21st century critical care medicine: An overview.

Critical care medicine in the 21st century has witnessed remarkable advancements that have significantly improved patient outcomes in intensive care units (ICUs). This abstract provides a concise summary of the latest developments in critical care, highlighting key areas of innovation. Recent advancements in critical care include Precision Medicine: Tailoring treatments based on individual patient characteristics, genomics, and biomarkers to enhance the effectiveness of therapies. The objective is to describe the recent advancements in Critical Care Medicine. Telemedicine: The integration of telehealth technologies for remote patient monitoring and consultation, facilitating timely interventions. Artificial intelligence (AI): AI-driven tools for early disease detection, predictive analytics, and treatment optimization, enhancing clinical decision-making. Organ Support: Advanced life support systems, such as Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy provide better organ support. Infection Control: Innovative infection control measures to combat emerging pathogens and reduce healthcare-associated infections. Ventilation Strategies: Precision ventilation modes and lung-protective strategies to minimize ventilator-induced lung injury. Sepsis Management: Early recognition and aggressive management of sepsis with tailored interventions. Patient-Centered Care: A shift towards patient-centered care focusing on psychological and emotional well-being in addition to medical needs. We conducted a thorough literature search on PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus using our tailored strategy, incorporating keywords such as critical care, telemedicine, and sepsis management. A total of 125 articles meeting our criteria were included for qualitative synthesis. To ensure reliability, we focused only on articles published in the English language within the last two decades, excluding animal studies, in vitro/molecular studies, and non-original data like editorials, letters, protocols, and conference abstracts. These advancements reflect a dynamic landscape in critical care medicine, where technology, research, and patient-centered approaches converge to improve the quality of care and save lives in ICUs. The future of critical care promises even more innovative solutions to meet the evolving challenges of modern medicine.

Gastrointestinal Manifestations and Outcomes of COVID-19: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Introduction Pulmonary symptoms are the most prominent manifestations of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms have been reported widely as well. Literature describing the relation of these symptoms with outcomes of COVID-19 patients is limited in terms of sample size, geographic diversity, and the spectrum of GI symptoms included. We aim to evaluate the association of GI symptoms with outcomes of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies assessing GI symptoms and outcomes in COVID-19 patients were undertaken using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria and the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) checklist. Details on outcomes included ICU vs. non-ICU admission, severe vs. non-severe disease, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) vs. no-IMV use, oxygen saturation <90% vs. >90%, in-hospital mortality vs. discharged alive and survivors. We obtained the odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (95%CI), and forest plots. Sensitivity analysis was used to analyze publication bias and heterogeneity. Results In 35 studies with 7931 confirmed COVID-19 patients, we found that anorexia (pooled OR:2.05; 95%CI: 1.36-3.09, p=0.0006) and abdominal pain (OR 2.80; 95%CI: 1.41-5.54, p=0.003) were associated with a higher risk of poor outcomes and no such association was found for diarrhea (OR 1.04; 95%CI: 0.85-1.26, p=0.71), nausea (OR 0.73; 95%CI: 0.38-1.39, p=0.34) and vomiting (OR 1.24; 95%CI 0.86-1.79, p=0.25). Conclusion The meta-analysis concludes that anorexia and abdominal pain are associated with poor outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, while diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting have no association. Future research should focus on whether detecting GI invasion in conjunction with fecal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing can aid in the early triage of high-risk individuals and improve outcomes.

Comprehensive Review of Red Meat Consumption and the Risk of Cancer.

Red and processed meat consumption rates are increasing in the United States. In this review, we present the current evidence that links red meat consumption and cancer development. A literature search was conducted in the PubMed and Google Scholar databases to review red meat consumption and its association with breast cancer and gastrointestinal cancer. Due to the presence of heme iron, which triggers oxidative reactions that eventually result in tumor formation, red meat consumption is strongly associated with the development of breast cancer. Ingestion of red meat increases Helicobacter pylori infections, resulting in enhanced expression of the CagA gene and the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines. This is the leading cause of gastric cancer. There is a strong correlation between heterocyclic amines and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in red meat and the development of pancreatic cancer. However, additional research is necessary to confirm this finding. Adult colorectal cancer is caused by the formation of heterocyclic amines and DNA adducts due to the intake of red and processed meats cooked at higher temperatures. The consumption of poultry is associated with a reduced risk of breast and gastrointestinal cancers, but the results are inconsistent. The evidence is strong for the association between red meat and breast cancer and most gastric cancers. The presence of aromatic hydrocarbons, heterocyclic amines, and heme iron in red meat has been found to be behind tumorigenesis. Poultry has been shown to have a low association with cancer, but additional research is needed.

Crystalloid Solutions in Hospital: A Review of Existing Literature.

Intravenous fluids (IVF) like normal saline (NS) and Ringer's lactate (RL) are often crucial in the management of hospitalized patients. Mishandling these fluids can lead to complications in about 20% of patients receiving them. In this review, we present the current evidence through the identification of observational studies and randomized trials that observed the optimal use of IVF. We found that NS may cause hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis in surgical patients, but there is no clear difference in mortality and long-term outcomes between NS and balanced crystalloids. Critically ill patients, particularly those in sepsis, benefit from balanced crystalloids, as high chloride content fluids like NS increase the risk of complications and mortality. In pancreatitis, NS has been shown to increase the risk of ICU admission when compared to RL; however, there is no significant difference in long-term outcomes and mortality between the fluids. RL is preferred for burns due to its isotonicity and lack of protein, preventing edema formation in an already dehydrated state. Plasma-lyte may resolve diabetic ketoacidosis faster, while prolonged NS use can lead to metabolic acidosis, acute kidney injury, and cerebral edema. In conclusion, NS, RL, and plasma-lyte are the most commonly used isotonic IVF in the hospital population. Incorrect choice of fluids in a different clinical scenario can lead to worse outcomes.

Epidemiology, Trends, Utilization Disparities, and Outcomes of Catheter Ablation and Its Association With Coronary Vasospasm Amongst Patients With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide Burden of Last Decade.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation (CA) is an important curative treatment for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), however, nationwide data on its utilization and disparities is limited. Coronary vasospasm is a rare, life-threatening, peri-operative complication of CA with limited literature in Caucasians. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study on adult hospitalizations in the USA from 2007 to 2017 by obtaining the data from National Inpatient Sample. The primary endpoints of our study were to identify the utilization rate of CA, disparities in utilization, and study the outcomes associated with CA. The secondary endpoints of the study were to identify the incidence of coronary vasospasm amongst patients who underwent CA, evaluate their association, and identify the predictors of coronary vasospasm. RESULTS: From 35,906,946 patients with NVAF, 343641 (0.96%) underwent CA. Its utilization decreased from 1% in 2007 to 0.71% in 2017. Patients who underwent CA, compared to those without CA, fared better in terms of hospital length of stay, mortality rate, disability rate, and discharge to the non-home facility. Patients in the 50-75 years age group, Native Americans, those with private insurance, and median household income of 76-100th percentile were associated with higher odds of CA utilization. Urban teaching hospitals and large-bedded hospitals performed more ablations, while the Mid-West region fared lower than the South, the West, and the Northeast. The prevalence of coronary vasospasm was higher amongst CA in comparison without CA, however, in regression analysis, no significant association was demonstrated between CA and coronary vasospasm. CONCLUSION: CA is an important treatment modality that is associated with improved clinical outcomes. Identification of factors associated with lower utilization of CA and its disparities will help to mitigate the burden associated with NVAF.

Comparing Simvastatin Monotherapy V/S Simvastatin-Ezetimibe Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Hyperlipidemia: A Meta-Analysis and Review.

Longstanding hyperlipidemia can increase the risk of cardiovascular disease. Statins are currently the mainstay of treatment in hyperlipidemia. Combination therapy of statin with ezetimibe is only indicated for severe hypercholesterolemia and very high-risk atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) population. There is a paucity of studies comparing statin monotherapy vs combination therapy with ezetimibe. This study aims to perform a meta-analysis of the existing literature and compare the effectiveness of statin monotherapy with statin-ezetimibe combination therapy in the management of hyperlipidemia. A systematic electronic search of the scientific literature was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus. Only randomized controlled trials comparing simvastatin monotherapy vs simvastatin-ezetimibe combination therapy between the years 2000 and 2021 and published in English language were included. Fifteen studies were included in the final analysis. The main outcomes that were compared were a reduction in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL). Our study showed that combination therapy led to a higher reduction of LDL-C (Mean difference: -20.22(-26.38, -14.07); P<0.0001) compared to monotherapy with a statin alone. There was no significant difference in the reduction of HDL-C values (Mean difference: -0.07(-0.45,0.32); P-0.04) between the two groups. Our study indicates that the combination therapy of simvastatin and ezetimibe is more effective in reduction of LDL-C levels compared to simvastatin monotherapy alone. Currently, guidelines recommend combination therapy only for severe hypercholesterolemia and high-risk ASCVD patients, more studies are needed to study the effectiveness of simvastatin-ezetimibe combination therapy in low-risk ASCVD population.

Prevalence of Cerebrovascular Accidents Among the US Population With Substance Use Disorders: A Nationwide Study.

