Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 27
Filter
1.
Clín. salud ; 35(1): 21-26, Mar. 2024. tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-231079

ABSTRACT

Background: This preliminary study examined the mediating role of illness representations on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between adherent and poorly adherent obstructive sleep apnea patients (OSA) to the automatic positive airway pressure (APAP) therapy. Method: A total of 185 patients were assessed on determinants of APAP treatment, illness representations, family coping, and self-efficacy, at T1 (prior to APAP treatment) and T2 (1 to 2 months with APAP treatment). Results: Regarding the determinants of APAP, adherent patients showed higher self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and decisional balance index, compared to poorly adherent patients. Adherent patients also showed higher family coping and HRQoL, but less threatening cognitive representations compared to poorly adherent patients. Illness cognitive and emotional representations mediated the relationship between self-efficacy/family coping and HRQoL, in adherent patients. Only illness cognitive representations mediated the relationship between self-efficacy and HRQoL in poorly adherent patients. Conclusions: The results highlight the importance of illness representations during OSA treatment in the promotion of adherence to APAP.(AU)


Antecedentes: Este estudio preliminar examina el papel mediador de la representación de la enfermedad en la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud (CVRS) entre pacientes con apnea obstructiva del sueño (AOS) observantes y poco observantes de la terapia de presión positiva automática en las vías respiratorias (APAP). Método: Se evaluó a un total de 185 pacientes sobre los determinantes del tratamiento APAP, las representaciones de la enfermedad, el afrontamiento familiar y la autoeficacia en T1 (antes del tratamiento APAP) y T2 (1 a 2 meses con tratamiento APAP). Resultados: En cuanto a los determinantes de la APAP, los observantes mostraron mayor autoeficacia, expectativas de resultados e índice de equilibrio decisional en comparación con los poco observantes. Los observantes también mostraron un mayor afrontamiento familiar y CVRS pero menos representaciones cognitivas amenazantes en comparación con los observantes deficientes. Las representaciones cognitivas y emocionales de la enfermedad mediaron la relación entre la autoeficacia/afrontamiento familiar y la CVRS en pacientes observantes. Solo las representaciones cognitivas de enfermedad mediaron la relación entre la autoeficacia y la CVRS en pacientes de baja observancia. Conclusiones: Los resultados destacan la importancia de las representaciones de la enfermedad durante el tratamiento de la AOS en la promoción de la adherencia a la APAP.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive , Quality of Life , Continuous Positive Airway Pressure , Self Efficacy , Symptom Assessment/psychology , Mental Health , Psychology, Clinical , Proof of Concept Study , Family Relations
2.
Pharmacol Res Perspect ; 12(1): e1166, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38204399

ABSTRACT

A better understanding of patients' adherence to treatment is a prerequisite to maximize the benefit of healthcare provision for patients, reduce treatment costs, and is a key factor in a variety of subsequent health outcomes. We aim to understand the state of the art of scientific evidence about which factors influence patients' adherence to treatment. A systematic literature review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines in five separate electronic databases of scientific publications: PubMed, PsycINFO (ProQuest), Cochrane library (Ovid), Google Scholar, and Web of Science. The search focused on literature reporting the significance of factors in adherence to treatment between 2011 and 2021, including only experimental studies (e.g., randomized controlled trials [RCT], clinical trials, etc.). We included 47 experimental studies. The results of the systematic review (SR) are grouped according to predetermined categories of the World Health Organization (WHO): socioeconomic, treatment, condition, personal, and healthcare-related factors. This review gives an actual overview of evidence-based studies on adherence and analyzed the significance of factors defined by the WHO classification. By showing the strength of certain factors in several independent studies and concomitantly uncovering gaps in research, these insights could serve as a basis for the design of future adherence studies and models.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs , Patient Compliance , Humans , Databases, Factual , World Health Organization
3.
Rev. bras. geriatr. gerontol. (Online) ; 27: e230227, 2024. tab, graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1559526

ABSTRACT

Resumo Objetivo Identificar na literatura, intervenções que auxiliam na promoção da funcionalidade da pessoa idosa durante a transição hospital domicílio. Método Revisão integrativa de literatura com buscas entre outubro e novembro de 2022, nas bases de dados: MEDLINE, Lilacs, IBECS, BDENF, WoS, SCOPUS, CINAHL e PEDro, com os MeSh: Aged, Transitional Care e Functional Status, em qualquer idioma, sem recorte temporal, com operador booleano OR e AND. Resultado: Identificou-se 2.123 artigos, nove atenderam aos critérios de inclusão, emergindo quatro categorias: Educação em saúde; Envolvimento ativo das pessoas idosas e cuidadores familiares; Atuação de equipe multidisciplinar; Acompanhamento após alta hospitalar. Conclusão A continuidade dos cuidados após alta hospitalar através de intervenções para manter e recuperar a funcionalidade é uma estratégia que fortalece a autonomia e a independência das pessoas idosas.


