Management of abnormal uterine bleeding on anticoagulation: the patient-clinician perspective.

Bleeding is a well-recognized side effect of anticoagulant therapy, which is used to treat venous thromboembolism (VTE) in individuals of all ages, including those of female sex, who commonly experience VTE as a complication of hormonal therapies and/or pregnancy. Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is also extremely common in reproductive-aged individuals of female sex. Despite these overlapping situations, relatively little attention has been paid to the impact of anticoagulant-associated HMB on treatment strategies and the patient experience. In this review, we summarize incidence and complications of HMB in anticoagulated individuals as well as management strategies for HMB in this population. We also address the patient experience, including the impact of HMB on quality of life and the impact of discontinuing hormonal therapies at the time of VTE diagnosis and anticoagulant initiation. We conclude by highlighting specific gaps related to the patient experience of anticoagulant-associated HMB in both the research and clinical settings.

Red blood cell capacity of modern menstrual products: considerations for assessing heavy menstrual bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Heavy menstrual bleeding affects up to one third of menstruating individuals and has a negative impact on quality of life. The diagnosis of heavy menstrual bleeding is based primarily on history taking, which is highly dependent on traditional disposable menstrual products such as pads and tampons. Only tampons undergo industry-regulated testing for absorption capacity. As use of alternative menstrual products is increasing, there is a need to understand how the capacity of these products compare to that of standard products. METHODS: A variety of commercially available menstrual products (tampons, pads, menstrual cups and discs, and period underwear) were tested in the laboratory to determine their maximal capacity to absorb or fill using expired human packed red blood cells. The volume of blood necessary for saturation or filling of the product was recorded. RESULTS: Of the 21 individual menstrual hygiene products tested, a menstrual disc (Ziggy, Jiangsu, China) held the most blood of any product (80 mL). The perineal ice-activated cold pack and period underwear held the least (<3 mL each). Of the product categories tested, on average, menstrual discs had the greatest capacity (61 mL) and period underwear held the least (2 mL). Tampons, pads (heavy/ultra), and menstrual cups held similar amounts of blood (approximately 20-50 mL). CONCLUSION: This study found considerable variability in red blood cell volume capacity of menstrual products. This emphasises the importance of asking individuals about the type of menstrual products they use and how they use them. Further understanding of capacity of newer menstrual products can help clinicians better quantify menstrual blood loss, identify individuals who may benefit from additional evaluation, and monitor treatment.

Hormonal therapies in females with blood disorders: thrombophilia, thrombosis, hemoglobinopathies, and anemias.

There is widespread use of gonadal steroid hormone therapy for a variety of indications throughout the reproductive and postreproductive lifespan. These therapies may have particular benefits and specific risk among those with blood disorders, including inherited or acquired bleeding disorders, thrombophilia, thrombosis, or anemia. This clinical review is intended to provide a guidance for counseling and management of adolescent and adult biologic females with thrombophilic risk factors and/or thrombosis who require hormonal therapy. In general, synthetic estrogens present in contraceptive products should be avoided in those with a personal or strong family history of thrombosis or thrombophilias. In contrast, natural estrogens present in formulations for climacteric symptom management do not need to be avoided, and vaginal or transdermal formulations are preferred. Likewise, transdermal estradiol is preferred for gender-affirming hormone therapy and requires individualized assessment in those at high risk of thrombosis. Progestogens (either synthetic progestins or naturally occurring progesterone) can be used safely in nearly all patients. There is minimal safety evidence among anticoagulated patients at risk for thrombosis, which requires a patient-specific approach when discussing hormone therapies.

Multidisciplinary care of the pregnant patient with or at risk for venous thromboembolism: a recommended toolkit from the Foundation for Women and Girls with Blood Disorders Thrombosis Subcommittee.

The care of pregnant persons with/at risk of venous thromboembolism is complex and often challenging. Although guidelines have been published regarding the use of specific therapies, such as anticoagulants; in this population, none have provided guidance on how to coordinate multidisciplinary care of these patients. Here we provide an expert consensus on the role of various providers in the care of this patient population, as well as necessary resources and suggestions for best practices.

Menstrual Technology Innovations and the Implications for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding.

Menstruation is a personal and cultural experience with financial and health implications. Menstruation historically has been managed with disposable commodities, including tampons and pads. New technologies, including underwear and menstrual cups and discs, have emerged to address diverse menstrual needs such as prioritization of sustainability, discretion, and inclusivity. New technologies are not routinely integrated into history taking or validated questionnaires, which currently rely on traditional tampon and pad use for identifying individuals with heavy menstrual bleeding. Review of menstrual technologies and accessories provides insight to empower gynecologists and other clinicians to take comprehensive menstrual histories, including strategies for identification of heavy menstrual bleeding and troubleshooting menstrual disturbances, within the context of new menstrual technologies.

Hormonal therapies and venous thrombosis: Considerations for prevention and management.

Background: Venous thromboses are well-established complications of hormonal therapy. Thrombosis risk is seen with both hormonal contraceptive agents and with hormone replacement therapy for menopause and gender transition. Over the past several decades, large epidemiological studies have helped better define these risks. Objectives: To review and discuss the differences in thrombosis risk of the many of hormonal preparations available as well as their interaction with patient-specific factors. Methods: We conducted a narrative review of the available literature regarding venous thrombosis and hormonal therapies including for contraception, menopausal symptoms, and gender transition. Results: Thrombosis risk with estrogen-containing compounds increases with increasing systemic dose of estrogen. While progesterone-only-containing products are not associated with thrombosis, when paired with estrogen in combined oral contraceptives, the formulation of progesterone does impact the risk. These components, along with patient-specific factors, may influence the choice of hormonal preparation. For patients who develop thrombosis on hormonal treatment, anticoagulation is protective against future thrombosis. Duration of anticoagulation is dependent on ongoing and future hormone therapy choice. Finally, the optimal management of hormone therapy for individuals diagnosed with prothrombotic illnesses such as COVID-19 remains unclear. Conclusions: When contemplating hormonal contraception or hormone replacement therapy, clinicians must consider a variety of factors including hormone type, dose, route, personal and family history of thrombosis, and other prothrombotic risk factors to make informed, personalized decisions regarding the risk of venous thrombosis.

Menstruation, anticoagulation, and contraception: VTE and uterine bleeding.

Abnormal or excessive menstrual bleeding affects one-third of reproductive-aged women. This number increases to 70% among women on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). While there is some variation in frequency of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) with different DOAC options, all menstruating individuals should receive counseling about the risk of HMB at the time of DOAC initiation. Management options include progestin-only therapies such as the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and etonogestrel subdermal implant or the progestin-only pill. Combined hormonal contraceptives and depot medroxyprogesterone acetate are associated with increased rates of thrombosis in nonanticoagulated women but may be continued, or even initiated, so long as therapeutic anticoagulation is ongoing. Procedural therapies, such as endometrial ablation, uterine artery embolization, or hysterectomy, are considerations for women who have completed childbearing and for whom more conservative measures are objectionable or ineffective. Given the high rates of HMB in women on DOACs, management strategies should be discussed even before heavy bleeding is diagnosed, particularly in women who experienced HMB prior to DOAC initiation. As iron deficiency with or without anemia is a common complication of HMB, complete blood count and ferritin levels should be monitored periodically, and iron deficiency should be treated with oral or intravenous iron supplementation.

