Lumbar Vertebral Body Tethering: Single Center Outcomes and Reoperations in a Consecutive Series of 106 Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes and reoperation rates in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) undergoing lumbar anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT) is a viable option in growing children. The benefit of motion preservation must be balanced by a higher reoperation rate. A paucity of reports has addressed lumbar AVBT. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study was conducted to identify all patients who underwent lumbar AVBT (lowest instrumented vertebra L3 or L4) with a minimum 2 years of follow-up. Clinical and radiographic parameters, including complications and reoperations, were also collected. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test for qualitative variables. RESULTS: From a dataset of 551 patients, we identified 106 patients (89% female) who underwent a lumbar AVBT (33 lumbar only, 73 bilateral thoracic/lumbar) with mean follow-up of 4.1±1.6 years at which point 85% (90/106) had reached skeletal maturity. Preoperatively, these patients were skeletally immature (age: 12.8±1.3 y, Sanders: 3.3±0.8, R=0.6±0.9) with a lumbar coronal curve angle of 49.6°±11.2 which corrected to 19.9°±11.2 (P <0.0001) at most recent follow-up. At the latest follow-up, 76.4% (81/106) of the patients harbored a coronal curve angle of < 30°. Twenty patients (18.9%) underwent 23 reoperations, with overcorrection being the most common (10/23, 43%). Broken tethers led to reoperation in 3 instances (3/23, 13%). Six patients in the cohort needed a posterior spinal fusion (6/106, 5.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Vertebral body tethering is a viable treatment option for skeletally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis. This report is the largest to date for lumbar AVBT, highlighting that 84% of patients harbored a curve < 35° at the latest follow-up but with an 18.9% reoperation rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Autofusion With Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods: A Case Report.

Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) are an effective alternative to traditional growing rods (TGRs) in the treatment of early-onset scoliosis (EOS), with comparable deformity correction despite fewer planned reoperations. This case report presents a unique case of autofusion in a patient with tetraplegic cerebral palsy, thoracic myelomeningocele, and EOS who was treated with dual MCGR instrumentation and underwent serial lengthening procedures for four years. We detail the operative and radiographic findings in a novel case of autofusion encountered after MCGR placement to treat EOS. An eight-year-old female with tetraplegic cerebral palsy causing a 94° right thoracic neuromuscular scoliosis was treated with dual MCGRs; she then underwent serial lengthenings every four months. At 12 years of age, during MCGR explantation and posterior spinal fusion, dense heterotopic autofusion was encountered around the MCGR instrumentation, limiting further deformity correction. The benefits of MCGRs make them an appealing alternative to TGRs for the treatment of EOS. Although the theoretical risk of autofusion in MCGRs is low, recent case reports propose autofusion as a possible reason for MCGRs' failure to lengthen.

Mechanical properties of experimental dental composites containing a combination of mesoporous and nonporous spherical silica as fillers.

OBJECTIVES: Mesoporous fillers have been investigated for use in dental composites because of their potential for creating micromechanical filler/resin matrix interphase bonding. Such a micromechanical bonding could eliminate the need for the silane treatment of fillers for interfacial chemical bonding that is prone to hydrolysis in the oral environment. In the case of micromechanical bonding, dental polymer chains are threaded mechanically (like a "necklace") through nanosized channels in the fillers. METHODS: A combination of mesoporous silica, which was synthesized using the non-surfactant templating method, and nonporous spherical silica (500nm) was used to prepare experimental dental composites. The porous silica used in this study contained interconnected pores and channels as opposed to porous fillers containing surface pores. The compressive strength, compressive modulus, flexural modulus, and flexural strength of these composites were evaluated. RESULTS: The results showed that composites containing a combination of mesoporous and nonporous fillers have better mechanical properties than the composites having either of these fillers alone. SIGNIFICANCE: The results showed that a combination of mesoporous and nonporous materials can be used to prepare stronger dental materials that may resist hydrolysis and wear.