ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The Chemotherapy Response Scoring (CRS) system was developed to enable reproducible reporting of histologic tumor response in interval debulking specimens following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced stage tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma. This prognostic biomarker has been included in ovarian cancer pathology reporting guidelines (International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting, College of American Pathologists) and in the upcoming European Society for Medical Oncology-European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESMO-ESGO) guidelines for ovarian cancer management. We present follow-up data on the CRS validation initiatives and suggest research with novel therapeutic agents incorporating this biomarker. METHODS: The cohort on whom CRS was originally developed was analyzed after an extended follow-up of an additional 36 months. The CRS histopathologic scoring system was applied to omental sections obtained at interval surgery from all 80 patients. Progression-free and overall survival were re-calculated. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 4.3 years the CRS score predicted progression-free survival with an HR of 0.39 (95% CI 0.21 to 0.70), p = 0.002 adjusted for age, stage, and debulking status (median 1.08 vs 2.27 years for CRS1/2 vs CRS3). CRS was also predictive of overall survival with an HR of 0.17 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.44), p = 0.0002 adjusted for age, stage, and debulking status (median 2.55 vs 5.47 years for CRS1/2 vs CRS3). CONCLUSION: CRS3 is a reproducible prognostic biomarker for improved progression-free and overall survival in stage 3C or 4 tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The score, obtained at interval debulking surgery, can help facilitate research and biomarker driven first-line treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer.
ABSTRACT
A 3-tier histopathologic scoring system, the chemotherapy response score (CRS), was previously devised for reporting the histologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in interval debulking surgery specimens of stage IIIc/IV tuboovarian high-grade serous carcinoma. This has been shown to predict the outcome and offer additional information to other methods of assessing the treatment response. In the present study, the reproducibility of this scoring system was assessed by determining the interobserver agreement among reporting pathologists. A total of 5 groups each comprising 3 pathologists with different levels of expertise were selected. The participants underwent an online tutorial on how to apply the CRS system. 40 cases (38 cases in 2 appraiser groups) were scored individually by each of the 15 pathologists. The interobserver reproducibility was calculated using Fleiss' κ, Kendall's coefficient of concordance, and the absolute agreement between (a) individual pathologists within 1 group, (b) with the majority score agreement between all groups, and (c) with all individual scores. The CRS system was found to be highly reproducible among all the pathologists' groups (κ=0.761). The agreement in identifying the group of patients with the best response to chemotherapy was exceptionally high (κ=0.926). We conclude that CRS has a high interobserver reproducibility, especially in identifying the subgroup of patients with the best chemotherapy response, justifying its inclusion in clinical trials and reporting practice.
Subject(s)
Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/drug therapy , Medical Oncology/methods , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Female , Humans , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Observer Variation , Prognosis , Reproducibility of Results , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To develop and validate a histopathologic scoring system for measuring response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in interval debulking surgery specimens of stage IIIC to IV tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A six-tier histopathologic scoring system was proposed and applied to a test cohort (TC) of 62 patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking surgery. Adnexal and omental sections were independently scored by three pathologists. On the basis of TC results, a three-tier chemotherapy response score (CRS) system was developed and applied to an independent validation cohort of 71 patients. RESULTS: The initial system showed moderate interobserver reproducibility and prognostic stratification of TC patients when applied to the omentum but not to the adnexa. Condensed to a three-tier score, the system was highly reproducible (kappa, 0.75). When adjusted for age, stage, and debulking status, the score predicted progression-free survival (PFS; score 2 v 3; median PFS, 11.3 v 32.1 months; adjusted hazard ratio, 6.13; 95% CI, 2.13 to 17.68; P < .001). The three-tier CRS system applied to omental samples from the validation cohort showed high reproducibility (kappa, 0.67) and predicted PFS (CRS 1 and 2 v 3: median, 12 v 18 months; adjusted hazard ratio, 3.60; 95% CI, 1.69 to 7.66; P < .001). CRS 3 also predicted sensitivity to first-line platinum therapy (94.3% negative predictive value for progression < 6 months). A Web site was established to train pathologists to use the CRS system. CONCLUSION: The CRS system is reproducible and shows prognostic significance for high-grade serous carcinoma. Implementation in international pathology reporting has been proposed by the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting, and the system could potentially have an impact on patient care and research.