A prospective, blinded study of a PF4-dependent assay for HIT diagnosis.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening, prothrombotic, antibody-mediated disorder. To maximize the likelihood of recovery, early and accurate diagnosis is critical. Widely available HIT assays, such as the platelet factor 4 (PF4) heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) lack specificity, and the gold-standard carbon 14-labeled serotonin release assay (SRA) is of limited value for early patient management because it is available only through reference laboratories. Recent studies have demonstrated that pathogenic HIT antibodies selectively activate PF4-treated platelets and that a technically simpler assay, the PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay (PEA), may provide an option for rapid and conclusive results. Based upon predefined criteria that combined 4Ts scores and HIT ELISA results, 409 consecutive adults suspected of having HIT were classified as disease positive, negative, or indeterminate. Patients deemed HIT indeterminate were considered disease negative in the primary analysis and disease positive in a sensitivity analysis. The ability of PEA and SRA to identify patients judged to have HIT was compared using receiver operating characteristic curve statistics. Using these predefined criteria, the diagnostic accuracy of PEA was high (area under the curve [AUC], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-1.0) and similar to that of SRA (AUC, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.82-1.0). In sensitivity analysis, the AUCs of PEA and SRA were also similar at 0.88 (95% CI, 0.78-0.98) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.77-0.96), respectively. The PEA, a technically simple nonradioactive assay that uses ∼20-fold fewer platelets compared with the SRA, had high accuracy for diagnosing HIT. Widespread use of the PEA may facilitate timely and more effective management of patients with suspected HIT.

Heavy menstrual bleeding in women on oral anticoagulants.

BACKGROUND: Although heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is a known complication of anticoagulant therapy, rates of HMB in users of the direct oral anticoagulants (OACs) apixaban and rivaroxaban are largely unknown. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of menstruating women prescribed rivaroxaban, apixaban and warfarin over a six-year period (2012-2018). The primary outcome was HMB requiring medical or surgical intervention. We used descriptive statistics and logistic regression to evaluate associations between OAC type, age, history of HMB, and the primary outcome. RESULTS: We identified 195 women of reproductive-age with a new therapeutic OAC prescription (62 on rivaroxaban, 54 on apixaban, 79 on warfarin). A minority (26/195, 13.3%) had a documented history of HMB, including 9 rivaroxaban users, 7 apixaban users and 10 warfarin users but most women (117/195, 60%) had no menstrual history documented. One third of subjects (64/195) required treatment for HMB within 6 months of starting OAC therapy. After controlling for a history of HMB, rivaroxaban users were 1.4 times more likely to require treatment as compared to users of other OACs. DISCUSSION: We found an association between rates of HMB necessitating medical or surgical intervention and rivaroxaban use. We also found that the majority of women did not have a documented menstrual history, suggesting that many providers do not inquire about menstrual bleeding when starting OAC therapy. Menstruating women, particularly those with a history of HMB, may be at increased risk for HMB necessitating medical treatment depending on the type of OAC used.

Abnormal uterine bleeding in users of rivaroxaban and apixaban.

Up to two-thirds of menstruating women experience abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) when treated with oral anticoagulants. However, the true prevalence of AUB for specific agents remains uncertain, as many of these episodes, while interfering significantly with quality of life and overall health, are not captured by definitions of major bleeding (MB) or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) used in clinical trials. A 2017 systematic review determined that women taking rivaroxaban, but not edoxaban or apixaban, had a twofold higher risk of AUB than women taking warfarin. Since then, new data have become available from extension trials, cancer-associated venous thromboembolism trials, pediatric trials, and a few observational studies specifically examining AUB as an outcome. Reported rates of uterine CRNMB were low (around 1%) and similar for rivaroxaban and apixaban in all these studies, and no episodes of uterine bleeding meeting MB criteria were reported. Rates of AUB not meeting MB or CRNMB criteria were much higher, affecting up to 50% of women on rivaroxaban. Only 1 such study included women on apixaban, and no AUB was reported. In pediatric trials, 19% of girls experienced menorrhagia when treated with rivaroxaban. In conclusion, rates of uterine MB and CRNMB were low in all studies, but rates of other types of AUB not meeting these criteria ranged from 15.8% to 50%. We conclude that AUB is underreported due to the limitations of MB/CRNMB criteria despite its substantial impact on quality of life. We urge future investigators to include broader definitions of AUB to better capture the impact of this outcome in menstruating women treated with oral anticoagulants.

