Survival analysis and prognostic factors in posterior fossa ependymomas in children and adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, the authors aimed to analyze the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients younger than 18 years of age who were diagnosed with posterior fossa ependymomas, and to identify prognostic factors such as the degree of resection, tumor topography, and involvement of the lesion in the hindbrain. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of patients younger than 18 years of age, treated beginning in 2000, with a diagnosis of posterior fossa ependymoma. Ependymomas were separated into three groups: tumors restricted to the fourth ventricle, tumors inside the fourth ventricle and exiting from the foramen of Luschka, and tumors inside the fourth ventricle and completely surrounding the hindbrain. Furthermore, the tumors were classified by molecular group using the staining method for H3K27me3. Statistical analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Of 1693 patients who underwent surgical treatment between January 2000 and May 2021, 55 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included. The median age at diagnosis was 2.98 years. The median OS was 44 months, and the survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 92.5%, 49.1%, and 38.3%, respectively. The cases were assigned to two posterior fossa ependymoma molecular groups: 35 (63.6%) cases to group A and 8 (14.5%) to group B. The median ages in groups A and B were 2.94 and 2.85 years and the median OS values were 44 and 38 months, respectively (p = 0.9245). Statistical analysis was performed on multiple variables, including age, sex, histological grade, Ki-67 expression, tumor volume, extent of resection, and adjuvant therapies. The median PFS of patients with dorsal-only involvement was 28 months; for dorsolateral involvement, it was 15 months; and for total involvement, it was 9.5 months (p = 0.0464). No statistically significant difference was found for OS. There was a statistically significant difference between the proportion of patients in whom gross-total resection was achieved in the dorsal-only involvement group (73.1%, 19/26) and those in the total involvement group (0%, 0/6) (p = 0.0019). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that the extent of resection has an impact on OS and PFS. The authors found that adjuvant radiotherapy resulted in a higher OS but did not prevent progression, that the pattern of involvement of the brainstem in the tumor at diagnosis could elicit important information regarding the patient's prognosis regarding PFS, and that the total involvement of the rhombencephalon impaired the gross-total resection of these tumors.

Outcomes and surgical approaches for pineal region tumors in children: 30 years' experience.

OBJECTIVE: Pineal region tumors account for 2.7%-11% of all CNS tumors in children. In this series, the authors present their surgical results and long-term outcomes from a pediatric pineal region tumor cohort. METHODS: A total of 151 children aged 0-18 years were treated from 1991 to 2020. Tumor markers were collected in all patients; if positive, chemotherapy was performed, and if negative, biopsy was performed, preferably endoscopically. Resection was performed when there was a residual germ cell tumor (GCT) lesion after chemotherapy. RESULTS: The distribution based on histological type, as verified by markers, biopsy, or surgery, was germinoma (33.1%), nongerminomatous GCT (NGGCT) (27.2%), pineoblastoma (22.5%), glioma (12.6%), and embryonal tumor (atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor) (3.3%). A total of 97 patients underwent resection, and gross-total resection (GTR) was achieved in 64%; the highest GTR rate (76.6%) was found in patients with GCTs, and the lowest (30.8%) was found in those with gliomas. The supracerebellar infratentorial approach (SCITA) was the most common, performed in 53.6% of patients, followed by the occipital transtentorial approach (OTA), performed in 24.7% of patients. Lesions were biopsied in 70 patients, and the diagnostic accuracy was 91.4. The overall survival (OS) rates at 12, 24, and 60 months as stratified by histological type were 93.7%, 93.7%, and 88% for patients with germinomas; 84.5%, 63.5%, and 40.7% for patients with pineoblastomas; 89.4%, 80.8%, and 67.2% for patients with NGGCTs; 89.4%, 78.2%, and 72.6% for patients with gliomas; and 40%, 20%, and 0% for patients with embryonal tumors, respectively (p < 0001). The OS at 60 months was significantly higher in the group with GTR (69.7%) than in the group with subtotal resection (40.8%) (p = 0.04). The 5-year progression-free survival was 77% for patients with germinomas, 72.6% for patients with gliomas, 50.8% for patients with NGGCTs, and 38.9% for patients with pineoblastomas. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of resection varies by histological type, and complete resection is associated with higher OS rates. Endoscopic biopsy is the method of choice for patients presenting with negative tumor markers and hydrocephalus. For tumors restricted to the midline and with extension to the third ventricle, a SCITA is preferred, whereas for lesions with extension toward the fourth ventricle, an OTA is preferred.

Gliomas in children and adolescents: investigation of molecular alterations with a potential prognostic and therapeutic impact.

PURPOSE: Gliomas represent the most frequent central nervous system (CNS) tumors in children and adolescents. However, therapeutic strategies for these patients, based on tumor molecular profile, are still limited compared to the wide range of treatment options for the adult population. We investigated molecular alterations, with a potential prognostic marker and therapeutic target in gliomas of childhood and adolescence using the next-generation sequencing (NGS) strategy. METHODS: We selected 95 samples with initial diagnosis of glioma from patients treated at Pediatric Oncology Institute-GRAACC/UNIFESP. All samples were categorized according to the 2021 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the CNS, which included 39 low-grade gliomas (LGGs) and 56 high-grade gliomas (HGGs). Four HGG samples were classified as congenital glioblastoma (cGBM). NGS was performed to identify somatic genetic variants in tumor samples using the Oncomine Childhood Cancer Research Assay® (OCCRA®) panel, from Thermo Fisher Scientific®. RESULTS: Genetic variants were identified in 76 of 95 (80%) tumors. In HGGs, the most common molecular alteration detected was H3F3A c.83A > T variant (H3.3 K27M) and co-occurring mutations in ATRX, TP53, PDGFRA, MET, and MYC genes were also frequently observed. One HGG sample was reclassified as supratentorial ependymoma ZFTA-fusion positive after NGS was performed. In LGGs, four KIAA1549-BRAF fusion transcripts were detected and this alteration was the most recurrent genetic event and favorable prognostic factor identified. Additionally, genetic variants in ALK and NTRK genes, which provide potential targets for therapy with Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs, were identified in two different cases of cGBM that were classified as infant-type hemispheric glioma, a newly recognized subgroup of pediatric HGG. CONCLUSION: Molecular profiling by the OCCRA® panel comprehensively addressed the most relevant genetic variants in gliomas of childhood and adolescence, as these tumors have specific patterns of molecular alterations, outcomes, and effectiveness to therapies.

