Assessment of Gray Matter Microstructure and Synaptic Density in Alzheimer's Disease: A Multimodal Imaging Study With DTI and SV2A PET.

OBJECTIVE: Multimodal imaging techniques have furthered our understanding of how different aspects of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology relate to one another. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) measures such as mean diffusivity (MD) may be a surrogate measure of the changes in gray matter structure associated with AD. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A) has been used to quantify synaptic loss, which is the major pathological correlate of cognitive impairment in AD. In this study, we investigated the relationship between gray matter microstructure and synaptic density. METHODS: DTI was used to measure MD and [11C]UCB-J PET to measure synaptic density in 33 amyloid-positive participants with AD and 17 amyloid-negative cognitively normal (CN) participants aged 50-83. Univariate regression analyses were used to assess the association between synaptic density and MD in both the AD and CN groups. RESULTS: Hippocampal MD was inversely associated with hippocampal synaptic density in participants with AD (r = -0.55, p <0.001, df = 31) but not CN (r = 0.13, p = 0.62, df = 15). Exploratory analyses across other regions known to be affected in AD suggested widespread inverse associations between synaptic density and MD in the AD group. CONCLUSION: In the setting of AD, an increase in gray matter MD is inversely associated with synaptic density. These co-occurring changes may suggest a link between synaptic loss and gray matter microstructural changes in AD. Imaging studies of gray matter microstructure and synaptic density may allow important insights into AD-related neuropathology.

Principal component analysis of synaptic density measured with [11C]UCB-J PET in early Alzheimer's disease.

BACKGROUND: Synaptic loss is considered an early pathological event and major structural correlate of cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease (AD). We used principal component analysis (PCA) to identify regional patterns of covariance in synaptic density using [11C]UCB-J PET and assessed the association between principal components (PC) subject scores with cognitive performance. METHODS: [11C]UCB-J binding was measured in 45 amyloid + participants with AD and 19 amyloid- cognitively normal participants aged 55-85. A validated neuropsychological battery assessed performance across five cognitive domains. PCA was applied to the pooled sample using distribution volume ratios (DVR) standardized (z-scored) by region from 42 bilateral regions of interest (ROI). RESULTS: Parallel analysis determined three significant PCs explaining 70.2% of the total variance. PC1 was characterized by positive loadings with similar contributions across the majority of ROIs. PC2 was characterized by positive and negative loadings with strongest contributions from subcortical and parietooccipital cortical regions, respectively, while PC3 was characterized by positive and negative loadings with strongest contributions from rostral and caudal cortical regions, respectively. Within the AD group, PC1 subject scores were positively correlated with performance across all cognitive domains (Pearson r = 0.24-0.40, P = 0.06-0.006), PC2 subject scores were inversely correlated with age (Pearson r = -0.45, P = 0.002) and PC3 subject scores were significantly correlated with CDR-sb (Pearson r = 0.46, P = 0.04). No significant correlations were observed between cognitive performance and PC subject scores in CN participants. CONCLUSIONS: This data-driven approach defined specific spatial patterns of synaptic density correlated with unique participant characteristics within the AD group. Our findings reinforce synaptic density as a robust biomarker of disease presence and severity in the early stages of AD.

Association of olfaction dysfunction with brain microstructure in prodromal Parkinson disease.

OBJECTIVE: Although olfaction dysfunction is now considered as an established clinical marker of prodromal Parkinson disease (PD), little is known about the neural underpinnings of olfaction dysfunction in the prodromal phase of PD. The aim of this study was to examine the microstructural association of olfaction in prodromal PD compared to early stage drug-naïve PD patients. METHODS: Diffusion MRI connectometry was conducted on 18 early PD and 17 prodromal PD patients to investigate the differences in group in terms of altered connectivity, i.e., integrity of white matter tracts, and subsequently to study the correlation of University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) score to white matter integrity in each group using a multiple regression model considering age, sex, RBD, and MoCA, as covariates. RESULTS: Individuals with prodromal PD had significantly higher quantitative anisotropy (QA) comparing with PD patients in bilateral middle cerebellar peduncles and right arcuate fasciculus. Multiple regression analysis in prodromal PD demonstrated positive association between UPSIT score and connectivity in left and right subgenual cingulum, right inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, left corticospinal tract, left parietopontine, left corticothalamic tract, and the body and the splenium of corpus callosum. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that PD and prodromal PD patients, which were matched for sex, UPSIT, and MoCA scores, have different white matter fiber architecture. Thus, it is postulated that olfaction dysfunction in prodromal and early clinical phases of PD may involve distinct pathogenesis. Increased network connectivity in prodromal and early PD may suggest the neural compensation.