Introduction Globally, stroke is one of the top ten causes of death. The incidence of stroke in patients aged 44 years and younger was noted to have risen over the past three decades. This rise in stroke diagnosis among young adults could be attributed to multiple reasons, including the rising prevalence of comorbidities like diabetes, hypertension, substance use disorders (SUDs), etc. Aim & objectives This study's primary aim was to evaluate the prevalence of stroke in the US population and the prevalence of SUDs amongst patients with a prior history of stroke. The secondary aim was to evaluate the association between Stroke and SUDs. Methods Our population was obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between the years 2013 to 2018. We identified respondents diagnosed with stroke using the questionnaire and the history of various SUDs amongst this population. The data were analyzed using SAS software (Version 9.4). We performed univariate analysis using the chi-square and Mann-Whitney test, and a p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Two hundred sixty-four thousand seven hundred forty (264,740) respondents were included in this study, and 10435 (3.94%) respondents were noted to have a history of stroke. The population subset with a stroke diagnosis was older (68 years vs. 51 years). Higher prevalence was noted among the female sex (52.14% females vs. 47.86% males), Non-Hispanic white ethnicity, followed by Non-Hispanic black & then other Hispanics (47.56% vs.25.47% vs. 7.82%), and those belonging to a lower annual household income of $0-$25,000 and $25,000-$65,000 ( 46.61% vs. 35.93% ). (p<0.0001). After adjusting for socio-demographics and coexisting comorbidities, e-cigarette [OR: 2.03; 95% CI: 2.03-2.03], cocaine [OR: 1.54; 95%CI:1.54-1.54], heroin [OR: 1.83; 95%CI: 1.83-1.83], marijuana or hashish [OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 1.01-1.01], were observed to have an association with higher odds of stroke than the population without a history of using these illicit drugs.  Conclusion Among respondents with a history of stroke, the use of cocaine was most prevalent, followed by marijuana/hashish, heroin, e-cigarettes, and injecting illegal drugs. The odds of having a stroke were two times higher in the population using an e-cigarette and higher among those using heroin, cocaine, and marijuana/ hashish. The Government should plan policy changes to treat SUDs in the USA, which could help reduce the stroke burden. Recall that bias and geographic variations in response rate by participants of the study were the limitations of our survey-based study.

Isolated Ascending Colon Gangrene With Persistent Ascending Mesocolon: A Case Report.

Persistent mesocolon is a rare embryological anomaly that occurs when the primitive dorsal mesocolon fails to fuse with the posterior lateral parietal peritoneum allowing for volvulus of the cecum and colon. In malrotation of the gut, the normal rotation of the embryonic gut is arrested or disturbed during in-utero development. To our knowledge, this is the first case of isolated colon gangrene with persistent ascending mesocolon to be reported, although earlier studies have documented cases of persistent mesocolon of both ascending and descending mesocolon. This case had signs of acute intestinal obstruction and peritonitis, and preoperative imaging was suggestive of sigmoid volvulus. Explorative laparotomy revealed a hugely dilated and gangrenous ascending colon; the fixed part of the small intestine was found in the subhepatic space, and the hepatic flexure was at a level below the transpyloric plane in the midclavicular line. Findings were suggestive of isolated colon gangrene with persistent ascending mesocolon and malrotation of the gut. Right hemicolectomy with terminal ileostomy was performed and postoperative follow-up showed no complications. For a young patient with no prior co-morbidities, a volvulus of ascending mesocolon diagnosis was deemed unlikely because ascending colon is a retroperitoneal organ. The medial position of ascending mesocolon and small bowel loops to the right side was a crucial intra-operative clue for diagnosis. Such cases are difficult to diagnose pre-operatively through imaging alone, hence explorative laparotomy becomes necessary. Intra-operative findings led to performing a right hemicolectomy and ileostomy to relieve the obstruction. Therefore, among other congenital reasons for intestinal obstruction, surgeons should consider persistent mesocolon and volvulus as differential diagnoses when evaluating young patients. Emergent surgery is the only approach to address this.

Rapunzel Syndrome in a Teenage Girl: A Case Report.

Trichobezoars are concretions of retained, undigested material, mostly hair or hair-like fibers in the stomach. Rapunzel syndrome is the condition when trichobezoars extend into the small bowel, leading to various complications including bowel obstruction, and perforation due to pressure necrosis. We present an interesting case of trichobezoar in a 15-year-old female patient, who presented with abdominal pain for one month duration. The exam was notable for a firm palpable mass in the epigastric area associated with localized tenderness and guarding. Contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen showed a distended stomach with the bezoar, dilated duodenal loops, and clumping of proximal jejunal loops. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showed a trichobezoar extending from the oesophagogastric junction to the pylorus. Endoscopic removal of the trichobezoar was not successful.  An elective laparotomy was performed, during which the stomach, duodenum, and proximal jejunum were dilated. The trichobezoar, measuring 35 cm in length, extended from the body of the stomach to the proximal jejunum and caused jejunal perforation due to pressure necrosis. The trichobezoar was removed and primary closure of jejunal perforation with diversion gastrojejunostomy and jejunostomy was done. There were no postoperative complications. The patient followed up with psychiatry in the clinic after discharge, she was diagnosed with trichotillomania and started on fluoxetine, with improvement in her behavioral symptoms. In young female patients with nonspecific chronic abdomen pain and a palpable mass, trichobezoar should be considered in the differential diagnosis. Contrast-enhanced abdomen CT is the preferred imaging modality and removal of the trichobezoar with an appropriate endoscopic or surgical procedure is the treatment of choice. It is essential to diagnose and treat the underlying behavioral condition to prevent recurrent episodes.