Molecular profiling of pediatric and adolescent ependymomas: identification of genetic variants using a next-generation sequencing panel.

PURPOSE: Ependymoma (EPN) accounts for approximately 10% of all primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors in children and in most cases, chemotherapy is ineffective and treatment remains challenging. We investigated molecular alterations, with a potential prognostic marker and therapeutic target in EPNs of childhood and adolescence, using a next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel specific for pediatric neoplasms. METHODS: We selected 61 samples with initial diagnosis of EPN from patients treated at Pediatric Oncology Institute-GRAACC/UNIFESP. All samples were divided according to the anatomical compartment of the CNS - 42 posterior fossa (PF), 14 supratentorial (ST), and five spinal (SP). NGS was performed to identify somatic genetic variants in tumor samples using the Oncomine Childhood Cancer Research Assay® (OCCRA®) panel, from Thermo Fisher Scientific®. RESULTS: Genetic variants were identified in 24 of 61 (39.3%) tumors and over 90% of all variants were pathogenic or likely pathogenic. The most commonly variants detected were in CIC, ASXL1, and JAK2 genes and have not been reported in EPN yet. MN1-BEND2 fusion, alteration recently described in a new CNS tumor type, was identified in one ST sample that was reclassified as astroblastoma. Additionally, YAP1-MAMLD1 fusion, a rare event associated with good outcome in ST-EPN, was observed in two patients diagnosed under 2 years old. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular profiling by the OCCRA® panel showed novel alterations in pediatric and adolescent EPNs, which highlights the clinical importance in identifying genetic variants for patients' prognosis and therapeutic orientation.

Validated quantitative needs assessment differences in the management of children with central nervous system cancer between Brazil, an upper middle-income country, and the United States of America, a high income country.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric cancer cure rates differ among high-income countries (HIC) and upper middle-income countries (UMIC). We have compared individual capacities of two major referral pediatric centers from a HIC and an UMIC caring for children with central nervous system (CNS) cancer. METHODS: A quantitative needs assessment questionnaire and key informant interviews, distributed in March of 2017, were used to evaluate the treatment of children with CNS cancer at Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC) children's cancer center in São Paulo, Brazil and Nationwide Children's Hospital (NCH) in Columbus, Ohio, United States of America (USA). RESULTS: Both hospitals had 24-hour pediatric oncology, nursing and intensivist coverage. Supportive care available at both institutions included social workers, psychologists, child life specialists, and physical/occupational/speech therapists. Differences included two part-time neuroradiologists and one pathologist specializing in neuropathology at IOP/GRAACC/UNIFESP, whereas eight full-time neuroradiologists and two neuropathologists at NCH/OSU. There were four pediatric neurosurgeons on staff at each hospital; however, there were only 2 operative days per week at IOP/GRAACC/UNIFESP, compared with 7 days at NCH/OSU. Additionally, time to initiation of radiation therapy at IOP/GRAACC/UNIFESP extended 2-4 weeks compared with less than 1 week at NCH/OSU. CONCLUSIONS: Center-specific differences in resources exist in highly specialized hospitals caring for children with CNS cancer in HIC and UMIC. This quantitative needs assessment may facilitate the development of targeted strategies for effective interventions to improve on the management of children with CNS cancers.

High-grade gliomas in children and adolescents: is there a role for reoperation?

OBJECTIVE: Tumors of the CNS are the main causes of childhood cancer and have an incidence that exceeds that of leukemia. In addition, they are the leading causes of cancer-related death in childhood. High-grade gliomas account for 11% of such neoplasms and are characterized by aggressive clinical behavior and high morbidity and mortality. There is a lack of studies focusing on the factors that can prolong survival in these patients or guide therapeutic interventions. The authors aimed to investigate the factors related to longer survival durations, with a focus on reoperation for gross-total resection (GTR). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, the authors analyzed 78 patients diagnosed with high-grade gliomas occurring across all CNS locations except diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas. Patients 0 to < 19 years of age were followed up at the Pediatric Oncology Institute. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed in the context of various prognostic factors, such as age, sex, histology, extent of tumor resection, reoperation for GTR, adjuvant treatment, and treatment initiation from 2010 onward. RESULTS: With a mean age at diagnosis of 8.7 years, 50% of the patients were female and approximately 39% underwent GTR at some point, which was already achieved in approximately 46% of them in the first surgery. The median OS was 17 months, and PFS was 10 months. In terms of median OS, the authors found no significant difference between those with reoperation for GTR and patients without GTR during treatment. Significant differences were observed in the OS in terms of the extent of resection in the first surgery, age, sex, Ki-67 expression, adjuvant treatment, and treatment initiation from 2010 onward. Furthermore, the PFS values significantly differed between those with GTR in the first surgery and Ki-67 expression ≥ 50%. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the importance of GTR for these neoplasms, highlights the role of surgeons in its achievement in the first attempt, and questions the role of reoperation for this purpose. Finally, this study further supports the use of combined adjuvant treatment for the improvement of OS and PFS.