Cilostazol adjunctive therapy in treatment of negative symptoms in chronic schizophrenia: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cilostazol, a selective inhibitor of phosphodiesterase III, as an adjunctive to risperidone in alleviating the negative symptoms of schizophrenia. METHODS: Eighty-four in-patients with diagnosis of chronic schizophrenia participated in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial and underwent 8 weeks of treatment with either cilostazol (50 mg twice a day) or placebo as an adjuvant to risperidone. Participants were assessed using the positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) at baseline and at weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8. The primary outcome measure of the trial was to evaluate the efficacy of cilostazol compared to placebo in improving the PANSS negative subscale score. RESULT: General linear model repeated measures demonstrated significant effect for time × treatment interaction on negative subscale scores (p < .001) and PANSS total (p = .006) but did not demonstrate significant effect on the PANSS positive (p = .37) and general (p = .06) subscales. Frequency of adverse events was not significantly different between the 2 treatment groups. No serious adverse event was observed. CONCLUSION: An 8-week course of treatment with cilostazol as an adjunct to risperidone showed a favorable safety and efficacy profile in patients with schizophrenia.

Agomelatine as a Treatment for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents: A Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a chronic neurodevelopmental disorder. Due to lack of response to the medication and significant side effects of the treatment with stimulants, alternative medications should be considered. The aim of this study is to evaluate efficacy of agomelatine in treatment of ADHD. METHODS: Fifty-four outpatients, children 6-15 years old, with diagnosis of ADHD according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) diagnostic criteria participated in a 6-week, parallel, double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Fifty patients completed 6 weeks of treatment with either ritalin (methylphenidate hydrochloride [MPH]) (20 mg/day in participants below 30 kg and 30 mg/day in patients with weight ≥30 kg) or agomelatine (15 mg/day in patients with weight ≥30 kg and 25 mg/day in patients with weight ≥45 kg). Participants were assessed using Parent and Teacher ADHD Rating Scale-IV at baseline and at weeks 3 and 6. RESULTS: General linear model repeated measures showed no significant differences between the two groups on Parent and Teacher Rating Scale scores (F = 1.13, df = 1.26, p = 0.305, and F = 0.95, df = 1.25, p = 0.353, respectively). Changes in Teacher and Parent ADHD Rating Scale scores from baseline to the study end were not significantly different between the agomelatine group (9.28 ± 8.72 and 24.12 ± 7.04, respectively) and the MPH group (6.64 ± 11.04 and 25.76 ± 7.82, respectively) (p = 0.46 and p = 0.44, respectively). There was a trend for less insomnia in the agomelatine group versus MPH-treated group (4% vs. 24%, p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: A treatment course of 6 weeks with agomelatine demonstrated a favorable safety and efficacy profile in children and adolescents with ADHD. Nonetheless, larger controlled studies with longer treatment periods are necessary.

Riluzole combination therapy for moderate-to-severe major depressive disorder: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Recent evidences suggest that glutamatergic dysregulation implicated in neural plasticity and cellular resilience may contribute to the pathophysiology of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Riluzole, which exerts its effect by targeting glutamate neurotransmission, has shown antidepressant effect in recent preclinical, observational and open label studies. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of riluzole in patients with MDD. Sixty-four inpatients with diagnosis of moderate to severe major depressive disorder participated in a parallel, randomized, controlled trial, and sixty patients underwent 6 weeks treatment with either riluzole (50 mg/bid) plus citalopram (40 mg/day) or placebo plus citalopram (40 mg/day). All participants were inpatients for the whole duration of the study. Patients were assessed using Hamilton depression rating scale (HDRS) at baseline and weeks 2, 4 and 6. The primary outcome measure was to assess the efficacy of riluzole compared to placebo in improving the depressive symptoms. General linear model repeated measures demonstrated significant effect for time × treatment interaction on HDRS [F (1.86, 107.82) = 8.63, p < 0.001]. Significantly greater improvement was observed in HDRS scores in the riluzole group compared to the placebo group from baseline HDRS score at weeks 2, 4 and 6 (p < 0.001, p = 0.001, p = 0.002, respectively). Significantly greater response with greater speed to treatment was observed in the riluzole group than the placebo group. No serious adverse event occurred. This study showed a favorable safety and efficacy profile in patients with major depressive disorder. Larger controlled studies with longer treatment periods are needed to investigate long term safety, efficacy and optimal dosing.