Updated reference intervals for urine normetanephrine have no effect on test sensitivity but fewer false positives.

OBJECTIVE: We previously highlighted the problem of frequent false positives in 24 h urine normetanephrine(UNM) measurements owing to reference intervals that are inappropriately low for the population being screened for pheochromocytoma. Using a large population database, we devised new age-stratified reference intervals for the 24 h UNM test that were higher compared to previous. However, it was uncertain as to whether this would compromise test sensitivity for true pheochromocytoma cases. DESIGN AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all pheochromocytoma cases from a recently constructed provincial registry. All confirmed cases had their diagnostic UNM results retrospectively re-analysed according to the newly proposed UNM reference intervals to determine the percentage and phenotype of cases that might have been theoretically missed with the new reference range. RESULTS: After excluding pediatric and non-secretory head and neck paragangliomas, there were 60 confirmed pheochromocytoma cases. Using prior reference intervals, 51/60 (85%) had an abnormally high UNM. Of the 9 with normal UNM, 4 had a high urine metanephrine(UMN), 5 had normal levels of both UNM and UMN such that 55/60 had abnormal test results, representing the historical combined test sensitivity of 92%. Using the proposed reference interval, 43/60 (72%) had high UNM results. Of the 17 with normal UNM, 12 had high UMN, 5 had normal levels of both UNM and UMN. Therefore, 55/60 patients had had elevations in either UNM or UMN, corresponding to an identical combined test sensitivity of 92%. CONCLUSIONS: Reference intervals for UNM derived from actual clinical population screening data are higher than in traditional healthy volunteers. Use of these more appropriate reference intervals can significantly reduce the false positive rate without compromising test sensitivity for true pheochromocytoma.

Inpatient Measurements of Urine Metanephrines are Indistinguishable from Pheochromocytoma: Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Pheochromocytoma is a rare cause of acute cardiovascular disease; however, any severe illness may have high catecholamines, simulating pheochromocytoma. We determined the spectrum of urine metanephrines from inpatient and outpatient collections without pheochromocytoma, compared with confirmed pheochromocytoma patients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis using centralized laboratory data serving all outpatients and hospitals in southern Alberta. The analysis comprised 24-hour urine normetanephrine and metanephrine (UNM-UMN) results collected from hospital inpatients, community outpatients, and patients from a comprehensive provincial pheochromocytoma registry. RESULTS: There were 974 unique inpatients (including 132 from intensive care), 6802 outpatients, and 58 pheochromocytoma patients. Among outpatient, general ward, and intensive care unit (ICU) patients, 18.7%, 34.4%, and 67.4% of results, respectively, were supranormal. Although pheochromocytoma patients had higher median UNM-UMN vs inpatients, there was substantial overlap. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed area under the curve (AUC) of 0.64-0.91 to detect true pheochromocytoma (P < .0001), with progressively poorer discrimination among hospitalized and ICU-dependent patients. A 24-hour urine normetanephrine >6.95 nmol/d had 98% specificity for pheochromocytoma when inpatient general ward samples were included, but only 46% sensitivity and 13% positive predictive value for pheochromocytoma. Considering ICU collections, 98% specificity required results more than fivefold above the upper reference limit and still had poor positive predictive value. A model combining both UNM and UMN results as a cross-product marginally improved the ROC AUC, but improved sensitivity in outpatients and ward patients but not ICU patients. CONCLUSION: There is a high degree of overlap in UNM-UMN between hospitalized patients and pheochromocytoma; high test specificity is not achieved in this population unless >3-5 times the upper reference limit.

Properly Collected Plasma Metanephrines Excludes PPGL After False-Positive Screening Tests.

CONTEXT: False-positive results are common for pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PPGL) real-world screening. OBJECTIVE: Determine the correlation between screening urine and seated plasma metanephrines in outpatients where PPGL was absent, compared to meticulously prepared and supine-collected plasma metanephrines with age-adjusted references. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Databases from a single-provider provincial laboratory (2012-2018), a validated PPGL registry, and a manual chart review from a specialized endocrine testing unit. PATIENTS: PPGL registry data excluded known PPGL cases from the laboratory database. Outpatients having both urine and plasma metanephrines <90 days apart. METHODS: The correlation between urine and seated plasma measures along with the total positivity rate. All cases of plasma metanephrines drawn in the endocrine unit were reviewed for test indication and test positivity rate. RESULTS: There were 810 non-PPGL pairs of urine and plasma metanephrines in the laboratory database; 46.1% of urine metanephrines were reported high. Of seated outpatient plasma metanephrines drawn a median of 5.9 days later, 19.2% were also high (r = 0.33 and 0.50 for normetanephrine and metanephrine, respectively). In contrast, the meticulously prepared and supine collected patients (n = 139, 51% prior high urine metanephrines) had <3% rate of abnormal high results in patients without known PPGL/adrenal mass. CONCLUSIONS: There was a poor-to-moderate correlation between urine and seated plasma metanephrines. Up to 20% of those with high urine measures also had high seated plasma metanephrines in the absence of PPGL. Properly prepared and collected supine plasma metanephrines had a false-positive rate of <3% in the absence of known PPGL/adrenal mass.