Papel del radiofarmacéutico clínico en la seguridad del paciente durante los estudios de perfusión miocárdica de esfuerzo con vasodilatadores / Role of the clinical radiopharmacist in patient safety during myocardial perfusion imaging with vasodilator stress agents

Objetivos: Evaluar el papel del radiofarmacéutico en un equipo multidisciplinar en la detección de contraindicaciones del regadenosón para su uso seguro en pacientes a los que se solicitó una SPECT de perfusión miocárdica. Métodos: Se estudió ambispectivamente su uso seguro en 1.905 pacientes (54,1% mujeres, edad media: 66,6±11,7 años, rango: 20-95años). Se registraron datos relativos al sexo, a la edad, al historial médico, a la medicación, a las alergias medicamentosas y a las contraindicaciones para el estrés farmacológico, así como las recomendaciones realizadas al médico nuclear responsable. Resultados: Las contraindicaciones detectadas y las correspondientes recomendaciones fueron las siguientes: riesgo de prolongación del intervalo QTc (7,5%): comprobación previa del intervalo QTc y monitorización del ECG; ictus o AIT previo (4,2%): evaluación de estenosis carotídea; alergia a salicilatos y/o sulfamidas (3,1%): empleo de [99mTc]Tc-MIBI; epilepsia o riesgo de convulsiones (2,4%): uso de adenosina o reconsiderar su indicación; tratamiento con corticosteroides sistémicos en EPOC severa (1,3%): reevaluar las condiciones del paciente; EPOC reagudizada (0,8%): posponer hasta la resolución del episodio agudo; asma grave (0,4%): no realizar la prueba; toma de metilxantinas (0,3%): evitar su consumo previo; otras (6,1%): evaluación de cada contraindicación. No se observaron contraindicaciones en el 73,6% de los pacientes. Se anularon el 2,9% de las peticiones debido a contraindicaciones absolutas. Conclusiones: Empleando una metodología de trabajo sistemática, el radiofarmacéutico detectó un elevado número de incidencias, presentando uno de cada cuatro pacientes alguna contraindicación clínica. Las recomendaciones emitidas fueron aceptadas por los médicos nucleares, que modificaron su enfoque, incrementando así la seguridad de estos pacientes.(AU)

Aim: To assess the radiopharmacist's role in a multidisciplinary team focused on the contraindications of regadenoson in order to ensure the safe use of pharmacologic vasodilator stress agents in patients undergoing SPECT-MPI. Methods: We ambispectively studied its safe use in 1905 patients (54.1% female, mean age: 66.6±11.7 years, range: 20-95years). Sex, age, medical history, medications, drug allergies, and contraindications for stress testing were registered together with recommendations for the nuclear physician in charge. Results: Detected contraindications and corresponding recommendations were as follows: risk factors for QTc interval prolongation 7.5% — measurement of QTc interval previously to test and monitor ECG; prior stroke or TIA 4.2% — consider carotid stenosis assessment; salicylates/sulfonamides allergy 3.1% — use 99mTc-sestamibi; epilepsy or risk factors for seizures 2.4% — use of adenosine or reconsider test indication; systemic corticosteroid therapy for severe COPD 1.3% — reassessment of patient's condition; acute exacerbation of COPD 0.8% — defer test until acute episode is over; severe asthma 0.4% — do not perform test; methylxanthine ingestion 0.3% — avoid consumption previously; other 6.1% — evaluation of other contraindications. No contraindications were detected in 73.6% of patients. The test was cancelled due to absolute contraindications in 2.9% of the requests. Conclusions: Working in a systematic way, the radiopharmacist was able to detect a high number of issues related to regadenoson, with one out of four patients presenting some clinical contraindication. The recommendations given by the radiopharmacist were well accepted by the nuclear physicians who changed their approach contributing to increase the safety of patients referred for MPI.(AU)

Role of the clinical radiopharmacist in patient safety during myocardial perfusion imaging with vasodilator stress agents.

