Assessment of care timelines in intestinal malrotation with volvulus: A retrospective chart review.

BACKGROUND: Patients with intestinal malrotation with volvulus (MWV) may suffer bowel ischemia, which can be correlated with the timing of surgical intervention. The purpose of this study was to identify and assess time-blocks in the care of patients from initial physician assessment (IPA) to surgical intervention to highlight potential opportunities for improvement. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients with MWV presenting to McMaster Children's Hospital between January 1st, 2000 and December 31st, 2020 (n = 31). Demographic data and time-blocks of care were identified and analyzed (p < 0.05 considered significant). All times were reported as medians. RESULTS: 22 males (71%) and 9 females (29%) were identified; median age was 9.8 d. IPA to incision was 10.7hrs and surgical consult to incision was 3.4hrs. Time to incision for patients <1 y was not significantly different than those >1 y (10.5hrs vs 10.7hrs, p = 0.737). The use of ultrasound did not significantly affect time to incision (7.9hrs vs 12.0hrs, p = 0.128). For patients requiring resection or having pan-necrosis there was no significant difference in time from IPA (10.9hrs vs 10.5hrs, p = 0.238) or surgical consult to incision (4.0hrs vs 3.3hrs, p = 0.808). CONCLUSION: Time from IPA to surgical consult and time from surgical consult to surgical intervention represented the largest proportions of time. Age, use of ultrasound, and need for resection or having pan-necrosis did not significantly affect the time to incision. This data may be used to inform opportunities for expediting the management of patients with MWV once they have presented to a physician. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Postoperative pain and pain management and neurocognitive outcomes after non-cardiac surgery: a protocol for a series of systematic reviews.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium (POD) is common after non-cardiac surgery in older adults and can result in increased risk of adverse outcomes including postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). Pain after surgery is also frequent and can persist as chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP). Evidence is inconsistent and controversial on whether acute and chronic postsurgical pain, and different postoperative pain management strategies (including opioid versus opioid-sparing strategies), is associated with the occurrence of POD and POCD. In this protocol, we propose a series of systematic reviews to answer the following research questions: In adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery, (1) is acute postsurgical pain associated with POD and/or POCD? (2) Are opioid-sparing/avoidance strategies of acute postoperative pain management associated with lower incidence and/or severity of POD and POCD, compared to predominantly opioid-based strategies? (3) Is CPSP associated with POCD? (4) Are opioid-sparing management strategies of CPSP associated with lower incidence and/or severity of POCD compared to standard of care or strategies not aiming at reduced opioid use? METHODS: We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane (CENTRAL), CINAHL, and PSYCHINFO. According to the research question, we will include cohort and case-control studies (questions 1 and 3) or randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies (questions 2 and 4). The risk of bias will be assessed independently and in duplicate using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the Joanna-Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist. Disagreements will be resolved by a third reviewer. Findings will be reported narratively, and where possible and appropriate, meta-analyses will be performed. Certainty of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We will conduct the reviews in accordance with the guideline of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Protocols. DISCUSSION: Our systematic reviews will summarize available evidence to date on the association of postoperative pain and its management strategies with the incidence of POD and POCD in non-cardiac surgery. We will evaluate the existing evidence and its limitations and inform the design of future interventional studies comparing the effects of different pain management strategies on postoperative neurocognitive outcomes. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021192105.