ABSTRACT
Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) frequently captures unexpected structural abnormalities unrelated to the original intent of the diagnostic test. Once identified by dentists, these findings often require appropriate clinical referral for further investigation. This study reviewed recent literature using a comprehensive search to identify and curate common CBCT incidental findings (IFs). Studies were included if they reported CBCT IFs and included more than 10 cases. The review included 16 primary studies in addition to 4 studies described in recent relevant systematic reviews. A total of 51 descriptive terms used to describe key IFs across studies were identified, and terms were organized semantically into 15 core finding categories. Recommendations for management and referral acuity were derived from otolaryngologic clinical practice guidelines and input from practicing otolaryngologists, and the results were integrated into a clinical management algorithm for acuity of referral. This comprehensive review offers practical recommendations to facilitate appropriate clinical management of CBCT IFs via otolaryngologic referral.
Subject(s)
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Incidental Findings , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods , Humans , Referral and Consultation , Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases/therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: In this study, we examine how impairments in vision, hearing, touch, and olfaction relate to depression in older adults, considering both individual and multisensory impairments (MSIs). STUDY DESIGN: Analysis of cross-sectional data from a longitudinal investigation involving black and white older adults aged 70 to 79 at enrollment. SETTING: We studied 1640 black and white participants in the Health ABC study using complete sensory evaluation data from years 3 to 5. METHODS: Our MSI assessment utilized data obtained for visual acuity, hearing perception, olfactory performance, and tactile function. We performed multivariable logistic regression analyses to examine the associations between the presence of individual and MSIs and depression which was defined as the presence of antidepressants prescribed for depression, or a Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale score of greater than 10. RESULTS: We observed a possible dose-response relationship between the number of sensory impairments and depression. In adjusted models, when compared to no impairments, vision (odds ratio [OR] = 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09-1.93) and hearing impairments (OR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.11-1.99) were significantly associated with depression, whereas olfaction (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.83-1.47) and tactile impairments (OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 0.96-1.70) were not. Participants with 3 sensory impairments had a higher rate of depression (OR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.22-3.54) compared to those without impairments, and this risk increased further for those with 4 sensory impairments (OR = 2.95, 95% CI: 1.48-5.88). CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that individuals with MSI represent a high-risk population for depression, warranting close monitoring to screen for depression. The study emphasizes the importance of considering multiple sensory impairments in the context of mental health and supports the early identification and monitoring of depression in this population.