[Facing fever in the pediatric patient: Checklist as a tool for parents]. / Checklist como herramienta para los padres ante la fiebre en el paciente pediátrico.

INTRODUCTION: In Western Europe, 20%-40% of children with fever request health care. Most of them present trivial viral infections, however, it is essential in pediatrics to distinguish patients who present a severe infection. This process begins with the recognition of the seriousness and the subsequent search for medical attention by the parents. METHODOLOGY: Analytical and cross-sectional observational study. One hundred patients were selected in two health centers. Sociodemographic data were collected, together with the responses to a checklist containing the signs and symptoms to request health care in case of fever. Subsequently, the checklist was filled out by the pediatrician. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 5.41 years. 50% consulted in the first 48h of fever evolution. In 42%, the response to all the items on the checklist was exactly the same between the companion and the pediatrician. There were no significant differences according to variables: first episode of fever (P=.262), age of the patient (P=.859), having a sibling (P=.880), family relationship of the companion (P=.648) or educational level of the companion (P=.828). CONCLUSIONS: Medical consultations for fever in pediatrics are carried out very early. A high percentage do not present alarm signs when they consult. There is a need to expand training on the alarm signs of fever in all parents, regardless of the number of children, age or educational level. The checklist as a tool for home assessment of fever has received high marks for its usefulness.

Érase una vez una niña y su lindo gatito / Once upon a time there was a girl and her cute kitty

Introducción: Campylobacter es el principal patógeno de gastroenteritis transmitida por alimentos, ocurriendo generalmente por la ingesta de pollo mal cocinado, constituyendo otra importante fuente de infección los cachorros de animales domésticos. Caso clínico: escolar con gastroenteritis aguda con sospecha diagnóstica inicial de giardiasis por ambiente epidémico (gato doméstico). Se recoge coprocultivo en el que se detecta Campylobacter jejuni, prescribiéndose azitromicina, dado lo prolongado de la clínica. A lo largo del control evolutivo en el centro de salud la familia informa de que se ha solicitado nueva muestra de heces en el gato, dado persistencia de los síntomas pese a tratamiento con metronidazol. Finalmente, crece también Campylobacter jejuni en el coprocultivo de la mascota. Tras finalizar ambos el tratamiento antibiótico, permanecen asintomáticos. Como posible alimento sospechoso del origen del cuadro está el corazón de pollo no cocinado con el que alimentaban al gato de forma habitual. Conclusiones: ante un cuadro de gastroenteritis aguda es fundamental una adecuada anamnesis que incluya ambiente epidémico y alimentos sospechosos. En ocasiones las mascotas también constituyen una fuente de transmisión de la infección a nuestros pacientes. En este caso se sospecha la cadena de contaminación: corazón de pollo no cocinado-heces de gato doméstico-niña (AU)

Introduction: Campylobacter is a well-known food-borne pathogen that causes human gastroenteritis. The most common way for children to become infected with campylobacteriosis is through chicken that is not fully cooked, another important source of infection are domestic puppies.Case report: it is presented the case of an eight-year-old girl with acute gastroenteritis, the first diagnostic suspicion was giardiasis due to epidemic environment (domestic cat). A stool culture was collected in which Campylobacter jejuni was detected. Azithromycin was prescribed because of prolonged symptoms. Throughout the control in the health center, family reported that a new fecal sample has been requested from the cat due to the persistence of the symptoms despite treatment with metronidazole. Finally, Campylobacter jejuni also grew in the pet's stool culture. After both finished antibiotic treatment, they remained asymptomatic. The possible suspected infection source was the chicken heart with which the cat was regularly fed. Conclusions: the evaluation of the child with acute gastroenteritis begins with a careful history which includes epidemiological environment and suspicious food intake. Ocassionally, pets are also a source of transmission to our patients. In this case, the suspected contamination chain was: uncooked chicken heart- domestic cat faeces-girl. (AU)

Wait and see en epilepsia pediátrica. Nuestra experiencia / Wait and see in paediatric epilepsy. Our experience