Management of heavy menstrual bleeding on anticoagulation.

Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is a common complication of anticoagulation, affecting ∼70% of menstruating women receiving oral anticoagulants. The risk of HMB is lower with apixaban and/or dabigatran than with rivaroxaban. HMB can result in iron deficiency with or without anemia, increased need for medical interventions, decreased quality of life, and missed school/work. Mainstays of treatment include hormone therapies such as the levonorgestrel intrauterine system, subdermal implant, and other progesterone-based therapies, which can result in decreased blood loss and, in some cases, amenorrhea. Combined hormone therapies can be used while patients continue receiving anticoagulation and are also highly effective for decreasing menstrual blood loss. Rarely, procedure-based interventions such as endometrial ablation may be required. Patients should be evaluated for iron deficiency and anemia and offered supportive therapies as needed. Abbreviating the course of anticoagulation or skipping doses can increase the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism by as much as fivefold, but switching oral anticoagulants may be considered. Awareness of HMB and careful history taking at each visit are crucial to avoid a missed diagnosis.

Factor VIII: Long-established role in haemophilia A and emerging evidence beyond haemostasis.

Factor VIII protein (FVIII) as a coagulation replacement factor has for decades been used as the standard of care for management of people with haemophilia A. It is effective for treatment of bleeding events, as prophylaxis to prevent bleeding events and preserve joint function, and to support surgery in people with haemophilia A. Despite long experience in treating haemophilia A, we are only beginning to understand the functions of FVIII beyond its established role as a coenzyme to factor IXa to expedite thrombin generation through the intrinsic pathway of coagulation. Here, we review the current role of FVIII coagulant (FVIII:C) in haemophilia A management and emerging evidence for the role of FVIII across multiple systems, including the cardiovascular system, angiogenesis and maintenance of bone health. For instance, supraphysiological FVIII levels are a risk factor for venous thromboembolism. von Willebrand factor (VWF), which forms a non-covalent complex with circulating FVIII, is an established marker and regulator of angiogenesis. In a mouse model of haemophilia, treatment with FVIII decreased expression of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-Β ligand (RANKL), a marker for bone turnover. Longitudinal follow-up data in people with haemophilia A are needed to confirm and extend these observations.

Management of anticoagulation for cancer-associated thrombosis in patients with thrombocytopenia: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The management of anticoagulation for cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) in patients with thrombocytopenia is controversial. Whereas some studies suggest that administration of reduced-dose low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or temporary discontinuation for moderate and severe thrombocytopenia may be a safe and effective, others suggest full-dose anticoagulation with transfusion support. We sought to address this important knowledge gap and summarize the literature comparing these two common management strategies. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature (PROSPERO CRD42017077127) using MEDLINE (inception to September 2017) was conducted. We included studies that reported recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding complications among patients treated with both of the two most common management strategies: therapeutic anticoagulation with platelet transfusion support and dose-modified anticoagulation for periods when the platelet count is <50 × 109/L. RESULTS: A total of 134 article records were identified on the initial search and 10 articles underwent full text review. Two observational studies met the inclusions criteria. A total of 121 patients with CAT and thrombocytopenia were included. Forty-two of these patients had pulmonary embolism and 87 had deep vein thrombosis (DVT) including 38 upper extremity DVT. Overall, 27% of patients, regardless of their treatment strategy, experienced recurrent VTE. Thirteen percent of anticoagulated patients (15% of all patients) experienced a major bleeding episode. Meta-analysis could not be conducted. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings do not support one management strategy over another to treat CAT patients with thrombocytopenia. However, the data highlights the heightened risk of recurrent VTE in this patient population despite the thrombocytopenia.