Abstract Objective To identify interventions in the literature that assist in promoting functionality in older adults during the hospital-to-home transition. Method Integrative literature review with searches conducted between October and November 2022, in the following databases: MEDLINE, Lilacs, IBECS, BDENF, WoS, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and PEDro, using the MeSH terms: Aged, Transitional Care, and Functional Status, in any language, without temporal restriction, employing boolean operators OR and AND. Result A total of 2,123 papers were identified, with nine meeting the inclusion criteria, resulting in four categories: Health education; Active involvement of older adults and family caregivers; Multidisciplinary team involvement; Follow-up care post-hospital discharge. Conclusion The continuity of care post-hospital discharge through interventions aimed at maintaining and restoring functionality is a strategy that strengthens the autonomy and independence of older adults.

4.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38131702

ABSTRACT

Considering the multidimensionality of chronic pain, it is crucial to develop comprehensive strategies for its effective management. However, establishing well-defined, evidence-based guidelines for such approaches remains challenging. To overcome this, we present the finding from a 4-month intervention to enhance the management of non-cancer chronic pain in older adults with pre-frailty and frailty. The intervention's core elements comprised a multidisciplinary individualized plan, a case manager, and patient education. This pilot study involved 22 participants (≥65 years). It assessed changes in pain frequency and intensity (pain scale), frailty (Fried frailty phenotype criteria), and medication adherence (Brief Adherence Rating Scale) before and after the 4-month intervention. The results were encouraging: pain frequency and intensity and frailty score tended to decrease, and medication adherence showed significant improvement. This preliminary small-scale pilot study provides a foundation for further research and for exploring the potential scalability of this multidisciplinary patient-centred intervention.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Frailty , Humans , Aged , Frail Elderly , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Pilot Projects , Geriatric Assessment/methods
5.
Rev Gaucha Enferm ; 44: 20210323, 2023.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37341280

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the strategies to combat COVID-19 in Long-Term Care Facilities for older people in Bahia state. METHODOLOGY: This is a qualitative study based on documentary analysis of the collection produced by the Intersectoral Committee on Monitoring Long-Term Care for older people in the state of Bahia, from April 2020 to June 2021. Data analysis was based on Bardin's content analysis. RESULTS: The commission produced seven documents in the period analyzed. Two thematic categories emerged: Intersectoral Networks and Telemonitoring of Long-Term Care Facilities for the Elderly. CONCLUSION: The coordination in an intersector network and the telemonitoring carried out by the Intersector Committee on Monitoring Long-Term Care Facilities were the main strategies to fight COVID-19 in these institutions. The need to implement effective public policies to support long-term care facilities for older people is highlighted.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Aged , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Health Facilities , Public Policy , Qualitative Research
6.
Res Social Adm Pharm ; 19(4): 653-659, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36621396

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Ascertaining Barriers to Compliance (ABC) taxonomy for describing medication adherence was created in 2012, aiming to standardize terms and definitions in research and practice. The taxonomy comprises seven terms and definitions. Originally developed in English, subsequently translated into French and German, is currently being translated to Portuguese, Spanish, Czech, Romanian and Italian, aiming to promote its global use and overcome cultural barriers. OBJECTIVES: To cross-culturally translate the ABC taxonomy into Portuguese for Portugal and Brazil. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify published taxonomy terms and definitions in Portuguese, and to identify panelists in medication adherence. Initial mapping of terms and definitions retrieved was scrutinized by the research team to build an e-survey. The e-survey was piloted and then sent to panelists in both countries seeking consensus using a three-round Delphi method. Consensus was defined as ≥ 85% for round 1 and ≥ 75% for round 2. Terms with agreement <10% were dropped between rounds. In round 3, terms and definitions reaching agreement between 50 and 75% were classified as moderate consensus,>75-95% as consensus and >95% as strong consensus. RESULTS: A total of 778 studies were identified and 84 included, enabling the extraction of 154 terms and 32 definitions. In round 1, 164 panelists participated, 115 in round 2 and 99 in the round 3. Consensus was achieved in both countries for all seven terms and definitions, although with varying intensity of agreement. The term "Management of adherence" and the definition of "Discontinuation" obtained moderate consensus in both countries. CONCLUSIONS: A unified and unique ABC taxonomy in Portuguese was possible to develop for use in Portugal and in Brazil. Its use will harmonize and standardize the terms and definitions used in clinical practice and research.


Subject(s)
Cross-Cultural Comparison , Medication Adherence , Humans , Portugal , Delphi Technique , Ethnicity , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
Endocrine ; 79(3): 477-483, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36574148

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aims to predict the Intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) adherence behavior of patients with Type 1 Diabetes. METHODS: Patients with Type 1 Diabetes mellitus using FreeStyle Libre™ System (FL), a isCGM device, that attended the "Insulin Infusion Pump clinic" at Centro Hospitalar de São João were enrolled and evaluated for sociodemographic and clinical characterization, beliefs and concerns about Diabetes Mellitus, as well as isCGM's perceptions. Intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring data were collected to characterize monitoring patterns and to measure isCGM's adherence-FL average of scans/day. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients with a mean of 30.36 years (sd=11.35) participate in this study. A median of 7 scans/day was performed. The adherence predictors found was Age (ß = 0.191, p = 0.006), Time in target (ß = 0.530, p = 0.002), isCGM Necessity (ß = 2.631, p = 0.048), Body Mass Index (ß = -0.549, p = 0.017) and Sex (ß = -3.996; p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: This study emphasizes the relevance of glucose monitoring adherence in disease control and shows that males of younger ages, presenting with higher body mass index levels, lower time in target, and reporting lower isCGM necessity are less adherent to isCGM. Therefore, these patients should be closely followed and object of personalized strategies to promote treatment adherence.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Male , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring , Blood Glucose , Body Mass Index , Insulin Infusion Systems , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use
8.
Rev. gaúch. enferm ; 44: 20210323, 2023. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS, BDENF - Nursing | ID: biblio-1441894

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective To describe the strategies to combat COVID-19 in Long-Term Care Facilities for older people in Bahia state. Methodology This is a qualitative study based on documentary analysis of the collection produced by the Intersectoral Committee on Monitoring Long-Term Care for older people in the state of Bahia, from April 2020 to June 2021. Data analysis was based on Bardin's content analysis. Results The commission produced seven documents in the period analyzed. Two thematic categories emerged: Intersectoral Networks and Telemonitoring of Long-Term Care Facilities for the Elderly. Conclusion The coordination in an intersector network and the telemonitoring carried out by the Intersector Committee on Monitoring Long-Term Care Facilities were the main strategies to fight COVID-19 in these institutions. The need to implement effective public policies to support long-term care facilities for older people is highlighted.


RESUMEN Objetivo Describir las estrategias de enfrentamiento a COVID-19 en Instituciones de Larga Permanencia para Ancianos en el estado de Bahia. Metodología Se trata de una investigación retrospectiva, por medio de un análisis documental del acervo producido por la Comisión Intersectorial de Monitoreo de Instituciones de Larga Permanencia para Ancianos en el Estado de Bahía, en el período de abril/2020 a junio/2021. El tratamiento de los datos se basó en el análisis de contenido de Bardin. Resultados Surgieron dos categorías temáticas: Articulación en red Intersectorial y telemonitorización de instituciones de larga permanencia para ancianos. Conclusión Se concluyó que el conjunto de acciones de articulación en red intersectorial y telemonitoramiento realizadas por la Comisión Intersectorial de Monitoreo de Larga Permanencia fueron estrategias fundamentales para mitigar el impacto de COVID-19 en las instituciones. Se destaca la necesidad de implementación de políticas públicas efectivas de apoyo a las instituciones de larga permanencia para ancianos, repensar críticamente sobre la tipología de estos equipos.


RESUMO Objetivo Descrever as estratégias de enfrentamento à COVID-19 em Instituições de Longa Permanência para Idosos no estado da Bahia. Metodologia Trata-se de uma pesquisa retrospectiva, por meio de uma análise documental do acervo produzido pela Comissão Intersetorial de Monitoramento de Instituições de Longa Permanência para Idosos no Estado da Bahia, no período de abril/2020 a junho/2021. O tratamento dos dados baseou-se na análise de conteúdo de Bardin. Resultados Emergiram duas categorias temáticas: Articulação em rede Intersetorial e telemonitoramento de instituições de longa permanência para idosos. Conclusão Concluiu-se que o conjunto de ações de articulação em rede intersetorial e telemonitoramento realizadas pela Comissão Intersetorial de Monitoramento de Longa Permanência foram estratégias fundamentais para mitigar o impacto da COVID-19 nas instituições. Destaca-se a necessidade de implementação de políticas públicas efetivas de apoio às instituições de longa permanência para idosos, repensando criticamente sobre a tipologia destes equipamentos.

9.
PLoS One ; 17(8): e0273213, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35976966

ABSTRACT

Chronic pain affects almost 38% of the Portuguese adult population, with high costs for both patients and society. Those who suffer with chronic pain frequently complain of feeling misunderstood and of lack of support. These complaints are the main reason why support telephone lines for chronic pain were created in some countries. However, there is no scientific data supporting their creation or evaluating their performance. This paper presents a qualitative study protocol to assess patients and healthcare professionals' perspectives on the creation of a telephone support line for chronic pain. It constitutes the first step to attain the main goal of developing and implementing a functioning support line for chronic pain in Portugal. The methodology to assess patients and healthcare professionals' perspectives and needs is presented. In order to gather information as close to reality as possible, focus groups interviews were chosen as data sources. Given the present context of the COVID-19 pandemic, meetings will take place online, using a digital platform. All interviews will be transcribed verbatim, coded and synthesised into categories and main themes. Thematic analysis will be conducted using NVivo® V12 software, employing an iterative and reflexive approach. Finally, comparative and relational analysis will be performed in order to identify topics where patients and professionals converge or greatly diverge. The findings will be useful for grounding the creation of a telephone support line for chronic pain patients. Results dissemination will be important for policy-makers to develop a new perspective towards chronic pain services available.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Chronic Pain , Adult , Chronic Pain/therapy , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , Pandemics , Portugal , Qualitative Research
10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35954625

ABSTRACT

Vaccine hesitation is a topic of utmost importance, with the COVID-19 pandemic serving as a clear reminder of its timeliness. Besides evaluating COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in a sample of Portuguese people, this study aims at understanding cognitive and emotional representations related to vaccination, and their influence on vaccination hesitation. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between 27 December 2020 and 27 January 2021. It assessed cognitive and emotional COVID-19 representations; vaccination status; cognitive and emotional representations of vaccination and perceived necessity and concerns about vaccines. Of 31 × 58 participants, 91% accepted taking a COVID-19 vaccine. Among several other significant findings, women (71.3%) more often considered that the pandemic affected their lives (p < 0.001) and were more often concerned with being infected (p < 0.001). Likewise, there were significantly more female participants concerned about taking a COVID-19 vaccine and its possible effects, when compared to the number of male participants (p < 0.001). The number of participants with a higher education level that were more worried about becoming infected was greater (p = 0.001), when compared with those less educated. Regarding age groups, people aged 18 to 24 had fewer concerned participants (9.6%), while the number of individuals aged 55 to 64 had the most (p < 0.001). Somewhat surprisingly, perceiving oneself as extremely informed about COVID-19 was not associated with greater vaccine acceptance (OR = 1.534 [1.160−2.029]; (p = 0.003)). Moreover, people aged 25 to 64 years old and with lower education level were more likely not to accept vaccination (OR = 2.799 [1.085−7.221]; (p = 0.033)). Finally, being more concerned about taking a vaccine lowers its acceptance (OR = 4.001 [2.518−6.356]; (p < 0.001)). Cognitive and emotional representations have a great impact and are reliable predictors of vaccine acceptance. Thus, it is of extreme importance that public health messages be adapted to the different characteristics of the population.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use , Cognition , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Vaccination
11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35742302

ABSTRACT

In September 2021, the Special Issue "Evidence-based Behaviour Change Interventions in Healthcare" was proposed as the manifestation of a will to compile multidisciplinary works of academic research focused on the effect of health education, psychology, and socio-cultural dimensions on the improvement in health habits in the population [...].


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care , Health Facilities
12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35162159

ABSTRACT

Concerns, behaviours, and beliefs influence how people deal with COVID-19. Understanding the factors influencing adherence behaviour is of utmost importance to develop tailored interventions to increase adherence within this context. Hence, we aimed to understand how COVID-19 affected adherence behaviour in Portugal. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between 1 March and 3 April 2021. Descriptive statistics were performed, as well as univariable and multivariable regression models. Of the 1202 participants, 476 who were taking at least one medication prescribed by the doctor were selected. Of these, 78.2% were female, and the mean age was 40.3 ± 17.9 years old. About 74.2% were classified as being highly adherent. During the pandemic, 8.2% of participants reported that their adherence improved, while 5.9% had worsened adherence results. Compared with being single, widowers were 3 times more prone to be less adherent (OR:3.390 [1.106-10.390], p = 0.033). Comorbid patients were 1.8 times (OR:1.824 [1.155-2.881], p = 0.010) more prone to be less adherent. Participants who reported that COVID-19 negatively impacted their adherence were 5.6 times more prone to be less adherent, compared with those who reported no changes (OR:5.576 [2.420-12.847], p < 0.001). None of the other variables showed to be significantly associated with pharmacological adherence.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Medication Adherence , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Portugal/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
13.
Front Pharmacol ; 12: 681378, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34349646

ABSTRACT

Objective: Despite the effectiveness of pain medicines, nonadherence to prescribed medication remains a major problem faced by healthcare systems. The aim of present study was to perform the translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Intentional Non-Adherence Scale (INAS) for the European Portuguese language in a sample of chronic pain patients. Methods: A Portuguese version of the INAS scale was constructed through a process of translation, back translation, and expert's panel evaluation. A total of 133 chronic pain patients were selected from two chronic pain clinics from tertiary hospitals in Porto, Portugal. The protocol interview included the assessment of pain beliefs (PBPI), beliefs about medicine (BMQ), medication adherence (MARS-P9), and two direct questions about adherence previously validated. Results: The internal consistency in all subscales was α = 0.902 for testing treatment; α = 0.930 for mistrust treatment; α = 0.917 for resisting treatment; and α = 0.889 for resisting illness. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis revealed a four-factor structure that explained 74% of the variance. The construct validity of the INAS was shown to be adequate, with the majority of the previously defined hypotheses regarding intercorrelations with other measures confirmed. Conclusion: The Portuguese version of INAS could be a valuable and available instrument for Portuguese researchers and clinicians to assess the intentional nonadherence determinants during the management of chronic pain.

14.
Prev Med ; 146: 106467, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33636195

ABSTRACT

In recent years, interest in medication adherence has greatly increased. Adherence has been particularly well studied in the context of arterial hypertension treatment. Numerous interventions have addressed this issue, however, the effort to improve adherence has been often frustrating and frequently disorganized. The aim of present study was to perform a scoping review of medication adherence interventions in hypertensive patients, so that a clear overview was achieved. Moreover, an evidence-based categorization of interventions was developed. The review was performed according to the PRISMA-ScR statement. MEDLINE and Web of Science were searched, and studies published from database inception until August 17, 2020 were included. A total of 2994 non-duplicate studies were retrieved. After screening and eligibility phases, a total of 45 articles were included. Studies were analyzed regarding their design, participant characteristics and management of adherence strategies employed. Furthermore, medication adherence and blood pressure outcomes, as well as adherence measuring tools were evaluated. Each study's intervention was then categorized using a novel evidence-based system of categorization, derived from the conceptual clustering framework used in machine learning. This work is an important step in pushing for better informed and more efficient future research efforts, both by providing an overview of the research field and by creating a new, evidence-based intervention categorization tool. It also provides valuable information to clinicians about medication adherence to antihypertensive therapy.


Subject(s)
Hypertension , Medication Adherence , Databases, Factual , Humans , Hypertension/drug therapy
15.
Patient Prefer Adherence ; 14: 321-332, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32109998

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Pharmacological interventions remain the cornerstone of chronic pain treatment; however, nearly 40% of the prescription medicines are not taken as prescribed. The present study aims at understanding and describing non-adherence from the perspective of chronic pain patients during a 1-year follow-up study. METHODS: A cohort of 950 consecutive patients referred to a first consultation in Multidisciplinary Chronic Pain Clinics was followed with a standardized protocol for 1 year. This included assessment of pain characteristics; prescribed medication; therapeutic adherence; effectiveness of treatment, non-adherence and its perceived reasons; clinical outcomes and quality of life. We used a mixed methods approach, including qualitative and quantitative analyses. RESULTS: Forty-nine percent of the 562 patients who responded to all assessments during follow-up were adherent after 1 year of chronic pain treatment. The core associations between each "non-adherence reason" and Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Code (ATC) group were perceived side effects (p=0.019) and delayed start (p=0.022) for narcotic analgesics (opioids); perceived non-efficacy (p=0.017) and delayed start (p=0.004) for antiepileptics and anticonvulsants; perceived low necessity (p=0.041) and delayed start (p=0.036) for analgesics antipyretics; change in prescriptions because of a new clinical condition for antidepressants (p=0.024); high concerns (p=0.045) and change in prescriptions because of a new clinical condition (p<0.001) for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; delayed start (p=0.016) and financial constraints (p=0.018) for other medications. DISCUSSION: This study emphasizes the patient's perspective regarding non-adherence to pharmacological treatment of chronic pain, providing valuable and novel information to be used in future interventions to help patients make an informed choice about their adherence behavior.

16.
J Eval Clin Pract ; 25(2): 346-352, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30648328

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of present study was to perform the translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-P9) for the European Portuguese language in a sample of chronic pain patients. METHODS: A Portuguese version of the nine-item MARS (©Professor Rob Horne) scale (MARS-P9) was constructed through a process of translation, back translation, and experts' panel evaluation. A total of 141 chronic pain patients were subsequently evaluated at four time assessments during a 1-year pain medication treatment. The protocol interview included the assessment of pain intensity and interference (BPI), clinical outcomes and quality of life (S-TOPS), and MARS-P9. RESULTS: The internal consistency coefficient was acceptable for the total scale (α = 0.84). Exploratory factor analysis revealed a two-factor structure (intentional and unintentional nonadherence) that explained 61% of the variance. Convergent and discriminant validity were demonstrated by correlations between MARS scores and pain interference (r = 0.180, P ≤ 0.01) and S-TOPS (r = 0.242, P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: MARS-P9 has been shown to be an adequate instrument for Portuguese researchers and clinicians to assess the pattern of adherence during the management of chronic pain.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Medication Adherence , Self Report , Adult , Aged , Culture , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Portugal , Qualitative Research , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
17.
J Pain ; 20(6): 706-715, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30597203

ABSTRACT

Opioid use in chronic non cancer pain (CNCP) is still controversial regarding their effectiveness and safety. We conducted a 2-year prospective cohort study in 4 multidisciplinary chronic pain clinics to assess long-term opioid effectiveness in CNCP patients. All adult CNCP patients consecutively admitted to their first consultation were recruited. Demographic and clinical data were collected, and propensity score matching was used to adjust for differences between opioid users and nonusers. The Brief Pain Inventory and the Short version of Treatment Outcomes in Pain Survey were used to measure pain outcomes and quality of life. A total of 529 subjects were matched and included in our analysis. Rate of prescription opioid use was 59.7% at baseline, which increased to 70.3% over 2 years, of which 42.7% of the prescriptions were for strong opioids. Opioid users reported no improvement regarding pain symptoms, physical function, emotional function, and social/familiar disability. Opioid users reported higher satisfaction with care and outcomes at 1 year of follow-up, but at 2 years, they only reported improvement in satisfaction with outcomes. Opioids have shown limited effectiveness in long-term CNCP management, as opioid users presented no improvements regarding functional outcomes and quality of life. These findings emphasize the need for proper selection and outcome assessment of CNCP patients prescribed opioids. PERSPECTIVE: This study adds important additional evidence concerning the controversial use of opioids in CNCP management. Opioid users presented no improvement regarding pain relief, functional outcomes and quality of life over 2 years of follow-up. Therefore, our results support and highlight the limited effectiveness of opioids in long-term CNCP management.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Propensity Score , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Recovery of Function/drug effects , Young Adult
18.
Pain Med ; 20(11): 2166-2178, 2019 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30590762

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Opioid use in chronic pain has increased worldwide in recent years. The aims of this study were to describe the trends and patterns of opioid therapy over two years of follow-up in a cohort of chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) patients and to assess predictors of long-term opioid use and clinical outcomes. METHODS: A prospective cohort study with two years of follow-up was undertaken in four multidisciplinary chronic pain clinics. Demographic data, pain characteristics, and opioid prescriptions were recorded at baseline, three, six, 12, and 24 months. RESULTS: Six hundred seventy-four CNCP patients were recruited. The prevalence of opioid prescriptions at baseline was 59.6% (N = 402), and 13% (N = 86) were strong opioid prescriptions. At 24 months, opioid prescription prevalence was as high as 74.3% (N = 501), and strong opioid prescription was 31% (N = 207). Most opioid users (71%, N = 479) maintained their prescription during the two years of follow-up. Our opioid discontinuation was very low (1%, N = 5). Opioid users reported higher severity and interference pain scores, both at baseline and after two years of follow-up. Opioid use was independently associated with continuous pain, pain location in the lower limbs, and higher pain interference scores. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes a pattern of increasing opioid prescription in chronic pain patients. Despite the limited improvement of clinical outcomes, most patients keep their long-term opioid prescriptions. Our results underscore the need for changes in clinical practice and further research into the effectiveness and safety of chronic opioid therapy for CNPC.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Chronic Pain/epidemiology , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Pain Clinics/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Prevalence , Prospective Studies
19.
Pain Med ; 20(4): 736-746, 2019 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30010966

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The psychological health of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) influences their response to a number of conservative and invasive pain treatments. However, evidence is still scarce regarding the impact of anxiety and depression in the clinical outcomes of multidisciplinary pain management over time. This study, based on longitudinal data from a clinical practice setting, aimed to assess the effectiveness of the usual multidisciplinary approach provided to CLBP patients and to explore the impact of anxiety and depression symptoms and their interaction on clinical outcomes. METHODS: In this study, participants included were adult patients in their first consultation in a multidisciplinary chronic pain clinic. Anxiety and depression symptoms were assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and the Shortened Treatment Outcomes in Pain Survey (S-TOPS) were used to assess outcomes. Linear mixed effects models were used to assess the impact of anxiety, depression, and their interaction on treatment outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 284 patients (age 60.4 ± 13.7 years, 74.6% female) with CLBP were included at baseline. The majority of patients had both anxiety and depression and experienced higher pain severity (P < 0.001) and higher pain-related disability (P < 0.001). Anxiety and depression mainly predicted changes in pain interference over time. Their interaction significantly predicted changes in pain interference. CONCLUSIONS: Anxiety, depression, and their interaction are associated with changes in pain disability at one-year follow-up. These findings encourage the pretreatment screening of anxiety and depression as independent symptoms in patients with CLBP in order to design more tailored and effective multidisciplinary treatments.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/complications , Depression/complications , Low Back Pain/psychology , Low Back Pain/therapy , Pain Management/psychology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chronic Pain/psychology , Chronic Pain/therapy , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Clinics , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
20.
Pain Res Treat ; 2018: 5704627, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30112202

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: High rates of opioid use for chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) have been reported worldwide, despite its association with adverse events, inappropriate use, and limited analgesic effect. Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is the most prevalent and disabling adverse effect associated with opioid therapy. Our aim was to assess the incidence, health related quality of life (HRQOL), and disability in OIC patients. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed, with 6 months of follow-up, of adult CNCP patients consecutively admitted in 4 multidisciplinary pain clinics (MPC). Demographic and clinical data have been collected. Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and Short version of Treatment Outcomes in Pain Survey (S-TOPS) were used to measure functional outcomes and HRQOL. OIC was assessed using Bowel Function Index (BFI). RESULTS: 694 patients were recruited. OIC prevalence at baseline was 25.8%. At 6 months, OIC incidence was 24.8%. Female gender (OR = 1.65, p = 0.039), opioid therapy (OR 1.65, p = 0.026), and interference pain score on BPI (OR 1.10, p = 0.009) were identified as OIC independent predictors. OIC patients presented higher disability and pain interference and severity scores. OIC patients reported less satisfaction with outcome (p = 0.038). DISCUSSION: Constipation is a common adverse event among opioid users with major functional and quality of life impairment. These findings emphasise the need of OIC adequate assessment and management.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL