ABSTRACT
Fractures and dislocations of the carpal bones are more common in young active patients. These injuries can lead to pain, dysfunction, and loss of productivity. Conventional radiography remains the primary imaging modality for evaluation of suspected carpal fractures and dislocations. However, multidetector computed tomography (CT) is playing an increasingly important role, especially in the following situations: (a) when results from initial radiographs are negative in patients with suspected carpal fractures, (b) when initial radiographic findings are indeterminate, and (c) when knowledge of the extent of carpal fractures or dislocations is required before surgical treatment. The advantages of multidetector CT include quick and accurate diagnosis with availability in most emergency centers. Multidetector CT can easily display the extent of carpal fractures and dislocations, often depicting fractures that are occult at radiography. In addition, with multiplanar (two-dimensional) and volumetric (three-dimensional) reformation, pathologic conditions and anatomic relationships are better perceived. This information can be easily conveyed to orthopedic and trauma surgeons and can be crucial for surgical treatment and planning.
Subject(s)
Carpal Bones/diagnostic imaging , Carpal Bones/injuries , Fractures, Bone/diagnostic imaging , Joint Dislocations/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Wrist Injuries/diagnostic imaging , HumansSubject(s)
Abdominal Injuries/therapy , Athletic Injuries/therapy , Fractures, Bone/therapy , Ilium/injuries , Wounds, Penetrating/therapy , Abdominal Injuries/diagnosis , Abdominal Injuries/etiology , Accidents , Athletic Injuries/diagnosis , Blood Chemical Analysis , Fractures, Bone/diagnostic imaging , Fractures, Bone/etiology , Humans , Ilium/diagnostic imaging , Intestines/injuries , Male , Middle Aged , Radiography , Trauma Centers , Traumatology/methods , Wounds, Penetrating/etiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Appendiceal CT was introduced at our hospital in 1996 and now is used in most patients. The use of appendiceal CT has generated controversy and mixed results in various investigations. Our purpose was to determine the percentage of patients for whom CT was performed, incidence of appendicitis, accuracy of CT, percentage of equivocal interpretations, and negative appendectomy rates for those patients who did and did not undergo CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient records from 2001 that included clinical or CT preoperative examination were analyzed, with follow-up through 2003. Patient age and sex, clinical presentation, CT techniques, CT interpretations, operative reports, pathology reports, and patient disposition were determined. Final diagnoses were provided by pathologic criteria, patient follow-up, or patient survey. Statistical analysis included Fisher's exact test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: Of 753 patients, 663 (88%) were examined on CT for suspected appendicitis and 90 had an appendectomy without undergoing CT. The incidence of appendicitis in the patients who underwent CT was 39.2%. The sensitivity and specificity of CT were 99% and 95%, respectively; the area under the ROC curve was 0.9896; and the percentage of equivocal CT interpretations was 3.3%. The false-negative appendectomy rates were 3.0% and 5.6% for patients with and without CT, respectively (for all patients, p = 0.326; for female pediatric patients, p = 0.030). CONCLUSION: Five years ago, the negative appendectomy rate dropped from 20% to 7%, and it is now 3.0%. The incidence of appendicitis in patients who are examined on CT is stable compared with similar cohorts from prior investigations. Patients who do not undergo CT also have a low negative appendectomy rate, but this relatively small group is selected on the basis of a convincing clinical presentation. Female pediatric patients likely would have a lower negative appendectomy rate with greater use of CT.
Subject(s)
Appendicitis/diagnostic imaging , Appendix/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Appendectomy , Appendicitis/epidemiology , Appendicitis/surgery , Child , Databases, Factual/statistics & numerical data , False Negative Reactions , False Positive Reactions , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the presence and CT distribution of nontraumatic fluid collections and edema in the abdomen and pelvis after initial fluid resuscitation of patients with major (>/==" BORDER="0"> 25% total body surface area) thermal burns. CONCLUSION: Awareness of the presence and expected CT distribution of nontraumatic fluid after initial fluid resuscitation in patients with major burns can assist the radiologist in differentiating such collections from those caused by mechanical trauma.