A DBS method for quantitation of the new oral trypanocidal drug fexinidazole and its active metabolites.

AIM: Fexinidazole (FEX) is a nitroimidazole being developed as a new trypanocide treatment for human African trypanosomiasis/sleeping sickness. Its main metabolites, fexinidazole sulfoxide (M1) and fexinidazole sulfone (M2), show the same in vitro pharmacological activity as FEX. METHODS & RESULTS: An LC-MS/MS assay was developed for quantitation of FEX in DBS, collected via finger-prick from healthy subjects. The DBS assay was specific, accurate and reproducible for FEX, M1 and M2 when validated against the current plasma assay. DBS samples were stable for 24 h at 37°C with 95% relative humidity, and 58 weeks desiccated at room temperature. CONCLUSION: DBS finger-prick sampling offers a simple, practical method for determining FEX, M1 and M2 concentrations in clinical studies in Africa.

Dried Blood Spot Methodology in Combination With Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry Facilitates the Monitoring of Teriflunomide.

BACKGROUND: Teriflunomide, a once-daily oral immunomodulator approved for treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, is eliminated slowly from plasma. If necessary to rapidly lower plasma concentrations of teriflunomide, an accelerated elimination procedure using cholestyramine or activated charcoal may be used. The current bioanalytical assay for determination of plasma teriflunomide concentration requires laboratory facilities for blood centrifugation and plasma storage. An alternative method, with potential for greater convenience, is dried blood spot (DBS) methodology. Analytical and clinical validations are required to switch from plasma to DBS (finger-prick sampling) methodology. METHODS: Using blood samples from healthy subjects, an LC-MS/MS assay method for quantification of teriflunomide in DBS over a range of 0.01-10 mcg/mL was developed and validated for specificity, selectivity, accuracy, precision, reproducibility, and stability. Results were compared with those from the current plasma assay for determination of plasma teriflunomide concentration. RESULTS: Method was specific and selective relative to endogenous compounds, with process efficiency ∼88%, and no matrix effect. Inaccuracy and imprecision for intraday and interday analyses were <15% at all concentrations tested. Quantification of teriflunomide in DBS assay was not affected by blood deposit volume and punch position within spot, and hematocrit level had a limited but acceptable effect on measurement accuracy. Teriflunomide was stable for at least 4 months at room temperature, and for at least 24 hours at 37°C with and without 95% relative humidity, to cover sampling, drying, and shipment conditions in the field. The correlation between DBS and plasma concentrations (R = 0.97), with an average blood to plasma ratio of 0.59, was concentration independent and constant over time. CONCLUSIONS: DBS sampling is a simple and practical method for monitoring teriflunomide concentrations.

A phase I open-label study investigating the disposition of [14C]-cabazitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Cabazitaxel is a semisynthetic taxane approved for the treatment of patients with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer (now known as metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer) treated previously with a docetaxel-containing treatment regimen. The human plasma pharmacokinetics of cabazitaxel have been described previously, but detailed analyses of the metabolism and excretion pathways of cabazitaxel have not yet been published. Metabolite profiling, quantification, and identification as well as excretion analyses were carried out on samples from patients with advanced solid tumors who received an intravenous infusion of 25 mg/m [C]-cabazitaxel (50 µCi, 1.85 MBq) over 1 h. In plasma, cabazitaxel was the main circulating compound. Seven metabolites were detected, but with each accounting for 5% or less of the parent drug exposure, none were considered relevant metabolites. In excreta, 76.0% of the administered dose was recovered in feces within 2 weeks and 3.7% of the dose was excreted in urine within 1 week. Approximately 20 metabolites were detected in excreta; the main metabolites corresponded to combined mono-O-demethyl or di-O-demethyl derivatives on the taxane ring, with hydroxyl or cyclized derivatives on the lateral chain. Docetaxel (di-O-demethyl-cabazitaxel) was only detected at trace levels in excreta. These results suggest an extensive hepatic metabolism and biliary excretion of cabazitaxel in humans.

Bioequipotency of idraparinux and idrabiotaparinux after once weekly dosing in healthy volunteers and patients treated for acute deep vein thrombosis.

