Impact of COVID-19 Infection on the Outcome of Patients With Ischemic Stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We evaluated whether stroke severity, functional outcome, and mortality are different in patients with ischemic stroke with or without coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. METHODS: A prospective, observational, multicentre cohort study in Catalonia, Spain. Recruitment was consecutive from mid-March to mid-May 2020. Patients had an acute ischemic stroke within 48 hours and a previous modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 to 3. We collected demographic data, vascular risk factors, prior mRS score, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, rate of reperfusion therapies, logistics, and metrics. Primary end point was functional outcome at 3 months. Favourable outcome was defined depending on the previous mRS score. Secondary outcome was mortality at 3 months. We performed mRS shift and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: We evaluated 701 patients (mean age 72.3±13.3 years, 60.5% men) and 91 (13%) had COVID-19 infection. Median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was higher in patients with COVID-19 compared with patients without COVID-19 (8 [3-18] versus 6 [2-14], P=0.049). Proportion of patients with a favourable functional outcome was 33.7% in the COVID-19 and 47% in the non-COVID-19 group. However, after a multivariable logistic regression analysis, COVID-19 infection did not increase the probability of unfavourable functional outcome. Mortality rate was 39.3% among patients with COVID-19 and 16.1% in the non-COVID-19 group. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, COVID-19 infection was a risk factor for mortality (hazard ratio, 3.14 [95% CI, 2.10-4.71]; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ischemic stroke and COVID-19 infection have more severe strokes and a higher mortality than patients with stroke without COVID-19 infection. However, functional outcome is comparable in both groups.

Phone and Video-Based Modalities of Central Blinded Adjudication of Modified Rankin Scores in an Endovascular Stroke Trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The standard outcome measure in stroke research is modified Rankin scale (mRS) evaluated by local blinded investigators. We aimed to assess feasibility and reliability of 2 central adjudication methods of mRS in the setting of a randomized endovascular stroke trial. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis derived from the Randomized Trial of Revascularization With Solitaire FR Device Versus Best Medical Therapy in the Treatment of Acute Stroke Due to Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion Presenting Within Eight Hours of Symptom Onset (REVASCAT) trial cohort. Primary outcome was distribution of mRS at 90 days. Local evaluation was done by certified investigators masked to treatment assignment using structured face-to-face interviews. In addition, central assessment was performed by 2 independent raters via structured phone interview (n=120) and via video recordings of the face-to-face interviews with local investigators (n=106). Interrater agreement was evaluated using kappa and discordance statistics. Sensitivity analyses for the primary end point using different adjudication approaches were performed. Correlation between mRS obtained with each modality and 24-hour follow-up infarct volumes was studied. RESULTS: Using local evaluation as the reference, higher agreement rates were noted with central video than with central phone evaluations (kw 0.92 [0.88-0.96] versus 0.77 [0.72-0.83]). Discrepancies in mRS scoring between local and central raters (phone- and video-based) were similar in both treatment allocation arms. Sensitivity analyses showed benefit of endovascular treatment irrespective of adjudication method, but higher odds ratios were observed with local evaluations. Final infarct volume was similarly correlated with mRS across all 3 evaluation modalities. CONCLUSIONS: Central adjudication of mRS is feasible, reducing interrater variability and avoiding potential problems related to lack of blinding. Our findings may have implications in the planning of future randomized acute stroke trials, especially in those including nonpharmacological interventions. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01692379.

Diabetic macular edema and its relationship to renal microangiopathy: a sample of Type I diabetes mellitus patients in a 15-year follow-up study.

PURPOSE: In the present study, our objective was to determine the epidemiological risk factors for the development of diabetic macular edema, especially attendant on renal diabetic lesion (microalbuminuria or overt nephropathy) in 112 Type I diabetic patients after 15 years. METHODS: This is a 15-year follow-up study of a cohort of 112 consecutive Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus patients without diabetic retinopathy or nephropathy who were enrolled in 1990. We studied the incidence of diabetic macular edema and its risk factors. The epidemiological risk factors included in the study were as follows: gender, diabetes duration, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, arterial hypertension, macroangiopathy, triglyceride levels, fractions of cholesterol [high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol], and cigarette smoking. RESULTS: The incidence of diabetic macular edema after 15 years was as follows: the focal form of diabetic macular edema was present in 13 (11.6%) patients and the diffuse form of macular edema was present in 10 (8.9%) patients, among 23 (20.5%) patients. The following factors were significant in the development of diabetic macular edema: high levels of LDL-cholesterol (P=.013), high levels (>7.5%) of HbA1c (P=.021), the presence of macroangiopathy (P=.022), the severity of diabetic retinopathy (P=.029), the presence of arterial hypertension (P=.037), and the presence of overt nephropathy (P=.047). Microalbuminuria was not significant in logistic regression (P=.587), and cigarette smoking was not significant (P=.976). The relationship between diabetic macular edema and duration of diabetes presented two peaks of incidence: first in patients with 15-20 years' duration of diabetes mellitus, and second in patients with >35 years' duration. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, our data suggest that better control of glycemia, LDL-cholesterol levels, and blood pressure in Type I diabetes mellitus patients may be beneficial in reducing the incidence of diabetic macular edema. Finally, our data validate the current guidelines for ophthalmologic care for the detection of diabetic macular edema over the long-term course of diabetes.

