Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Publication year range
1.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 24(4): 688-96, 2009 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19032445

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the principal inhibitory neurotransmitter in the adult mammalian brain. However, GABA is found not only in peripheral neuronal tissue, but also in many peripheral non-neuronal tissues, and is thought to have important physiological functions in addition to neurotransmission. We previously reported that GABA participates in chondrocyte proliferation. In the present study, we investigated the effects of GABA on the proliferation of a gastric cancer cell line, KATO III. METHODS: Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemical analyses were performed to examine the expression of the GABA synthesis enzyme, glutamate decarboxylase (GAD), and that of the GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptor subunits. The production of GABA was confirmed by immunohistochemistry. The proliferative effect of GABA on KATO III cells was analyzed by bromodeoxyuridine incorporation assay, and the activation status of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases (extracellular signal-regulated kinase [ERK]-1/2, Jun-N-terminal kinase, and p38) and the expression of cyclin D1 were analyzed by western blotting. RESULTS: KATO III cells expressed GAD and GABA. More than five GABA(A) receptor subunits, including the pi subunit, were expressed in KATO III cells; however, GABA(B) receptor subunits were not seen. The addition of GABA to the medium promoted KATO III proliferation, and maximum proliferative effects were observed in the presence of 10 or 1 microM GABA. The addition of 1 microM GABA predominantly activated ERK-1/2 among the three MAP kinases in addition to increasing cyclin D1 expression. CONCLUSION: GABA is able to promote KATO III cell proliferation in an autocrine or a paracrine fashion through GABA(A) receptors followed by MAP kinase activation.


Subject(s)
Cell Proliferation , Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1/metabolism , Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3/metabolism , Stomach Neoplasms/enzymology , gamma-Aminobutyric Acid/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Cyclin D1/metabolism , Enzyme Activation , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Glutamate Decarboxylase/metabolism , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Protein Subunits , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Receptors, GABA-A/metabolism , Receptors, GABA-B/metabolism , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Stomach Neoplasms/genetics , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology
2.
Yakugaku Zasshi ; 127(7): 1159-66, 2007 Jul.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17603276

ABSTRACT

Access to drug information (DI) needed to evaluate generic product bioequivalence was studied to identify problems with the current status of DI availability and encourage proper use of DI. Ten items were chosen from among the stock of branded products at the University Pharmacy, and five corresponding generics were selected for each item. Conditions of access to information on pharmacokinetic tests and dissolution tests were rated and the assigned ratings compared. In the case of pharmacokinetic parameters obtainable from makers of generic drugs, we also performed Welch's t-test to compare the difference between values reported for branded and generic products. From the standpoint of individual tests, the pharmacokinetic tests yielded higher scores on the whole than did the dissolution tests, and low scores were obtained for the half-life of blood drug concentration (T1/2). We observed a tendency for the adequacy of information to depend more upon the drug item itself than upon the nature of the test. The percentage of tests allowing for comparison with branded products varied from 0%-75% (average 49%). Parameter by parameter, the range of variation was from 35% of Tmax to 63% of Cmax. Factors precluding comparison included insufficient data on branded products, mismatch in assayed chemical species between branded and generic, mismatch between final sampling time in AUC(t) measurement, dosage inconsistency, and insufficient data on generic products. DI should be provided in a manner that facilitates comparison of information supplied by generic drug makers with data released by makers of branded products.


Subject(s)
Drug Information Services , Drugs, Generic/pharmacokinetics , Education, Pharmacy, Graduate , Internship, Nonmedical , Schools, Pharmacy , Therapeutic Equivalency , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL