Assessing Regurgitation Severity, Adverse Remodeling, and Fibrosis with CMR in Primary Mitral Regurgitation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review offers an evidence-based analysis of established and emerging cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) techniques used to assess the severity of primary mitral regurgitation (MR), identify adverse cardiac remodeling and its prognostic effect. The aim is to provide different insights regarding clinical decision-making and enhance the clinical outcomes of patients with MR. RECENT FINDINGS: Cardiac remodeling and myocardial replacement fibrosis are observed frequently in the presence of substantial LV volume overload, particularly in cases with severe primary MR. CMR serves as a useful diagnostic imaging modality in assessing mitral regurgitation severity, early detection of cardiac remodeling, myocardial dysfunction, and myocardial fibrosis, enabling timely intervention before irreversible damage ensues. Incorporating myocardial remodeling in terms of left ventricular (LV) dilatation and myocardial fibrosis with quantitative MR severity assessment by CMR may assist in defining optimal timing of intervention.

Association of Secondary Mitral Regurgitation and Right Ventricular Dysfunction among Patients with Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.

AIMS: The association between secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) and right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in heart failure patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) is unclear. Hence, our objective was to study the association between secondary MR and the occurrence of RV dysfunction among patients with NICM using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with NICM were enrolled in a prospective observational registry between 2008-2019. CMR was used to quantify MR severity along with RV function. RV dysfunction was defined as RV ejection fraction <45%. The outcome of the study was a composite event of all-cause death, heart transplantation, or left ventricular assist device implantation at follow-up. In the study cohort of 241 patients, RV dysfunction (RVEF < 45%) was present in 148 (61%). In comparison to patients without RV dysfunction, those with RV dysfunction had higher median MR volume (23 ml [IQR 16-31ml] vs 18 ml [IQR 12-25 ml], P=0.002) and MR fraction (33% [IQR 25-43%] vs 22% [IQR 15-29%], P<0.001). Furthermore, secondary MR was independently associated with RV dysfunction: MR volume ≥ 24ml (OR 3.21, 95% CI 1.26-8.15, P= 0.01) and MR fraction≥ 30% (OR 5.46, 95% 2.23-13.35, P=0.002). Increasing RVEF (every 1% increase) was independently associated with lower risk of adverse events (HR 0.98, 95% 0.95, 1.00, P=0.047). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NICM, the severity of secondary MR is associated with an increased prevalence of RV dysfunction. RV dysfunction is not only associated with the severity of LV dysfunction, but also with the severity of secondary MR.

Assessing Regurgitation Severity, Adverse Remodeling, and Fibrosis with CMR in Aortic Regurgitation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is emerging as a valuable imaging modality for the assessment of aortic regurgitation (AR). In this review, we discuss the assessment of AR severity, left ventricular (LV) remodeling, and tissue characterization by CMR while highlighting the latest studies and addressing future research needs. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies have further established CMR-based thresholds of AR severity and LV remodeling that are associated with adverse clinical outcomes, and lower than current guideline criteria. In addition, tissue profiling with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and extracellular volume (ECV) quantification can reliably assess adverse myocardial tissue remodeling which is also associated with adverse outcomes. The strengths and reproducibility of CMR in evaluating ventricular volumes, tissue characteristics, and regurgitation severity position it as an excellent modality in evaluating and following AR patients. Advanced CMR techniques for the detection of tissue remodeling have shown significant potential and merit further investigation.

Aortic Regurgitation: Review of the Diagnostic Criteria and the Management Guidelines.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The evaluation of aortic regurgitation (AR) has advanced from physical examination and angiography towards evidence based non-invasive quantitative methods, primarily with echocardiography and more recently with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). This review highlights the guidelines and recent evidence in the diagnosis and management of AR; and outlines future areas of research. RECENT FINDINGS: Contemporary large cohorts of AR patients studied with echocardiography and CMR suggest that the left ventricular remodeling and systolic function triggers for intervention may be lower than previously recommended in the guidelines and emphasize the importance of LV volumes in risk stratification. Important gaps of knowledge in the quantitation of AR severity and patient risk stratification were fulfilled recently. Potential thresholds for intervention using ventricular volumes and CMR quantitative findings were recently described. The criteria for what constitutes hemodynamically significant AR and the optimal timing of intervention AR deserve further study.