AIM: To assess the bioequipotency of equimolar doses of idraparinux (2.5 mg) and idrabiotaparinux (3.0 mg). METHOD: In a phase I study, 48 healthy male volunteers were randomized to a single subcutaneous injection of idrabiotaparinux or idraparinux, followed by plasma sampling over 27 days. In a prospective substudy of the phase III EQUINOX trial, 228 patients treated for acute symptomatic deep vein thrombosis received idrabiotaparinux or idraparinux once weekly for 6 months. Plasma sampling was performed within 5 days following the last injection. The primary pharmacodynamic endpoint was the inhibition of activated factor X (FXa) activity. Maximal anti-FXa activity (Amax) and area under anti-FXa activity vs. time curve (AAUC) were calculated. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. RESULTS: In both studies, pharmacodynamic anti-FXa vs. time profiles of idrabiotaparinux and idraparinux were superimposable. Ratio estimates (90% confidence intervals [CIs]) for idrabiotaparinux : idraparinux were 0.96 (0.89, 1.04) for Amax and 0.95 (0.87, 1.04) for AAUC in the phase I study, and 1.11 (1.00, 1.22) for Amax and 1.06 (0.96, 1.16) for AAUC at month 6 in the EQUINOX substudy. Idrabiotaparinux and idraparinux were considered bioequipotent because 90% CIs were within the pre-specified interval (0.80, 1.25). Study treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Pharmacodynamic parameters reported after single dose in healthy volunteers and after repeated once weekly dosing in patients demonstrated the bioequipotency of idrabiotaparinux and idraparinux based on FXa inhibition. These outcomes support the use of an idrabiotaparinux dose bioequipotent to an idraparinux dose in large clinical trials, and the possibility to substitute idrabiotaparinux to idraparinux for the treatment of venous thromboembolism.

Phase I pharmacokinetic, food effect, and pharmacogenetic study of oral irinotecan given as semisolid matrix capsules in patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To characterize the maximum-tolerated dose, recommended dose, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), pharmacokinetic profile, and food effect of orally administered irinotecan formulated as new semisolid matrix capsules. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Irinotecan was given orally in fasted patients once daily for 5 consecutive days and repeated every 3 weeks. Patients were randomly assigned to take the drug along with a high-fat, high-calorie breakfast for the administration at day 1 of the first or second cycle. Dosages tested were 70 and 80 mg/m(2)/day. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients received 101 cycles of therapy (median two cycles, range 1-15). During the first cycle, grade 3 delayed diarrhea and grade 3 fever were the DLTs at the dosage of 80 mg/m(2)/day in three out of five patients. Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were mild to moderate. Exposure to the active metabolite SN-38 was relatively high compared with i.v. infusion, but no relevant accumulation was observed. Food had no significant effect on irinotecan pharmacokinetics. One confirmed partial remission and 10 disease stabilizations were observed in previously treated patients. No association was found between the UGT1A1*28 genotype and the risk of severe irinotecan-induced toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: For oral irinotecan, a dose of 70 mg/m(2)/day for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks is recommended for further studies. Delayed diarrhea was the main DLT, similar to that observed with intravenously administered irinotecan. This study confirms that oral administration of irinotecan is feasible and may have favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of oral irinotecan given once daily for 5 days every 3 weeks in combination with capecitabine in patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To assess the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor activity of oral irinotecan given in combination with capecitabine to patients with advanced, refractory solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were treated from day 1 with irinotecan capsules given once daily for 5 consecutive days (50 to 60 mg/m2/d) concomitantly with capecitabine given twice daily for 14 consecutive days (800 to 1,000 mg/m2); cycles were repeated every 21 days. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled and received 155 cycles of therapy (median, five cycles; range, one to 18 cycles). With irinotecan 60 mg/m2/d and capecitabine 2 x 800 mg/m2/d, grade 3 delayed diarrhea in combination with grade 2 nausea (despite maximal antiemetic support) and grade 3 anorexia and colitis, were the first-cycle dose-limiting toxicities in two of six patients, respectively. At the recommended doses (irinotecan 50 mg/m2/d; capecitabine 2 x 1,000 mg/m2/d), side effects were mostly mild to moderate and uniformly reversible. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that there was no interaction between oral irinotecan and capecitabine, and that body-surface area was not significantly contributing to the observed pharmacokinetic variability. Confirmed partial responses were observed in two patients with gallbladder carcinoma and in one patient with melanoma. Disease stabilization was noted in 16 patients. CONCLUSION: The recommended phase II doses for oral irinotecan and capecitabine are 50 mg/m2/d for 5 consecutive days, and 2 x 1,000 mg/m2/d for 14 consecutive days repeated every 3 weeks, respectively.

Phase I study of an oral formulation of irinotecan administered daily for 14 days every 3 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumours.

A phase I study was conducted with oral irinotecan given daily for 14 days every 3 weeks in 45 patients with solid tumours to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity, preliminary antitumour response and pharmacokinetics. Irinotecan was administered orally as a powder-filled capsule at doses ranging from 7.5 to 40 mg/m2 per day. Tumours were predominantly colorectal (30) together with 10 other gastrointestinal, 2 breast, 2 small cell lung and 1 ovarian. All but three patients had received prior chemotherapy. The median number of administered cycles was 3 (range 1-19). Gastrointestinal toxicities (grade 3 nausea, grade 3/4 vomiting and diarrhoea) and one incidence of grade 3 asthenia were dose limiting. There were no grade 3/4 haematological toxicities. The MTD was 30 mg/m2 per day. There were two documented partial responses, one in a patient with cancer of the small intestine and the other in a patient with colon cancer. Stable disease was seen in 16 patients (35.5%). Peak concentrations of irinotecan and metabolite SN-38 were reached within 2.0-2.4 h. The metabolic ratio of SN-38 AUC to irinotecan AUC was 0.17+/-0.10 (mean+/-SD). The dose recommended for phase II studies is 30 mg/m2 per day administered daily for 14 days every 3 weeks.

Reliable anticoagulation with enoxaparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: The pharmacokinetics of enoxaparin in PCI (PEPCI) study.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic response to intravenous (IV) enoxaparin given 8-12 hr after subcutaneous (SC) dosing in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Fifty-five patients received SC enoxaparin (1 mg/kg every 12 hr) followed by an IV bolus (0.3 mg/kg) 8-12 hr after the last SC dose, at the start of PCI or during catheterization. Anti-Xa levels were within the target range in 98% of patients 2-8 hr after the last SC dose, in 96% of patients following the IV bolus, and in 91% of patients for a further 2 hr. Subcutaneous enoxaparin (1 mg/kg every 12 hr) provides sufficient anti-Xa levels for PCI 2-8 hr after the last dose. An additional 0.3 mg/kg enoxaparin dose given IV 8-12 hr after the last SC dose reliably maintains anti-Xa levels within the target for at least 2 additional hr.

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of enoxaparin in unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

AIMS: A major concern with any antithrombotic therapy is an increase in the risk of haemorrhage. The aim of this study was to analyse population pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationships for enoxaparin in patients with unstable angina (UA) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), which may help predict risk of haemorrhage. METHODS: Anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) activity was measured as marker of enoxaparin concentration in 448 patients receiving the drug as a single 30-mg intravenous bolus followed by 1.0 or 1.25 mg kg(-1) subcutaneously twice a day. A population pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted and individual estimates of enoxaparin clearance and area under the curve were tested as prognostic factors for the occurrence of haemorrhagic episodes. RESULTS: Basic population PK parameters were an enoxaparin clearance of 0.733 l h(-1)[95% confidence interval (CI) 0.698, 0.738], a distribution volume of 5.24 l (95% CI 4.20, 6.28) and an elimination half-life of 5.0 h. Enoxaparin clearance was significantly related to patient weight and creatinine clearance, and was the only independent predictor of experiencing both all (10.7%, P = 0.0013) and major (2.2%, P = 0.0004) haemorrhagic events. A creatinine clearance of 30 ml min(-1) was associated with a decrease in enoxaparin clearance of 27% compared with that in a patient with a median creatinine clearance of 88 ml min-1, and was related to a 1.5- and 3.8-fold increase in the risk of 'all' and 'major' haemorrhagic episodes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Enoxaparin clearance depends on body weight, and, therefore, weight-adjusted dosing is recommended to minimize interpatient variability in drug exposure and the risk of haemorrhage. The importance of an increased risk of haemorrhage with decreasing renal function must be weighed against the benefit of treatment with enoxaparin in patients with UA and NSTEMI.

Dosage adjustment and pharmacokinetic profile of irinotecan in cancer patients with hepatic dysfunction.

