Prevalence of Dietary Modification and Supplement Use in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving Systemic Therapy.

Many patients diagnosed with cancer adopt dietary changes and supplement use, and a growing body of evidence suggests that such modifications can affect outcomes to cancer therapy. We sought to assess the prevalence of these practices and the surrounding physician-patient dialogue among patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. An online survey was administered by Kidney Cancer Research Alliance (KCCure), interrogating dietary modification patterns, supplement usage, out-of-pocket expenditure related to supplements, and patients' views toward alternative medicine practices. Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving combination therapy were actively solicited. In total, 289 unique responses were collected. The most common first-line treatments were nivolumab/ipilimumab (32.4%) and axitinib/pembrolizumab (13.1%). Within the cohort, 147 (50.9%) started using supplements following diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma; the most utilized supplements were probiotics, cannabidiol (CBD) oil/marijuana, and Vitamin C, reported by 70 (47.6%), 61 (41.4%), and 54 (36.7%), respectively. Dietary modifications following cancer diagnosis were reported by 101 (34.9%) respondents, of which 19.8% followed the Mediterranean diet and 18.8% adopted a ketogenic diet. Most respondents (71.3%) noted that they consistently report supplement usage to their physicians. A substantial proportion of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma utilize dietary modification and supplements as an adjunct to antineoplastic therapy. Considering the widespread adoption of these practices and the reported effects on cancer treatment, it is crucial for healthcare providers to engage in discussions with patients regarding supplement use.

Renal Cell Carcinoma of Variant Histology: New Biologic Understanding Leads to Therapeutic Advances.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the 10 most commonly diagnosed solid tumors. Most RCCs are histologically defined as clear cell, comprising approximately 75% of diagnoses. However, the remaining RCC cases are composed of a heterogeneous combination of diverse histopathologic subtypes, each with unique pathogeneses and clinical features. Although the therapeutic approach to both localized and metastatic RCCs has dramatically changed, first with the advent of antiangiogenic targeted therapies and more recently with the approval of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combinations, these advances have primarily benefited the clear cell RCC patient population. As such, there remains critical gaps in the optimization of treatment regimens for patients with non-clear cell, or variant, RCC histologies. Herein, we detail recent advances in understanding the biology of RCC with variant histology and how such findings have guided novel clinical studies investigating precision oncology approaches for these rare subtypes. Among the most common variant histology RCCs are papillary RCC, comprising approximately 15%-20% of all diagnoses. Although a histopathologically diverse subset of tumors, papillary RCC is canonically associated with amplification of the MET protooncogene; recently completed and ongoing trials have investigated MET-directed therapies for this patient population. Finally, we discuss the unique biology of RCC with sarcomatoid dedifferentiation and the recent clinical findings detailing its paradoxical sensitivity to ICIs.

Barriers to Clinical Trial Implementation Among Community Care Centers.

Importance: While an overwhelming majority of patients diagnosed with cancer express willingness to participate in clinical trials, only a fraction will enroll onto a research protocol. Objective: To identify critical barriers to trial enrollment to translate findings into actionable practice changes that increase cancer clinical trial enrollment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study included designated site contacts at oncology practices with teams who were highly involved with the Association of Community Cancer Centers (ACCC) Community Oncology Research Institute (ACORI) clinical trials activities, all American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)-ACCC collaboration pilot sites, and/or sites providing care to at least 25% African American and Hispanic residents. To determine participation trends among health care practices in oncology-focused research, identify barriers to clinical trial implementation and operation, and establish unmet needs for cancer clinics interested in trial participation, a 34-question survey was designed. Survey questions were defined within 3 categories: cancer center demographic characteristics, clinical trial characteristics, and referral practices. The survey was distributed through email and was open from June 20 through October 5, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Participation in and barriers to conducting oncology trials in different community oncology settings. Results: The survey was distributed to 100 cancer centers, with completion by 58 centers (58%) across 25 states. Fifty-two centers (88%) reported that they conduct therapeutic clinical trials, of which 33 (63%) were from urban settings, 11 (21%) were from suburban settings, and 8 (15%) were from rural settings. Only 25% of rural practices (2 of 8) offered phase 1 trials, compared with 67% of urban practices (22 of 33) (P = .01). Respondents noted challenges in conducting research, including patient recruitment (27 respondents [52%]), limited staffing (27 [52%]), and nonrelevant trials for their patient population (25 [48%]). Among sites not offering therapeutic trials, barriers to research conduct included limited infrastructure, funding, and staffing. Most centers (46 of 58 [79%]) referred patients to outside centers for clinical trial enrollment, particularly in the context of late-stage disease and/or disease progression. Only 17 of these sites (37%) had established protocols for patient follow-up subsequent to outside referral. Conclusions and Relevance: In this national survey study of barriers to clinical trial implementation, most sites offered therapeutic trials, but there were significant disparities in trial availability across care settings. Furthermore, fundamental deficiencies in trial support infrastructure limited research activity, including within programs currently conducting research as well as at sites interested in future clinical research opportunities. These results identify crucial unmet needs for oncology clinics to effectively offer clinical trials to patients seeking care.

Stratification of Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma by the Abundance of Sarcomatoid Features Reveals Differences in Survival and the Underlying Pathobiology.

Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (sRCC) is histologically heterogeneous, with variable sarcomatoid amounts intermixed within epithelial carcinoma. However, the current classification for this aggressive disease is homogeneous and agnostic to the sarcomatoid proportion. We investigated whether sRCC subclassification has prognostic value and can reveal the biology underlying dedifferentiation and its clinical aggressiveness. On the basis of the intratumoral abundance of sarcomatoid features, cases were classified as sarcomatoid-high (≥10% sarcomatoid features) or sarcomatoid-low (<10% sarcomatoid features) in a cohort of 104 consecutive patients with sRCC undergoing nephrectomy at a single center. In comparison to sarcomatoid-low patients (n = 52), sarcomatoid-high patients (n = 52) had significantly shorter overall survival (median 14.5 vs 62.9 mo; p < 0.001), which was confirmed on multivariable analysis, and significantly shorter median metastasis-free survival among patients with clinically localized disease (10.7 vs 39.0 mo; p = 0.043). Transcriptomic analyses of 45 sRCC tumors revealed significant upregulation of nine hallmark pathways related to cell cycle/proliferation, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, reactive oxidative species, and interferon-α signaling among sarcomatoid-high (n = 24) versus sarcomatoid-low (n = 21) tumors. Categorization into transcriptomic clusters revealed predominance of proliferative, inflammatory, and immune effector phenotypes among sarcomatoid-high tumors, versus a hypoxia/angiogenesis phenotype among sarcomatoid-low tumors. Overall, these findings indicate prognostic value for sRCC subclassification into high versus low sarcomatoid groups and highlight key biology underlying the differences in clinical outcomes. PATIENT SUMMARY: Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (sRCC) is a highly aggressive form of kidney cancer. The percentage of sarcomatoid features varies among tumors, but sRCC is still defined as a single kidney cancer type. Our results show that grouping patients according to their percentage of sarcomatoid features improves prediction of whether their tumors will become metastatic or lethal, and reveal molecular differences that may be important for this disease. Future assignment of sRCC to high and low sarcomatoid groups may help in guiding research and patient management.