AIM: To assess the radiopharmacist's role in a multidisciplinary team focused on the contraindications of regadenoson in order to ensure the safe use of pharmacologic vasodilator stress agents in patients undergoing SPECT-MPI. METHODS: We ambispectively studied its safe use in 1905 patients (54.1% female, mean age: 66.6±11.7 years, range: 20-95 years). Sex, age, medical history, medications, drug allergies, and contraindications for stress testing were registered together with recommendations for the nuclear physician in charge. RESULTS: Detected contraindications and corresponding recommendations were as follows: risk factors for QTc interval prolongation 7.5% - measurement of QTc interval previously to test and monitor ECG; prior stroke or TIA 4.2% - consider carotid stenosis assessment; salicylates/sulfonamides allergy 3.1% - use 99mTc-sestamibi; epilepsy or risk factors for seizures 2.4% - use of adenosine or reconsider test indication; systemic corticosteroid therapy for severe COPD 1.3% - reassessment of patient's condition; acute exacerbation of COPD 0.8% - defer test until acute episode is over; severe asthma 0.4% - do not perform test; methylxanthine ingestion 0.3% - avoid consumption previously; other 6.1% - evaluation of other contraindications. No contraindications were detected in 73.6% of patients. The test was canceled due to absolute contraindications in 2.9% of the requests. CONCLUSIONS: Working in a systematic way, the radiopharmacist was able to detect a high number of issues related to regadenoson, with one out of four patients presenting some clinical contraindication. The recommendations given by the radiopharmacist were well accepted by the nuclear physicians who changed their approach contributing to increase the safety of patients referred for MPI.

Safety of regadenoson in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease / Seguridad de regadenosón en pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica severa

Objective. To assess the safety of regadenoson, a selective agonist of A2A adenosine receptors, combined with low-level exercise in subjects with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), referred for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). Methods. We studied prospectively 12 male patients with severe COPD. Stress was 4min of low-level exercise with bolus injection of regadenoson (0.4mg) at 1.5min, followed by 99mTc-MPI agent injection. Demographics, medical history, lung medications, adverse events, oxygen saturation (SatO2), MPI findings for coronary artery disease (CAD), and changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP), and heart rate (HR) were registered. Results. The observed adverse event profile of regadenoson was similar to that of patients with mild-moderate COPD. There was no clinical exacerbation of COPD. Adverse events were self-limiting: dyspnea (33.3%), fatigue (25.0%), chest pain, headache (16.7%, respectively), and gastrointestinal discomfort, dry mouth, flushing, feeling hot and dizziness (8.3%, respectively). 25.0% of patients did not report any symptoms. We observed significant increases in SBP and HR from baseline (142.6mmHg±22.3 vs 152.5mmHg±18.5, and 80 b.p.m.±18 vs 105 b.p.m.±22, respectively; p<0.05). Conclusions. Regadenoson combined with low-level exercise is safe and well tolerated in stable patients with severe COPD undergoing MPI (AU)

Objetivo. Evaluar la seguridad de regadenosón, un agonista selectivo de los receptores adenosínicos A2A, combinado con ejercicio de baja intensidad, en sujetos con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC) severa, en estudios de perfusión miocárdica. Métodos. Se estudiaron de forma prospectiva 12 pacientes con EPOC severa (todos ellos varones). El estrés consistió en la realización de un ejercicio de baja intensidad durante 4min junto con la administración de un bolo de regadenosón (0,4mg) a los 1,5min, seguido de la inyección del radiofármaco tecneciado de perfusión miocárdica. Se registraron los datos demográficos, el historial médico, la medicación para patología respiratoria, los efectos adversos, la saturación de oxígeno (SatO2), los hallazgos de enfermedad coronaria en el estudio de perfusión miocárdica y los cambios en la presión arterial sistólica (PAS) y la frecuencia cardiaca (FC). Resultados. El perfil de efectos adversos de regadenosón fue similar al de pacientes con EPOC leve-moderada. No se produjeron exacerbaciones clínicas de la EPOC. Los efectos adversos experimentados, todos autolimitados, fueron disnea (33,3%), cansancio (25%), dolor torácico, cefalea (16,7%, respectivamente), molestias gastrointestinales, boca seca, rubefacción, calor y mareos (8,3%, respectivamente). El 25% de los pacientes no informaron síntomas. Se observaron aumentos significativos desde los valores basales de la PAS y la FC (142,6mmHg±22,3 vs 152,5mmHg±18,5 y 80l.p.m.±18 vs 105l.p.m.±22, respectivamente; p<0,05). Conclusiones. Regadenosón combinado con ejercicio de baja intensidad es seguro y bien tolerado en pacientes con EPOC severa estable sometidos a estudios de perfusión miocárdica (AU)