Renal and retinal microangiopathy after 15 years of follow-up study in a sample of Type 1 diabetes mellitus patients.

PURPOSE: In the present study, the objective is to determine the epidemiological risk factors in the appearance of diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy in 112 Type 1 diabetic patients after 15 years. METHODS: A 15-year follow-up study was done in a cohort of 112 consecutive Type 1 (IDDM) diabetes mellitus patients without diabetic retinopathy or nephropathy at enrolment in 1990. We studied the incidence of diabetic retinopathy and/or microalbuminuria. The epidemiological risk factors included in the study were gender, diabetes duration, HbA(1c) levels, arterial hypertension, levels of triglycerides and fractions of cholesterol (HDL-cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol). RESULTS: The incidence of diabetic retinopathy was 55.40% at the end of study; the risk factors associated were duration of diabetes mellitus (P<.001), high levels of HbA(1c) (P=.009), presence of arterial hypertension (P=.007) and high levels of LDL-cholesterol (P=.002). The incidence of microalbuminuria was 41.07% and that of overt nephropathy, 19.60%; the risk factors associated were high levels of HbA(1c) (P<.001) and presence of arterial hypertension (P=.023). At the end of study, four groups of patients were formed: patients without microalbuminuria or retinopathy, patients with microalbuminuria only, patients with retinopathy only and patients with retinopathy and microalbuminuria. From the results of the discriminate analysis, we may assume that for the development of retinal lesions only, in the diabetes mellitus, the duration of the disease, the high levels of HbA(1c) and the arterial hypertension are most important, and for the development of renal and retinal lesion simultaneously, the important factor is poor control of glycemia measured by levels of HbA(1c) and arterial hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, microalbuminuria correlated well with severe forms of diabetic retinopathy, and at the end of the study, two groups of patients had been configured: the first group had developed only diabetic retinopathy, and the second, their patients with diabetic retinopathy together with renal lesion (microalbuminuria). For the first group, the duration of diabetes mellitus was the most important risk factor, and for the second group, the levels of HbA(1c) and blood pressure were the most important.

Intracameral cefazolin as prophylaxis against endophthalmitis in cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic intracameral cefazolin in preventing endophthalmitis in cataract surgery. SETTING: Service of Ophthalmology, St. Joan Hospital, Reus, Spain. METHODS: In this noncontrolled retrospective observational study, all patients had uncombined cataract surgery from January 2001 to December 2004. All cases of postoperative endophthalmitis were related. The patients were classified into 2 groups. The first (n = 3650) had surgery between January 2001 and December 2002, and the second (n = 3618) had surgery between January 2003 and December 2004; the second group received a bolus of intracameral cefazolin instilled at the end of surgery. RESULTS: The rate of postoperative endophthalmitis was lower in the cases with intracameral injection at the end of surgery (0.055%) than in those without cefazolin injection (0.63%). No patients in the group with intracameral cefazoline developed corneal endothelium or retinal toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Intracameral bolus injection of cefazolin (1 mg in 0.1 mL solution) in cataract surgery demonstrated prophylactic efficacy in diminishing the rate of postoperative endophthalmitis without toxic effects on the cornea or retina.

Risk factors for diffuse and focal macular edema.

OBJECTIVE: The epidemiological risk factors for the different forms of diabetic macular edema (focal or diffuse) are not differentiated in the literature. In the present study, the objective was to determine which risk factors influence the appearance of focal or diffuse macular edema. RESEARCH, DESIGN, AND METHODS: A 4-year prospective study in a population of Type II diabetic patients (NIDDM) in three groups, the first with 29 patients with diffuse diabetic macular edema (Group A), the second with 32 patients with focal macular edema (Group B), and the third with 32 patients with diabetic retinopathy but without diabetic macular edema (Group C); the three groups were selected on the basis of sex, age, and duration of diabetes with similar patterns. We studied the following risk factors: treatment of diabetes mellitus by insulin, presence of diastolic blood hypertension, presence of microalbuminuria or diabetic nephropathy, levels of HbA1c, type of diabetic retinopathy, presence of previous panretinal photocoagulation, and levels of triglycerides and fractions of cholesterol. RESULTS: In discriminant analysis and in order of importance, the epidemiological risk factors for Group A were the following: presence of panretinal laser, diastolic blood hypertension, diabetic nephropathy, and insulin treatment; for group B, the risk factors were the following: insulin treatment, presence of diastolic blood hypertension, and high levels of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c); and for group, C the risk factors were the following: diastolic blood hypertension, insulin treatment of diabetes, and high levels of HbA1c. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, the group of patients with focal macular edema were epidemiologically similar to the group of patients with diabetic retinopathy without macular edema, the group of patients with diffuse macular edema were epidemiologically different.