A description and opinions of a longitudinal book club for comprehensive pharmacy faculty development.

INTRODUCTION: The objectives of this study were to implement a faculty development book club centering on pharmacy education and to evaluate faculty opinions of the process. METHODS: A year-long pharmacy faculty development book club was conducted. Monthly meetings explored a pharmacy education text. Discussions centered on reflective questions submitted by chapter facilitators. Participants completed pre- and post-surveys regarding attitudes and opinions of faculty development utilizing a book club format. The Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn's multiple comparisons, Mann-Whitney, and Wilcoxon tests were used to analyze results. RESULTS: Of 48 faculty, 26 and 19 responded to the pre- and post-surveys, respectively; 73% agreed they would like a faculty development book club on the pre-survey, while 86.3% of participants were satisfied or highly satisfied with the book club on the post-survey. On the pre-survey, females and clinical faculty felt they would be more engaged in the book club than in more traditional development programs; the same groups indicated more engagement on the post-survey. Males indicated greater improvement in teaching abilities than females as a result of the book club. Of paired pre- and post-surveys, 12 respondents more strongly agreed that they were able to describe characteristics of a student-centered approach to teaching after the book club. CONCLUSIONS: Faculty found a comprehensive book club to be an enjoyable and engaging way of developing skills and knowledge as a pharmacy academician. This alternative delivery method for faculty development programming can be replicated by other institutions. Further study is needed to evaluate long-term outcomes.

Design, implementation, and evaluation of an online elective course on current topics in pharmacy.

INTRODUCTION: To describe the design and implementation of the Current Topics in Professional Pharmacy online elective course and evaluate the degree to which the course improved student pharmacists' awareness of and interest in current topics affecting the profession of pharmacy. METHODS: A one-credit hour online summer elective included weekly modules of current topics affecting the profession of pharmacy, along with a longitudinal final project in which students created their own current topic module. Each module consisted of assigned reference materials and online discussion forum posts to answer discussion questions and share professional opinions. Student achievement of curricular outcomes and course-specific objectives was measured utilizing pre- and post-course surveys, assessment of weekly module forum posts, and a final course knowledge and comprehension quiz. RESULTS: Student self-rated awareness and desire to stay updated on current topics in pharmacy increased significantly from pre-survey to post-survey (39.7% to 98.3% agree or strongly agree, p<0.001; 25.9-87.9%, p<0.001, respectively). Student confidence in their ability to formulate and effectively express their professional opinion also significantly improved (67.2% to 93.1%, p<0.001). Seven of the 12 course competencies assessed by the survey significantly improved from pre- to post-course. The majority of students agreed or strongly agreed that the course adequately addressed all 12 pre-selected Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) Appendix B content areas. CONCLUSIONS: Performance assessment and survey results demonstrated achievement of curricular outcomes and course objectives. Students completing the course showed an increased interest and awareness related to current topics affecting the profession of pharmacy.

Collaborative Examination Item Review Process in a Team-Taught, Self-Care Sequence.

OBJECTIVE: To improve examination item quality by educating and involving course instructors in evidence-based item review and encouraging use of this process in future courses. METHODS: A peer-review process was implemented in a 2-course sequence (intervention) that involved training and review sessions before each examination and was compared to the previous year's courses (control). Instructors completed a presurvey and postsurvey on training, experience, self-confidence, and self-rated success in multiple-choice item writing. Statistics were calculated for all items in the control and intervention sequences and compared using independent t tests. Items also were classified into levels based on difficulty and discrimination, and distribution into these levels was compared between sequences with independent t tests. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between control and intervention sequence items with regard to mean difficulty (86.3% and 84.4%) or discrimination (0.23- and 0.25), respectively, although item classification distribution did appear to change between the control and intervention sequences' subjective feelings of confidence, and success in item writing increased between presurvey and postsurvey. Confidence in ability to peer-review test items and to implement a formal item evaluation process also increased. CONCLUSION: Item statistics did not change significantly, but reviewed and edited items distributed more favorably into item statistic-based categories. This method of review positively affected instructors' perceptions of their item-writing confidence and success and improved self-rated opinions of their ability to edit items and train others to do so.