PURPOSE: To determine the recommended dose (RD) and the pharmacokinetic profile of irinotecan and its metabolites in cancer patients with hyperbilirubinemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were assigned to four treatment groups according to their baseline total bilirubin level. Patients in group I (bilirubin within normal range) and group II (bilirubin 1.0 to 1.5 times upper limit of normal [ULN]) received a dose of 350 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. Patients in groups III (bilirubin 1.51 to 3.0 times ULN) and IV (bilirubin > 3.1 times ULN) received starting doses of 175 and 100 mg/m(2), respectively. RDs were defined according to the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) experienced at cycle 1. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients including 21 gastrointestinal cancers were included. Grade 4 febrile neutropenia and diarrhea were common DLTs in patients with hyperbilirubinemia. At a dose of irinotecan 350 mg/m(2), DLTs were observed in two of seven and one of five patients in groups I and II, respectively. In group III, escalated doses of irinotecan 175, 200, and 240 mg/m(2) were associated with DLTs in one of seven, one of five, and three of six patients, respectively. No DLT was observed in group IV. High bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase levels were associated with an exponential decrease in the clearance of irinotecan. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that the relative increase in exposure was likely caused by reduced biliary excretion. CONCLUSION: We showed that baseline total bilirubin level could be used to determine the appropriate dose of irinotecan in cancer patients with hepatic dysfunction. Doses of 350 mg/m(2) and 200 mg/m(2) were considered RDs in patients with bilirubin values

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of enoxaparin in obese volunteers.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of the low-molecular-weight heparin enoxaparin in obese and nonobese volunteers, by means of two administration regimens. METHODS: Enoxaparin was administered subcutaneously (1.5 mg/kg once daily for 4 days) and in a single 6-hour infusion (1.5 mg/kg) to 24 obese volunteers and 24 age-, sex-, and height-matched nonobese volunteers in a randomized, open-label, 2-way crossover design. Blood plasma was assessed for anti-Xa and anti-IIa activity and activated partial thromboplastin time. RESULTS: After subcutaneous administration, steady-state exposure was achieved after the second dose in nonobese volunteers and after the third dose in obese volunteers. Time to maximum anti-Xa activity was 1 hour longer in obese volunteers, but maximum anti-Xa activity was similar in both groups. For anti-Xa activity, exposure at steady-state was 16% higher in obese volunteers than in nonobese volunteers (90% confidence interval, 108%-125%). After intravenous infusion, total body clearance and volume of distribution at steady state were higher in obese volunteers than in nonobese volunteers, but when adjusted for weight, these values were about 10% lower in obese volunteers. Anti-IIa activity after subcutaneous administration did not differ significantly between obese and nonobese volunteers. Pharmacodynamic analysis of activated partial thromboplastin time showed similar results in obese and nonobese volunteers after both intravenous and subcutaneous administration. No deaths or serious adverse events occurred during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Enoxaparin was well tolerated when administered subcutaneously or intravenously, and there appears to be no need to modify the currently recommended dose for obese volunteers.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the prophylactic dose of enoxaparin once daily over 4 days in patients with renal impairment.

The pharmacokinetics of the low-molecular-weight heparin enoxaparin were evaluated in 12 healthy volunteers and 36 patients with mild, moderate or severe renal impairment. Enoxaparin was administered once daily by subcutaneous injections at a dose of 40 mg for 4 days and venous blood samples were taken over a 5-day period to determine antifactor Xa and antifactor IIa activity and the activated partial thromboplastin time. Adverse events were also recorded. The results for anti-Xa activity showed that the rate of absorption of enoxaparin was similar across the four groups of study participants. The elimination half-life increased with the degree of renal impairment, and this relationship was more evident after repeated dosing. Anti-Xa exposure was not significantly different between healthy volunteers and patients with mild or moderate renal impairment, but was significantly increased in patients with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance < or =30 ml/min). Anti-Xa clearance decreased with the degree of renal impairment after repeated dosing, but only the difference between patients with severe renal impairment and healthy volunteers was statistically significant, the clearance on Day 4 being 39% lower in patients with severe renal impairment than in healthy volunteers (P=.0001). Anti-IIa activity was low in all study participants, and the activated partial thromboplastin time was not significantly different between the study groups. In conclusion, the clearance of enoxaparin is reduced in patients with severe renal impairment. Dose adjustment of enoxaparin may need to be recommended in these patients, but no recommendation can be made in patients with mild or moderate renal impairment.