Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 12698, 2020 07 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32728051

ABSTRACT

An important goal in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is the prediction of relapses. This study assesses whether anti-nucleosome antibodies (anti-NCS) increase the risk of renal relapse in inactive SLE. A prospective cohort of 115 patients with inactive SLE (M-SLEDAI ≤ 2) were followed for 12 months to assess the development of relapse (increase of M-SLEDAI ≥ 4) and specific renal flare (renal SLEDAI ≥ 4). At baseline, we identified potential risk factors for relapse, including anti-NCS. At baseline, 18 (16%) of the 115 patients with inactive SLE were anti-NCS positive. At the 12-month follow-up, anti-NCS-positive patients had a higher incidence of renal relapse compared to anti-NCS-negative patients (38.9% vs 13.4%, respectively). In Cox regression analysis, after adjusting for age, disease duration, anti-dsDNA, and immunosuppressive drugs, the presence of anti-NCS positivity at baseline increased the risk of renal relapse (HR: 5.31, 95% CI 2.03-13.92). Nevertheless, there were no differences in the incidence of other relapses in anti-NCS-positive versus anti-NCS-negative. Our results indicate that in inactive SLE, anti-NCS determination can be useful for identifying patients with a higher risk of developing renal relapse. Interestingly, this study identified that continued use of oral immunosuppressive therapy in patients with inactive SLE can reduce the risk of renal relapse.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Antinuclear/metabolism , DNA/immunology , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/immunology , Lupus Nephritis/immunology , Prednisone/administration & dosage , Administration, Oral , Adult , Asymptomatic Diseases , Female , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Prednisone/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Recurrence , Regression Analysis , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
2.
PLoS One ; 12(9): e0184056, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28898254

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: There are controversial results about the role of serum leptin and adiponectin levels as biomarkers of the severity of proteinuria in lupus nephritis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between serum leptin and adiponectin levels with severity of proteinuria secondary to lupus nephritis (LN). METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 103 women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) were evaluated for kidney involvement. We compared 30 SLE patients with LN, all of them with proteinuria, versus 73 SLE patients without renal involvement (no LN). A comprehensive set of clinical and laboratory variables was assessed, including serum levels of leptin and adiponectin by ELISA. Multivariate analyses were used to adjust for potential confounders associated with proteinuria in LN. RESULTS: We found higher adiponectin levels in the LN group compared with the no LN group (20.4 ± 10.3 vs 15.6 ± 7.8 µg/mL; p = 0.02), whereas no differences were observed in leptin levels (33.3 ± 31.4 vs 22.5 ± 25.5 ng/mL; p = 0.07). Severity of proteinuria correlated with an increase in adiponectin levels (r = 0.31; p = 0.001), but no correlation was observed with leptin. Adiponectin levels were not related to anti-dsDNA or anti-nucleosome antibodies. In the logistic regression, adiponectin levels were associated with a high risk of proteinuria in SLE (OR = 1.06; 95% CI 1.01-1.12; p = 0.02). Instead, leptin was not associated with LN. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that adiponectin levels are useful markers associated with proteinuria in LN. Further longitudinal studies are required to identify if these levels are predictive of renal relapse.


Subject(s)
Adiponectin/blood , Leptin/blood , Lupus Nephritis/blood , Lupus Nephritis/complications , Proteinuria/diagnosis , Proteinuria/etiology , Adult , Biomarkers , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/complications , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/diagnosis , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/drug therapy , Lupus Nephritis/diagnosis , Lupus Nephritis/etiology , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index
3.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 23(7): 376-382, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28937473

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is limited information about the factors related with the development of long-term permanent work disability (PWD) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with a combination of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cs-DMARDs). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate incidence and factors associated with the development of PWD in RA treated with combination therapy using conventional synthetic cs-DMARDs. METHODS: We assessed in multivariate models the effect of clinical and demographic factors in the development of PWD in a long-term retrospective cohort of 180 workers with RA who were treated with a combination of cs-DMARDs. RESULTS: Incidence rates of PWD were 2.2% at 1 year, 7.7% at 5 years, 24.9% at 10 years, 34.9% at 15 years, and 45% at 20 years. In the adjusted Cox regression analysis, factors associated with PWD development were the first failure with combination of cs-DMARDs (hazard ratio [HR], 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-5.46; P = 0.03), poor functioning at time of cohort onset (HR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.05-4.70; P = 0.03), and requirement for joint replacement (HR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.28-8.79; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Around 25% of workers with combination therapy with cs-DMARDs developed PWD in 10 years following the diagnosis of RA. Some factors increase the risk of disability. Permanent work disability generates a relevant society burden and increases health care costs. Therefore, indicators predicting failure of combination therapies with cs-DMARDs might provide clinicians of useful tools for modifying treatments avoiding the disease progression.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Cost of Illness , Sick Leave/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Antirheumatic Agents/classification , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/economics , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/physiopathology , Disability Evaluation , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Female , Health Care Costs , Humans , Male , Mexico , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Statistics as Topic
4.
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc ; 51(4): 372-7, 2013.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24021064

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: traumatic brain injury is a main cause of hospital admission and death in children. Our objective was to identify prognostic factors of pediatric traumatic brain injury. METHODS: this was a dynamic cohort study of traumatic brain injury with 6 months follow-up. The exposition was: mild or moderate/severe traumatic brain injury, searching for prognosis (morbidity-mortality and decreased Glasgow scale). Relative risk and logistic regression was estimated for prognostic factors. RESULTS: we evaluated 440 patients with mild traumatic brain injury and 98 with moderate/severe traumatic brain injury. Morbidity for mild traumatic brain injury was 1 %; for moderate/severe traumatic brain injury, 5 %. There were no deaths. Prognostic factors for moderate/severe traumatic brain injury were associated injuries (RR = 133), fractures (RR = 60), street accidents (RR = 17), night time accidents (RR = 2.3) and weekend accidents (RR = 2). Decreased Glasgow scale was found in 9 %, having as prognostic factors: visible injuries (RR = 3), grown-up supervision (RR = 2.5) and time of progress (RR = 1.6). CONCLUSIONS: there should be a prognosis established based on kinetic energy of the injury and not only with Glasgow Scale.


Introducción: en los niños con traumatismo, las lesiones craneoencefálicas son las principales causas de hospitalización y muerte. El objetivo de esta investigación fue identificar los factores pronóstico del traumatismo craneoencefálico en los niños. Métodos: cohorte dinámica con seis meses de seguimiento. El trauma craneoencefálico se estratificó como leve o moderado-severo, se identificó morbilidad y se realizó evaluación con la escala de coma de Glasgow. Se estimó riesgo relativo (RR) y regresión logística para factores pronóstico. Resultados: se identificaron 440 pacientes con trauma craneoencefálico leve y 98 con moderado-severo; se observó morbilidad en 1 y 5 %, respectivamente. No hubo defunciones. Los factores pronóstico para el trauma moderado-severo fueron los siguientes: lesiones relacionadas (RR = 133), fracturas (RR = 60), accidentes en la calle (RR = 17), horario nocturno (RR = 2.3) y fin de semana (RR = 2). Se presentó deterioro en la puntuación de Glasgow en 9 %, con los siguientes factores pronóstico: lesiones visibles (RR = 3), supervisión por adulto (RR = 2.5) y tiempo de evolución (RR = 1.6). Conclusiones: en los niños con trauma craneoencefálico debe establecerse el pronóstico según la energía cinética de la lesión y con la escala Glasgow.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries , Brain Injuries/diagnosis , Brain Injuries/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Male , Prognosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...