Safety of regadenoson in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety of regadenoson, a selective agonist of A2A adenosine receptors, combined with low-level exercise in subjects with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), referred for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). METHODS: We studied prospectively 12 male patients with severe COPD. Stress was 4min of low-level exercise with bolus injection of regadenoson (0.4mg) at 1.5min, followed by (99m)Tc-MPI agent injection. Demographics, medical history, lung medications, adverse events, oxygen saturation (SatO2), MPI findings for coronary artery disease (CAD), and changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP), and heart rate (HR) were registered. RESULTS: The observed adverse event profile of regadenoson was similar to that of patients with mild-moderate COPD. There was no clinical exacerbation of COPD. Adverse events were self-limiting: dyspnea (33.3%), fatigue (25.0%), chest pain, headache (16.7%, respectively), and gastrointestinal discomfort, dry mouth, flushing, feeling hot and dizziness (8.3%, respectively). 25.0% of patients did not report any symptoms. We observed significant increases in SBP and HR from baseline (142.6mmHg±22.3 vs 152.5mmHg±18.5, and 80 b.p.m.±18 vs 105 b.p.m.±22, respectively; p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Regadenoson combined with low-level exercise is safe and well tolerated in stable patients with severe COPD undergoing MPI.

Calciphylaxis, a cause of 99mTc-diphosphonate soft-tissue uptake / Calcifilaxis, una causa de captación de 99mTc-difosfonatos en partes blandas

No disponible

Utilidad de la SPECT-TAC en la identificación de fístulas en una peritoneogammagrafía / Utility of SPECT-CT in the identification of fistulas in a peritoneal scintigraphy

No disponible

[Quality control dose calibrators]. / Control de calidad de activímetros.

We have reviewed the legislation about the quality control of dose calibrator. The importance of verifying the correct work of these instruments, is fundamental in daily practice of radiopharmacy and nuclear medicine. The Spanish legislation establishes to include these controls as part of the quality control of radiopharmaceuticals, and the program of quality assurance in nuclear medicine. We have reviewed guides and protocols from international eminent organizations, summarizing the recommended tests and periodicity of them.

Control de calidad de activímetros / Quality control of dose calibrators

Hemos realizado una revisión del control de calidad de activímetros, debido a la importancia de verificar el correcto funcionamiento de estos instrumentos, importantes en la práctica diaria de la radiofarmacia y la medicina nuclear. La normativa española establece la necesidad de incluir estos controles como parte del control de calidad de radiofármacos y del programa de garantía de calidad de medicina nuclear. En el trabajo hemos revisado diferentes guías y protocolos de organismos internacionales de reconocido prestigio, apuntando las principales pruebas que se deben realizar y la periodicidad aconsejada (AU)

We have reviewed the legislation about the quality control of dose calibrator. The importance of verifying the correct work of these instruments, is fundamental in daily practice of radiopharmacy and nuclear medicine. The Spanish legislation establishes to include these controls as part of the quality control of radiopharmaceuticals, and the program of quality assurance in nuclear medicine. We have reviewed guides and protocols from international eminent organizations, summarizing the recommended tests and periodicity of them (AU)