Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Brain Behav ; 12(3): e2495, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35134280

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Neurocritical care is a growing subspecialty. It concerns with the management of life-threatening neurological disorders. There is limited information regarding epidemiological data, disease characteristics, variability of clinical care, and in-hospital mortality of neurocritical patients worldwide. OBJECTIVES: To study the pattern of neurocritical disorders in intensive care units. METHODOLOGY: This prospective observational study was conducted on neurocritical patients who were admitted to four intensive care units of major hospitals in Khartoum state during the period from November 2020 to January 2021. RESULTS: Seventy-two neurocritical patients were included in this study, 40 (55.6%) were males and 32(44.4%) were females. Twenty-three (31.9%) patients were with stroke, 12 (16.7%) with encephalitis, 9 (12.5%) with status epilepticus, 6 (8.3%) with Guillain Barre syndrome, and 4(5.6%) with Myasthenia Gravis (MG). Twenty-three patients (39.9%) needed mechanical ventilation (MV), which was the major indication for intensive care unit admission. CONCLUSION: Stroke was the dominant diagnostic pattern requiring intensive care unit admission. Mechanical ventilation was the major indication for admission. Establishing specialized neurocritical intensive care units is highly recommended.


Subject(s)
Nervous System Diseases , Stroke , Critical Care , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Nervous System Diseases/epidemiology , Nervous System Diseases/therapy , Stroke/therapy
2.
Brain Behav ; 12(3): e2540, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35196419

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with neurocritical disorders who require admission to intensive care units (ICUs) constitute about 10-15% of critical care cases. OBJECTIVES: To study the outcome of neurocritical disorders in intensive care units. METHODOLOGY: This is a prospective cross-sectional study that was conducted among neurocritical patients who were admitted in four intensive care units of four major hospitals in Khartoum state during the period from November 2020 to March 2021. RESULTS: Seventy-two neurocritical patients were included in this study; 40(55.6%) were males and 32(44.4%) were females. Twenty-one (29.2%) patients fully recovered, 35 (48.6%) partially recovered and 16 (22.2%) died. The mortality of the common neurocritical diseases were as follows: stroke 30.4%, encephalitis (8.3%), status epilepticus (11.1%), Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) (16.7%), and myasthenia gravis (MG) (25%). CONCLUSION: This study identified that near two-thirds of the patients required mechanical ventilation. Delayed admission was observed due to causes distributed between the medical side and patient side. The majority of patients were discharged from ICU with partial recovery.


Subject(s)
Critical Care , Intensive Care Units , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies
3.
AIMS Public Health ; 7(4): 758-768, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33294479

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Breaking bad news is an important task for doctors in different specialties. The aim of the study was to assess adherence of Sudanese doctors to the SPIKES protocol in breaking bad news. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study recruited 192 doctors, at Wad Medani teaching hospital, Sudan. A questionnaire-based on SPIKES protocol was distributed among 10 departments in our hospital. Data were analyzed using SPSS and Microsoft excel. RESULTS: There were (n = 101, 52.6%) females and (n = 91, 47.4%) males among the participants. 95.3% have been involved in breaking bad news, but only 56.3 received education and training about this issue. 43% admitted bad experience in breaking bad news, while 65.6% mentioned that bad news should be delivered directly to patients. The majority (>90%) agreed training is needed in the area of breaking bad news. Usual adherence to the SPIKES protocol was reported in a range of 35-79%, sometimes adherence was reported in a range of 20-44% while never adherence was reported in a range of zero-13.5%. Consultants, registrars, obstetrician and gynecologists and surgeons achieved high scores in breaking bad news. Training is an important factor in achieving high score in SPIKES protocol. The unadjusted effect of background factors on SPIKES score, showed that only training has significant impact on protocol adherence (P = 0.034, unadjusted; and P = 0.038 adjusted). CONCLUSION: Large number of Sudanese doctors will try to adhere to SPIKES protocol. Training is an important factor in the success of breaking bad news.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL