Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 35
Filter
2.
J Neurol ; 2024 Aug 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39138652

ABSTRACT

Progressive inflammation of one hemisphere characterises Rasmussen's encephalitis (RE), but contralesional epileptiform activity has been repeatedly reported. We aimed to quantify contralesional epileptiform activity in RE and uncover its functional and structural underpinnings. We retrospectively ascertained people with RE treated between 2000 and 2018 at a tertiary centre (Centre 1) and reviewed all available EEG datasets. The temporal occurrence of preoperative contralesional epileptiform activity (interictal/ictal) was evaluated using mixed-effects logistic regression. Cases with/without contralesional epileptiform activity were compared for cognition, inflammation (ipsilesional brain biopsies), and MRI (cortical and fixel-based morphometry). EEG findings were validated in a second cohort treated at another tertiary centre (Centre 2) between 1995 and 2020. We included 127 people with RE and 687 EEG samples. Preoperatively, contralesional epileptiform activity was seen in 30/68 (44%, Centre 1) and 8/59 (14%, Centre 2). In both cohorts, this activity was associated with younger onset age (OR = 0.9; 95% CI 0.83-0.97; P = 0.006). At centre 1, contralesional epileptiform activity was associated with contralesional MRI alterations, lower intelligence (OR = 5.19; 95% CI 1.28-21.08; P = 0.021), and impaired verbal memory (OR = 10.29; 95% CI 1.97-53.85; P = 0.006). After hemispherotomy, 11/17 (65%, Centre 1) and 28/37 (76%, Centre 2) were seizure-free. Contralesional epileptiform activity was persistent postoperatively in 6/12 (50%, Centre 1) and 2/34 (6%, Centre 2). Preoperative contralesional epileptiform activity reduced the chance of postoperative seizure freedom in both cohorts (OR = 0.69; 95% CI 0.50-0.95; P = 0.029). Our findings question the concept of strict unilaterality of RE and provide the evidence of contralesional epileptiform activity as a possible EEG predictor for persisting postoperative seizures.

3.
Epilepsia Open ; 2024 Aug 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39139018

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Using Optical coherence tomography (OCT), we evaluated the association between peripapillary retinal nerve fiber, macular thickness, macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer, and drug resistance. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we recruited people diagnosed with epilepsy and healthy controls. People with epilepsy were further stratified as drug-resistant or non-drug-resistant based on their response to anti-seizure medications. OCT measurements were conducted, and findings in right eye were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-one drug-resistant participants, 37 non-drug-resistant, and 45 controls were enrolled. The average peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer, ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer, and macular thickness were thinner in the epilepsy groups than in controls. The drug-resistant group had significantly lower average ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness (p = 0.004) and a higher proportion of abnormal/borderline GC/IPL thickness (p = 5.40E-04) than the non-drug-resistant group. Nevertheless, no significant differences were seen between the average thickness of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber and macular thickness. The temporal sectors of these three parameters were also significantly thinner in the drug-resistant group than in the non-drug-resistant. In a multivariate regression model, drug resistance was an independent predictor of reduced ganglion cell-inner plexiform thickness (Odds ratios OR = 10.25, 95% CI 2.82 to 37.28). Increased seizure frequency (r = -0.23, p = 0.039) and a higher number of anti-seizure medications ever used (r = -0.27, p = 0.013) were negatively associated with ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness. SIGNIFICANCE: Individuals with drug-resistant epilepsy had a consistent reduction in average ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness and the temporal sector of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer and macular thickness. This suggests that ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness could potentially serve as an indicator of the burden of drug resistance, as it correlated with reduced thickness in individuals having more frequent seizures and greater exposure to ASMs. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: In our study, we used a special tool called OCT to measure how thick the retina is in people with epilepsy and in healthy control. We found that the retina was consistently thinner in all areas for those with epilepsy compared to healthy control. Particularly, a specific layer called the ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer was a lot thinner in the group that didn't respond to medications, and this thinning was related to how often seizures occurred and how much medications were taken. Also, certain parts of the retina were thinner in the drug-resistant group.

4.
CNS Drugs ; 2024 Aug 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39112912

ABSTRACT

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is responsible for most epilepsy-related deaths. It is mainly related to unwitnessed nocturnal convulsions, either focal to bilateral or generalised tonic-clonic seizures (TCS). Targeted preventive strategies are currently lacking as underlying mechanisms are largely unknown. Antiseizure medications (ASMs) modulate SUDEP risk through seizure reduction, but it is yet undetermined whether individual ASMs or other medications could also influence the internal SUDEP cascade. Seizure detection devices (SDD) may offer an alternative strategy by preventing TCS from being unwitnessed. Here, we critically evaluated the current evidence on the influence of ASMs, non-epilepsy concomitant drugs and SDD on SUDEP occurrence. We found no robust evidence for the effect of starting ASMs on SUDEP beyond TCS control, but we found some indications of a protective effect for polytherapy. We found no signs that specific ASMs exert a risk for SUDEP. One study suggested a possible protective effect of levetiracetam requiring further investigation. Only a few small studies addressed the association between non-epilepsy concomitant drugs and SUDEP, with no consistent effect for psychotropic medications and one more extensive study suggesting a lower risk among statin users. We only found indirect evidence indicating a protective effect for enhancing nocturnal supervision without explicitly addressing the impact of SDD on SUDEP occurrence. Further work is needed to explore the potential of ASMs and other interventions to modulate SUDEP risk, and they should accurately account for TCS frequency, polypharmacy and markers of non-adherence.

5.
6.
Lancet Glob Health ; 12(8): e1323-e1330, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38976998

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: WHO estimates that more than 50 million people worldwide have epilepsy and 80% of cases are in low-income and middle-income countries. Most studies in Africa have focused on active convulsive epilepsy in rural areas, but there are few data in urban settings. We aimed to estimate the prevalence and spatial distribution of all epilepsies in two urban informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya. METHODS: We did a two-stage population-based cross-sectional study of residents in a demographic surveillance system covering two informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya (Korogocho and Viwandani). Stage 1 screened all household members using a validated epilepsy screening questionnaire to detect possible cases. In stage 2, those identified with possible seizures and a proportion of those screening negative were invited to local clinics for clinical and neurological assessments by a neurologist. Seizures were classified following the International League Against Epilepsy recommendations. We adjusted for attrition between the two stages using multiple imputations and for sensitivity by dividing estimates by the sensitivity value of the screening tool. Complementary log-log regression was used to assess prevalence differences by participant socio-demographics. FINDINGS: A total of 56 425 individuals were screened during stage 1 (between Sept 17 and Dec 23, 2021) during which 1126 were classified as potential epilepsy cases. A total of 873 were assessed by a neurologist in stage 2 (between April 12 and Aug 6, 2022) during which 528 were confirmed as epilepsy cases. 253 potential cases were not assessed by a neurologist due to attrition. 30 179 (53·5%) of the 56 425 individuals were male and 26 246 (46·5%) were female. The median age was 24 years (IQR 11-35). Attrition-adjusted and sensitivity-adjusted prevalence for all types of epilepsy was 11·9 cases per 1000 people (95% CI 11·0-12·8), convulsive epilepsy was 8·7 cases per 1000 people (8·0-9·6), and non-convulsive epilepsy was 3·2 cases per 1000 people (2·7-3·7). Overall prevalence was highest among separated or divorced individuals at 20·3 cases per 1000 people (95% CI 15·9-24·7), unemployed people at 18·8 cases per 1000 people (16·2-21·4), those with no formal education at 18·5 cases per 1000 people (16·3-20·7), and adolescents aged 13-18 years at 15·2 cases per 1000 people (12·0-18·5). The epilepsy diagnostic gap was 80%. INTERPRETATION: Epilepsy is common in urban informal settlements of Nairobi, with large diagnostic gaps. Targeted interventions are needed to increase early epilepsy detection, particularly among vulnerable groups, to enable prompt treatment and prevention of adverse social consequences. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research using Official Development Assistance.


Subject(s)
Epilepsy , Urban Population , Humans , Kenya/epidemiology , Epilepsy/epidemiology , Female , Prevalence , Male , Adult , Adolescent , Cross-Sectional Studies , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Child , Middle Aged , Child, Preschool , Infant
7.
Neuroepidemiology ; 2024 Jul 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39074464

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Premature mortality is a significant part of the epilepsy burden and may vary across populations, especially between high-income and lower- and middle-income countries. People with epilepsy in China are approximately a fifth of the global population with epilepsy. Previous studies were unlikely to represent the situation in China due to limitations in design, methods, sample size, follow-up time, and other inherent population heterogeneity. SUMMARY: By summarising the evidence on the mortality characteristics in Chinese populations with epilepsy in the last six decades, we found a median mortality rate of 14.7 (6.8-74.4)/1000 person-years and a median standardised mortality ratio (SMR) of 4.4 (2.6-12.9) in population-based studies, and a median mortality rate of 12.3 (9.5-101.5)/1000 person-years and a median SMR of 3.0 (1.5-5.1) in hospital-based studies. Vascular diseases, complications of diabetes, and accidental injuries were the leading causes of death. Risk factors for mortality were reported as older age, male, longer duration and higher frequency of seizures. Case fatality ratios of status epilepticus (SE) in adults were higher than in children, and both increased with follow-up time. Mortality in people with symptomatic epilepsy was high and varied across different primary diseases. KEY MESSAGES: The highest mortality rate and sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) incidence were reported from the least developed areas in China. Accidental injuries were the most common causes of epilepsy-related deaths, while the incidence of SUDEP may be underestimated in Chinese populations. Further research is warranted to improve the understanding of premature mortality risk so that preventative measures can be introduced to improve the situation.

8.
Epilepsia ; 2024 Jul 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39056373

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to develop a model and perform a preliminary internal validation study of the Scale for Objective Diagnostic Components of Paroxysmal Events (STAMP). METHODS: We developed STAMP, which builds on the International League Against Epilepsy task force scale for functional seizures with additional categories for epileptic seizures and syncope. We included 200 consecutive referrals to a Dutch tertiary epilepsy center to evaluate seizurelike events. We recorded demographic and clinical data and collected the clinical evaluation at referral and after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of follow-up. We ascertained the STAMP at each time point and evaluated factors predicting an improvement in STAMP grade during follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 200 referrals at baseline, 131 were classified as having epileptic seizures, 17 as functional seizures, and three as syncope, and 49 were unclassifiable. STAMP grade at baseline was 4 (absent) in 56 individuals, 3 (circumstantial) in 78, 2 (clinically established) in six, and 1 (documented) in 11. Over time, 62 cases STAMP grades improved, and 23 remained unclassifiable. A refinement of STAMP grade during follow-up was due to successful event recordings in 34 people (30 video-electroencephalographic [EEG] recordings, four tilt table testing), home videos or clinician-witnessed events in 13, and identification of interictal EEG or magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities in seven. An improved STAMP grade after 12 months of follow-up was significantly more likely in those with higher event frequency, unclassifiable events, longer event duration, and a shorter time since the first event and less likely in those with a history suggestive of seizures. SIGNIFICANCE: This epilepsy service evaluation underscores the crucial role of event recording in improving diagnostic certainty. STAMP may be used to monitor diagnostic performance over time but requires further validation.

10.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry ; 95(9): 833-837, 2024 Aug 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38749674

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In addition to other stroke-related deficits, the risk of seizures may impact driving ability after stroke. METHODS: We analysed data from a multicentre international cohort, including 4452 adults with acute ischaemic stroke and no prior seizures. We calculated the Chance of Occurrence of Seizure in the next Year (COSY) according to the SeLECT2.0 prognostic model. We considered COSY<20% safe for private and <2% for professional driving, aligning with commonly used cut-offs. RESULTS: Seizure risks in the next year were mainly influenced by the baseline risk-stratified according to the SeLECT2.0 score and, to a lesser extent, by the poststroke seizure-free interval (SFI). Those without acute symptomatic seizures (SeLECT2.0 0-6 points) had low COSY (0.7%-11%) immediately after stroke, not requiring an SFI. In stroke survivors with acute symptomatic seizures (SeLECT2.0 3-13 points), COSY after a 3-month SFI ranged from 2% to 92%, showing substantial interindividual variability. Stroke survivors with acute symptomatic status epilepticus (SeLECT2.0 7-13 points) had the highest risk (14%-92%). CONCLUSIONS: Personalised prognostic models, such as SeLECT2.0, may offer better guidance for poststroke driving decisions than generic SFIs. Our findings provide practical tools, including a smartphone-based or web-based application, to assess seizure risks and determine appropriate SFIs for safe driving.


Subject(s)
Automobile Driving , Ischemic Stroke , Seizures , Humans , Seizures/etiology , Seizures/complications , Ischemic Stroke/complications , Male , Female , Aged , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Aged, 80 and over , Prognosis , Cohort Studies , Adult
11.
Epilepsia Open ; 9(3): 1059-1066, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38593277

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess asymptomatic rates and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection in people with epilepsy and their healthcare workers in a long-term care facility which had implemented weekly surveillance testing between April 2020 and June 2022. METHODS: Questionnaires focused on objective and subjective COVID-19 symptoms for people with epilepsy residing in and their healthcare workers at the Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy in June 2022. Demographic information, comorbidities, and seizure frequency were gathered from medical records. We also collected responses on objective and subjective COVID-19 symptoms from healthcare workers who participated in a prospective study assessing the reaction to COVID-19 vaccinations (SAFER). RESULTS: Fifty-five out of 89 (62%) residents tested positive at least once on weekly PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 during the period of interest; 20 of those (37%) were asymptomatic. In comparison, of those 63 healthcare workers who tested positive at least once on weekly testing during the same period, only four (6%) were asymptomatic. Of the 159 healthcare workers who also participated in the SAFER study, 41 tested positive at least once, and seven (17%) were completely asymptomatic during infection with SARS-CoV-2. SIGNIFICANCE: People with epilepsy living in a long-term care facility were more likely to present with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections than healthcare workers at the same facility. Despite possible bias in the reporting of subjective symptoms due to management-by-proxy, there is no evidence that vulnerable people living in an epilepsy long-term care facility showed reduced resilience towards infections. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: People with epilepsy living in care home facilities had a surprisingly high degree of asymptomatic infections with SARS-CoV-2. Very few residents had severe or fatal outcomes. This is in stark contrast to the widely reported bad outcomes for people without epilepsy in other care homes. People with epilepsy reported significantly less symptoms than their healthcare workers. No changes in seizure frequency during or after infection were observed.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epilepsy , Health Personnel , Long-Term Care , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Asymptomatic Infections/epidemiology
12.
Ann Gen Psychiatry ; 23(1): 11, 2024 Mar 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38433207

ABSTRACT

Epilepsy is one of the most common neurologic conditions. Its clinical manifestations are not restricted to seizures but often include cognitive disturbances and psychiatric disorders. Prospective population-based studies have shown that people with epilepsy have an increased risk of developing mood disorders, and people with a primary mood disorder have an increased risk of developing epilepsy. The existence of common pathogenic mechanisms in epilepsy and mood disorders may explain the bidirectional relation between these two conditions. Recognition of a personal and family psychiatric history at the time of evaluation of people for a seizure disorder is critical in the selection of antiseizure medications: those with mood-stabilizing properties (e.g., lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine) should be favoured as a first option in those with a positive history while those with negative psychotropic properties (e.g., levetiracetam, topiramate) avoided. While mood disorders may be clinically identical in people with epilepsy, they often present with atypical manifestations that do not meet ICD or DSM diagnostic criteria. Failure to treat mood disorders in epilepsy may have a negative impact, increasing suicide risk and iatrogenic effects of antiseizure medications and worsening quality of life. Treating mood disorders in epilepsy is identical to those with primary mood disorders. Yet, there is a common misconception that antidepressants have proconvulsant properties. Most antidepressants are safe when prescribed at therapeutic doses. The incidence of seizures is lower in people randomized to antidepressants than placebo in multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trials of people treated for a primary mood disorder. Thus, there is no excuse not to prescribe antidepressant medications to people with epilepsy.

13.
Epilepsy Res ; 200: 107295, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38278099

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Epilepsy care in China has expanded considerably in the last decade but still remains largely unknown; we developed an easy-to-use tool to assess its quality. METHODS: We adapted the Epilepsy Update Quality Measurement, produced by the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) for use in China: The Quality Indicator for Epilepsy Treatment-China National Action (QUIET-CHINA). This tool incorporates a standardized case report form initially for logging quality indicators for people with epilepsy during in-patient stays. Nine quality indicators covered seizures, drugs, diagnostics, screening for co-morbid conditions, counseling for woman of child bearing age, and a composite indicator was further proposed by total number of interventions performed divided by the total number of people eligible in each indicator. The tool also has an electronic reporting and data feedback system. 96 epilepsy centers in 31 jurisdictions in mainland China have been piloted since 2017. RESULTS: Data from 11,600 individuals with epilepsy in the first 3-year study period were analyzed. The median age was 31; 60% were male. The composite indicators were 74%. Seizure freedom rate was less than 25% in all epilepsy types and post-surgical seizure freedom rate was 21%. 90% had seizure type and frequency, antiepileptic drugs recorded, while only 70% with active epilepsy were on regular antiepileptic drugs treatment. Investigations for diagnosis and etiology were performed in around 90% but screening for co-morbid conditions and counseling for women of childbearing potential was 38% and 15% respectively. Severe side effect happened in 2% individuals during the treatment. CONCLUSION: The preliminary results of the national action provided some baseline information. Except for an overall improvement, a significant treatment gap still exists, and psychiatric co-morbidities or issues affecting women are not seen as a priority. QUIET-CHINA will be expanded to more and other levels of hospitals, to help narrow the treatment gap and equalize the comprehensive epilepsy care on the national level.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants , Epilepsy , Male , Female , Humans , Adult , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Epilepsy/diagnosis , Epilepsy/therapy , Epilepsy/chemically induced , Seizures/drug therapy , China
14.
Eur J Neurol ; 31(1): e16096, 2024 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37877685

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim was to investigate the neurological complications associated with coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) during the 2022 Omicron wave. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The medical records of a cohort of people admitted to neurological wards of three participating tertiary centres in Sichuan from 12 December 2022 to 12 January 2023 were reviewed. Demographics and clinical data were obtained and analysed with an interest in COVID-19-related new-onset or worse neurological symptoms. The current data were also compared in two centres with similar data from the same period 12 months earlier. RESULTS: In all, 790 people were enrolled, of whom 436 were positive for COVID-19. Ninety-nine had new onset COVID-related neurological problems, or their known neurological condition deteriorated during the wave. There was a significant difference in demographics from the findings amongst admissions 12 months earlier as there was an increase in the average age, the incidence of encephalitis and encephalopathy, and mortality rates. One hundred and one received COVID-specific antivirals, intravenous glucocorticoids and intravenous immunoglobulin therapy. No differences were seen between these and those who did not use them. CONCLUSION: New-onset neurological conditions, particularly encephalitis and encephalopathy, increased significantly during this period. Deterioration of existing neurological conditions, such as seizure exacerbation, was also observed. A large-scale treatment trial of people with COVID-19 infection presenting with neurological disorders is still needed.


Subject(s)
Brain Diseases , COVID-19 , Encephalitis , Humans , Cohort Studies , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , China/epidemiology , Seizures
17.
Arq. neuropsiquiatr ; 76(11): 783-790, Nov. 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-973940

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Neurocysticercosis is one of the most common risk factors for epilepsy but its association with drug-resistant epilepsy remains uncertain. Conjectures of an association with drug-resistant epilepsy have been fueled by reports of an association between calcific neurocysticercosis lesions (CNL) and hippocampal sclerosis (HS) from specialized epilepsy centers in Taenia solium-endemic regions. The debate arising from these reports is whether the association is causal. Evidence for the association is not high quality but sufficiently persuasive to merit further investigation with longitudinal imaging studies in population-based samples from geographically-diverse regions. The other controversial point is the choice of a surgical approach for drug-resistant epilepsy associated with CNL-HS. Three approaches have been described: standard anteromesial temporal lobectomy, lesionectomy involving a CNL alone and lesionectomy with anteromesial temporal lobectomy (for dual pathology); reports of the latter two approaches are limited. Presurgical evaluation should consider possibilities of delineating the epileptogenic zone/s in accordance with all three approaches.


RESUMO A neurocisticercose é um dos mais comuns fatores de risco para a epilepsia, mas sua associação com a epilepsia resistente a medicamentos (DRE) permanece incerta. Conjecturas de uma associação com a DRE têm sido alimentadas por relatos de uma associação entre lesões de neurocisticercose calcária (CNL) e esclerose hipocampal (HS) de centros especializados em epilepsia em regiões endêmicas de Taenia solium. O debate que surge desses relatórios é se a associação é causal. Se bem as evidências para a associação não são de alta qualidade, são suficientemente persuasivas para merecer mais investigação com estudos longitudinais de imagens em amostras de base populacional de regiões geograficamente diversas. O outro ponto controverso é a escolha da abordagem cirúrgica para a DRE associada à CNL-HS. Três abordagens têm sido descritas: lobectomia temporal ântero-mesial padrão, lesionectomia envolvendo apenas CNL e lesionectomia com lobectomia temporal ântero-mesial (para patologia dupla); os relatórios das duas últimas abordagens são limitados. A avaliação pré-cirúrgica deve considerar as possibilidades de delinear a (s) zona (s) epileptogênica (s) de acordo com as três abordagens.


Subject(s)
Humans , Animals , Sclerosis/etiology , Neurocysticercosis/complications , Epilepsy/etiology , Hippocampus/pathology , Risk Factors , Taenia solium , Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe/surgery , Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe/etiology , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/complications , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/etiology
18.
Arq. neuropsiquiatr ; 71(3): 180-182, mar. 2013.
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-668768

ABSTRACT

Epilepsy affects between 5 and 10 people in a 1,000 and carries considerable morbidity and premature mortality. The complex inheritance pattern of a lowered seizure threshold is not fully understood but is likely to be polygenic. In the majority of people with epilepsy, we do not understand the pathophysiology, how a seizure is triggered, and how it can be prevented. In the centennial year of the discovery of the antiepileptic properties of phenobarbital, we have over 20 antiepileptic drugs; however, none have dramatically changed the long-term prognosis of the condition. The cascade of events triggering epilepsy is likely to vary greatly among individuals. The hope for the future is a shift of paradigm away from the symptomatic approach that currently exists. Indeed, once epileptogenesis is fully understood, treatment can be targeted at specific mechanisms, and then we will have truly disease-modifying therapies.


A epilepsia afeta entre 5 e 10 em cada 1.000 pessoas, e está associada a comorbidades e mortalidade prematura. O complexo padrão de herança, possivelmente poligênico, para baixo limiar convulsivo, ainda não é bem compreendido. Na maioria das pessoas com epilepsia ainda não entendemos a sua fisiopatologia, como as crises epilépticas são desencadeadas ou como podem ser prevenidas. No centenário da descoberta das propriedades antiepilépticas do fenobarbital, temos mais de 20 drogas disponíveis para tratamento de epilepsia; contudo, nenhum fármaco mudou dramaticamente o prognóstico desta condição, em longo prazo. A cascata de eventos que desencadeia a epilepsia, provavelmente, varia muito de indivíduo para indivíduo. A esperança para o futuro é a mudança do atual paradigma da abordagem sintomática. Uma vez que a epileptogênese seja melhor compreendida, o tratamento poderá ser direcionado aos seus mecanismos específicos e então poderemos dispor de tratamentos capazes de modificar a história natural da doença.


Subject(s)
Humans , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Epilepsy/physiopathology , Forecasting
19.
Bull. W.H.O. (Print) ; 90(12): 871-871A, 2012-12-01.
Article in English | WHO IRIS | ID: who-271235
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL