Respiratory allergic diseases and allergen immunotherapy: A French patient survey before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic brought unprecedented global disruption to both healthcare providers and patients with respiratory allergies. There are limited real-life data on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the risk perception of patients with allergy treated with allergen immunotherapy (AIT). Objective: To understand the risk perception of allergic patients treated with sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) before and during the pandemic, and their attitudes towards COVID-19 infection and vaccination. Methods: This was a non-interventional, cross-sectional survey conducted from October to November 2021 in France. Adult patients, who had been prescribed and had received a Stallergenes SLIT (liquid or liquid and tablets) before the pandemic (from August 1, 2018 to March 10, 2020) and during the pandemic (from March 11, 2020 to August 31, 2021), were identified from the Stallergenes named-patient products (NPP) database. Patients completed an online questionnaire. Data were analyzed descriptively. Results: A total of 5258 patients from all over France completed the questionnaire. Mean (±SD) age of the respondents was 39.3 (±13.0) years and 66.9% were female. Some of them (11.8%) were obese (BMI >30 kg/m2). Main allergic diseases were rhinitis (80.0% of patients) with or without conjunctivitis, and asthma (39.0%). More than half of the patients experienced moderate to severe (58.0%) and persistent allergic rhinitis profile (70.4%). Most patients were poly-allergic (72.7%), mostly to house dust mites (61.9%), grass pollens (61.5%), tree pollens (57.8%), and cat dander (37.2%). Only 14.1% of patients experienced an aggravation of their allergy symptoms during lockdown and 14.8% were infected with COVID-19, with hospitalization required for 1.8%. Only 3.1% of patients reported their SLIT initiation as being postponed due to the pandemic. SLIT was changed, temporarily interrupted or permanently discontinued during the pandemic in 21.9% of patients. Changes mainly concerned the maintenance dose for SLIT-liquid (63.2%). SLIT modification was due to COVID-19 infection in only 4.2%. Most patients did not feel vulnerable (53.1%), anxious (55.2%), at risk to present severe symptoms of COVID-19 (77.1%), or at risk to transmit coronavirus (80.4%). However, greater anxiety was reported in patients with allergic asthma (33.6%) or other respiratory disorders (50.4%). Patients who felt vulnerable partly assigned their vulnerability to their allergic disease (59.3%). Suffering from an allergic disease did not make patients feel more vulnerable to side effects of COVID-19 vaccine for 79.6% of them. Conclusion: Overall, most patients with allergy and under SLIT were not strongly concerned by the COVID-19 infection. SLIT did not have a negative impact on the COVID-19 symptoms.

Sesame allergy in children: New insights into diagnosis and management.

Sesame is a potentially potent allergen that can trigger skin, gastrointestinal, and respiratory tract symptoms, and anaphylaxis. Only 20% to 30% of sesame-allergic children develop tolerance. The prevalence of sesame allergy depends on local diets and ranges from 0.1% to 0.9%. A high risk of accidental exposure to sesame has resulted in mandatory food labeling in many countries. More than half of patients with sesame allergy are also allergic to peanut/tree nuts. Serum-specific IgE testing with a quantitative Ses i 1 component can be performed safely and has higher clinical specificity and better positive predictive value for oral food challenge (OFC) than whole sesame extract or skin prick testing (SPT). Compared with SPT or OFC, in vitro Ses i 1 testing requires no special techniques and carries no risk of reactions. Diagnosis of suspected sesame allergy begins with a thorough history and physical examination. A positive sesame extract test (≥0.1 kUA /L) should prompt further testing. In patients with a high probability of reacting, results of component testing may facilitate a decision about performing an OFC. In a Japanese study of OFC and Ses i 1, there was a 5% probability of a positive OFC with Ses i 1 sIgE levels <0.13 kUA /L, and a 50% probability of a positive OFC with levels >32.0 kUA /L. Most patients could safely consume sesame if sIgE levels were <0.13 kUA /L. Ses i 1 testing can be used to guide appropriate management (avoidance, emergency medication, and oral immunotherapy).

Staphylococcal Sensitization: A Correlate of Type 2-High Inflammation in Children With Severe Asthma.

BACKGROUND: Sensitization to Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin (SE) has been identified to be a risk factor for asthma, but its determinants remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine the significance of SE sensitization in children with moderate to severe asthma. METHODS: This was an observational cross-sectional analysis performed from 2011 to 2015 including children from the prospective Severe Asthma Molecular Phenotype cohort: school-age children with severe and moderate asthma or preschool-age children with severe and moderate recurrent wheeze. We evaluated sensitization to four SEs (Staphylococcus enterotoxin A, Staphylococcus enterotoxin B, Staphylococcus enterotoxin C, and toxic shock staphylococcic toxin). RESULTS: We analyzed data from 377 children: 233 of preschool age and 144 of school age. Among them, 26 (11.2%) and 59 (41.0%) children, respectively, had sensitization to at least one SE. The burden of sensitization was higher in older children in terms of both specific IgE levels and the number of sensitizations. In multivariable analysis, SE sensitization was associated with elevated total IgE in both populations (odds ratio [OR] = 9.35, P = .01; and OR = 8.06, P < .01), and with bronchoalveolar lavage eosinophilia in both preschool and school-age children (OR = 3.95, P = .03; and OR = 4.11, P = .03, respectively). Classification and regression trees showed an association of SE sensitization with age and with total IgE in the entire population, and with total IgE, bronchoalveolar lavage eosinophilia, and blood eosinophilia in school-age children. CONCLUSIONS: Staphylococcal enterotoxin sensitization was correlated with type 2-high inflammation (eosinophilic inflammation and elevated total IgE count) in this population of moderate to severe asthmatic children.

Determinants of blood eosinophilia in moderate and severe asthmatic patients during childhood: Evidence from the severe asthma molecular phenotype (SAMP) cohort.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a heterogeneous disease in which the interaction between genetic and environmental factors plays a major role. The significance of blood eosinophil is unclear. The aim of the study was to determine the significance of blood eosinophil count in moderate-to-severe asthmatic children of preschool age and school age. METHODS: This was a prospective cross-sectional study performed from 2011 to 2015 including children from the severe asthma molecular phenotype (SAMP) cohort at Trousseau Hospital (Paris, France). We included children with severe and moderate asthma, or severe and moderate recurrent wheeze, aged from 1 to 15 years at the time of exploration. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 402 children: 248 of preschool age and 154 of school age. Blood eosinophil count third quartile thresholds were 322 and 600 cells/µL for the preschool- and school-age groups, respectively. In multivariate analysis, a blood eosinophil count over this threshold was associated with elevated total IgE (OR = 5.33, P < .01), multiple hospitalizations for asthma attacks (OR = 4.96, P = .03), and a maternal history of asthma (OR = 4.91, P = .01) in preschool children; and with staphylococcal toxin-specific IgE (OR = 2.75, P = .03) in children of school age. Random forest analysis reinforced these results. CONCLUSION: High blood eosinophil count is linked to both atopic features and control of asthma with different parameters associated with these features depending on age.

Two Different Composite Markers Predict Severity and Threshold Dose in Peanut Allergy.

BACKGROUND: Safe and cost-effective biological surrogate markers to evaluate the severity and threshold dose of peanut allergy (PA) reactions during an oral food challenge (OFC) are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate biological markers associated with the severity and threshold dose of an allergic reaction during an OFC in a population of children with PA. METHODS: Demographic and biological parameters of children with peanut OFC and basophil activation test (BAT) results were collected. Patients were stratified into 2 severity groups (mild-to-moderate and severe) and 2 cumulative threshold dose groups: low (LCTG) ≤100 mg crushed peanut and high >100 mg. RESULTS: Among the 68 children included, there was a 96% concordance between the OFC and BAT result for the diagnosis of PA. Of the 56 children with a positive OFC and BAT to peanut (median age: 8.8 years), the severity of an allergic reaction and the cumulative threshold dose were not correlated (P = .24). Higher Ara h 2-specific IgE and FcεRI-positive control values were both associated with severe reactions to peanut. Combining these 2 markers led to a 92% sensitivity (84%-97%) and an 82% specificity (71%-89%) for severe reactions in all subjects. For children in the LCTG, a 4-variable composite marker, including age, normalized basophil sensitivity (EC50), and FcεRI- and fMLP-positive control values, resulted in a 97% sensitivity (89%-99%) and 61% specificity (49%-71%). CONCLUSION: Distinct composite markers including BAT allergen-specific and non-allergen-specific parameters appear to be associated with severity and cumulative threshold dose in children with PA.

Diagnosis of Sesame Allergy: Analysis of Current Practice and Exploration of Sesame Component Ses i 1.

BACKGROUND: Sesame is an allergen of increasing importance. OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize the outcomes of oral food challenges (OFCs) to sesame and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of skin prick testing (SPT), sesame, and Ses i 1-specific IgE (sIgE). METHODS: We reviewed sesame OFCs performed at the Mount Sinai pediatric allergy clinic between January 2010 and April 2018. We assessed the accuracy of diagnostic tests by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curves. The association between OFC outcome and sesame sensitization was analyzed using a logistic regression, which was then used to estimate the 95% positive predictive value (PPV) of these tests. RESULTS: We identified 341 patients (69% male, mean age 7.7 years) who underwent sesame OFC. Among 106 (31%) positive OFCs, the median cumulative eliciting dose was 500 mg sesame protein (1/2 teaspoon tahini). Sesame SPT wheal ≥6 mm had sensitivity 54.1% and specificity 87.8%; AUC 0.756 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.699-0.814). SPT wheal size ≥14 mm had 95% PPV. Sesame-sIgE level did not correlate with OFC outcome. Ses i-sIgE levels were analyzed in 30 patients using the Immuno Solid-phase Allergen Chip (ISAC) microarray and were significantly associated with OFC outcome (AUC: 0.715 [95% CI, 0.541-0.890]). Ses i 1-sIgE ≥0.3 ISAC Standardized Units had sensitivity 58.3% and specificity 83.3%. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study of sesame allergy to date. Sesame SPT is a more accurate predictor of sesame allergy compared with sesame sIgE. Ses i 1-sIgE appears promising but requires further study regarding diagnostic accuracy.

Omalizumab in Severe Refractory Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis in Children: Case Series and Review of the Literature.

INTRODUCTION: Vernal keratoconjunctivis (VKC) is a severe form of pediatric ocular allergy, characterized by acute and chronic corneoconjunctival inflammation that may lead to visual sequelae. Although topical immunosuppressive drugs such as cyclosporine are usually effective, some severe forms may be refractory and require prolonged steroid therapy. Very few papers report the use of omalizumab in VKC in the literature. In the present study, we describe our clinical experience with omalizumab in severe VKC children. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the files of four boys treated with omalizumab because of severe VKC, defined as persistent corneal inflammation despite continuous topical 2% cyclosporine and steroid eye drops. We also performed a literature review. RESULTS: Four boys, aged 7-13 years old, were treated. All children had asthma and one had severe lid eczema. Two patients had required intrapalpebral depot-steroid injections. Omalizumab was administered every 2 weeks by subcutaneous injections, at doses varying from 450 to 600 mg per injection. Three patients out of four responded to the treatment, with a decrease in global symptoms (median symptom rating decreasing from 89 to 29 on a 100-mm visual analog scale), frequency and in duration of the inflammatory flares, and also a decreased need for topical steroid. Their median clinical grade decreased from 4 to 3 (Bonini grading). However, the response was incomplete and they still had inflammatory corneoconjunctival flares despite continuous topical cyclosporine. On the other hand, asthma and lid eczema were completely controlled in these three patients. The fourth child did not respond to omalizumab and needed oral steroids for his VKC and his asthma. Noticeably, this latter patient did not have detectable sensitization to any allergen, contrary to the other cases. The treatment was stopped in this refractory case, but is still ongoing in all other cases, with a median duration of 33 months (range 16-42 months). In the literature (four cases), omalizumab may have a more complete efficacy in some cases, but the results are still variable. CONCLUSION: Omalizumab is an interesting treatment in severe refractory forms of VKC, but its efficacy is incomplete in these very severe cases.