Comparison of Surgical Outcomes After Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy or Total Vaginal Hysterectomy for Large Uteri.

OBJECTIVE: To compare surgical outcomes between total laparoscopic hysterectomy and total vaginal hysterectomy with uterine weight greater than 250 g. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from American College of Surgeons' National Quality Improvement Project Hysterectomy Specific Database. Women with uterine weight greater than 250 g undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications by total laparoscopic hysterectomy or total vaginal hysterectomy were matched by propensity scores, which were calculated using preoperative characteristics and uterine weight. Total vaginal hysterectomy was matched to total laparoscopic hysterectomy at a ratio of 1:2. Pairwise analysis was performed using Wilcoxon rank-sum and Fisher exact tests as appropriate. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify the independent effect of total vaginal hysterectomy on surgical outcomes. RESULTS: There were 1,870 total vaginal hysterectomies that were matched to 3,740 total laparoscopic hysterectomies. No differences in preoperative demographics and comorbidities were seen for the patients. Uterine weight was similar for both groups: 376 g (interquartile range 293-501) for total vaginal hysterectomy and 384 g (interquartile range 302-515) for total laparoscopic hysterectomy (odds ratio [OR] 0.98, 95% CI 0.92-1.09). The rate of composite major complications was similar between total vaginal hysterectomy and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (4.3% vs 5.3%, OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.61-1.05). Intraoperative cystotomies were higher with total vaginal hysterectomy (0.8% vs 0.3%, OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.17-6.61), and ureteral injuries were more common with total laparoscopic hysterectomy (1.2% vs 0.2%, OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02-0.38). Total vaginal hysterectomy operating time was significantly shorter compared with total laparoscopic hysterectomy (77 minutes, interquartile range 56-111 vs 122 minutes, interquartile range 91-164; OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.42-0.89). After adjusting for confounders, total vaginal hysterectomy was not found to be independently associated with major morbidity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.95, 95% CI 0.18-5.11) and was associated with a lower probability of operating times exceeding 2.5 hours (aOR 0.31, 95% CI 0.27-0.43). CONCLUSION: In patients matched by uterine size and preoperative characteristics, total vaginal hysterectomy is not associated with an increased composite risk of major surgical morbidity or other adverse surgical outcomes.

The effect of 'Out of hours surgery Service' in Israel on hip fracture fixation outcomes: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: 'Out of Hours Surgery Service' (OHSS) was implemented in Israel, amongst other reasons, in order to reduce the time interval between hospital admission and surgery and consequently improve outcomes. The OHSS is currently operated in the public hospitals in Israel. In this study we compared the data of patients before and after OHSS implementation to determine its efficacy in improving patient care. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study of 792 adult patients who underwent hip fracture surgery between 2002 and 2007 in a single hospital. The study population included two groups: patients that were operated before the implementation of the OHSS (2002-2004) and after the implementation of the OHSS (2005-2007). Data regarding all patients was collected using the institution's computer program. The following variables were analyzed: patients' demographics, time interval from hospitalization to surgery, causes for delaying surgery, post-operative length of hospitalization and mortality. RESULTS: Patients in the post-OHSS group had more illnesses and higher ASA classification than those in the pre-OHSS group. The post-OHSS group had a significantly decreased length of stay in the hospital before and after the surgery. After adjusting for ASA score and age, the post-OHSS group was found to have decreased post-operative hospitalization and lower post-operative mortality. Surgery was delayed in pre-OHSS period mainly due to operating rooms unavailability. CONCLUSION: Implementation of OHSS facilitated operating room availability, thus early operation and reduced post-operative mortality. In accordance with other studies, patient's outcome is greatly influenced by the time from admission to hip fracture surgery.