Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 39
Filter
1.
Radiol Med ; 2024 Jul 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39017759

ABSTRACT

We review the etiologies of bowel obstruction in infants and children that can be identified on ultrasound (US) including perforated appendicitis, intussusception, foreign body ingestion, colonic volvulus, intra-abdominal mass lesions, internal hernia, and stricturing inflammatory bowel disease. US can potentially identify the cause of bowel obstruction in these age groups, without the need for additional cross-sectional imaging, and can aid in patient management including interventional and surgical planning. Hence, it is important to be familiar with the sonographic imaging findings of bowel obstruction in infants and children.

2.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 21(6S): S310-S325, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38823953

ABSTRACT

Soft tissue vascular anomalies may be composed of arterial, venous, and/or lymphatic elements, and diagnosed prenatally or later in childhood or adulthood. They are divided into categories of vascular malformations and vascular tumors. Vascular malformations are further divided into low-flow and fast-flow lesions. A low-flow lesion is most common, with a prevalence of 70%. Vascular tumors may behave in a benign, locally aggressive, borderline, or malignant manner. Infantile hemangioma is a vascular tumor that presents in the neonatal period and then regresses. The presence or multiple skin lesions in an infant can signal underlying visceral vascular anomalies, and complex anomalies may be associated with overgrowth syndromes. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.


Subject(s)
Societies, Medical , Vascular Malformations , Humans , Vascular Malformations/diagnostic imaging , United States , Evidence-Based Medicine , Infant , Vascular Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Infant, Newborn , Child , Diagnostic Imaging/methods , Hemangioma/diagnostic imaging , Practice Guidelines as Topic
3.
J Pediatr Surg ; 59(6): 1101-1107, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38418275

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound (US) is gaining acceptance for the evaluation of midgut volvulus in children. However, its impact on clinical outcomes is unknown. We aim to determine whether using US as a first-line modality changes imaging mobilization, time to surgery and re-feeding, length of stay, and frequency of bowel necrosis, short bowel syndrome, and death. METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective cohort study was performed at a tertiary pediatric institution. Eighty children with surgically confirmed midgut volvulus from 2014 to 2021 were compared before and after implementation of US as first-line imaging and based on the modality used to diagnose midgut volvulus. RESULTS: Outcomes were not statistically different pre- versus post-implementation. Compared with patients who had UGI only, those who had US only or both had significantly quicker imaging mobilization (median: -33 min; 95% CI: -61.2, -4.8; p = 0.023 and median: -31 min; 95% CI: -58.5, -3.6; p = 0.028 respectively). Patients with US only were less likely to have bowel necrosis compared with those who had UGI only (9.1% versus 43.8%, p = 0.042). Patients who had US only or both were less likely to develop short bowel syndrome compared to UGI only (4.8% US only, 0% both, 40% UGI only; p = 0.027 for US only, p = 0.005 for both). CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant change in outcomes was found after implementation of US as first-line imaging for midgut volvulus. However, patients diagnosed with US only or US in combination with UGI had quicker imaging mobilization and decreased frequency of bowel necrosis and short bowel syndrome. Findings suggest that US has potential to improve patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.


Subject(s)
Intestinal Volvulus , Ultrasonography , Humans , Intestinal Volvulus/diagnostic imaging , Intestinal Volvulus/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Ultrasonography/statistics & numerical data , Child, Preschool , Child , Infant , Digestive System Abnormalities/surgery , Digestive System Abnormalities/diagnostic imaging , Short Bowel Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Necrosis , Treatment Outcome , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data
4.
J Ultrasound ; 27(2): 407-417, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38402484

ABSTRACT

Bowel obstruction (BO) in children has a wide differential diagnosis, ranging from non-urgent conditions to surgical emergencies. Abdominal radiographs are most often used as the first imaging modality for the evaluation of obstruction. However, for some indications, ultrasound can be the primary imaging modality. Therefore, it is incumbent on radiologists to recognize the types of bowel obstruction that can be recognized with US. Key sonographic features of BO include differential dilation of bowel loops, bowel wall thickening, and free fluid. "Do Not Miss" findings that indicate need for emergent treatment include volvulus, pneumoperitoneum, and/or signs of ischemia (bowel wall thinning and/or absent perfusion). The aim of this pictorial essay is to provide guidance on the sonographic technique and findings that enable identification of BO on US. Examples of neonatal BO on US, including common and less frequently encountered etiologies, are illustrated in this pictorial essay.


Subject(s)
Intestinal Obstruction , Ultrasonography , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Diagnosis, Differential , Intestinal Obstruction/diagnostic imaging , Intestines/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography/methods
5.
Eur J Pediatr ; 182(11): 5159-5165, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37698612

ABSTRACT

The combination of low dose CT and AI performance in the pediatric population has not been explored. Understanding this relationship is relevant for pediatric patients given the potential radiation risks. Here, the objective was to determine the diagnostic performance of commercially available Computer Aided Detection (CAD) for pulmonary nodules in pediatric patients at simulated lower radiation doses. Retrospective chart review of 30 sequential patients between 12-18 years old who underwent a chest CT on the Siemens SOMATOM Force from December 20, 2021, to April 12, 2022. Simulated lower doses at 75%, 50%, and 25% were reconstructed in lung kernel at 3 mm slice thickness using ReconCT and imported to Syngo CT Lung CAD software for analysis. Two pediatric radiologists reviewed the full dose CTs to determine the reference read. Two other pediatric radiologists compared the Lung CAD results at 100% dose and each simulated lower dose level to the reference on a nodule by nodule basis. The sensitivity (Sn), positive predictive value (PPV), and McNemar test were used for comparison of Lung CAD performance based on dose. As reference standard, 109 nodules were identified by the two radiologists. At 100%, and simulated 75%, 50%, and 25% doses, lung CAD detected 60, 62, 58, and 62 nodules, respectively; 28, 28, 29, and 26 were true positive (Sn = 26%, 26%, 27%, 24%), 30, 32, 27, and 34 were false positive (PPV = 48%, 47%, 52%, 43%). No statistically significance difference of Lung CAD performance at different doses was found, with p-values of 1.0, 1.0, and 0.7 at simulated 75%, 50%, and 25% doses compared to standard dose. CONCLUSION: The Lung CAD shows low sensitivity at all simulated lower doses for the detection of pulmonary nodules in this pediatric population. However, radiation dose may be reduced from standard without further compromise to the Lung CAD performance. WHAT IS KNOWN: • High diagnostic performance of Lung CAD for detection of pulmonary nodules in adults. • Several imaging techniques are applied to reduce pediatric radiation dose. WHAT IS NEW: • Low sensitivity at all simulated lower doses for the detection of pulmonary nodules in our pediatric population. • Radiation dose may be reduced from standard without further compromise to the Lung CAD performance.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms , Multiple Pulmonary Nodules , Adult , Humans , Child , Adolescent , Artificial Intelligence , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Multiple Pulmonary Nodules/diagnostic imaging , Radiation Dosage
7.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 20(8): 730-737, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37498259

ABSTRACT

In this white paper, the ACR Pediatric AI Workgroup of the Commission on Informatics educates the radiology community about the health equity issue of the lack of pediatric artificial intelligence (AI), improves the understanding of relevant pediatric AI issues, and offers solutions to address the inadequacies in pediatric AI development. In short, the design, training, validation, and safe implementation of AI in children require careful and specific approaches that can be distinct from those used for adults. On the eve of widespread use of AI in imaging practice, the group invites the radiology community to align and join Image IntelliGently (www.imageintelligently.org) to ensure that the use of AI is safe, reliable, and effective for children.


Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Radiology , Adult , Humans , Child , Societies, Medical , Radiology/methods , Radiography , Diagnostic Imaging/methods
8.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 20(8): 738-741, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37400046

ABSTRACT

Radiology has been a pioneer in adopting artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled devices into the clinic. However, initial clinical experience has identified concerns of inconsistent device performance across different patient populations. Medical devices, including those using AI, are cleared by the FDA for their specific indications for use (IFUs). IFU describes the disease or condition the device will diagnose or treat, including a description of the intended patient population. Performance data evaluated during the premarket submission support the IFU and include the intended patient population. Understanding the IFUs of a given device is thus critical to ensuring that the device is used properly and performs as expected. When devices do not perform as expected or malfunction, medical device reporting is an important way to provide feedback about the device to the manufacturer, the FDA, and other users. This article describes the ways to retrieve the IFU and performance data information as well as the FDA medical device reporting systems for unexpected performance discrepancy. It is crucial that imaging professionals, including radiologists, know how to access and use these tools to improve the informed use of medical devices for patients of all ages.


Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Device Approval , Child , Humans
10.
Clin Imaging ; 101: 50-55, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37301051

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To test the performance of a commercially available adult pulmonary nodule detection artificial intelligence (AI) tool in pediatric CT chests. METHODS: 30 consecutive chest CTs with or without contrast of patients ages 12-18 were included. Images were retrospectively reconstructed at 3 mm and 1 mm slice thickness. AI for detection of lung nodules in adults (Syngo CT Lung Computer Aided Detection (CAD)) was evaluated. 3 mm axial images were retrospectively reviewed by two pediatric radiologists (reference read) who determined the location, type, and size of nodules. Lung CAD results at 3 mm and 1 mm slice thickness were compared to reference read by two other pediatric radiologists. Sensitivity (Sn) and positive predictive value (PPV) were analyzed. RESULTS: The radiologists identified 109 nodules. At 1 mm, CAD detected 70 nodules; 43 true positive (Sn = 39 %), 26 false positive (PPV = 62 %), and 1 nodule which had not been identified by radiologists. At 3 mm, CAD detected 60 nodules; 28 true positive (Sn = 26 %), 30 false positive (PPV = 48 %) and 2 nodules which had not been identified by radiologists. There were 103 solid nodules (47 measuring < 3 mm) and 6 subsolid nodules (5 measuring < 5 mm). When excluding 52 nodules (solid < 3 mm and subsolid < 5 mm) based on algorithm conditions, the Sn increased to 68 % at 1 mm and 49 % at 3 mm but there was no significant change in the PPV measuring 60 % at 1 mm and 48 % at 3 mm. CONCLUSION: The adult Lung CAD showed low sensitivity in pediatric patients, but better performance at thinner slice thickness and when smaller nodules were excluded.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms , Solitary Pulmonary Nodule , Adult , Humans , Child , Artificial Intelligence , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Solitary Pulmonary Nodule/diagnostic imaging , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods
14.
Pediatr Radiol ; 52(7): 1242-1254, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35229184

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, some pediatric radiologists have shifted to working from home; the long-term ramifications for pediatric radiologists and departments have not yet been defined. OBJECTIVE: To characterize experiences of working from home associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and guide expectations after the pandemic is controlled, via separate surveys of Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR) and Society of Chiefs of Radiology at Children's Hospitals (SCORCH) members. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two separate surveys were conducted. In the first, SPR members were surveyed Jan. 11 through Feb. 8, 2021. The response rate was 17.0% (255 of 1,501). Survey questions included demographics, information on the ability to work from home and subjective experiences ranked on a scale of 0 to 10. The survey enabled segregation and comparison of responses between those with and without home PACS. In the second survey, SCORCH members were surveyed Dec. 8, 2020, through Jan. 8, 2021. The response rate was 51.5% (51/99). Survey questions included the logistics of working from home, technical specifications and the expectations on clinical duties performed from home. The Wilcoxon rank test was used to determine statistical significance of compared variables between respondents with and without home PACS in SPR members, and expectations between SPR and SCORCH members. Descriptive statistics summarized demographic questions and free text responses. RESULTS: The majority of member respondents (81.2%, 207/255) had a home PACS and most departments provided home PACS to faculty (94.1%, 48/51). Overall, radiologists who could work from home were satisfied with their ability to work from home (mean rating: 8.3/10) and were significantly more satisfied than predicted by those without home PACS (5.9/10, P<0.0001). Respondents overwhelmingly indicated they were less able to teach trainees (mean rating: 2.7/10) and had decreased emotional engagement (mean rating: 4.4/10), but had improved research productivity and cognitive ability for research when working from home (mean rating for both: 5.3/10). Regarding the expectations of the ability to work from home after no longer needing to address the pandemic, department chairs generally favored fewer rotations from home, with 97.9% (47/48) indicating working from home should be 60% or fewer assignments, compared with 84.1% (164/195) of individual radiologists (P=0.071). CONCLUSIONS: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a shift to working from home using PACS. Results of these SPR and SCORCH member surveys can help inform future decisions regarding pediatric radiologists working from home once the pandemic has been controlled.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Radiology , Child , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Pandemics , Surveys and Questionnaires
15.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 218(6): 931-939, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35107311

ABSTRACT

Midgut volvulus in association with malrotation is a pediatric surgical emergency. Prompt and accurate diagnosis is necessary to avoid bowel ischemia and necrosis, thereby reducing morbidity and mortality. Historically, the fluoroscopic upper gastrointestinal series has been the preferred imaging modality for the evaluation of both midgut malrotation and volvulus, although the use of ultrasound (US) is increasing. In this Narrative Review, we describe the findings of midgut malrotation and volvulus on US, including practical tips for acquisition and interpretation; discuss the advantages and challenges of both imaging modalities; and propose a path and safeguards for possible transition to the use of US as the first-line modality for diagnosis based on our experience in imaging children with midgut malrotation and volvulus.


Subject(s)
Digestive System Abnormalities , Intestinal Volvulus , Child , Diagnostic Imaging , Digestive System Abnormalities/diagnostic imaging , Digestive System Abnormalities/surgery , Humans , Intestinal Volvulus/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography/methods
16.
Pediatr Surg Int ; 38(3): 437-443, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34999941

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: COVID-19 disease can manifest with intussusception in pediatric patients, but prevalence of abnormalities on ultrasounds performed for intussusception is uncertain. We aim to report our experience in children with COVID-19 presenting with suspected intussusception imaged with ultrasound. METHODS: Children under 18 years who had an ultrasound for possible intussusception underwent retrospective analysis and were tested for COVID-19 between April 1 and December 14, 2020. Patients' demographic, clinical, radiological and surgical characteristics were reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-four COVID-19-positive patients were identified; 19 boys with mean age 3 years (range: 3 months-18 years). Ultrasound was abnormal in 11 patients (11/24, 46%). Sonographic features of enterocolitis were documented in seven children (7/24, 29%). Three boys (3/24, 13%) were found to have ileocolic intussusception on ultrasound and underwent air enema with failed reduction (3/3, 100%), precipitating surgical reductions, all with favorable outcomes. One patient (1/24, 4%) was found to have a long segment of persistent small bowel-small bowel intussusception which was surgically repaired. CONCLUSION: Given the known association between failed reduction at air enema and delayed presentation, heightened awareness for intussusception in the setting of COVID-19 should be maintained, though more often, the etiology was attributed to other GI manifestations of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Ileal Diseases , Intussusception , Adolescent , Child , Enema , Humans , Ileal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Ileal Diseases/etiology , Ileal Diseases/surgery , Infant , Intussusception/diagnostic imaging , Intussusception/surgery , Male , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome
18.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 218(1): 182-183, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34319165

ABSTRACT

Of over 100 FDA-cleared artificial intelligence (AI) tools for triage, detection, or diagnosis in medical imaging, only one is cleared for use in children. Thus, children may be unable to benefit from the advances that AI provides to adults. Furthermore, dataset demographics are frequently absent from the publicly available FDA documents, and it is not apparent that the software is unsuitable for use in pediatric patients. Herein, recommendations for change are proposed.


Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Diagnostic Imaging/methods , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Pediatrics/methods , Child , Humans , Triage/methods
19.
Jpn J Radiol ; 40(3): 262-270, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34661860

ABSTRACT

Foreign body (FB) ingestion is common in children, particularly from 6 months to 3 years of age. As young children may be unable to provide a clinical history and the ingestion is often unwitnessed, imaging plays an important role in diagnosis, predicting outcomes and detecting complications that require surgical intervention. Since 2015, our institution's diagnostic algorithm for suspected airway foreign bodies has included a noncontrast airway FB CT (FB-CT) with the z-axis coverage spanning from the larynx to the proximal segmental bronchi of the lower lung zones. The effective dose of radiation from this FB-CT airway protocol is typically less than 1 mSv, compared to an effective dose of just under 1 mSv to up to 3 mSv for a fluoroscopic esophagram in children under 10 years of age and 1-3 mSv for a routine pediatric CT chest. In using the FB-CT airway protocol at our institution, we observed that esophageal rather than airway FBs were sometimes encountered on these exams. However, the confidence among radiologists for definitively diagnosing an esophageal foreign body on noncontrast CT was variable. Consequently, we created a teaching module of positive cases for our group of 21 pediatric body radiologists to increase their diagnostic confidence. This pictorial essay illustrates our institutional experience and can help others to confidently diagnose esophageal foreign bodies using a dedicated CT foreign body imaging protocol. At a similar radiation dose to a fluoroscopic esophagram, CT provides the additional advantage of an expedited diagnosis without the need for a radiologist on site.


Subject(s)
Foreign Bodies , Bronchi/diagnostic imaging , Child , Child, Preschool , Esophagus/diagnostic imaging , Esophagus/surgery , Foreign Bodies/complications , Foreign Bodies/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Infant , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
20.
Pediatr Radiol ; 52(3): 460-467, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34741178

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection may be associated with appendicitis or clinical symptoms that mimic appendicitis, but it is not clear if the findings or utility of imaging in pediatric patients with suspected appendicitis have changed since the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate for potential differences in SARS-CoV-2 positive and SARS-CoV-2 negative pediatric patients imaged for suspected appendicitis to determine the reliability of the existing medical imaging approach for appendicitis in a population that contains both SARS-CoV-2 positive and SARS-CoV-2 negative pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients imaged for suspected appendicitis Apr. 1, 2020, to Dec. 31, 2020, were identified via an electronic medical records search. Differences in ultrasound (US) diagnostic performance, use of computed tomography (CT) following US, rates of appendicitis, imaging findings of appendicitis and perforation were compared between SARS-CoV-2 positive and SARS-CoV-2 negative tested patients, using pathology and surgery as reference standards for appendicitis and perforation, respectively. Fisher exact test and Student's t-test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: One thousand, six hundred and ninety-three patients < 18 years old met inclusion criteria, with 46% (772/1,693) female, 11 imaged with only CT and 1,682 with US. Comparing SARS-CoV-2 positive and SARS-CoV-2 negative patients, no statistically significant differences in sensitivity or specificity of US (P = 1 and P = 1, respectively), or in the US (P-values ranging from 0.1 to 1.0) or CT imaging findings (P-values ranging from 0.2 to 1.0) in appendicitis were found. Perforation rates were similar between SARS-CoV-2 positive (20/57, 35.1% perforated) and SARS-CoV-2 negative (359/785, 45.7% perforated) patients with appendicitis (P = 0.13). Use of CT following first-line US was similar, with 7/125 (5.6%) of SARS-CoV-2 positive imaged with CT after US and 127/1,557 (8.2%) of SARS-CoV-2 negative imaged with CT after US (P = 0.39). CONCLUSION: In pediatric patients with suspected appendicitis, no significant difference was found in the diagnostic performance of US, CT usage or perforation rates between SARS-CoV-2 positive and SARS-CoV-2 negative patients.


Subject(s)
Appendicitis , COVID-19 , Adolescent , Appendicitis/diagnostic imaging , Appendicitis/epidemiology , Appendicitis/surgery , Child , Female , Humans , Pandemics , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Tertiary Care Centers , Ultrasonography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...