with a significant incidence of pruritus in up to 80% of patients. No previous study has compared the effectiveness of ondansetron (5-HT(3) antagonist) vs. diphenhydramine (H(1) receptor blocker) for the treatment of this side effect. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind study, 113 patients with a pruritus score 3 or 4 (1=absent; 2=mild, no treatment required; 3=moderate pruritus, treatment required; and 4=severe pruritus) after SA morphine 0.2 mg were assigned to group ondansetron, which received 4 mg intravenously (i.v.) ondansetron, and group diphenhydramine, which received 25 mg i.v. diphenhydramine. Patients who continued to have pruritus > or =3, 30 min after the study drug were considered treatment failures and were treated with naloxone 0.04 mg i.v. repeatedly, as well as patients who relapsed. Pain scores, nausea, vomiting, and sedation were determined before and 30 min after the study drugs were administered. Patients were followed up for 24 h. RESULTS: The success rate was comparable between the two groups [40/57 (70%) and 38/56 (70%), P=0.79, in group ondansetron and group diphenhydramine, respectively]. Among the successfully treated patients, the recurrence rates of moderate to severe pruritus were 11/40 (28%) in group ondansetron and 13/38 (35%) in group diphenhydramine, P=0.52. The side effect profile was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Ondansetron is as effective as diphenhydramine in relieving pruritus caused by SA morphine in patients undergoing a cesarean delivery. However, up to 50% of patients required naloxone either for primary failure or for recurrence.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section , Diphenhydramine/therapeutic use , Histamine H1 Antagonists/therapeutic use , Morphine/adverse effects , Narcotics/adverse effects , Ondansetron/therapeutic use , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pruritus/drug therapy , Serotonin Antagonists/therapeutic use , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Morphine/therapeutic use , Naloxone/therapeutic use , Narcotic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Narcotics/therapeutic use , Patient Satisfaction , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Pruritus/chemically induced , Recurrence , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL