Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Fam Syst Health ; 38(4): 369-379, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33119369

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The current study aimed to assess perinatal depression (PD) screening and treatment practices of obstetrical health care providers. METHOD: Retrospective record reviews (n = 557) evaluated the PD screening, referral, and treatment practices at an Obstetrician/Gynecology practice. This study assessed the frequency of screening for PD, rates of elevated Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) scores, treatment recommendations, demographic correlates, and predictors of elevated EPDS scores. RESULTS: PD screening completion rates were: 60.1% (intake), 35% (glucola test), and 85.5% (6-week follow-up). Rates of clinically elevated EPDS scores were: 18.21% (intake), 17.43% (glucola test), and 13.00% (6-week follow-up). Correlates of clinically elevated EPDS scores at intake and 6-week follow-up were history of depression, history of anxiety, and young age. History of depression and anxiety were associated with an increased likelihood of having a clinically significant EPDS score at intake. Intake EPDS score and history of depression were associated with an increased likelihood of having a clinically significant EPDS score at 6-week follow-up. DISCUSSION: Obstetric/gynecology providers should screen for perinatal depression at every obstetrical appointment. It is important to thoroughly assess history of depression and anxiety. Education and training for health care providers and perinatal women may improve the mental health experience of perinatal women. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).


Subject(s)
Depression/diagnosis , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Perinatal Care/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Depression/physiopathology , Depression/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/methods , Mass Screening/psychology , Obstetrics/trends , Perinatal Care/trends , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Psychometrics/instrumentation , Psychometrics/methods , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Psychiatry Res ; 291: 113161, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32562932

ABSTRACT

The prevalence and negative effects of perinatal depression are well known. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is a common screening tool for perinatal depression and it is recommended for use by several professional organizations. The current study tested competing EPDS factor structures and assessed EPDS change from intake to 6-week follow-up, and identified demographic correlates in an outpatient obstetric sample. Using a retrospective observational study design, medical records were coded for demographic, mental health, and EPDS patient data (n = 524). Confirmatory factor analysis, t-tests, and ANOVA were utilized. Findings included: (1) a 3-factor model (i.e. anxiety, depression, anhedonia) of the EPDS displayed the best fit to the current data; (2) small declines in all 3 subscales of the EPDS from intake to 6-week follow-up appointments and; (3) demographic correlates of EPDS subscales included history of depression, history of anxiety, race, and pregnancy status (i.e. first child or not). The 3-factor structure can be used in clinical practice to assess perinatal depression in a nuanced fashion. Given that history of depression and anxiety are risk factors for perinatal depression, a thorough assessment of these items in clinical practice is needed.


Subject(s)
Depression, Postpartum/diagnosis , Depression, Postpartum/psychology , Population Surveillance , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/standards , Psychometrics/standards , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Mass Screening/methods , Mass Screening/standards , Pregnancy , Psychometrics/methods , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...