Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate therapy to prevent hepatitis B virus vertical transmission-A review of maternal and infant outcomes.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a global health problem. Vertical transmission of HBV from HBV surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive mothers to their infants is the most common cause of HBV infection worldwide. The use of passive-active immunoprophylaxis is >90% effective in reducing the risk of vertical transmission, but immunoprophylaxis failure can occur in infants born to mothers with high viraemia. Thus, it is recommended that pregnant women with HBV-DNA level >200 000 IU/ml receive nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) treatment [i.e. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), lamivudine or telbivudine] during third trimester to prevent infant immunoprophylaxis failure. TDF is recommended as the first-line therapy based on available data on efficacy, safety and resistance profile. However, maternal immunological reconstitution following parturition can increase immune-mediated flares to viral antigens that is potentially exacerbated following TDF withdrawal. In this article, we review available data on the efficacy and safety of TDF administration to prevent HBV mother-to-child transmission. We also discuss changes in maternal viral markers [i.e. HBV-DNA, HBV e antigen and HBsAg] and alanine aminotransferase during follow-up post-partum in mothers received NA to prevent HBV vertical transmission.

Real-world clinical and virological outcomes in a retrospective multiethnic cohort study of 341 untreated and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-treated chronic hepatitis B pregnant patients in North America.

BACKGROUND: There are limited long-term data on outcomes of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in untreated and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)-treated women during pregnancy. AIMS: To assess clinical outcomes in a multiethnic cohort of patients during pregnancy and post-partum in a low HBV endemic region. METHODS: Retrospective real-world study of women with CHB (treated or untreated with TDF) from 2011 to 2019; data including ALT, HBV DNA, HBeAg and liver stiffness measurement were collected during pregnancy and post-partum. RESULTS: In 341 women (446 pregnancies) followed for a median of 33 months (IQR: 26.7-39.5) post-partum, 19% (65/341) received TDF (11 initiated pre-pregnancy, 53 for mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) prevention). During follow-up, 72/341 had subsequent pregnancy, including 18/53 on TDF for MTCT risk, of whom 7/18 were re-treated. In all TDF-treated women, HBV DNA declined but rebounded after TDF withdrawal (median baseline, near birth and early follow-up levels were 7.2, 3.0 and 5.5 log IU/mL respectively [P < 0.01]). In HBeAg+ patients (65/341) ALT flares were more common (P = 0.03), especially for those who stopped TDF post-partum, requiring re-treatment in 21% (11/53). In comparison, 54% (116/215) of untreated women had a post-partum ALT flare; one with fulminant hepatitis underwent transplant 13 months post-partum. HBsAg clearance occurred in 2.6% (9/341, 3/9 HBeAg+, 2/9 TDF treated) at median 30 months (IQR: 23-40) and 37% (24/65) of HBeAg+ patients had HBeAg loss at median 17 months (IQR: 12-26) post-partum. CONCLUSIONS: Post-partum ALT flares were common, especially after TDF withdrawal. Overall, 37% achieved HBeAg clearance and 2.9% had HBsAg loss during long-term follow-up.

Cost-effectiveness of quantitative hepatitis B virus surface antigen testing in pregnancy in predicting vertical transmission risk.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Vertical transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV) can occur despite immunoprophylaxis in mothers with high HBV DNA levels (>5-7 log10 IU/ml). Quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (qHBsAg) testing could be used as a surrogate marker to identify high viral load carriers, but there is limited data in pregnancy. We conducted a prospective observational study to determine the cost-effectiveness and utility of qHBsAg as a valid surrogate marker of HBV DNA. METHODS: Pregnant patients with chronic hepatitis B were recruited from a tertiary referral centre. HBV DNA levels and qHBsAg were assessed in the second to third trimester. Statistical analysis was performed by Spearman's rank correlation and student's t-test. The cost-effectiveness of qHBsAg as compared to HBV DNA testing was calculated. RESULTS: Ninety nine women with 103 pregnancies, median age 32 years, 65% Asian, 23% African and 12% other [Hispanic, Caucasian] were enrolled. Overall, 23% (23/99) were HBV e Ag (HBeAg)-positive. A significant correlation between qHBsAg and HBV DNA levels was noted in HBeAg-positive patients (r = 0.79, P < 0.05) but not in HBeAg-negative patients (r = 0.17, P = 0.06). In receiver operating characteristic analysis, the optimal qHBsAg cut-off values for predicting maternal viraemia associated with immunoprophylaxis failure (i.e., HBV DNA ≥7 log10 IU/ml) was 4.3 log10 IU/ml (accuracy 98.7%, sensitivity 94.7%, specificity 94.4%) (95% CI, 97-100%, P < 0.05). Use of HBV DNA as compared to qHBsAg costs approximately $20 000 more per infection prevented. CONCLUSION: In resource poor regions, qHBsAg could be used as a more cost-effective marker for high maternal viraemia, and indicate when anti-HBV nucleos/tide analogue therapy should be used to prevent HBV immunoprophylaxis failure.