ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Assessment of left (LV) ventricular function is one of the most important tasks of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). Impairment of LV deformation is a strong predictor of cardiovascular outcome in various cardiac diseases like ischemic heart disease or cardiomyopathies. The aim of the study was to provide reference values for myocardial deformation derived from the CMR feature tracking imaging (FTI) algorithm in a reference population of healthy volunteers. METHODS: FTI was applied to standard short axis and 2-, 3- and 4-chamber views of vector-ECG gated CMR cine SSFP sequences of 150 strictly selected healthy volunteers (75 male/female) of three age tertiles (mean age 45.8 yrs). Global peak and mean radial, circumferential and longitudinal endo- and myocardial systolic strain values as well as early diastolic strain rates were measured using FTI within a standard protocol on a 1.5T whole body MR scanner. RESULTS: Global peak systolic values were 36.3 ± 8.7% for radial, -27.2 ± 4.0% for endocardial circumferential, -21.3 ± 3.3% for myocardial circumferential, -23.4 ± 3.4% for endocardial longitudinal and -21.6 ± 3.2% for myocardial longitudinal strain. Global peak values were -2.1 ± 0.5 s(-1) for radial, 2.1 ± 0.6 s(-1) for circumferential endocardial, 1.7 ± 0.5 s(-1) for circumferential myocardial, 1.8 (1.5-2.2) s(-1) for longitudinal endocardial, 1.6 (1.4-2.0) s(-1) for longitudinal myocardial early diastolic strain rates. Men showed a higher radial strain than women whereas the circumferential and longitudinal strains were lower resulting in less negative values. Circumferential and longitudinal strain rates were significantly higher in female subjects. Radial strain increased significantly with age whereas the diastolic function measured by the radial, circumferential and longitudinal strain rates showed a decrease. The coefficients of variation determined in ten further subjects, who underwent two CMR examinations within 12 days, were -4.8% for circumferential and -4.5% for longitudinal endocardial mean strains. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial deformation analysis using FTI is a novel technique and robust when applied to standard cine CMR images providing the possibility of a reliable, objective quantification of global LV deformation. Since strain values and strain rates differed partly between genders as well as between age groups, the application of specific reference values as provided by this study is recommendable.
Subject(s)
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine/methods , Myocardial Contraction , Ventricular Function, Left , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Algorithms , Biomechanical Phenomena , Feasibility Studies , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results , Sex Factors , Stress, Mechanical , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To investigate whether myocardial deformation imaging, assessed by feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance (FTI-CMR), would allow objective quantification of myocardial strain and estimation of functional recovery in patients with first time ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging was performed in 74 consecutive patients 2-4 days after successfully reperfused STEMI, using a 1.5T CMR scanner (Philips Achieva). Peak systolic circumferential and longitudinal strains were measured using the FTI applied to SSFP cine sequences and were compared to infarct size, determined by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Follow-up CMR at 6 months was performed in order to assess residual ejection fraction, which deemed as the reference standard for the estimation of functional recovery. RESULTS: During the follow-up period 53 of 74 (72%) patients exhibited preserved residual ejection fraction ≥50%. A cut-off value of -19.3% for global circumferential strain identified patients with preserved ejection fraction ≥50% at follow-up with sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 85% (AUC=0.86, 95% CI=0.75-0.93, p<0.001), which was superior to that provided by longitudinal strain (ΔAUC=0.13, SE=0.05, z-statistic=2.5, p=0.01), and non-inferior to that provided by LGE (ΔAUC=0.07, p=NS). Multivariate analysis showed that global circumferential strain and LGE exhibited independent value for the prediction of preserved LV-function, surpassing that provided by age, diabetes and baseline ejection fraction (HR=1.4, 95% CI=1.0-1.9 and HR=1.4, 95% CI=1.1-1.7, respectively, p<0.05 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Estimation of circumferential strain by FTI provides objective assessment of infarct size without the need for contrast agent administration and estimation of functional recovery with non-inferior accuracy compared to that provided by LGE.
Subject(s)
Image Enhancement/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine/methods , Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology , Aged , Contrast Media , Electrocardiography/methods , Female , Gadolinium , Humans , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , ROC Curve , Recovery of Function , Sensitivity and Specificity , Stroke Volume/physiology , Troponin T/analysis , Ventricular Function, Left/physiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Myocardial deformation measurement is superior to left ventricular ejection fraction in identifying early changes in myocardial contractility and prediction of cardiovascular outcome. The lack of standardization hinders its clinical implementation. The aim of the study is to investigate a novel standardized deformation imaging approach based on the feature tracking algorithm for the assessment of global longitudinal (GLS) and global circumferential strain (GCS) in echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). METHODS: 70 subjects undergoing CMR were consecutively investigated with echocardiography within a median time of 30 min. GLS and GCS were analyzed with a post-processing software incorporating the same standardized algorithm for both modalities. Global strain was defined as the relative shortening of the whole endocardial contour length and calculated according to the strain formula. RESULTS: Mean GLS values were -16.2 ± 5.3 and -17.3 ± 5.3 % for echocardiography and CMR, respectively. GLS did not differ significantly between the two imaging modalities, which showed strong correlation (r = 0.86), a small bias (-1.1 %) and narrow 95 % limits of agreement (LOA ± 5.4 %). Mean GCS values were -17.9 ± 6.3 and -24.4 ± 7.8 % for echocardiography and CMR, respectively. GCS was significantly underestimated by echocardiography (p < 0.001). A weaker correlation (r = 0.73), a higher bias (-6.5 %) and wider LOA (± 10.5 %) were observed for GCS. GLS showed a strong correlation (r = 0.92) when image quality was good, while correlation dropped to r = 0.82 with poor acoustic windows in echocardiography. GCS assessment revealed only a strong correlation (r = 0.87) when echocardiographic image quality was good. No significant differences for GLS between two different echocardiographic vendors could be detected. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative assessment of GLS using a standardized software algorithm allows the direct comparison of values acquired irrespective of the imaging modality. GLS may, therefore, serve as a reliable parameter for the assessment of global left ventricular function in clinical routine besides standard evaluation of the ejection fraction.