Introducción: El tratamiento farmacológico de la epilepsia no es curativo; pretende, en lo posible, evitar crisis en niños que probablemente van a seguir teniéndolas. Pacientes y métodos: El objeto es analizar nuestra experiencia en niños con epilepsia y con primera crisis no sintomática aguda no tratados con antiepilépticos. Se analizó a pacientes atendidos en una consulta de neuropediatría, desde 2017 hasta 2021, que habían sufrido una o más crisis no sintomáticas agudas y a los que no se les había tratado farmacológicamente. Resultados: Sesenta y cinco pacientes cumplieron los criterios de selección. Veinticuatro habían tenido una única crisis, con un tiempo medio de duración de 12 minutos (1-60). En un 66,7% fue nocturna. Un 41,7% presentó electroencefalograma patológico, y un 21%, hallazgos patológicos en la neuroimagen. El tiempo medio de control fue de 2,7 años (0,003-13,6 años). Cuarenta y uno presentaron más de una crisis, con una duración media de nueve minutos (1-60). Cinco pacientes presentaron más de 20 crisis, y el resto, entre dos y 17. Veinticuatro (58,5%) presentaron únicamente crisis nocturnas. Se realizó un electroencefalograma en todos: grafoelementos epileptiformes en el 63,4%; y neuroimagen en todos: patológica en el 4,9%. El tiempo medio de control fue de 3,8 años (0,01-9,1 años). Conclusiones: La frecuencia de las crisis, la patología de base o los resultados de las pruebas complementarias no deberían ser las únicas variables que habría que considerar para iniciar el tratamiento farmacológico antiepiléptico en los niños. Debería prevalecer, por encima de aquéllos, el potencial perjuicio sobre la calidad de vida y el neurodesarrollo, las funciones atencionales y el comportamiento del niño, y siempre consensuar esta decisión con los padres.(AU)

Introduction: Pharmacological treatment of epilepsy is not healing; it tries to avoid seizures, as far as possible, in children who probably would still have them. Patients and methods: Our purpose is to analyse our experience with epileptic children and those who have a first non-symptomatic seizure without pharmacological treatment. Patients seen in a paediatric neurology consultation, from 2017 to 2021, who had suffered one or more acute non-symptomatic crises and who had not been treated pharmacologically, were analysed. Results: Sixty-five patients meet the selection criteria. Twenty-four patients had had a single crisis with a mean duration of 12 minutes (1-60). In 66.7% it was nocturnal. 41.7% presented pathological electroencephalogram, and 21% pathological findings in neuroimaging. The mean control time was 2.7 years (0.003-13.6 years). Forty-one presented more than one crisis, with a mean duration of nine minutes (1-60). Five patients presented more than 20 seizures, the rest between two and 17. Twenty-four (58.5%) presented only nocturnal seizures. An electroencephalogram was performed in all: epileptiform graphoelements in 63.4%; and neuroimaging in all: pathological in 4.9%. Mean control time was 3.8 years (0.01-9.1 years). Conclusions: Seizure frequency, underlying pathology or test results should not be the only variables to take into consideration when starting antiepileptic drug treatment. The repercussion on their quality of life and neurodevelopment should prevail, agreeing on this decision with the parents.(AU)

['Wait and see' in paediatric epilepsy. Our experience]. / Wait and see en epilepsia pediátrica. Nuestra experiencia.

INTRODUCTION: Pharmacological treatment of epilepsy is not healing; it tries to avoid seizures, as far as possible, in children who probably would still have them. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our purpose is to analyse our experience with epileptic children and those who have a first non-symptomatic seizure without pharmacological treatment. Patients seen in a paediatric neurology consultation, from 2017 to 2021, who had suffered one or more acute non-symptomatic crises and who had not been treated pharmacologically, were analysed. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients meet the selection criteria. Twenty-four patients had had a single crisis with a mean duration of 12 minutes (1-60). In 66.7% it was nocturnal. 41.7% presented pathological electroencephalogram, and 21% pathological findings in neuroimaging. The mean control time was 2.7 years (0.003-13.6 years). Forty-one presented more than one crisis, with a mean duration of nine minutes (1-60). Five patients presented more than 20 seizures, the rest between two and 17. Twenty-four (58.5%) presented only nocturnal seizures. An electroencephalogram was performed in all: epileptiform graphoelements in 63.4%; and neuroimaging in all: pathological in 4.9%. Mean control time was 3.8 years (0.01-9.1 years). CONCLUSIONS: Seizure frequency, underlying pathology or test results should not be the only variables to take into consideration when starting antiepileptic drug treatment. The repercussion on their quality of life and neurodevelopment should prevail, agreeing on this decision with the parents.

