IBD-Disk as a tool estimating the prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease-related disability and associated influencing factors in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) disk is an easy tool to use in clinical practice to measure IBD-related disability, with a score >40 correlating with high daily-life burden. Its use has been limited mainly to the western world. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of IBD-related disability and evaluate the associated risk factors in Saudi Arabia. Methods: In this cross sectional study conducted at a tertiary referral center for IBD, the English IBD disk was translated into Arabic, and patients with IBD were approached to complete it. Total IBD disk score (0 = no disability; 100 = severe disability) was documented and a score of >40 was set as a threshold to estimate the prevalence of disability. Results: Eighty patients with a mean age of 32.5 ± 11.9 years and disease duration of 6 years, including 57% females, were analyzed. The mean IBD-disk total score was 20.70 ± 18.69. The mean subscores for each function within the disk ranged from 0.38 ± 1.69 for sexual functions to 3.61 ± 3.29 for energy. The overall prevalence of IBD-related disability was 19% (15/80 scoring >40) and was much higher in active disease, in males and in IBD of long duration (39%, 24%, and 26%, respectively). A clinically active disease, high CRP, and high calprotectin were strongly associated with higher disk scores. Conclusion: Although the overall mean IBD disk score was low, nearly 19% of our population had high scores signifying a high prevalence of disability. As demonstrated by other studies, active disease and high biomarkers were significantly associated with higher IBD-disk scores.

Risk factors of primary and secondary restless legs syndrome among a middle-aged population in Saudi Arabia: A community-based study.

INTRODUCTION: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is etiologically divided into primary and secondary syndromes. However, a comparative description of both types is lacking in the literature. We compared primary and secondary RLS with respect to demographic determinants, associated risk factors, and comorbidities. METHODS: Following a cross-sectional survey on the prevalence of RLS in a Saudi population, RLS cases were identified using the International RLS Study Group (IRLSSG) criteria. Cases were assessed with an interview-based questionnaire regarding baseline characteristics, risk factors, and comorbidities and with lower limb examinations and laboratory measurements. RLS severity was assessed using the IRLSSG Severity Rating Scale. RESULTS: In total, 78 patients with RLS, including 50 (64.1%) primary and 28 (35.9%) secondary cases, were examined. Of the primary cases, 35 (70%) were male; of the secondary cases, 25 (89.3%) were female (P < 0.001). Multivariate regression confirmed the association of male gender with primary RLS (odds ratio = 14.53, 95% confidence interval [2.9-75], P = 0.001). There were more dark- and black-skinned participants in the primary RLS group (38, 72%) than in the secondary group (15, 28%) (P = 0.042). Iron deficiency was observed in most (26, 92%) of the secondary cases. More severe symptoms were reported in secondary than in primary RLS cases (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Primary RLS is more common but less severe than secondary RLS. Male gender and ethnicity play significant roles in primary RLS, whereas female gender and iron deficiency may be the main risk factors associated with secondary RLS.

Risk Stratification of Patients with Crohn's Disease: A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Decision Making and Its Impact on Long-Term Outcome.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Complications such as need for bowel resections and hospitalization due to Crohn's disease (CD) occur when disease activity persists due to ineffective therapy. Certain "high-risk" features require an early introduction of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy to prevent such complications. We aim to evaluate the prevalence of "high-risk" features among a cohort of patients with CD and examine the association between discordance of early therapy with baseline risk stratification and disease outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All adult patients with CD were retrospectively identified and their medical records were reviewed. Clinical, endoscopic, laboratory, and radiological data were collected. Patients were divided into "low" and "high" risk groups according to the presence or absence of penetrating disease, perianal involvement, foregut involvement, extensive disease seen on endoscopy or cross-sectional imaging, young age at the time of diagnosis (<40), persistent cigarette smoking and frequent early requirements for corticosteroid therapy. Initial treatment selection and treatment approach ("step-up" vs. "accelerated step-up" vs. "top-down") within 6 months of diagnosis were recorded. Rates of CD-related bowel resections and hospitalization within 5 years of diagnosis were calculated. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between "discordance" of early treatment selections and risk stratification categories with outcomes. RESULTS: Eighty-five CD patients were included. The median age and duration of disease were 25 (interquartile range [IQR] 19-32) and 5 (IQR 4-6) years, respectively. Sixty five percent were females and 66% were native Saudis. Smoking was reported in 12% of patients and perianal disease in 18%. "High-risk" features were identified in 43 (51%) patients, of which only 6 (14%) were treated with "top-down" therapy and 7 (16%) with "accelerated step-up" care. The risk of requiring a bowel resection, and hospitalization was higher for "high-risk" patients compared to "low-risk" patients (risk ratio [RR] 13.67, 95% CI 1.88-99.41; p = 0.003, and RR 1.86, 95% CI 0.03-0.43; p = 0.0312, respectively). "Discordance" occurred in 34% of cases. Bowel resection was required in 15/85 (18%) patients and 32/85 (38%) required at least one hospitalization within 5 years of diagnosis. Logistic regression analysis identified a statistically significant association between "discordance" and need for bowel resections (OR 6.50, 95% CI 1.59-26.27, p = 0.009), and hospitalizations (OR 3.01, 95% CI 1.08-8.39, p = 0.035) within 5 years of diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: "Discordance" between patient risk-profile and treatment selection early in the course of CD has a significant impact on disease outcome, specifically need for bowel resection and hospitalization, which are more likely to occur in the presence of "high-risk" features. Early identification of "high-risk" features could help prevent long-term complications.