Sex differences in myocardial remodeling and extracellular volume in aortic regurgitation.

Whether sex differences exist in the cardiac remodeling related to aortic regurgitation (AR) is unclear. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is the current non-invasive reference standard for cardiac remodeling assessment and can evaluate tissue characteristics. This prospective cohort included patients with AR undergoing CMR between 2011 and 2020. We excluded patients with confounding causes of remodeling. We quantified left ventricular (LV) volume, mass, AR severity, replacement fibrosis by late Gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and extracellular expansion by extracellular volume fraction (ECV). We studied 280 patients (109 women), median age 59.5 (47.2, 68.6) years (P for age = 0.25 between sexes). Women had smaller absolute LV volume and mass than men across the spectrum of regurgitation volume (RVol) (P ≤ 0.01). In patients with ≥ moderate AR and with adjustment for body surface area, indexed LV end-diastolic volume and mass were not significantly different between sexes (all P > 0.5) but men had larger indexed LV end systolic volume and lower LV ejection fraction (P ≥ 0.01). Women were more likely to have NYHA class II or greater symptoms than men but underwent surgery at a similar rate. Prevalence and extent of LGE was not significantly different between sexes or across RVol. Increasing RVol was independently associated with increasing ECV in women, but not in men (adjusted P for interaction = 0.03). In conclusion, women had lower LV volumes and mass than men across AR severity  but their ECV increased with higher regurgitant volume, while ECV did not change in men. Indexing to body surface area did not fully correct for the cardiac remodeling differences between men and women. Women were more likely to have symptoms but underwent surgery at a similar rate to men. Further research is needed to determine if differences in ECV would translate to differences in the course of AR and outcomes.

Influence of Cardiac Remodeling on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Aortic Regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: Quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) outcome studies in aortic regurgitation (AR) are few. It is unclear if volume measurements are beneficial over diameters. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the association of CMR quantitative thresholds and outcomes in AR patients. METHODS: In a multicenter study, asymptomatic patients with moderate or severe AR on CMR with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were evaluated. Primary outcome was development of symptoms or decrease in LVEF to <50%, development of guideline indications for surgery based on LV dimensions, or death under medical management. Secondary outcome was the same as the primary outcome, excluding surgery for remodeling indications. We excluded patients who underwent surgery within 30 days of CMR. Receiver-operating characteristic analyses for the association with outcomes were performed. RESULTS: We studied 458 patients (median age: 60 years; IQR: 46-70 years). During a median follow-up of 2.4 years (IQR: 0.9-5.3 years), 133 events occurred. Optimal thresholds were regurgitant volume of 47 mL and regurgitant fraction of 43%, indexed LV end-systolic (iLVES) volume of 43 mL/m2, indexed LV end-diastolic volume of 109 mL/m2, and iLVES diameter of 2 cm/m2. In multivariable regression analysis, iLVES volume of ≥43 mL/m2 (HR: 2.53; 95% CI: 1.75-3.66; P < 0.001) and indexed LV end-diastolic volume of ≥109 mL/m2 were independently associated with the outcomes and provided additional discrimination improvement over iLVES diameter, whereas iLVES diameter was independently associated with the primary outcome but not the secondary outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In asymptomatic AR patients with preserved LVEF, CMR findings can be used to guide management. CMR-based LVES volume assessment performed favorably compared to LV diameters.

Medical Management of Aortic Disease: If They Don't Need Surgery, What Do They Need?

Management of aortic disease has evolved significantly over the past few decades. A preemptive diagnostic approach with a multidisciplinary team and shared decision-making has led to improved clinical outcomes. Surgery is the cornerstone of management for most aortic conditions; however, medical therapy is now an important adjunctive therapy in most if not all patients. Herein, we review the role and evidence behind medical management of patients with aortic disease.