TITLE: Wait and see en epilepsia pediátrica. Nuestra experiencia.El tratamiento farmacológico de la epilepsia no es curativo; pretende, en lo posible, evitar crisis en niños que probablemente van a seguir teniéndolas. Pacientes y métodos. El objeto es analizar nuestra experiencia en niños con epilepsia y con primera crisis no sintomática aguda no tratados con antiepilépticos. Se analizó a pacientes atendidos en una consulta de neuropediatría, desde 2017 hasta 2021, que habían sufrido una o más crisis no sintomáticas agudas y a los que no se les había tratado farmacológicamente. Resultados. Sesenta y cinco pacientes cumplieron los criterios de selección. Veinticuatro habían tenido una única crisis, con un tiempo medio de duración de 12 minutos (1-60). En un 66,7% fue nocturna. Un 41,7% presentó electroencefalograma patológico, y un 21%, hallazgos patológicos en la neuroimagen. El tiempo medio de control fue de 2,7 años (0,003-13,6 años). Cuarenta y uno presentaron más de una crisis, con una duración media de nueve minutos (1-60). Cinco pacientes presentaron más de 20 crisis, y el resto, entre dos y 17. Veinticuatro (58,5%) presentaron únicamente crisis nocturnas. Se realizó un electroencefalograma en todos: grafoelementos epileptiformes en el 63,4%; y neuroimagen en todos: patológica en el 4,9%. El tiempo medio de control fue de 3,8 años (0,01-9,1 años). Conclusiones. La frecuencia de las crisis, la patología de base o los resultados de las pruebas complementarias no deberían ser las únicas variables que habría que considerar para iniciar el tratamiento farmacológico antiepiléptico en los niños. Debería prevalecer, por encima de aquéllos, el potencial perjuicio sobre la calidad de vida y el neurodesarrollo, las funciones atencionales y el comportamiento del niño, y siempre consensuar esta decisión con los padres.

[Telematic attention in a neuropediatrics consultation during the COVID-19 alarm state. Cross-sectional study and satisfaction survey]. / Valoración de la atención telemática en una consulta de Neuropediatría durante el estado de alarma por COVID-19. Estudio transversal y encuesta de satisfacción.

INTRODUCTION: Crisis caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus limit face-to-face consultation to the minimum necessary, this was a change toward telephone activity. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the experience of a neuropediatric consultation, INRPC, and satisfaction survey with the telephone consultation during COVID-19 crisis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational, cross-sectional, descriptive and analytical study of healthcare activity, as well as user satisfaction, during the State of Alarm in a neuropediatric consultation in a regional referral hospital. To measure satisfaction, a survey is conducted with parents and guardians. RESULTS: 416 children were attended by telephone. Most frequent diagnoses: neurodevelopmental disorder (27.8%), isolated ADD/ADHD (26.8%), and epilepsy (9.2%). 32.2% responded to the survey: 66.6% prior satisfaction. Global satisfaction with telephone consultation 59.9%; 77% would return to make the telephone consultation. CONCLUSIONS: User satisfaction with the telephone consultation, in a crisis situation, is similar to that perceived with the face-to-face consultation. 32% respond to the survey, and 60% are satisfied.

Estudio retrospectivo sobre la efectividad y seguridad de la pauta antibiótica reducida a 5-7 días en la faringoamigdalitis aguda estreptocócica comparada con la pauta clásica de 10 días / Retrospective study on the effectiveness and safety of the shortened 5- to 7-day antibiotic regimen for acute streptococcal pharyngotonsillitis compared to the classic 10-day regimen

Introducción: El tratamiento antibiótico clásico de la faringoamigdalitis aguda estreptocócica es una pauta de 10 días; sin embargo, la aparición de resistencias antibióticas induce a explorar pautas más cortas. Material y métodos: Seleccionamos a aquellos pacientes diagnosticados de faringoamigdalitis aguda estreptocócica en 2 cupos de pediatría de un centro de salud entre junio de 2016 y abril de 2020. Se compararon los resultados de aquellos que recibieron tratamiento 8-10 días con el de aquellos que lo recibieron 5-7 días. Resultados: Se analizaron 350 episodios (252 pacientes). El 64% recibieron tratamiento durante 8-10 días (grupo 1) y el 36% durante 5-7 días (grupo 2). No se observaron diferencias significativas en la aparición de faringoamigdalitis aguda estreptocócica o escarlatina los 3 meses posteriores (OR 0,97; IC 95%: 0,46-2,03), con una proporción similar en ambos grupos (9,8 vs. 9,5%). Sin diferenciar el tipo de infección (faringoamigdalitis aguda estreptocócica, escarlatina u otro tipo de infección streptocócica), se observaron resultados similares (OR 0,81; IC 95%: 0,41-1,59) con el 13,4% en el grupo 1 y el 11,1% en el 2. Respecto a la aparición de reacciones adversas medicamentosas recogidas en la historia clínica, fue de 2,7% en el grupo 1 y 0,8% en el 2 (OR 0,29; IC 95%: 0,04-2,44). Conclusiones: Según nuestra experiencia, la pauta antibiótica corta (5-7 días) en faringoamigdalitis aguda estreptocócica no es menos efectiva ni más insegura que la clásica pauta de 10 días. (AU)

