Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
EClinicalMedicine ; 32: 100726, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33554093

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In recent years, more awareness is raised about sex-specific dilemmas in inherited bleeding disorders. However, no large studies have been performed to assess differences in diagnosis, bleeding phenotype and management of men and women with bleeding disorders. Therefore, we investigated sex differences in a large cohort of well-defined patients with autosomal inherited bleeding disorders (von Willebrand disease (VWD), rare bleeding disorders (RBDs) and congenital platelet defects (CPDs)). METHODS: We included patients from three nationwide cross-sectional studies on VWD, RBDs and CPDs in the Netherlands, respectively the WiN, RBiN and TiN study. In all studies a bleeding score (BS) was obtained, and patients filled in an extensive questionnaire on the management and burden of their disorder. FINDINGS: We included 1092 patients (834 VWD; 196 RBD; 62 CPD), of whom 665 (60.9%) were women. Women were more often referred because of a bleeding diathesis than men (47.9% vs 36.6%, p = 0.002). Age of first bleeding was similar between men and women, respectively 8.9 ± 13.6 (mean ±sd) years and 10.6 ± 11.3 years (p = 0.075). However, the diagnostic delay, which was defined as time from first bleeding to diagnosis, was longer in women (11.6 ± 16.4 years) than men (7.7 ± 16.6 years, p = 0.002). Similar results were found when patients referred for bleeding were analyzed separately. Of women aging 12 years or older, 469 (77.1%) had received treatment because of sex-specific bleeding. INTERPRETATION: Women with autosomal inherited bleeding disorders are more often referred for bleeding, have a longer diagnostic delay, and often require treatment because of sex-specific bleeding. FUNDING: The WiN study was supported (in part) by research funding from the Dutch Hemophilia Foundation (Stichting Haemophilia), Shire (Takeda), and CSL Behring (unrestricted grant).

2.
J Thromb Haemost ; 2018 May 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29847021

ABSTRACT

Hyperfibrinolytic bleeding can be caused by a deficiency of one of the inhibitors of fibrinolysis (plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 [PAI-1] or α2-antiplasmin [α2-AP]), or an excess of one of the activators of fibrinolysis: tissue-type plasminogen activator or urokinase-type plasminogen activator. This review focuses on the clinical implications of these disorders. The bleeding phenotype of fibrinolytic disorders is characterized by delayed bleeding after trauma, surgery and dental procedures. Bleeding in areas of high fibrinolytic activity is also common, such as menorrhagia and epistaxis. Patients with α2-AP deficiency present with the most severe bleeding episodes. Recently, it was discovered that hyperfibrinolytic disorders are associated with a high rate of obstetric complications such as miscarriage and preterm birth, especially in PAI-1 deficient patients. Hyperfibrinolytic disorders are probably underdiagnosed because of lack of knowledge and lack of accurate diagnostic tests. A substantial part of the large group of patients diagnosed as 'bleeding of unknown origin' could actually have a hyperfibrinolytic disorder. In the case of a high index of suspicion (i.e. because of a positive family history, recurrent bleeding or uncommon type of bleeding such as an intramedullary hematoma), further testing should not be withheld because of normal results of standard hemostatic screening assays. Timely diagnosis is important because these disorders can generally be treated well with antifibrinolytic agents.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...