Introduction: Antibiotherapy regimens for management of acute streptococcal pharyngitis traditionally last 10 days, but the development of resistance to different antimicrobials has motivated the exploration of shorter courses. Material and methods: We selected patients given a diagnosis of streptococcal pharyngitis in 2 paediatric caseloads of one primary care centre between June 2016 and April 2020. We compared outcomes in patients treated with 8- to 10-day courses versus 5- to 7-day courses. Results: The analysis included 350 care episodes (252 patients). Sixty-four percent were managed with 8- to 10-day courses of antibiotherapy (group 1) and 36% with 5- to 7-day courses (group 2). There were no significant differences in the incidence of streptococcal pharyngitis or scarlet fever in the 3 months that followed (OR, 0.98; 95% CI: 0.46-2.03), with similar percentages in both groups (9.8 vs. 9.5%). Overall, without differentiating based on the type of infection (streptococcal pharyngitis, scarlet fever or other streptococcal infections), we found similar outcomes (OR, 0.81; 95% CI: 0.41-1.59): 13.4% in group 1 and 11.1% in group 2. We also found no differences in the frequency of adverse events documented in the health records (OR, 0.29; 95% CI: 0.04-2.44): 2.7% in group 1 and 0.8% in group 2. Conclusions: In our experience, a shorter antibiotic course (5-7 days) is not less effective or more unsafe for management of acute streptococcal pharyngitis than the traditional 10-day course. (AU)

[Atypical growth of an intracranial lipoma]. / Crecimiento atípico en un lipoma intracraneal.

TITLE: Crecimiento atípico en un lipoma intracraneal.

Retrospective study on the effectiveness and safety of the shortened 5- to 7-day antibiotic regimen for acute streptococcal pharyngotonsillitis compared to the classic 10-day regimen.

INTRODUCTION: Antibiotherapy regimens for management of acute streptococcal pharyngitis traditionally last 10 days, but the development of resistance to different antimicrobials has motivated the exploration of shorter courses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We selected patients given a diagnosis of streptococcal pharyngitis in 2 paediatric caseloads of 1 primary care centre between June 2016 and April 2020. We compared outcomes in patients treated with 8- to 10-day courses versus 5- to 7-day courses. RESULTS: The analysis included 350 care episodes (252 patients). Sixty-four percent were managed with 8- to 10-day courses of antibiotherapy (group 1) and 36% with 5- to 7-day courses (group 2). There were no significant differences in the incidence of streptococcal pharyngitis or scarlet fever in the 3 months that followed (OR, 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46-2.03), with similar percentages in both groups (9.8% vs 9.5%). Overall, without differentiating based on the type of infection (streptococcal pharyngitis, scarlet fever or other streptococcal infections), we found similar outcomes (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.41-1.59): 13.4% in group 1 and 11.1% in group 2. We also found no differences in the frequency of adverse events documented in the health records (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.04-2.44): 2.7% in group 1 and 0.8% in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, a shorter antibiotic course (5-7 days) is not less effective or more unsafe for management of acute streptococcal pharyngitis than the traditional 10-day course.

Miositis por SARS-CoV-2 / SARS-CoV-2-associated myositis

Se describe el caso de una paciente de 9 años que presenta, durante el seguimiento por infección por SARS-CoV-2, incapacidad para la deambulación por dolor de extremidades inferiores. Ante una clínica y exploración compatible con miositis, se realiza analítica sanguínea en la que se observa una elevación de creatinfosfoquinasa (CPK). La paciente presenta buena evolución con tratamiento sintomático. A propósito del caso se realiza una revisión bibliográfica de los casos pediátricos de miositis asociados a la infección por SARS-CoV-2 (AU)

We describe the case of a 9-year-old patient who presented with inability to walk due to lower extremity pain in the follow-up of infection by SARS-CoV-2. Since the manifestations and findings of the examination were compatible with myositis, a blood test was performed that evinced elevation of creatine phosphokinase. The patient had a favourable outcome with symptomatic treatment. In the context of this case, we conducted a literature review of paediatric cases of myositis associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. (AU)